1,011 research outputs found

    Seasonal Reflectance Courses of Forests

    Get PDF

    Latitudinal gradient of spruce forest understory and tundra phenology in Alaska as observed from satellite and ground-based data

    Get PDF
    The latitudinal gradient of the start of the growing season (SOS) and the end of the growing season (EOS) were quantified in Alaska (61ยฐN to 71ยฐN) using satellite-based and ground-based datasets. The Alaskan evergreen needleleaf forests are sparse and the understory vegetation has a substantial impact on the satellite signal. We evaluated SOS and EOS of understory and tundra vegetation using time-lapse camera images. From the comparison of three SOS algorithms for determining SOS from two satellite datasets (SPOT-VEGETATION and Terra-MODIS), we found that the satellite-based SOS timing was consistent with the leaf emergence of the forest understory and tundra vegetation. The ensemble average of SOS over all satellite algorithms can be used as a measure of spring leaf emergence for understory and tundra vegetation. In contrast, the relationship between the ground-based and satellite-based EOSs was not as strong as that of SOS both for boreal forest and tundra sites because of the large biases between those two EOSs (19 to 26 days). The satellite-based EOS was more relevant to snowfall events than the senescence of understory or tundra. The plant canopy radiative transfer simulation suggested that 84โ€“86% of the NDVI seasonal amplitude could be a reasonable threshold for the EOS determination. The latitudinal gradients of SOS and EOS evaluated by the satellite and ground data were consistent and the satellite-derived SOS and EOS were 3.5 to 5.7 days degreeโˆ’ 1 and โˆ’ 2.3 to โˆ’ 2.7 days degreeโˆ’ 1, which corresponded to the spring (May) temperature sensitivity of โˆ’ 2.5 to โˆ’ 3.9 days ยฐCโˆ’ 1 in SOS and the autumn (August and September) temperature sensitivity of 3.0 to 4.6 days ยฐCโˆ’ 1 in EOS. This demonstrates the possible impact of phenology in spruce forest understory and tundra ecosystems in response to climate change in the warming Artic and sub-Arctic regions

    Assessing the contribution of understory sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence through 3-D radiative transfer modelling and field data

    Get PDF
    A major international effort has been made to monitor sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) from space as a proxy for the photosynthetic activity of terrestrial vegetation. However, the effect of spatial heterogeneity on the SIF retrievals from canopy radiance derived from images with medium and low spatial resolution remains uncharacterised. In images from forest and agricultural landscapes, the background comprises a mixture of soil and understory and can generate confounding effects that limit the interpretation of the SIF at the canopy level. This paper aims to improve the understanding of SIF from coarse spatial resolutions in heterogeneous canopies by considering the separated contribution of tree crowns, understory and background components, using a modified version of the FluorFLIGHT radiative transfer model (RTM). The new model is compared with others through the RAMI model intercomparison framework and is validated with airborne data. The airborne campaign includes high-resolution data collected over a tree-grass ecosystem with the HyPlant imaging spectrometer within the FLuorescence EXplorer (FLEX) preparatory missions. Field data measurements were collected from plots with a varying fraction of tree and understory vegetation cover. The relationship between airborne SIF calculated from pure tree crowns and aggregated pixels shows the effect of the understory at different resolutions. For a pixel size smaller than the mean crown size, the impact of the background was low (R2 > 0.99; NRMSE 0.2). This study demonstrates that using a 3D RTM model improves the calculation of SIF significantly (R2 = 0.83, RMSE = 0.03 mW mโˆ’2 srโˆ’1 nmโˆ’1) when the specific contribution of the soil and understory layers are accounted for, in comparison with the SIF calculated from mixed pixels that considers only one layer as background (R2 = 0.4, RMSE = 0.28 mW mโˆ’2 srโˆ’1 nmโˆ’1). These results demonstrate the need to account for the contribution of SIF emitted by the understory in the quantification of SIF within tree crowns and within the canopy from aggregated pixels in heterogeneous forest canopies

    Comparison of phenology estimated from reflectance-based indices and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) observations in a temperate forest using GPP-based phenology as the standard

    Get PDF
    ยฉ The Author(s), 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Remote Sensing 10 (2018): 932, doi:10.3390/rs10060932.We assessed the performance of reflectance-based vegetation indices and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) datasets with various spatial and temporal resolutions in monitoring the Gross Primary Production (GPP)-based phenology in a temperate deciduous forest. The reflectance-based indices include the green chromatic coordinate (GCC), field measured and satellite remotely sensed Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI); and the SIF datasets include ground-based measurement and satellite-based products. We found that, if negative impacts due to coarse spatial and temporal resolutions are effectively reduced, all these data can serve as good indicators of phenological metrics for spring. However, the autumn phenological metrics derived from all reflectance-based datasets are later than the those derived from ground-based GPP estimates (flux sites). This is because the reflectance-based observations estimate phenology by tracking physiological properties including leaf area index (LAI) and leaf chlorophyll content (Chl), which does not reflect instantaneous changes in phenophase transitions, and thus the estimated fall phenological events may be later than GPP-based phenology. In contrast, we found that SIF has a good potential to track seasonal transition of photosynthetic activities in both spring and fall seasons. The advantage of SIF in estimating the GPP-based phenology lies in its inherent link to photosynthesis activities such that SIF can respond quickly to all factors regulating phenological events. Despite uncertainties in phenological metrics estimated from current spaceborne SIF observations due to their coarse spatial and temporal resolutions, dates in middle spring and autumnโ€”the two most important metricsโ€”can still be reasonably estimated from satellite SIF. Our study reveals that SIF provides a better way to monitor GPP-based phenological metrics.This research was supported by U. S. Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research Grant DE-SC0006951, National Science Foundation Grants DBI 959333 and AGS-1005663, and the University of Chicago and the MBL Lillie Research Innovation Award to Jianwu Tang and China Scholarship Council No. 201506190095 to Z. Liu. Xiaoliang Lu was also supported by the open project grant (LBKF201701) of Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Chinese Academy of Sciences

    Evaluation of the MODIS LAI product using independent lidar-derived LAI: A case study in mixed conifer forest

    Get PDF
    This study presents an alternative assessment of the MODIS LAI product for a 58,000 ha evergreen needleleaf forest located in the western Rocky Mountain range in northern Idaho by using lidar data to model (R2=0.86, RMSE=0.76) and map LAI at higher resolution across a large number of MODIS pixels in their entirety. Moderate resolution (30 m) lidar-based LAI estimates were aggregated to the resolution of the 1-km MODIS LAI product and compared to temporally-coincident MODIS retrievals. Differences in the MODIS and lidar-derived values of LAI were grouped and analyzed by several different factors, including MODIS retrieval algorithm, sun/sensor geometry, and sub-pixel heterogeneity in both vegetation and terrain characteristics. Of particular interest is the disparity in the results when MODIS LAI was analyzed according to algorithm retrieval class. We observed relatively good agreement between lidar-derived and MODIS LAI values for pixels retrieved with the main RT algorithm without saturation for LAI LAIโ‰ค4. Moreover, for the entire range of LAI values, considerable overestimation of LAI (relative to lidar-derived LAI) occurred when either the main RT with saturation or back-up algorithm retrievals were used to populate the composite product regardless of sub-pixel vegetation structural complexity or sun/sensor geometry. These results are significant because algorithm retrievals based on the main radiative transfer algorithm with or without saturation are characterized as suitable for validation and subsequent ecosystem modeling, yet the magnitude of difference appears to be specific to retrieval quality class and vegetation structural characteristics

    Responses of Land Surface Phenology to Wildfire Disturbances in the Western United States Forests

    Get PDF
    Land surface phenology (LSP) characterizes the seasonal dynamics in the vegetation communities observed for a satellite pixel and it has been widely associated with global climate change. However, LSP and its long-term trend can be influenced by land disturbance events, which could greatly interrupt the LSP responses to climate change. Wildfire is one of the main disturbance agents in the western United States (US) forests, but its impacts on LSP have not been investigated yet. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the LSP responses to wildfires in the western US forests, this dissertation focused on three research objectives: (1) to perform a case study of wildfire impacts on LSP and its trend by comparing the burned and a reference area, (2) to investigate the distribution of wildfire impacts on LSP and identify control factors by analyzing all the wildfires across the western US forests, and (3) to quantify the contributions of land cover composition and other environmental factors to the spatial and interannual variations of LSP in a recently burned landscape. The results reveal that wildfires play a significant role in influencing spatial and interannual variations in LSP across the western US forests. First, the case study showed that the Hayman Fire significantly advanced the start of growing season (SOS) and caused an advancing SOS trend comparing with a delaying trend in the reference area. Second, summarizing \u3e800 wildfires found that the shifts in LSP timing were divergent depending on individual wildfire events and burn severity. Moreover, wildfires showed a stronger impact on the end of growing season (EOS) than SOS. Last, LSP trends were interrupted by wildfires with the degree of impact largely dependent on the wildfire occurrence year. Third, LSP modeling showed that land cover composition, climate, and topography co-determine the LSP variations. Specifically, land cover composition and climate dominate the LSP spatial and interannual variations, respectively. Overall, this research improves the understanding of wildfire impacts on LSP and the underlying mechanism of various factors driving LSP. This research also provides a prototype that can be extended to investigate the impacts on LSP from other disturbances

    ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์›๊ฒฉ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๋“ค์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ง€์†์  ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ ๋ฐ ํƒœ์–‘ ์œ ๋„ ์—ฝ๋ก์†Œ ํ˜•๊ด‘๋ฌผ์งˆ ๊ด€์ธก

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ํ˜‘๋™๊ณผ์ • ์กฐ๊ฒฝํ•™, 2022.2. ๋ฅ˜์˜๋ ฌ.Monitoring phenology, physiological and structural changes in vegetation is essential to understand feedbacks of vegetation between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere by influencing the albedo, carbon flux, water flux and energy. To this end, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) from satellite remote sensing have been widely used. However, there are still limitations in satellite remote sensing as 1) satellite imagery could not capture fine-scale spatial resolution of SIF signals, 2) satellite products are strongly influenced by condition of the atmosphere (e.g. clouds), thus it is challenging to know physiological and structural changes in vegetation on cloudy days and 3) satellite imagery captured a mixed signal from over- and understory, thus it is difficult to study the difference between overstory and understory phenology separately. Therefore, in order to more accurately understand the signals observed from the satellite, further studies using near-surface remote sensing system to collect ground-based observed data are needed. The main purpose of this dissertation is continuous observation of vegetation phenology and SIF using near-surface remote sensing system. To achieve the main goal, I set three chapters as 1) developing low-cost filter-based near-surface remote sensing system to monitor SIF continuously, 2) monitoring SIF in a temperate evergreen needleleaf forest continuously, and 3) understanding the relationships between phenology from in-situ multi-layer canopies and satellite products. In Chapter 2, I developed the filter-based smart surface sensing system (4S-SIF) to overcome the technical challenges of monitoring SIF in the field as well as to decrease sensor cost for more comprehensive spatial sampling. I verified the satisfactory spectral performance of the bandpass filters and confirmed that digital numbers (DN) from 4S-SIF exhibited linear relationships with the DN from the hyperspectral spectroradiometer in each band (R2 > 0.99). In addition, we confirmed that 4S-SIF shows relatively low variation of dark current value at various temperatures. Furthermore, the SIF signal from 4S-SIF represents a strong linear relationship with QEpro-SIF either changing the physiological mechanisms of the plant using DCMU (3-(3, 4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethyurea) treatment. I believe that 4S-SIF will be a useful tool for collecting in-situ data across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Satellite-based SIF provides us with new opportunities to understand the physiological and structural dynamics of vegetation from canopy to global scales. However, the relationships between SIF and gross primary productivity (GPP) are not fully understood, which is mainly due to the challenges of decoupling structural and physiological factors that control the relationships. In Chapter 3, I reported the results of continuous observations of canopy-level SIF, GPP, absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR), and chlorophyll: carotenoid index (CCI) in a temperate evergreen needleleaf forest. To understand the mechanisms underlying the relationship between GPP and SIF, I investigated the relationships of light use efficiency (LUE_p), chlorophyll fluorescence yield (ฮฆ_F), and the fraction of emitted SIF photons escaping from the canopy (f_esc) separately. I found a strongly non-linear relationship between GPP and SIF at diurnal and seasonal time scales (R2 = 0.91 with a hyperbolic regression function, daily). GPP saturated with APAR, while SIF did not. In addition, there were differential responses of LUE_p and ฮฆ_F to air temperature. While LUE_p reached saturation at high air temperatures, ฮฆ_F did not saturate. I also found that the canopy-level chlorophyll: carotenoid index was strongly correlated to canopy-level ฮฆ_F (R2 = 0.84) implying that ฮฆ_F could be more closely related to pigment pool changes rather than LUE_p. In addition, I found that the f_esc contributed to a stronger SIF-GPP relationship by partially capturing the response of LUE_p to diffuse light. These findings can help refine physiological and structural links between canopy-level SIF and GPP in evergreen needleleaf forests. We do not fully understand what satellite NDVI derived leaf-out and full leaf dates actually observe because deciduous broadleaf forest consists of multi-layer canopies typically and mixed-signal from multi-layer canopies could affect satellite observation. Ultimately, we have the following question: What phenology do we actually see from space compared to ground observations on multi-layer canopy phenology? In Chapter 4, I reported the results of 8 years of continuous observations of multi-layer phenology and climate variables in a deciduous broadleaf forest, South Korea. Multi-channel spectrometers installed above and below overstory canopy allowed us to monitor over- and understory canopy phenology separately, continuously. I evaluated the widely used phenology detection methods, curvature change rate and threshold with NDVI observed above top of the canopy and compared leaf-out and full leaf dates from both methods to in-situ observed multi-layer phenology. First, I found that NDVI from the above canopy had a strong linear relationship with satellites NDVI (R2=0.95 for MODIS products and R2= 0.85 for Landsat8). Second, leaf-out dates extracted by the curvature change rate method and 10% threshold were well matched with understory leaf-out dates. Third, the full-leaf dates extracted by the curvature change rate method and 90% threshold were similar to overstory full-leaf dates. Furthermore, I found that overstory leaf-out dates were closely correlated to accumulated growing degree days (AGDD) while understory leaf-out dates were related to AGDD and also sensitive to the number of chill days (NCD). These results suggest that satellite-based leaf-out and full leaf dates represent understory and overstory signals in the deciduous forest site, which requires caution when using satellite-based phenology data into future prediction as overstory and understory canopy show different sensitivities to AGDD and NCD.์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ ๋ฐ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์ , ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์œก์ƒ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„์™€ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ๊ถŒ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€, ํƒ„์†Œ ์ˆœํ™˜ ๋“ฑ์˜ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ„์„ฑ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก๋œ ์ •๊ทœํ™” ์‹์ƒ ์ง€์ˆ˜ (NDVI) ํƒœ์–‘ ์œ ๋„ ์—ฝ๋ก์†Œ ํ˜•๊ด‘๋ฌผ์งˆ (SIF)๋Š” ๋Œ€์ค‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ์šฐ์ฃผ ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ํ•œ๊ณ„์ ๋“ค์ด ์กด์žฌํ•œ๋‹ค. 1) ์•„์ง๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ณ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„์˜ ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ SIF ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” ์—†๊ณ , 2) ์œ„์„ฑ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋“ค์€ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์˜ ์งˆ (์˜ˆ, ๊ตฌ๋ฆ„)์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›์•„, ํ๋ฆฐ ๋‚ ์˜ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์ , ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ํž˜๋“ค๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, 3) ์œ„์„ฑ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋Š” ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ๊ณผ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์ด ํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋˜์–ด ์„ž์ธ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ๊ฐ ์ธต์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ธฐ์— ์–ด๋ ค์›€์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋ฏ€๋กœ, ์œ„์„ฑ์—์„œ ํƒ์ง€ํ•œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ , ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์ , ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์›๊ฒฉ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์‹ค์ธก ์ž๋ฃŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ์š”๊ตฌ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ์ฃผ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์›๊ฒฉ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ ๋ฐ SIF๋ฅผ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹ค์ธกํ•˜๊ณ , ์œ„์„ฑ ์˜์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„์  ๋ฐ ๊ถ๊ธˆ์ฆ๋“ค์„ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ ๋ฐ ๋ณด์™„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์•„๋ž˜์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์„ธ๊ฐ€์ง€ Chapter: 1) SIF๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ•„ํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์ €๋ ดํ•œ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ, 2)์˜จ๋Œ€ ์นจ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ์˜ ์—ฐ์†์ ์ธ SIF ๊ด€์ธก, 3)์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๊ณผ ์‹ค์ธกํ•œ ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ ๋น„๊ต๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. SIF๋Š” ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ , ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ , ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์ธ์ž๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด, SIF๋ฅผ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์›๊ฒฉ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๋“ค์ด ์ตœ๊ทผ ์ œ์‹œ๋˜์–ด ์˜ค๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ์•„์ง๊นŒ์ง€ SIF๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒ์—…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ํ†ต๋˜๋Š” ๊ด€์ธก ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ํ˜„์ €ํžˆ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋ถ„๊ด‘๊ณ„์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์ƒ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๋ณด์ • ๋ฐ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ ค์›Œ ๋†’์€ ์งˆ์˜ SIF๋ฅผ ์ทจ๋“ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋„์ „ ์ ์ธ ๋ถ„์•ผ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ Chapter 2์—์„œ๋Š” SIF๋ฅผ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์†์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ•„ํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ(Smart Surface Sensing System, 4S-SIF)์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ผ์„œ๋Š” ๋Œ€์—ญ ํ•„ํ„ฐ๋“ค๊ณผ ํฌํ† ๋‹ค์ด์˜ค๋“œ๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์„œ๋ณด ๋ชจํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ€์—ญ ํ•„ํ„ฐ ๋ฐ ๊ด€์ธก ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ์ž๋™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ, ํ•œ ๊ฐœ์˜ ํฌํ† ๋‹ค์ด์˜ค๋“œ๊ฐ€ 3๊ฐœ์˜ ํŒŒ์žฅ ๋ฒ”์œ„(757, 760, 770 nm)์˜ ๋น› ๋ฐ ํƒœ์–‘์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ž…์‚ฌ๋˜๋Š” ๊ด‘๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์‹์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ/๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋œ ๊ด‘๋Ÿ‰์„ ๊ด€์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๊ณ ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํฌํ† ๋‹ค์ด์˜ค๋“œ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ธ์‹๋œ ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ๊ฐ’์€ ์ƒ์—…์ ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋งค๋˜๋Š” ์ดˆ๊ณ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„ ๋ถ„๊ด‘๊ณ„(QE Pro, Ocean Insight)์™€ ๋šœ๋ ทํ•œ ์„ ํ˜• ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค (R2 > 0.99). ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ, 4S-SIF์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก๋œ SIF์™€ ์ดˆ๊ณ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„ ๋ถ„๊ด‘๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”์ถœํ•œ SIF๊ฐ€ ์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ด๋ฃจ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค๋Š” ํ™”ํ•™ ๋ฌผ์งˆ์ธ DCMU(3-(3, 4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethyurea)์„ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ–ˆ์Œ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , ์‚ฐ์ถœ๋œ SIF๋“ค์€ ์„ ํ˜• ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์„ผ์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๋“ค์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์‰ฝ๊ณ  ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ €๋ ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์˜ SIF๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์žฅ์ ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ SIF๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์ผ์ฐจ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ(gross primary productivity, GPP)์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ตœ๊ทผ ํƒ„์†Œ ์ˆœํ™˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ๊ฐ๊ด‘๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, SIF์™€ GPP์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋Š” ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ๋งŽ์€ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ์ง€๋‹ˆ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋Š” SIF-GPP ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜๋Š” ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋ฐ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ์š”์ธ์„ ๋”ฐ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ์ฐฐํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ๋ถ€์กฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ Chapter 3์—์„œ๋Š” ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ SIF, GPP, ํก์ˆ˜๋œ ๊ด‘ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์œ ํšจ๋ณต์‚ฌ๋Ÿ‰ (absorbed photosynthetically active radiation, APAR), ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํด๋กœ๋กœํ•„๊ณผ ์นด๋กœํ‹ฐ๋…ธ์ด๋“œ์˜ ๋น„์œจ ์ธ์ž (chlorophyll: carotenoid index, CCI)๋ฅผ ์˜จ๋Œ€์นจ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ ์—ฐ์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. SIF-GPP ๊ด€๊ณ„์˜ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ฐํžˆ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ, ๊ด‘ ์ด์šฉํšจ์œจ (light use efficiency, LUE_p), ์—ฝ๋ก์†Œ ํ˜•๊ด‘ ์ˆ˜๋“๋ฅ  (chlorophyll fluorescence yield, ฮฆ_F) ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  SIF ๊ด‘์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ตฐ๋ฝ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ๋น„์œจ (escape fraction, f_esc)์„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ  ํƒ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. SIF์™€ GPP์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋Š” ๋šœ๋ ทํ•œ ๋น„ ์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ(R2 = 0.91 with a hyperbolic regression function, daily), ์ผ์ฃผ๊ธฐ ๋‹จ์œ„์—์„œ SIF๋Š” APAR์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์„ ํ˜•์ ์ด์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ GPP๋Š” APAR์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋šœ๋ ทํ•œ ํฌํ™” ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ LUE_p ์™€ ฮฆ_F ๊ฐ€ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ ์˜จ๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ•˜๋Š” ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. LUE_p๋Š” ๋†’์€ ์˜จ๋„์—์„œ ํฌํ™” ๋˜์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ฮฆ_F๋Š” ํฌํ™” ํŒจํ„ด์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ตฐ๋ฝ ์ˆ˜์ค€์—์„œ์˜ CCI์™€ ฮฆ_F๊ฐ€ ๋šœ๋ ทํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค(R2 = 0.84). ์ด๋Š” ฮฆ_F๊ฐ€ ์—ฝ๋ก์†Œ ์ƒ‰์†Œ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ LUE_p์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋” ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, f_esc๊ฐ€ ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘์˜ ์‚ฐ๋ž€๋œ ์ •๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ ํ•˜์—ฌ, ฮฆ_F์™€ LUE_p์˜ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ์€ ์˜จ๋Œ€ ์นจ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ ๊ตฐ๋ฝ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ SIF-GPP๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์€ ์‹์ƒ์ด ์ฒ ์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ฃผ๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜์‘์ด๋‹ค. ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์€ ์œก์ƒ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„์™€ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ๊ถŒ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๋ฌผ์งˆ ์ˆœํ™˜์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ NDVI๋Š” ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋Œ€์ค‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ํ™œ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ์˜ ์œ„์„ฑ NDVI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์‹ค์ œ ์–ด๋Š ์‹œ์ ์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€๋Š” ๋ถˆ๋ถ„๋ช…ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ ํ™œ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์€ ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ์‚ผ์ฐจ์›์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ ธ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ์œ„์„ฑ ์˜์ƒ์€ ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ€ ์„ž์—ฌ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ด์ฐจ์›์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฌผ์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ์œ„์„ฑ NDVI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์ด ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ด๋ฃจ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ํ™œ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ ์‹ค์ œ ํ˜„์žฅ ๊ด€์ธก๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ ์–ด๋Š ์‹œ์ ์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ถ๊ธˆ์ฆ์ด ๋‚จ๋Š”๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ Chapter 4์—์„œ๋Š” ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ 8๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ํ™œ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ๋‚ด์˜ ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์›๊ฒฉ ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ณ , ์œ„์„ฑ NDVI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์ฑ„๋„ ๋ถ„๊ด‘๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์œ„์™€ ์•„๋ž˜์— ์„ค์น˜ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ, ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ๊ณผ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์—ฐ์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋งŽ์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ธ 1) ์—ญ์น˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ 2) ์ด๊ณ„๋„ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋กœ, ๊ตฐ๋ฝ์˜ ์ƒ์ธต๋ถ€์—์„œ ์‹ค์ธกํ•œ NDVI์™€ ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ NDVI๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์„ ํ˜• ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ๋‹ค (R2=0.95 ๋Š” MODIS ์˜์ƒ๋“ค ๋ฐ R2= 0.85 ๋Š” Landsat8). ๋‘๋ฒˆ์งธ๋กœ, ์ด๊ณ„๋„ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ 10%์˜ ์—ญ์น˜ ๊ฐ’์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์ž„์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ธ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋กœ, ์ด๊ณ„๋„ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ 90%์˜ ์—ญ์น˜ ๊ฐ’์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ๋น„์Šทํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์˜จ๋„์™€ ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ•˜๋Š” ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ๋šœ๋ ทํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์ ์‚ฐ ์ƒ์žฅ ์˜จ๋„ ์ผ์ˆ˜ (AGDD)์™€ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๊ณ , ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” AGDD์™€ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ์„ ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์ถ”์œ„ ์ผ์ˆ˜(NCD)์—๋„ ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์œ„์„ฑ NDVI ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์ด ๋†’๊ณ , ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ๋น„์Šทํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ๊ณผ ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์ด ์˜จ๋„์— ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ์–ด, ์œ„์„ฑ์—์„œ ์‚ฐ์ถœ๋œ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•  ๋•Œ, ์–ด๋–ค ์ธต์˜ ์‹์ƒ์ด ์œ„์„ฑ ์˜์ƒ์— ์ฃผ๋œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š”์ง€ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์œ„์„ฑ์€ ๋„“์€ ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์†์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋งํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋„๊ตฌ์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ด€์ธก ๊ฐ’์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก๋œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ๊ฒ€์ฆ์ด ์š”๊ตฌ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” 1) ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ, 2) ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ๊ด€์ธก, 3) ๋‹ค์ธต ์‹์ƒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์—์„œ ๊ด€์ธก๋˜๋Š” ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ ๋ฐ ์œ„์„ฑ์—์„œ ์ถ”์ •๋œ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์„œ๋Š” ์ƒ์—… ์„ผ์„œ๋“ค๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ, ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ €๋ ดํ•˜๊ณ  ์† ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ ์œผ๋กœ๋„ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•จ์ด ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ SIF๋ฅผ ์˜จ๋Œ€ ์นจ์—ฝ์ˆ˜๋ฆผ์—์„œ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ธกํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ด์ผ์ฐจ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ SIF๋Š” ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋งŽ์€ ์„ ํ–‰ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์—์„œ ๋ฐœํ‘œํ•œ ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ SIF์™€ GPP๊ฐ€ ์„ ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค์†Œ ์ƒ๋ฐ˜๋œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ด๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์ธก ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๋ด„์ฒ  ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ์„ ์—ฐ์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ธกํ•˜๊ณ , ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹๋ฌผ ๊ณ„์ ˆ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์œ„์„ฑ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๊ฐœ์—ฝ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ํ•˜๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋กœ ๋ฐ›๊ณ , ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์ƒ๋ถ€ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์™€ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ์‹ค์ธกํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์œ„์„ฑ ์˜์ƒ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ผ ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์œ„์„ฑ ์˜์ƒ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์‹์ƒ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ , ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ทผ์ ‘ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์„ผ์‹ฑ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค.Abstract i Chapter 1. Introduction 2 1. Background 2 2. Purpose 5 Chapter 2. Monitoring SIF using a filter-based near surface remote sensing system 9 1. Introduction 9 2. Instrument desing and technical spefications of the filter-based smart surface sensing system (4S-SIF) 12 2.1. Ultra-narrow band pass filter 14 2.2. Calibration of 4S-SIF 15 2.3. Temperature and humidity response 16 2.4. Evaluate SIF quality from 4S-SIF in the field 17 3. Results 20 4. Discussion 23 Chapter 3. SIF is non-linearly related to canopy photosynthesis in a temperate evergreen needleleaf forest during fall transition 27 1. Introduction 27 2. Methods and Materials 31 2.1. Study site 31 2.2. Leaf-level fluorescence measurement 32 2.3. Canopy-level SIF and spectral reflectance measurement 34 2.4. SIF retrieval 37 2.5. Canopy-level photosynthesis estimates 38 2.6. Meteorological variables and APAR 39 2.7. Statistical analysis 40 3. Results 41 4. Discussion 48 4.1. Non-linear relationships between SIF and GPP 49 4.2. Role of f_esc in SIF-GPP relationship 53 4.3. Implications of non-linear SIF-GPP relationship in temperate ENF 54 5. Conclusion 57 6. Appendix 59 Chapter 4. Monitoring spring phenology of multi-layer canopy in a deciduous broadleaf forest: What signal do satellites actually see in space 65 1. Introduction 65 2. Materials and Methods 69 2.1. Study site 69 2.2. Multi-layer spectral reflectance and transmittance measurement 70 2.3. Phenometrics detection 72 2.4. In-situ multi-layer phenology 74 2.5. Satellite remote sensing data 75 2.6. Meteorological variables 75 3. Results 76 3.1. Seasonal to interannual variations of NDVI, 1-transmittance, and air temperature 76 3.2. Inter-annual variation of leaf-out and full-leaf dates 78 3.3. The relationships between dates calculated according tothreshold and in-situ multi-layer phenology 80 3.4. The relationship between multi-layer phenology, AGDD and NCD 81 4. Discussion 82 4.1. How do satellite-based leaf-out and full-leaf dates differ from in-situ multi-layer phenology 83 4.2. Are the 10 % and 90 % thresholds from satellite-basedNDVI always well matched with the leaf-out and full-leaf dates calculated by the curvature change rate 86 4.3. What are the implications of the difference between satellite-based and multi-layer phenology 87 4.4. Limitations and implications for future studies 89 5. Conclusion 91 6. Appendix 92 Chapter 5. Conclusion 114 Abstract in Korean 115๋ฐ•

    Forest disturbance and recovery: A general review in the context of spaceborne remote sensing of impacts on aboveground biomass and canopy structure

    Get PDF
    Abrupt forest disturbances generating gaps \u3e0.001 km2 impact roughly 0.4โ€“0.7 million km2aโˆ’1. Fire, windstorms, logging, and shifting cultivation are dominant disturbances; minor contributors are land conversion, flooding, landslides, and avalanches. All can have substantial impacts on canopy biomass and structure. Quantifying disturbance location, extent, severity, and the fate of disturbed biomass will improve carbon budget estimates and lead to better initialization, parameterization, and/or testing of forest carbon cycle models. Spaceborne remote sensing maps large-scale forest disturbance occurrence, location, and extent, particularly with moderate- and fine-scale resolution passive optical/near-infrared (NIR) instruments. High-resolution remote sensing (e.g., โˆผ1 m passive optical/NIR, or small footprint lidar) can map crown geometry and gaps, but has rarely been systematically applied to study small-scale disturbance and natural mortality gap dynamics over large regions. Reducing uncertainty in disturbance and recovery impacts on global forest carbon balance requires quantification of (1) predisturbance forest biomass; (2) disturbance impact on standing biomass and its fate; and (3) rate of biomass accumulation during recovery. Active remote sensing data (e.g., lidar, radar) are more directly indicative of canopy biomass and many structural properties than passive instrument data; a new generation of instruments designed to generate global coverage/sampling of canopy biomass and structure can improve our ability to quantify the carbon balance of Earth\u27s forests. Generating a high-quality quantitative assessment of disturbance impacts on canopy biomass and structure with spaceborne remote sensing requires comprehensive, well designed, and well coordinated field programs collecting high-quality ground-based data and linkages to dynamical models that can use this information
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore