Meat- and plant-based products induced similar satiation which was not affected by multimodal augmentation

Little is known about how plant-based products influence satiation compared to corresponding meat-based products. As augmented reality (AR) intensifies sensory experiences, it was hypothesized to improve satiation. This study compared satiation between intake of meatballs and plant-based balls and plant-based balls intensified with AR for visual, olfactory, and haptic sensory properties. Intake order of the meatballs, plant-based balls, and augmented plant-based balls, eaten on separate days, was randomized. Satiation was measured from twenty-eight non-obese adults as ad libitum intake of the balls and extra snacks, and as subjective appetite sensations. Liking and wanting to eat the products were also investigated.There were no differences between the products in satiation. Before tasting the augmented plant-based balls were less liked than the meatballs (p = 0.002) or plant-based balls (p = 0.046), but after eating the first ball or eating the ad libitum number of balls the differences in liking disappeared. Wanting evaluations were similar for each product and decreased during eating (p < 0.001). A group of participants susceptible to AR was found (n = 11), described by decreased intake when augmentation was applied. Among the sub-group, wanting to eat the augmented balls was lower before tasting (p = 0.019) and after eating the first ball (p = 0.002) and appetite was less suppressed after eating the balls ad libitum (p = 0.01), when compared to non-susceptible participants.We conclude that meatballs and plant-based balls were equal in inducing satiation, and multisensory augmentation did not influence satiation. However, the augmentation decreased liking evaluations before tasting. Further studies are needed to explore differences between consumer groups in susceptibility to augmentation

The evolution of subsurface deformation and tribological degradation of a multiphase Fe-based hardfacing induced by sliding contact

Multiphase Fe-based hardfacing alloys, for example Tristelle 5183 Fe-21%Cr-10%Ni-7.5%Nb-5%Si-2%C in wt.%, are extensively used for tribological applications, including valves, bearings and drive mechanisms, where two surfaces are unavoidably subjected to loaded sliding contact within engineering systems. In this study, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were used to characterise, for the first time, the tribologically affected material induced by the self-mated sliding contact of HIPed Tristelle 5183. This provided novel insight into the deformation modes which permit the accumulation of the high levels of subsurface strain required for plasticity dominated (adhesive) wear in a commercial hardfacing. In the subsurface regions furthest from the sliding contact, plastic deformation is accommodated by deformation induced martensitic transformation to ϵ-martensite and α′-martensite, twinning, the generation of planar dislocation arrangements (generated by planar slip) and the generation of dislocation tangles. Closer to the sliding contact, the subsurface becomes unstable, and nanocrystallisation driven by grain boundary mediated deformation mechanisms and crystallographic slip completely engulf the near surface microstructure. It is postulated that nanocrystalisation within the subsurface is a needed in order to accommodate the extremely high strains required in order to permit tribological degradation via plasticity dominated wear. The extrusion of metallic slivers via plastic ratcheting generates ductile shear cracks governed by plastic strain, and the failure of these slivers generates plate/flake-like wear debris.</p

Control of Geometric Phase by Dynamic Phase

The geometric and dynamic phases are generally treated as independent and together give rise to the total phase of a system. Here, we present a scenario in which these two phases become strongly interdependent. We achieve this by introducing a modified Young’s double-slit configuration that supports surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) propagating between the slits. Remarkably, by varying the slit separation distance, and hence the dynamic SPP phase, by just a single plasmon wavelength, the geometric phase can be significantly modified