Potentials of Plasma NGAL and MIC-1 as Biomarker(s) in the Diagnosis of Lethal Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is lethal malignancy with very high mortality rate. Absence of sensitive and specific marker(s) is one of the major factors for poor prognosis of PC patients. In pilot studies using small set of patients, secreted acute phase proteins neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) and TGF-β family member macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1) are proposed as most potential biomarkers specifically elevated in the blood of PC patients. However, their performance as diagnostic markers for PC, particularly in pre-treatment patients, remains unknown. In order to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of NGAL and MIC-1, their levels were measured in plasma samples from patients with pre-treatment PC patients (n = 91) and compared it with those in healthy control (HC) individuals (n = 24) and patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP, n = 23). The diagnostic performance of these two proteins was further compared with that of CA19-9, a tumor marker commonly used to follow PC progression. The levels of all three biomarkers were significantly higher in PC compared to HCs. The mean (± standard deviation, SD) plasma NGAL, CA19-9 and MIC-1 levels in PC patients was 111.1 ng/mL (2.2), 219.2 U/mL (7.8) and 4.5 ng/mL (4.1), respectively. In comparing resectable PC to healthy patients, all three biomarkers were found to have comparable sensitivities (between 64%-81%) but CA19-9 and NGAL had a higher specificity (92% and 88%, respectively). For distinguishing resectable PC from CP patients, CA19-9 and MIC-1 were most specific (74% and 78% respectively). CA19-9 at an optimal cut-off of 54.1 U/ml is highly specific in differentiating resectable (stage 1/2) pancreatic cancer patients from controls in comparison to its clinical cut-off (37.1 U/ml). Notably, the addition of MIC-1 to CA19-9 significantly improved the ability to distinguish resectable PC cases from CP (p = 0.029). Overall, MIC-1 in combination with CA19-9 improved the diagnostic accuracy of differentiating PC from CP and HCs

Membrane-Anchored HIV-1 N-Heptad Repeat Peptides Are Highly Potent Cell Fusion Inhibitors via an Altered Mode of Action

Peptide inhibitors derived from HIV-gp41 envelope protein play a pivotal role in deciphering the molecular mechanism of HIV-cell fusion. According to accepted models, N-heptad repeat (NHR) peptides can bind two targets in an intermediate fusion conformation, thereby inhibiting progression of the fusion process. In both cases the orientation towards the endogenous intermediate conformation should be important. To test this, we anchored NHR to the cell membrane by conjugating fatty acids with increasing lengths to the N- or C-terminus of N36, as well as to two known N36 mutants; one that cannot bind C-heptad repeat (CHR) but can bind NHR (N36 MUTe,g), and the second cannot bind to either NHR or CHR (N36 MUTa,d). Importantly, the IC50 increased up to 100-fold in a lipopeptide-dependent manner. However, no preferred directionality was observed for the wild type derived lipopeptides, suggesting a planar orientation of the peptides as well as the endogenous NHR region on the cell membrane. Furthermore, based on: (i) specialized analysis of the inhibition curves, (ii) the finding that N36 conjugates reside more on the target cells that occupy the receptors, and (iii) the finding that N36 MUTe,g acts as a monomer both in its soluble form and when anchored to the cell membrane, we suggest that anchoring N36 to the cell changes the inhibitory mode from a trimer which can target both the endogenous NHR and CHR regions, to mainly monomeric lipopetides that target primarily the internal NHR. Besides shedding light on the mode of action of HIV-cell fusion, the similarity between functional regions in the envelopes of other viruses suggests a new approach for developing potent HIV-1 inhibitors

Evasion of anti-growth signaling: a key step in tumorigenesis and potential target for treatment and prophylaxis by natural compounds

The evasion of anti-growth signaling is an important characteristic of cancer cells. In order to continue to proliferate, cancer cells must somehow uncouple themselves from the many signals that exist to slow down cell growth. Here, we define the anti-growth signaling process, and review several important pathways involved in growth signaling: p53, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), retinoblastoma protein (Rb), Hippo, growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), AT-rich interactive domain 1A (ARID1A), Notch, insulin-like growth factor (IGF), and Krüppel-like factor 5 (KLF5) pathways. Aberrations in these processes in cancer cells involve mutations and thus the suppression of genes that prevent growth, as well as mutation and activation of genes involved in driving cell growth. Using these pathways as examples, we prioritize molecular targets that might be leveraged to promote anti-growth signaling in cancer cells. Interestingly, naturally-occurring phytochemicals found in human diets (either singly or as mixtures) may promote anti-growth signaling, and do so without the potentially adverse effects associated with synthetic chemicals. We review examples of naturally-occurring phytochemicals that may be applied to prevent cancer by antagonizing growth signaling, and propose one phytochemical for each pathway. These are: epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) for the Rb pathway, luteolin for p53, curcumin for PTEN, porphyrins for Hippo, genistein for GDF15, resveratrol for ARID1A, withaferin A for Notch and diguelin for the IGF1-receptor pathway. The coordination of anti-growth signaling and natural compound studies will provide insight into the future application of these compounds in the clinical setting

Plasma MIC-1 correlates with systemic inflammation but is not an independent determinant of nutritional status or survival in oesophago-gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: Macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1(MIC-1) is a potential modulator of systemic inflammation and nutritional depletion, both of which are adverse prognostic factors in oesophago-gastric cancer (OGC). METHODS: Plasma MIC-1, systemic inflammation (defined as plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) of ⩾10 mg l(–1) or modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) of ⩾1), and nutritional status were assessed in newly diagnosed OGC patients (n=293). Healthy volunteers (n=35) served as controls. RESULTS: MIC-1 was elevated in patients (median=1371 pg ml(–1); range 141–39 053) when compared with controls (median=377 pg ml(–1); range 141–3786; P<0.001). Patients with gastric tumours (median=1592 pg ml(–1); range 141–12 643) showed higher MIC-1 concentrations than patients with junctional (median=1337 pg ml(–1); range 383–39 053) and oesophageal tumours (median=1180 pg ml(–1); range 258–31 184; P=0.015). Patients showed a median weight loss of 6.4% (range 0.0–33.4%), and 42% of patients had an mGPS of ⩾1 or plasma CRP of ⩾10 mg l(–1) (median=9 mg l(–1); range 1–200). MIC-1 correlated positively with disease stage (r(2)=0.217; P<0.001), age (r(2)=0.332; P<0.001), CRP (r(2)=0.314; P<0.001), and mGPS (r(2)=0.336; P<0.001), and negatively with Karnofsky Performance Score (r(2)=−0.269; P<0.001). However, although MIC-1 correlated weakly with dietary intake (r(2)=0.157; P=0.031), it did not correlate with weight loss, BMI, or anthropometry. Patients with MIC-1 levels in the upper quartile showed reduced survival (median=204 days; 95% CI 157–251) when compared with patients with MIC-1 levels in the lower three quartiles (median=316 days; 95% CI 259–373; P=0.036), but MIC-1 was not an independent prognostic indicator. CONCLUSIONS: There is no independent link between plasma MIC-1 levels and depleted nutritional status or survival in OGC

The role of MIC-1/GDF15 cytokine in glioblastoma

AbstractDespite advances in diagnosis and treatment made over the past two decades, high-gradeprimary brain tumors remain incurable neoplasms. Glioblastoma (GBM) represents the mostmalignant stage of astrocytic brain tumors. Identification of diagnostic and prognostic markers ineasily accessible biological material, such as plasma or cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF), would greatlyfacilitate the management of GBM patients. Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms that underlie thefunction of the factors implicated in GBM development would pave the way towards their potentialutility in cancer-targeting therapy.MIC-1/GDF15 (Macrophage Inhibitory Cytokine-1/ Growth Differentiation Factor 15), asecreted protein of the TGF-β superfamily, emerged as a candidate marker exhibiting increasingmRNA expression during astrocytoma malignant progression. However, injection of MIC-1/GDF15over-expressing GBM cell lines into nude mice has been previously shown to completely abolish theinherent tumorigenicity.In this study, determination of MIC-1/GDF15 protein levels in the CSF of a cohort of 94patients with intracranial tumors including astrocytomas (grades II, III and IV), meningioma, andmetastasis revealed significantly increased concentrations in GBM patients as compared to controlcohort of patients treated for non-neoplastic diseases. However, MIC-1/GDF15 levels were notelevated in the matching plasma samples from these patients. Most interestingly, GBM patients withthe increased concentrations of MIC-1/GDF15 in the CSF had worse outcome.In GBM tissue, it was found that the expression of MIC-1/GDF15 gene is low. Promotermethylation of the gene may partially explain the overall low expression levels. Investigation of thecellular origin of MIC-1/GDF15 expression in GBM tissue led to the MIC-1/GDF15 protein detectionin a subpopulation of the tumor infiltrating macrophages. These findings substantiated the workinghypothesis of MIC-1/GDF15 as harboring tumor-suppressive properties in GBM. Analysis of thesignaling pathway mediated by MIC-1/GDF15 in GBM highlighted the potential role of TGF-β signaltransduction. However, the lack of the functional response to the presence of MIC-1/GDF15 in-vitrosuggested operation of a paracrine loop for suppression of tumor formation which is evident solely invivo.In conclusion, MIC-1/GDF15 protein measured in the CSF may have diagnostic andprognostic values in patients with intracranial tumors. Molecular studies collectively proposeimplication of the tumor-host interactions in mediating the MIC-1/GDF15 tumor-suppressing activityduring GBM development.RésuméMalgré les progrès durant ces deux dernières décennies dans le diagnostique et le traitementdes tumeurs du cerveau primaires, ces néoplasmes restent incurables. Le glioblastome représente laforme la plus maligne des tumeurs astrocytiques du cerveau (astrocytomes). Pour le diagnostic et lepronostic, l'identification de marqueurs présents dans des substances facilement accessibles comme leplasma où le liquide céphalorachidien (LCR) faciliterait beaucoup la prise en charge des patients. Lacompréhension des mécanismes moléculaires de facteurs impliqués dans le développement du GBMpourrait ouvrir la voie vers l'utilisation de ces mécanismes dans des thérapies ciblées.MIC-1/GDF15 (Macrophage Inhibitory Cytokine-1/ Growth Differentiation Factor 15), uneprotéine secrétée qui appartient à la superfamille TGF-β, s'est révélé être un marqueur candidat, dontl'expression d'ARN messager augmente pendant la progression des astrocytomes malins. Cependant,une précedente étude montre que l'injection des lignées cellulaires de GBM fortement productrices deMIC-1/GDF15 dans des souris immunodéprimées abolit la tumorigénicité.Dans cette étude, les mesures dans une cohorte de 94 patients atteints de tumeursintracrâniennes comprenant des astrocytomes (grades II, III et IV), méningiomes et métastases,présentent des augmentations significatives des niveaux protéiques de MIC-1/GDF15 dans le LCRdes patients atteints de GBM par rapport aux patients traités pour des maladies non cancéreuses.Cependant, les niveaux de MIC-1/GDF15 n'étaient pas spécialement élevés dans le plasma. De plus,les patients atteints d'un GBM avec des niveaux élevés de MIC-1/GDF15 dans le LCR ont survécumoins longtemps. Dans les tissus de glioblastome, on observe que le gène MIC-1/GDF15 est peuexprimé. La méthylation du promoteur explique partiellement le faible niveau d'expression du gène.La recherche l'origine cellulaire de l'expression de MIC-1/GDF15, a permis de découvrir la présencede protéines MIC-1/GDF15 dans une sous-population de macrophages qui infiltrent les tumeurs. Cetteobservation supporte l'hypothèse que MIC-1/GDF15 présentait des propriétés de suppression destumeurs de type GBM. Des études sur les voies de signalisation régulées par MIC-1/GDF15 dans lesGBMs ont souligné l'importance de la voie de transduction du signal TGF-β. Cependant, l'absence deréponse fonctionnelle à MIC-1/GDF15 in vitro suggère fortement l'activité d'une boucle paracrinepour la répression de la formation de tumeur, qui n'est observé que in vivo.En conclusion, la protéine MIC-1/GDF15 mesurée dans le LCR pourrait avoir une valeur pourle diagnostic et le pronostic chez les patients atteints de GBM. Les études moléculaires suggèrent unepossible implication de l'interaction hôte-tumeur dans l'activité anti-tumorale de MIC-1/GDF15 sur leGBM

Elevated levels of MIC-1/GDF15 in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients are associated with glioblastoma and worse outcome.

For patients with brain tumors identification of diagnostic and prognostic markers in easy accessible biological material, such as plasma or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), would greatly facilitate patient management. MIC-1/GDF15 (growth differentiation factor 15) is a secreted protein of the TGF-beta superfamily and emerged as a candidate marker exhibiting increasing mRNA expression during malignant progression of glioma. Determination of MIC-1/GDF15 protein levels by ELISA in the CSF of a cohort of 94 patients with intracranial tumors including gliomas, meningioma and metastasis revealed significantly increased concentrations in glioblastoma patients (median, 229 pg/ml) when compared with control cohort of patients treated for non-neoplastic diseases (median below limit of detection of 156 pg/ml, p &lt; 0.0001, Mann-Whitney test). However, plasma MIC-1/GDF15 levels were not elevated in the matching plasma samples from these patients. Most interestingly, patients with glioblastoma and increased CSF MIC-1/GDF15 had a shorter survival (p = 0.007, log-rank test). In conclusion, MIC-1/GDF15 protein measured in the CSF may have diagnostic and prognostic value in patients with intracranial tumors