59 research outputs found
Involvement as a dilemma: between dialogue and discussion in team based organizations
"This article describes an ongoing action research project in a public administration
department working towards a more flat structure characterized
by value-based management, team organization, and involvement.
The article presents involvement as a multidimensional dilemma and
describes how employees experience and cope with traditional and
modern dilemmas, and how the borderline between them seems to be
blurred. It also includes the AR-dilemma unfolding in the relation
between the participants and us as actions researchers.
The dilemmas are discussed in relation to Human Resource Management.
The history of involvement is reflected as a historical transformation of
participative democracy into participative management characterized by
strategic communication." (author's abstract
Participation and power. Between constraint and empowerment in organizational action research
Participation as enactment of power in dialogic organizational action research:Reflections on conflicting knowledge interests and actionability
Participation as Enactment of Power in Dialogic Organisational Action Research. Reflections on Conflicting Interests and Actionability
"The article focuses on participation as enactment of power in dialogic, organisational
action research. The article has a dual purpose: It shows how participation
is enacted as power in processes between participating managers, employees
and action researchers with different or conflicting interests. It discusses
if and eventually how it is possible to handle participatory processes
when participation is conceptualised as enactment of power. This is done by
reflecting critically on two examples from a dialogic, action research project
carried out in two Danish, private organisations in 2008 and 2009. The overall
perspective is to bring participation as enactment of power into the centre of
dialogic, organisational action research processes and into action research that
understands itself as participatory.
The article argues in favour of understanding participation as enactment of
power in a project work between different partners (employees, managers, and
action researchers) with different interests. This argument is based on a definition
of participation as co-determination of goals and means. Moreover, the
article argues that combining reflexive and contextualised analyses from 1rst
and 2nd person approaches with broader 3rd person action research perspectives
might make dialogic, organisational action research projects more actionable.
Theoretically, participatory processes aim at empowerment. The article shows
that co-producing knowledge in dialogic, organisational action research implies
ongoing reflections on tensions in the action research concept of ‘co-‘. In
practice, these processes unfold in a field of tensions between empowerment
and constraint." (author's abstract
Employee Driven Innovation in Team (EDIT) – Innovative Potential, Dialogue, and Dissensus
"The article deals with employee driven innovation in regular teams from a
critical, pragmatic action research perspective, referring to theories on innovation,
dialogue, workplace learning, and organizational communication.
It is based on an action research project “Innovation and involvement
through strengthening dialogue in team based organizations” funded by
the Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. 18 teams
from one public and two private organizations participated in the project.
The article defines the concept of employee driven innovation (EDI) in relation
to theories on innovation, workplace learning and action research,
and presents EDI as a fairly new field of research. EDI is conceptualized
as a participatory endeavour differing from a mainstream understanding of
innovation as surplus value for the organization. The article focuses on incremental,
organizational process innovations co-created across conflicting
workplace interests in and between teams.
The article argues that it is meaningful to assert that every employee has
an innovative potential, no matter of what educational background or sector
and that sometimes, this innovative potential might be facilitated
through Dialogic Helicopter Team Meetings (DHTM) with a dissensus
approach.
During the action research process, it became important to organize a special
kind of DHTMs as a supplement to ordinary team action meetings
close to day-to-day operations, but separated in time and space. They focus
on how to improve existing organizational routines and work practice
in order to produce value for the organization, better work flow, and improved
work life quality. These meetings are discussed in relation to similar
organizational constructs within Scandinavian action research. The action research process made it clear that it is not enough to set up
DHTMs if they are going to facilitate EDIT. They must be characterized
by a dissensus approach, combining dissensus organizing and dissensus
sensibility. Dissensus organizing means that team conversations must be
organized in ways where silent or unspoken, critical voices speak up. This
can be done by using, e.g., pro and con groups or a bystander. This demands,
too, that team members, managers, and action researchers develop
dissensus sensibility to open up for more voices, for indirect criticism, and
for more democracy in the decision process trying to balance dialogues in
multidimensional tensions between consensus and dissensus.
The article grounds the complexities of this process in thick presentations
of DHTMs in Team Product Support, Danfoss Solar Inverters and Team
Children, Citizen Service, the Municipality of Silkeborg, Denmark. It
demonstrates how these meetings created different organizational process
innovations, and how theoretical concepts like DHTM, dissensus organizing
and dissensus sensibility were developed from practice." (author's abstract
Search for dark matter produced in association with bottom or top quarks in √s = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector
A search for weakly interacting massive particle dark matter produced in association with bottom or top quarks is presented. Final states containing third-generation quarks and miss- ing transverse momentum are considered. The analysis uses 36.1 fb−1 of proton–proton collision data recorded by the ATLAS experiment at √s = 13 TeV in 2015 and 2016. No significant excess of events above the estimated backgrounds is observed. The results are in- terpreted in the framework of simplified models of spin-0 dark-matter mediators. For colour- neutral spin-0 mediators produced in association with top quarks and decaying into a pair of dark-matter particles, mediator masses below 50 GeV are excluded assuming a dark-matter candidate mass of 1 GeV and unitary couplings. For scalar and pseudoscalar mediators produced in association with bottom quarks, the search sets limits on the production cross- section of 300 times the predicted rate for mediators with masses between 10 and 50 GeV and assuming a dark-matter mass of 1 GeV and unitary coupling. Constraints on colour- charged scalar simplified models are also presented. Assuming a dark-matter particle mass of 35 GeV, mediator particles with mass below 1.1 TeV are excluded for couplings yielding a dark-matter relic density consistent with measurements
- …