76 research outputs found

    DESIGN, ENGINEERING, AND ASSESSMENT OF MOBILE MINEFIELDS

    Get PDF
    Naval mine warfare typically supports a sea denial strategy through the denial and/or delay of the enemy’s use of the water space or by controlling sea traffic in a designated area. Sea mines have been effective for decades. However, with technological progress, mine countermeasure (MCM) efforts have reduced the risks of a minefield by detecting and/or neutralizing mines to establish and maintain a Q-route for safe passage. The concept of a mobile minefield is proposed to increase the difficulty of the enemy’s MCM and improve the survivability of the minefield by adding mobility. This research explores both the physical design concepts and the operational effectiveness of mobile mines based on simulations and models. The simulation results show that, compared to static mines, mobile mines improved the number of enemy ships destroyed by at least 200% and increased the time it took the enemy to transition through the minefield by 50%. The results suggest that the mobile minefield would be operationally useful for the Department of the Navy and this technology is worth pursing and exploring.Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release: Distribution is unlimited.Captain, Singapore ArmyCaptain, Singapore ArmyMajor, Singapore ArmyLieutenant, Taiwan NavyMajor, United States ArmyCivilian, Department of the NavyLieutenant, United States NavyCivilian, Singapore Technologies Engineering, SingaporeMajor, Singapore ArmyMajor, Singapore ArmyMajor, Singapore ArmyCommander, United States NavyCivilian, Defense Science and Technology Agency (DSTA), SingaporeMajor, Singapore ArmyMajor, Republic of Singapore Air ForceTenente-Coronel, Brazilian Air ForceLieutenant, United States NavyCivilian, Department of the ArmyMajor, Singapore ArmyMajor, Israel Defense ForcesCivilian, Defense Science Organisation, SingaporeCaptain, Singapore Arm

    Evidence of Color Coherence Effects in W+jets Events from ppbar Collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.8 TeV

    Full text link
    We report the results of a study of color coherence effects in ppbar collisions based on data collected by the D0 detector during the 1994-1995 run of the Fermilab Tevatron Collider, at a center of mass energy sqrt(s) = 1.8 TeV. Initial-to-final state color interference effects are studied by examining particle distribution patterns in events with a W boson and at least one jet. The data are compared to Monte Carlo simulations with different color coherence implementations and to an analytic modified-leading-logarithm perturbative calculation based on the local parton-hadron duality hypothesis.Comment: 13 pages, 6 figures. Submitted to Physics Letters

    Performance and Operation of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter

    Get PDF
    The operation and general performance of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter using cosmic-ray muons are described. These muons were recorded after the closure of the CMS detector in late 2008. The calorimeter is made of lead tungstate crystals and the overall status of the 75848 channels corresponding to the barrel and endcap detectors is reported. The stability of crucial operational parameters, such as high voltage, temperature and electronic noise, is summarised and the performance of the light monitoring system is presented

    Small Angle Muon and Bottom Quark Production in pbarp Collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.8 TeV

    Get PDF
    This Letter describes a measurement of the muon cross section originating from b quark decay in the forward rapidity range 2.4 < y(mu) < 3.2 in pbarp collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.8 TeV. The data used in this analysis were collected by the D0 experiment at the Fermilab Tevatron. We find that NLO QCD calculations underestimate b quark production by a factor of four in the forward rapidity region. A cross section measurement using muon+jet data has been included in this version of the paper.Comment: 12 pages, 5 figures, submitted to PR

    Calibration of the CMS Drift Tube Chambers and Measurement of the Drift Velocity with Cosmic Rays

    Get PDF
    Peer reviewe

    CMS physics technical design report : Addendum on high density QCD with heavy ions

    Get PDF
    Peer reviewe

    Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Get PDF

    Alignment of the CMS muon system with cosmic-ray and beam-halo muons

    Get PDF
    This is the Pre-print version of the Article. The official published version of the Paper can be accessed from the link below - Copyright @ 2010 IOPThe CMS muon system has been aligned using cosmic-ray muons collected in 2008 and beam-halo muons from the 2008 LHC circulating beam tests. After alignment, the resolution of the most sensitive coordinate is 80 microns for the relative positions of superlayers in the same barrel chamber and 270 microns for the relative positions of endcap chambers in the same ring structure. The resolution on the position of the central barrel chambers relative to the tracker is comprised between two extreme estimates, 200 and 700 microns, provided by two complementary studies. With minor modifications, the alignment procedures can be applied using muons from LHC collisions, leading to additional significant improvements.This work is supported by FMSR (Austria); FNRS and FWO (Belgium); CNPq, CAPES, FAPERJ, and FAPESP (Brazil); MES (Bulgaria); CERN; CAS, MoST, and NSFC (China); COLCIENCIAS (Colombia); MSES (Croatia); RPF (Cyprus); Academy of Sciences and NICPB (Estonia); Academy of Finland, ME, and HIP (Finland); CEA and CNRS/IN2P3 (France); BMBF, DFG, and HGF (Germany); GSRT (Greece); OTKA and NKTH (Hungary); DAE and DST (India); IPM (Iran); SFI (Ireland); INFN (Italy); NRF (Korea); LAS (Lithuania); CINVESTAV, CONACYT, SEP, and UASLP-FAI (Mexico); PAEC (Pakistan); SCSR (Poland); FCT (Portugal); JINR(Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan); MST and MAE (Russia); MSTDS (Serbia); MICINN and CPAN (Spain); Swiss Funding Agencies (Switzerland); NSC (Taipei); TUBITAK and TAEK (Turkey); STFC (United Kingdom); DOE and NSF (USA)

    Alignment of the CMS silicon tracker during commissioning with cosmic rays

    Get PDF
    This is the Pre-print version of the Article. The official published version of the Paper can be accessed from the link below - Copyright @ 2010 IOPThe CMS silicon tracker, consisting of 1440 silicon pixel and 15 148 silicon strip detector modules, has been aligned using more than three million cosmic ray charged particles, with additional information from optical surveys. The positions of the modules were determined with respect to cosmic ray trajectories to an average precision of 3–4 microns RMS in the barrel and 3–14 microns RMS in the endcap in the most sensitive coordinate. The results have been validated by several studies, including laser beam cross-checks, track fit self-consistency, track residuals in overlapping module regions, and track parameter resolution, and are compared with predictions obtained from simulation. Correlated systematic effects have been investigated. The track parameter resolutions obtained with this alignment are close to the design performance.This work is supported by FMSR (Austria); FNRS and FWO (Belgium); CNPq, CAPES, FAPERJ, and FAPESP (Brazil); MES (Bulgaria); CERN; CAS, MoST, and NSFC (China); COLCIENCIAS (Colombia); MSES (Croatia); RPF (Cyprus); Academy of Sciences and NICPB (Estonia); Academy of Finland, ME, and HIP (Finland); CEA and CNRS/IN2P3 (France); BMBF, DFG, and HGF (Germany); GSRT (Greece); OTKA and NKTH (Hungary); DAE and DST (India); IPM (Iran); SFI (Ireland); INFN (Italy); NRF (Korea); LAS (Lithuania); CINVESTAV, CONACYT, SEP, and UASLP-FAI (Mexico); PAEC (Pakistan); SCSR (Poland); FCT (Portugal); JINR (Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan); MST and MAE (Russia); MSTDS (Serbia); MICINN and CPAN (Spain); Swiss Funding Agencies (Switzerland); NSC (Taipei); TUBITAK and TAEK (Turkey); STFC (United Kingdom); DOE and NSF (USA)
    • …
    corecore