Pharmacogenetic implications in the management of metabolic diseases in Brazilian populations

Dyslipidemia, diabetes, obesity and hypertension are common metabolic diseases. In the last decades, unhealthy lifestyle and aging have leads to an increased incidence of these diseases, increasing morbidity and mortality by cardiovascular causes. The treatment of metabolic diseases includes lifestyle interventions as healthy diet and physical exercise, as well as pharmacological interventions. Several drugs are available for the management of metabolic diseases including among others lipidlowering antidiabetics and antihypertensive drugs. Variability in response to these drugs is influenced by both genetic and non-genetic factors. Polymorphisms in genes related to drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics have been shown to influence drug efficacy and safety. This review is focused on pharmacogenetic studies related to the management of metabolic diseases in samples of the Brazilian population. Associations of variants in drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters, drug target and metabolism-related genes with the efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering, antidiabetic and antihypertensive drugs are described. Most pharmacogenetic studies in Brazil have focused in pharmacological response to a small group of drugs, as statins and some antihypertensives, while there are almost no studies on antidiabetic and antiobesity drugs. Some studies reported significant associations of gene polymorphisms with drug response confirming previous data from other populations, whereas other works did not replicate, which may relay on the genetic admixture of our population. In conclusion, further studies are necessary considering larger sample sizes, new unexplored drugs and more genetic variants to obtain stronger conclusions to explore clinical applications of pharmacogenetic studies in our population

Uma Proposta de Modelagem para a Generalização de Elos de Rastreabilidade

Several models proposed traceability links that provide pre–definedgroups of links for requirements traceability. These models are limited to pre–defined links without the ability to add new attributes to the existing links. This work proposes a model for requirements traceability that generalizes the types of links already establishedin the literature and enables addition of new standards allowing the inclusion of attributes to the links that will be used in a specific traceability process.Diversos modelos propõem tipos pré–definidos de elos para a rastreabilidade de requisitos. Tais modelos fazem extensivas observações sobre as práticas da rastreabilidade, mas são limitados tanto pelos tipos de elos pré–definidos quanto pelacapacidade de incluir atributos para os elos. Este trabalho propõe um modelo para rastreabilidade de requisitos que generaliza os tipos de elos já definidos, permitindo a adição de novos padrões e a inclusão de atributos para os elos que serão utilizados em um determinado processo de rastreabilidade

Apolipoprotein E mRNA expression in mononuclear cells from normolipidemic and hypercholesterolemic individuals treated with atorvastatin

Abstract\ud \ud \ud \ud Background\ud \ud Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is a key component of the lipid metabolism. Polymorphisms at the apoE gene (APOE) have been associated with cardiovascular disease, lipid levels and lipid-lowering response to statins. We evaluated the effects on APOE expression of hypercholesterolemia, APOE ε2/ε3/ε4 genotypes and atorvastatin treatment in Brazilian individuals. The relationship of APOE genotypes and plasma lipids and atorvastatin response was also tested in this population.\ud \ud \ud \ud Methods\ud \ud APOE ε2/ε3/ε4 and plasma lipids were evaluated in 181 normolipidemic (NL) and 181 hypercholesterolemic (HC) subjects. HC individuals with indication for lowering-cholesterol treatment (n = 141) were treated with atorvastatin (10 mg/day/4-weeks). APOE genotypes and APOE mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were analyzed by TaqMan real time PCR.\ud \ud \ud \ud Results\ud \ud HC had lower APOE expression than NL group (p < 0.05) and individuals with low APOE expression showed higher plasma total and LDL cholesterol and apoB, as well as higher apoAI (p < 0.05). Individuals carrying ε2 allele have reduced risk for hypercholesterolemia (OR: 0.27, 95% I.C.: 0.08-0.85, p < 0.05) and NL ε2 carriers had lower total and LDL cholesterol and apoB levels, and higher HDL cholesterol than non-carriers (p < 0.05). APOE genotypes did not affect APOE expression and atorvastatin response. Atorvastatin treatment do not modify APOE expression, however those individuals without LDL cholesterol goal achievement after atorvastatin treatment according to the IV Brazilian Guidelines for Dyslipidemia and Atherosclerosis Prevention had lower APOE expression than patients with desirable response after the treatment (p < 0.05).\ud \ud \ud \ud Conclusions\ud \ud APOE expression in PBMC is modulated by hypercholesterolemia and the APOE mRNA level regulates the plasma lipid profile. Moreover the expression profile is not modulated neither by atorvastatin nor APOE genotypes. In our population, APOE ε2 allele confers protection against hypercholesterolemia and a less atherogenic lipid profile. Moreover, low APOE expression after treatment of patients with poor response suggests a possible role of APOE level in atorvastatin response.The present study was supported by a grant from FAPESP (Protocol # 2009/15125-8). We thank the volunteers for their participation and physicians and nurses from the Medical Clinics Division of the University Hospital of the University of Sao Paulo for technical support during patient selection. Alvaro Cerda is a recipient of a fellowship from CONICYT-Chile, Mario H. Hirata and Rosario D.C. Hirata were recipients from CNPq-Brazil, and Fabiana D.V. Genvigir, Maria A.V. Willrich and Simone S. Arazi were recipients from FAPESP-Brazil

Apolipoprotein E mRNA expression in mononuclear cells from normolipidemic and hypercholesterolemic individuals treated with atorvastatin

Abstract\ud \ud Background\ud Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is a key component of the lipid metabolism. Polymorphisms at the apoE gene (APOE) have been associated with cardiovascular disease, lipid levels and lipid-lowering response to statins. We evaluated the effects on APOE expression of hypercholesterolemia, APOE ε2/ε3/ε4 genotypes and atorvastatin treatment in Brazilian individuals. The relationship of APOE genotypes and plasma lipids and atorvastatin response was also tested in this population.\ud \ud \ud Methods\ud APOE ε2/ε3/ε4 and plasma lipids were evaluated in 181 normolipidemic (NL) and 181 hypercholesterolemic (HC) subjects. HC individuals with indication for lowering-cholesterol treatment (n = 141) were treated with atorvastatin (10 mg/day/4-weeks). APOE genotypes and APOE mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were analyzed by TaqMan real time PCR.\ud \ud \ud Results\ud HC had lower APOE expression than NL group (p < 0.05) and individuals with low APOE expression showed higher plasma total and LDL cholesterol and apoB, as well as higher apoAI (p < 0.05). Individuals carrying ε2 allele have reduced risk for hypercholesterolemia (OR: 0.27, 95% I.C.: 0.08-0.85, p < 0.05) and NL ε2 carriers had lower total and LDL cholesterol and apoB levels, and higher HDL cholesterol than non-carriers (p < 0.05). APOE genotypes did not affect APOE expression and atorvastatin response. Atorvastatin treatment do not modify APOE expression, however those individuals without LDL cholesterol goal achievement after atorvastatin treatment according to the IV Brazilian Guidelines for Dyslipidemia and Atherosclerosis Prevention had lower APOE expression than patients with desirable response after the treatment (p < 0.05).\ud \ud \ud Conclusions\ud APOE expression in PBMC is modulated by hypercholesterolemia and the APOE mRNA level regulates the plasma lipid profile. Moreover the expression profile is not modulated neither by atorvastatin nor APOE genotypes. In our population, APOE ε2 allele confers protection against hypercholesterolemia and a less atherogenic lipid profile. Moreover, low APOE expression after treatment of patients with poor response suggests a possible role of APOE level in atorvastatin response

Polymorphisms in mTOR and Calcineurin Signaling Pathways Are Associated With Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs, such as calcineurin and mTOR inhibitors, is essential to avoid undesirable kidney transplant outcomes. Polymorphisms in pharmacokinetics-related genes have been associated with variability in blood levels of immunosuppressive drugs and adverse effects, but influence of pharmacodynamics-related genes remains to be elucidated. The influence of polymorphisms in genes of the mTOR and calcineurin signaling pathways on long-term clinical outcomes was investigated in Brazilian kidney transplant recipients within the 1-year post-transplant. Two-hundred and sixty-nine kidney transplant recipients were enrolled at a kidney transplant center in São Paulo city, Brazil, and treated with tacrolimus plus everolimus or mycophenolate sodium (clinical trial NCT01354301). Clinical and laboratory data, including renal function parameters and drug blood levels were recorded. Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples. Polymorphisms in MTOR rs1057079 (c.4731G&gt;A), rs1135172 (c.1437T&gt;C), and rs1064261 (c.2997C&gt;T); PPP3CA rs3730251 (c.249G&gt;A); FKBP1A rs6033557 (n.259+24936T&gt;C); FKBP2 rs2159370 (c.-2110G&gt;T); and FOXP3 rs3761548 (c.-23+2882A&gt;C) and rs2232365 (c.-22-902A&gt;G) were analyzed by real-time PCR. Frequencies of gene polymorphisms did not differ among the treatment groups. Analysis of primary outcomes showed that patients carrying MTOR c.1437CC and FOXP3 c.-23+2882CC genotypes had higher serum creatinine than non-carriers (p &lt; 0.05) at 1-year post-transplant. MTOR c.4731G allele (AG+GG genotype) was associated with increased risk for acute rejection (OR = 3.53, 95% CI = 1.09–11.48, p = 0.037). Moreover, 1-year cumulative incidence of rejection was higher in MTOR c.4731G allele carriers compared to AA genotype carriers (p = 0.027). Individually, analysis of secondary outcomes revealed that FKBP2 c.-2110GG genotype carriers had higher risk of leukopenia, FKBP1A n.259+24936C allele carriers had increased risk of constipation, and FOXP3 c.-22-902A or c.-23+2882A allele had higher risk of gastrointestinal disorders (p &lt; 0.05). However, these results were not maintained in the multivariable analysis after p-value adjustment. In conclusion, variants in genes of mTOR and calcineurin pathways are associated with long-term impaired renal function, increased risk of acute rejection, and, individually, with adverse events in Brazilian kidney transplant recipients

Pharmacogenetics of OATP Transporters Reveals That SLCO1B1 c.388A>G Variant Is Determinant of Increased Atorvastatin Response

Aims: The relationship between variants in SLCO1B1 and SLCO2B1 genes and lipid-lowering response to atorvastatin was investigated. Material and Methods: One-hundred-thirty-six unrelated individuals with hypercholesterolemia were selected and treated with atorvastatin (10 mg/day/4 weeks). They were genotyped with a panel of ancestry informative markers for individual African component of ancestry (ACA) estimation by SNaPshot® and SLCO1B1 (c.388A&gt;G, c.463C&gt;A and c.521T&gt;C) and SLCO2B1 (−71T&gt;C) gene polymorphisms were identified by TaqMan® Real-time PCR. Results: Subjects carrying SLCO1B1 c.388GG genotype exhibited significantly high low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol reduction relative to c.388AA+c.388AG carriers (41 vs. 37%, p = 0.034). Haplotype analysis revealed that homozygous of SLCO1B1*15 (c.521C and c.388G) variant had similar response to statin relative to heterozygous and non-carriers. A multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that c.388GG genotype was associated with higher LDL cholesterol reduction in the study population (OR: 3.2, CI95%:1.3–8.0, p &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: SLCO1B1 c.388A&gt;G polymorphism causes significant increase in atorvastatin response and may be an important marker for predicting efficacy of lipid-lowering therapy

Personalized therapy for mycophenolate:Consensus report by the international association of therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical toxicology

When mycophenolic acid (MPA) was originally marketed for immunosuppressive therapy, fixed doses were recommended by the manufacturer. Awareness of the potential for a more personalized dosing has led to development of methods to estimate MPA area under the curve based on the measurement of drug concentrations in only a few samples. This approach is feasible in the clinical routine and has proven successful in terms of correlation with outcome. However, the search for superior correlates has continued, and numerous studies in search of biomarkers that could better predict the perfect dosage for the individual patient have been published. As it was considered timely for an updated and comprehensive presentation of consensus on the status for personalized treatment with MPA, this report was prepared following an initiative from members of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT). Topics included are the criteria for analytics, methods to estimate exposure including pharmacometrics, the potential influence of pharmacogenetics, development of biomarkers, and the practical aspects of implementation of target concentration intervention. For selected topics with sufficient evidence, such as the application of limited sampling strategies for MPA area under the curve, graded recommendations on target ranges are presented. To provide a comprehensive review, this report also includes updates on the status of potential biomarkers including those which may be promising but with a low level of evidence. In view of the fact that there are very few new immunosuppressive drugs under development for the transplant field, it is likely that MPA will continue to be prescribed on a large scale in the upcoming years. Discontinuation of therapy due to adverse effects is relatively common, increasing the risk for late rejections, which may contribute to graft loss. Therefore, the continued search for innovative methods to better personalize MPA dosage is warranted.</p

ABCA1 gene expression and polymorphisms on patients under hypolipemic therapy

A ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) é uma proteína transmembrana responsável pelo efluxo celular de colesterol e fosfolipídeos, que é um passo essencial para o transporte reverso do colesterol e para a biogênese da HDL. Polimorfismos do gene ABCA1 foram associados com risco de doença arterial coronariana, variações no perfil lipídico e diferenças na resposta a fármacos hipolipemiantes. Com a finalidade de avaliar os efeitos de polimorfismos do ABCA1 sobre a expressão gênica e a resposta a vastatinas, foram selecionados indivíduos normolipidemicos (NL, n=143) e hipercolesterolêmicos (HC, n=224). A resposta a atorvastatina (10 mg/dia/4 semanas) foi avaliada pelo perfil lipídico sérico em 141 indivíduos do grupo HC (ATORVA). DNA e RNA total foram extraídos de amostras de sangue periférico. Os polimorfismos de nucleotídeo único (SNP) G70943A (R219K), C-14T e C-105T, uma variante nova do ABCA1, foram detectados por PCR-RFLP e confirmados por seqüenciamento de DNA. A expressão de RNAm do ABCA1 em células mononucleares do sangue periférico (CMSP) foi analisada por PCR-duplex e PCR em tempo real, utilizando o gene GAPD como referência endógena. A freqüência do alelo -105T foi 1,4% em NL e 2,0% em HC. O alelo 70943A (genótipos GA+AA) foi associado com maior concentração sérica basal de apoAI (NL), de HDL-c (ATORVA) e com menores concentrações basais de triglicerídeos e VLDL-c e menor índice TG/HDL-c (HC e ATORVA) em comparação com o genótipo 70943GG (p<0,05). O polimorfismo C-105T está em desequilíbrio de ligação com o SNP C-14T (p=0,006). Portadores do alelo -105T (genótipos CT+TT), quando comparados aos portadores do genótipo -105CC, tiveram menores valores basais de triglicerídeos e VLDL-c, maior concentração de HDL-c e menor índice TG/HDL-c nos grupos HC e ATORVA e também maiores concentrações de apoAI e menor índice apoB/apoAI no grupo ATORVA (p<0,05). Nos grupos HC e ATORVA, os portadores do haplótipo -14CT+TT/-105CT+TT tiveram menores valores de triglicerídeos e VLDL-c basais, maiores concentrações de HDL-c e menor índice TG/HDL-c quando comparados aos portadores dos outros haplótipos (p<0,05). A expressão basal do ABCA1 foi menor nos HC que nos NL independentemente da taxa de expressão alta (GM1) ou baixa (GM2). Este efeito foi associado com os SNPs C-14T e G70943A SNPs. Após o tratamento com atorvastatina, a expressão de RNAm foi reduzida nos HC portadores do alelo - 14T em comparação com os portadores de alelo -14C. Esses resultados são sugestivos de que ABCA1 SNPs estão envolvidos na variação do perfil lipídico sérico e na expressão de RNAm em resposta a atorvastatina.The ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) is a transmembrane protein involved on cholesterol and phospholipid cellular efflux, which is an essential step for the reverse cholesterol transport and HDL biogenesis. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the ABCA1 gene have been associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease, differences on serum lipid profile and response to lowering-cholesterol drugs. We have evaluated the influence of ABCA1 SNPs on mRNA expression and lipid-lowering response to atorvastatin. Normolipidemic (NL, n=143) hypercholesterolemic (HC, n=224) individuals were enrolled in this study and the response to atorvastatin (10 mg/day/4 weeks) was evaluated in HC individuals (ATORVA, n=141). Blood samples were collected for biochemical analyses, genomic DNA and total RNA extraction. SNPs G70943A (R219K), C-14T and C-105T, a novel variant of ABCA1, were detected by PCR-RFLP and confirmed for DNA sequencing. ABCA1 mRNA expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was analysed by PCR-duplex and Real Time PCR, using the GAPD as the endogenous reference. In HC and NL, the frequency of -105T allele was 2.0% and 1.4%, respectively. The 70943A allele (genotypes GA+AA) was associated with higher basal concentrations of apoAI (NL) and HDL-c (ATORVA) and lower triglyceride and VLDL-c and TG/HDL-c ratio (HC and ATORVA) than the 70943GG genotype (p<0.05). We found a linkage disequilibrium between C-14T and C-105T SNPs in HC group (p=0.006). Individuals carrying -105T allele (CT/TT genotypes), when compared with -105CC carriers, had lower basal concentrations of triglyceride and VLDL-c, higher concentration of HDL-c and lower TG/HDL-c ratio in HC and ATORVA groups and also higher concentration of apoAI and lower apoB/apoAI ratio in ATORVA group (p<0.05). In HC and ATORVA, individuals with -14CT+TT/-105CT+TT haplotype had lower basal values of triglyceride and VLDL-c, higher concentration of HDL-c and lower TG/HDL-c ratio than carries of others haplotypes (p<0,05). ABCA1 mRNA basal expression was lower in HC when compared to NL independently of high (GM1) or low (GM2) basal expression rate. This effect was associated with C-14T and G70943A SNPs. After atorvastatin treatment, mRNA expression was reduced in HC individuals carrying -14T allele in comparison with the -14C allele carriers. These results are sugestive that ABCA1 SNPs are involved on variation of serum lipid profile and mRNA expression in response to atorvastatin

Statin effects on expression of genes involved in reverse cholesterol transport

A eficácia das estatinas em reduzir o risco de eventos coronarianos não é completamente explicada por seus efeitos em diminuir colesterol de lipoproteína de baixa densidade (LDL-C). Um dos seus efeitos adicionais pode ser decorrente da modificação na concentração de lipoproteína de alta densidade (HDL), reconhecida como ateroprotetora, principalmente por seu papel no transporte reverso do colesterol (TRC). Os transportadores de membrana do tipo ATP-binding cassette, ABCA1 e ABCG1, e o scavenger receptor BI (SRBI) são proteínas importantes envolvidas no TRC e seus genes são regulados por vários fatores de transcrição, entre eles os liver-x-receptors (LXRs). Com a finalidade de avaliarmos os efeitos dos hipolipemiantes sobre expressão dos transportadores ABC e do receptor SRBI, a expressão de RNAm do ABCA1, ABCG1, SCARB1, NR1H3 (LXR&#945;) e NR1H2 (LRX&#946;) foi avaliada por PCR em tempo real em células das linhagens HepG2 (origem hepática) e Caco-2 (origem intestinal) tratadas com atorvastatina ou sinvastatina (10 µM) e/ou ezetimiba (até 5 µM) por até 24 horas. Além disso, a expressão desses genes também foi avaliada em células mononucleares do sangue periférico (CMSP) de 50 pacientes normolipidêmicos (NL) e 71 hipercolesterolêmicos (HC) tratados com atorvastatina (10mg/dia/4semanas, n=48) ou sinvastatina e/ou ezetimiba (10mg/dia/4 ou 8 semanas, n=23). A possível associação entre os polimorfismos ABCA1 C-14T e R219K e a expressão de RNAm em CMSP também foi avaliada por PCR-RFLP. O SCARB1 foi o gene mais expresso nas células HepG2 e Caco-2, seguido por NR1H2, NR1H3, ABCG1 e ABCA1 em HepG2 ou por ABCA1 e ABCG1 em Caco-2. O tratamento com estatinas (1 ou 10 µM) ou ezetimiba (5 µM), por 12 ou 24 horas, aumentou a expressão de RNAm do ABCG1, mas não de ABCA1 e SCARB1, em células HepG2. Ainda nesta linhagem, o aumento na transcrição dos genes NR1H2 e NR1H3 foi observado somente com a maior concentração de atorvastatina (10 µM) e, ao contrário, o tratamento com ezetimiba causou redução na transcrição de NR1H2, sem alteração de NR1H3. Em células Caco-2, o tratamento com atorvastatina ou sinvastatina por 12 ou 24 horas reduziu a quantidade do transcrito ABCA1 e não alterou a expressão do SCARB1 e do ABCG1, embora, para este último, tenha havido uma tendência à diminuição da expressão após tratamento com sinvastatina (p=0,07). Após tratamento com ezetimiba isolada (até 5 µM) nenhuma alteração de expressão de RNAm foi observada em células Caco-2; no entanto, após 24 horas de tratamento com sinvastatina e ezetimiba, foi reduzida a taxa de transcrição de ABCA1 e ABCG1, mas não de SCARB1. Ao contrário das linhagens celulares, em CMSP os genes NR1H2 e ABCG1 foram os mais expressos, seguidos pelos genes SCARB1 e ABCA1 e, finalmente, pelo NR1H3. Indivíduos HC tiveram maior expressão basal de NR1H2 e NR1H3, mas não de outros genes, quando comparados aos NL (pT quando comparados aos portadores do genótipo -14CC (p=0,034). O tratamento com estatinas, com ezetimiba ou com a terapia combinada diminuiu a transcrição de ABCA1 e ABCG1. Para o SCARB1, NR1H2 e NR1H3, nenhuma alteração de expressão de RNAm em CMSP foi detectada após os tratamentos in vivo. Após todas as fases de tratamento, ABCA1 e ABCG1 e também NR1H2 e NR1H3 foram significativamente correlacionados entre si, mas nenhuma correlação com perfil lipídico sérico foi relevante. Coletivamente, esses resultados dão indícios de que os hipolipemiantes analisados (estatinas e ezetimiba) têm um importante papel na regulação da expressão de genes envolvidos no transporte reverso do colesterol e sugerem a existência de regulação tecido-específica para os dois transportadores ABC. Além disso, o efeito das estatinas ou da ezetimiba sobre a expressão do ABCA1, do ABCG1 ou do SCARB1 não sofreu influencia de alterações diretas da transcrição dos LXRs.The efficacy of statins in reducing the risk of coronary events is not completely explained by their effects in decreasing cholesterol low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C). One of their additional effects may result from the change in concentration of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), recognized as atheroprotective, mainly for the role in reverse cholesterol transport (RCT). The membrane transporters, as ATP-binding cassette, ABCA1 and ABCG1, and scavenger receptor BI (SRBI) are important proteins involved in the RCT and their genes are regulated by various transcription factors, including the liver-X-receptors (LXRs) . In order to evaluate the effects of lipid lowering on expression of ABC transporters and SRBI receptor, the mRNA expression of ABCA1, ABCG1, SCARB1, NR1H3 (LXR&#945;) and NR1H2 (LRX&#946;) was assessed by real time PCR in HepG2 (hepatic origin) and Caco-2 (intestinal origin) cells treated with atorvastatin or simvastatin (10 µM) and/or ezetimibe (up to 5 µM) for 24 hours. Furthermore, the expression of these genes was evaluated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of 50 normolipidemic (NL) and 71 hypercholesterolemic (HC) patients treated with atorvastatin (10mg/d/4 weeks, n = 48) or simvastatin and/or ezetimibe (10mg/d/4 or 8 weeks, n = 23). The possible association between ABCA1 C-14T and R219K polymorphisms and mRNA expression in PBMC was also evaluated by PCR-RFLP. SCARB1 was the most expressed in HepG2 and Caco-2 cells, followed by NR1H2, NR1H3, ABCG1 and ABCA1 in HepG2 or by ABCG1 and ABCA1 in Caco-2. The treatment with statins (1 or 10 µM) or ezetimibe (5 µM) for 12 or 24 hours, increased mRNA expression of ABCG1 but not ABCA1 and SCARB1 in HepG2 cells. Moreover, in HepG2 cells, atorvastatin also upregulated NR1H2 and NR1H3 only at 10.0 &#181;M, meanwhile ezetimibe downregulated NR1H2 but did not change NR1H3 expression. In Caco-2 cells, atorvastatin or simvastatin treatment for 12 or 24 hours reduced the amount of ABCA1 transcript and did not alter the ABCG1 and SCARB1 expressions, despite the tendency to decrease ABCG1 mRNA expression after simvastatin treatment (p = 0.07). After treatment with ezetimibe alone (up to 5 &#181;M) no change in mRNA expression was observed in Caco-2 cells; however, after 24 hours- simvastatin and ezetimibe treatments decreased the transcription of ABCA1 and ABCG1, but not of SCARB1. Unlike cell lines, in PBMC, NR1H2 and ABCG1 were the most expressed, followed by SCARB1 and ABCA1 and finally by the NR1H3. HC patients showed higher NR1H2 and NR1H3 basal expressions, but not of other genes, compared to NL (p T polymorphism when compared with -14CC carriers (p = 0.034). Treatment with statins, ezetimibe, or combined therapy downregulated ABCA1 and ABCG1 expression. For SCARB1, NR1H2 and NR1H3, no change in mRNA expression in PBMC was detected after treatments. After all phases of treatment, ABCA1 and ABCG1 as well as NR1H2 and NR1H3 were significantly correlated, but no correlation with serum lipid profile was relevant. Collectively, these results provide evidences that the lipid lowering (statins and ezetimibe) have an important role in mRNA expression regulation of genes involved in reverse cholesterol transport and suggest the existence of tissue-specific regulation for the ABC transporters. Furthermore, the effect of statins or ezetimibe on ABCA1, ABCG1 or SCARB1 expression was not directly influenced by changes of LXR transcription