El script concordance test como herramienta evaluativa

El script concordance test es un instrumento de aprendizaje y de evaluación de las competencias inherentes al razonamiento clínico y a la toma de decisiones. La adquisición de experiencia clínica supone la elaboración de redes de conocimiento que se incorporan a la tarea clínica habitual. Estas redes, conocidas como scripts, se organizan para alcanzar metas relativas al diagnóstico, al establecimiento de estrategias de investigación y a opciones de tratamiento. El presente artículo muestra la construcción de este tipo de preguntas y su sistema de evaluación.The script concordance test is an instrument for learning and evaluating the inherent competencies in clinical reasoning and decision making. The acquisition of clinical experience implies the elaboration of knowledge networks that are incorporated to the routineclinical tasks. These networks, known as scripts, are organized to achieve goals related to diagnosis, the establishment of research strategies and treatment options. This article shows the construction of this type of questions and its evaluation system

Enseñanza de la medicina familiar y comunitaria en las universidades

La Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria es una disciplina académica, una especialidad médica y una profesión sanitaria cuyo ámbito de atención fundamental es la atención primaria en los centros de salud. Su incorporación como asignatura en los estudios de Medicina a nivel internacional se produjo en la década de los 60. En España lo hizo de forma mucho más tardía, iniciándose a partir del año 2000 y generalizándose su implantación a partir de la Orden Ministerial ECI/332/2008. Los actuales planes de estudios de Medicina en España muestran un grado de implementación desigual en cuanto a la existencia o no de una asignatura individualizada, el número de créditos ECTS y la duración del rotatorio clínico en los centros de salud. El proceso de adaptación al entorno del Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior es una oportunidad para la implantación definitiva y ordenada de la Medicina de Familia. Por su capacidad de educar en un modelo basado en la resolución de problemas, orientado al individuo, a la familia y a la comunidad con una perspectiva bio.psico.social, puede desarrollar un papel fundamental en la enseñanza de la Medicina.Family and Community Medicine is an academic subject, a medical specialty and a health profession whose primary focus is primary care in health centers. Its incorporation as a subject in medical studies occurred worlwide in the 60s. This happened much later in Spain, starting in 2000 and spreading its implementation after the publication of the Ministerial Order ECI/332/2008. The current curricula of Medicine in Spain show an uneven degree of implementation in terms of the existence or not of an individualized subject, the number of ECTS credits and the duration of the clinical practice in primary care. The process of adaptation to the environment of the European Higher Education Area is an opportunity for the definitive and ordered implementation of Family Practice. Because of its ability to educate in a model based on problem solving, oriented to the individual, the family and the community with a bio.psico.social perspective, it can develop a fundamental role in the teaching of Medicine

El análisis de incidentes críticos como método de aprendizaje

Los incidentes críticos son eventos inesperados, sorprendentes, que inducen en el alumno una respuesta innovadora.El análisis de los incidentes críticos aumenta la motivación por el aprendizaje, es capaz de transformar los errores en estrategias de mejora y facilita la comunicación en los grupos de trabajo.Permite evaluar competencias difíciles de analizar por otras vías: ética, comunicación o gestión de la consulta. Es una herramienta aplicable a lo largo de todo el continuum formativo (grado, postgrado y formación continuada). Se puede utilizar como técnica de selección de profesionales a partir de su competencia profesional.Critical Incidents (CI) are surprising and unexpected events that bring about creative responses in our students. The analysis of these CI increases the motivation for learning, enables to change the mistakes into strategies of improvement and facilitates the communication among the working groups. It also allows us to evaluate skills that are difficult to analyze through other methods: ethics, communication or clinical practice. It is a proper tool for the continnum formative ( graduate, postgraduate andcontinuous training). CI can be used as a professional selection technique from the professional competence

El aprendizaje por servicio: un modelo para la incorporación de competencias clínicas en medicina

El aprendizaje por servicio es una propuesta educativa en la que se combinan los procesos de aprendizaje y de servicio a la comunidad en un proyecto estructurado en el que los participantes se forman trabajando sobre las necesidades reales del entorno con el objetivo de mejorarlo. Por su naturaleza, aúna los procesos de aprendizaje significativo, autodirigido y colaborativo en el contexto de la acción social, y lo hace a través de proyectos en los que los alumnos son participantes activos de su propio aprendizaje, trabajando en necesidades reales del entorno. El presente artículo recoge los pasos a seguir para el diseño y ejecución de un proyecto de aprendizaje por servicio. Presenta las experiencias docentes del Departamento de Medicina de la Universidad de Alcalá que utilizan este método formativo para la formación en competencias.Service learning is an educational methodology that combines the learning process and the community services. This proposal develops meaningful learning, self-directed and collaborative learning in the context of social action. Also, it allows the participants to be anactive part in their own learning process while there are working on real environments. This article describes the steps to follow for the design and execution of a service learning project. Finally, the teaching experience of the Department of Medicine of the University of Alcalá using this technique is presented

Dyslipidemias: a pending challenge in cardiovascular prevention. Consensus document from CEIPC/SEA Committee

Documento presentado en el XXXI Congreso Nacional de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI). Oviedo, 18 de noviembre de 2010.En España, donde la enfermedad cardiovascular (ECV) es la primera causa de muerte, aproximadamente el 20% de los adultos presentan hipercolesterolemia, de los cuales sólo el 12% estarían controlados. El abordaje de las dislipemias debe realizarse en un contexto más amplio, mediante acciones encaminadas a reducir el riesgo cardiovascular (RCV). La medición del RCV facilita la toma de decisiones, pero no puede sustituir al juicio clínico, dadas las limitaciones de los métodos de cálculo disponibles. Este documento, elaborado por el Comité Español Interdisciplinar de Prevención Cardiovascular, a iniciativa de la Sociedad Española de Arteriosclerosis, describe las principales iniciativas en prevención cardiovascular de administraciones sanitarias y sociedades científicas, y el papel que juegan en ellas los profesionales sanitarios. Además de apoyar las iniciativas en marcha, se propone la puesta en marcha de una estrategia nacional de prevención cardiovascular, centrada en la modificación de estilos de vida (prevención del tabaquismo y promoción de la alimentación saludable y la actividad física) mediante acciones en todos los ámbitos. A nivel poblacional, la regulación de la publicidad alimentaria, la eliminación de los ácidos grasos trans y la reducción de azúcares añadidos en la cadena alimentaria constituyen intervenciones viables y coste-efectivas para ayudar a controlar las dislipemias y reducir el RCV. En el ámbito sanitario, se propone reducir las barreras para la aplicación de las guías, mejorar la formación de los profesionales en modificación de estilos de vida e incorporar la valoración del RCV entre los indicadores de calidad de la asistencia. Las sociedades científicas son responsables de colaborar con la administración y contribuir a la generación del conocimiento, su transmisión y su aplicación. Finalmente, está en manos de los profesionales evaluar al paciente dislipémico en el contexto del RCV, promover estilos de vida saludables y hacer un uso eficiente del arsenal terapéutico disponible. In Spain, where cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death, hypercholesterolemia, one of the most prevalent risk factors in adults, is poorly controlled. Dyslipidemia should not be approached in isolation, but in the context of overall cardiovascular risk (CVR). Measurement of CVR facilitates decision making, but should not be the only tool nor should it take the place of clinical judgment, given the limitations of the available calculation methods. This document, prepared by the Interdisciplinary Spanish Committee on Cardiovascular Prevention, at the proposal of the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis, reviews the cardiovascular prevention activities of the regional health authorities, scientific societies and medical professionals. An initiation of a national strategy on cardiovascular prevention is proposed based on lifestyle modification (healthy diet, physical activity and smoking cessation) through actions in different settings. At the population level, regulation of food advertising, elimination of trans fats and reduction of added sugar are feasible and cost-effective interventions to help control dyslipidemias and reduce CVR. In the health setting, it is proposed to facilitate the application of guidelines, improve training for medical professionals, and include CVR assessment among the quality indicators. Scientific societies should collaborate with the health authorities and contribute to the generation and transmission of knowledge. Finally, it is in the hands of professionals to apply the concept of CVR, promote healthy lifestyles, and make efficient use of available pharmacological treatments

Statement of the Spanish Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular Prevention Committee (CEIPC ) on the 2012 European Cardiovascular Prevention Guidelines

Las guías europeas de prevención cardiovascular contemplan dos sistemas de evaluación de la evidencia (SEC y GRADE) y recomiendan combinar las estrategias poblacional y de alto riesgo, interviniendo en todas las etapas de la vida, con la dieta como piedra angular de la prevención. La valoración del RCV incorpora los niveles de HDL y los factores psicosociales, una categoría de muy alto riesgo y el concepto edad-riesgo. Se recomienda e luso de métodos cognitivo-conductuales (entrevistamotivadora, intervenciones psicológicas), aplicados por profesionales sanitarios, con la participación de familiares de los pacientes, para contrarrestar el estrés psicosocial y reducir el RCV mediante dietas saludables, entrenamiento físico, abandono del tabaco y cumplimiento terapéutico. También se requieren medidas de salud pública, como la prohibición de fumar en lugares públicos o eliminar los ácidos grasos trans de la cadena alimentaria. Otras novedades consisten en desestimar el tratamiento antiagregante en prevención primaria y la recomendación de mantener la PA dentro del rango13-139/80-85 mmHg en pacientes diabéticos o con RCV alto. Se destaca el bajo cumplimiento terapéutico observado, porque influye en el pronóstico de los pacientes y en los costes sanitarios. Para mejorar la prevención cardiovascular se precisa una verdadera alianza entre políticos, administraciones, asociaciones científicas y profesionales de la salud, fundaciones de salud, asociaciones de consumidores, pacientes y sus familias, que impulse las estrategias poblacional e individual, mediante el uso de toda la evidencia científica disponible, desde ensayos clínicos hasta estudios observacionales y modelo matemáticos para evaluar intervenciones a nivel poblacional, incluyendo análisis de coste-efectividadBased on the two main frameworks for evaluating scientific evidence—SEC and GRADE—European cardiovascular prevention guidelines recommend interventions across all life stages using a combination of population-based and high-risk strategies with diet as the cornerstone of prevention. The evaluation of cardiovascular risk (CVR) incorporates HDL level and psycho-social factors, a very high risk category, and the concept of age-risk. They also recommend cognitive-behavioural methods (e.g.,motivational interviewing, psychological interventions, led by health professionals and with the participation of the patient’s family, to counterbalance psychosocial stress and reduce CVR through the institution of positive habits such as a healthy diet, physical activity, smoking cessation, and adherence to treatment. Additionally, public health interventions—such as smoking ban in public areas or the elimination of trans fatty acids from the food chain—are also essential. Other innovations include abandoning antiplatelet therapy in primary prevention and the recommendation of maintaining blood pressure (BP) within the1 30-139/80-85 mmHg range in diabetic patients and individuals with high CVR. Finally ,due to the significant impact on patient progress and medical costs, special emphasisis given to the low therapeutic adherence levels observed . In sum ,improving cardiovascular prevention requires a true partnership among the political class, public administrations, scientific and professional associations, health foundations, consumer associations, patients and their families. Such partnership would promote population-based and individual strategies by taking advantage o the broad spectrum of scientific evidence available, from clinical trials to observational studies and mathematical models to evaluate population-based interventions, including cost-effectiveness analyse

Spanish adaptation of the 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice

The VI European Guidelines for Cardiovascular Prevention recommend combining population and high-risk strategies with lifestyle changes as a cornerstone of prevention, and propose the SCORE function to quantify cardiovascular risk. The guidelines highlight disease specific interventions, and conditions as women, young people and ethnic minorities. Screening for subclinical atherosclerosis with noninvasive imaging techniques is not recommended. The guidelines distinguish four risk levels (very high, high, moderate and low) with therapeutic objectives for lipid control according to risk. Diabetes mellitus confers a high risk, except for subjects with type 2 diabetes with less than <10 years of evolution, without other risk factors or complications, or type 1 diabetes of short evolution without complications. The decision to start pharmacological treatment of arterial hypertension will depend on the blood pressure level and the cardiovascular risk, taking into account the lesion of target organs. The guidelines don't recommend antiplatelet drugs in primary prevention because of the increased bleeding risk. The low adherence to the medication requires simplified therapeutic regimes and to identify and combat its causes. The guidelines highlight the responsibility of health professionals to take an active role in advocating evidence-based interventions at the population level, and propose effective interventions, at individual and population level, to promote a healthy diet, the practice of physical activity, the cessation of smoking and the protection against alcohol abuse.S

Antimicrobial resistance among migrants in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Rates of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are rising globally and there is concern that increased migration is contributing to the burden of antibiotic resistance in Europe. However, the effect of migration on the burden of AMR in Europe has not yet been comprehensively examined. Therefore, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and synthesise data for AMR carriage or infection in migrants to Europe to examine differences in patterns of AMR across migrant groups and in different settings. METHODS: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus with no language restrictions from Jan 1, 2000, to Jan 18, 2017, for primary data from observational studies reporting antibacterial resistance in common bacterial pathogens among migrants to 21 European Union-15 and European Economic Area countries. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to report data on carriage or infection with laboratory-confirmed antibiotic-resistant organisms in migrant populations. We extracted data from eligible studies and assessed quality using piloted, standardised forms. We did not examine drug resistance in tuberculosis and excluded articles solely reporting on this parameter. We also excluded articles in which migrant status was determined by ethnicity, country of birth of participants' parents, or was not defined, and articles in which data were not disaggregated by migrant status. Outcomes were carriage of or infection with antibiotic-resistant organisms. We used random-effects models to calculate the pooled prevalence of each outcome. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42016043681. FINDINGS: We identified 2274 articles, of which 23 observational studies reporting on antibiotic resistance in 2319 migrants were included. The pooled prevalence of any AMR carriage or AMR infection in migrants was 25·4% (95% CI 19·1-31·8; I2 =98%), including meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (7·8%, 4·8-10·7; I2 =92%) and antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (27·2%, 17·6-36·8; I2 =94%). The pooled prevalence of any AMR carriage or infection was higher in refugees and asylum seekers (33·0%, 18·3-47·6; I2 =98%) than in other migrant groups (6·6%, 1·8-11·3; I2 =92%). The pooled prevalence of antibiotic-resistant organisms was slightly higher in high-migrant community settings (33·1%, 11·1-55·1; I2 =96%) than in migrants in hospitals (24·3%, 16·1-32·6; I2 =98%). We did not find evidence of high rates of transmission of AMR from migrant to host populations. INTERPRETATION: Migrants are exposed to conditions favouring the emergence of drug resistance during transit and in host countries in Europe. Increased antibiotic resistance among refugees and asylum seekers and in high-migrant community settings (such as refugee camps and detention facilities) highlights the need for improved living conditions, access to health care, and initiatives to facilitate detection of and appropriate high-quality treatment for antibiotic-resistant infections during transit and in host countries. Protocols for the prevention and control of infection and for antibiotic surveillance need to be integrated in all aspects of health care, which should be accessible for all migrant groups, and should target determinants of AMR before, during, and after migration. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College Healthcare Charity, the Wellcome Trust, and UK National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare-associated Infections and Antimictobial Resistance at Imperial College London

Surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common infections associated with health care, but its importance as a global health priority is not fully understood. We quantified the burden of SSI after gastrointestinal surgery in countries in all parts of the world. Methods: This international, prospective, multicentre cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing elective or emergency gastrointestinal resection within 2-week time periods at any health-care facility in any country. Countries with participating centres were stratified into high-income, middle-income, and low-income groups according to the UN's Human Development Index (HDI). Data variables from the GlobalSurg 1 study and other studies that have been found to affect the likelihood of SSI were entered into risk adjustment models. The primary outcome measure was the 30-day SSI incidence (defined by US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for superficial and deep incisional SSI). Relationships with explanatory variables were examined using Bayesian multilevel logistic regression models. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02662231. Findings: Between Jan 4, 2016, and July 31, 2016, 13 265 records were submitted for analysis. 12 539 patients from 343 hospitals in 66 countries were included. 7339 (58·5%) patient were from high-HDI countries (193 hospitals in 30 countries), 3918 (31·2%) patients were from middle-HDI countries (82 hospitals in 18 countries), and 1282 (10·2%) patients were from low-HDI countries (68 hospitals in 18 countries). In total, 1538 (12·3%) patients had SSI within 30 days of surgery. The incidence of SSI varied between countries with high (691 [9·4%] of 7339 patients), middle (549 [14·0%] of 3918 patients), and low (298 [23·2%] of 1282) HDI (p < 0·001). The highest SSI incidence in each HDI group was after dirty surgery (102 [17·8%] of 574 patients in high-HDI countries; 74 [31·4%] of 236 patients in middle-HDI countries; 72 [39·8%] of 181 patients in low-HDI countries). Following risk factor adjustment, patients in low-HDI countries were at greatest risk of SSI (adjusted odds ratio 1·60, 95% credible interval 1·05–2·37; p=0·030). 132 (21·6%) of 610 patients with an SSI and a microbiology culture result had an infection that was resistant to the prophylactic antibiotic used. Resistant infections were detected in 49 (16·6%) of 295 patients in high-HDI countries, in 37 (19·8%) of 187 patients in middle-HDI countries, and in 46 (35·9%) of 128 patients in low-HDI countries (p < 0·001). Interpretation: Countries with a low HDI carry a disproportionately greater burden of SSI than countries with a middle or high HDI and might have higher rates of antibiotic resistance. In view of WHO recommendations on SSI prevention that highlight the absence of high-quality interventional research, urgent, pragmatic, randomised trials based in LMICs are needed to assess measures aiming to reduce this preventable complication

Adaptación española de las guías europeas de 2016 sobre prevención de la enfermedad cardiovascular en la práctica clínica

Las VI Guías Europeas de Prevención Cardiovascular recomiendan combinar las estrategias poblacional y de alto riesgo, con los cambios de estilo de vida como piedra angular de la prevención, y proponen la función SCORE para cuantificar el riesgo cardiovascular. Esta guía hace más hincapié en las intervenciones específicas de las enfermedades y las condiciones propias de las mujeres, las personas jóvenes y las minorías étnicas. No se recomienda el cribado de aterosclerosis subclínica con técnicas de imagen no invasivas. La guía establece cuatro niveles de riesgo (muy alto, alto, moderado y bajo), con objetivos terapéuticos de control lipídico según el riesgo. La diabetes mellitus confiere un riesgo alto, excepto en sujetos con diabetes tipo 2 con menos de diez años de evolución, sin otros factores de riesgo ni complicaciones, o con diabetes tipo 1 de corta evolución sin complicaciones. La decisión de iniciar el tratamiento farmacológico de la hipertensión arterial dependerá del nivel de presión arterial y del riesgo cardiovascular, teniendo en cuenta la lesión de órganos diana. Siguen sin recomendarse los fármacos antiplaquetarios en prevención primaria por el riesgo de sangrado. La baja adherencia al tratamiento exige simplificar el régimen terapéutico e identificar y combatir sus causas. La guía destaca que los profesionales de la salud pueden ejercer un papel importante en la promoción de intervenciones poblacionales y propone medidas eficaces, tanto a nivel individual como poblacional, para promover una dieta saludable, la práctica de actividad física, el abandono del tabaquismo y la protección contra el abuso de alcohol.S