Critical Conversations around Hiring Equity and Anti-Racist Search Processes

When the COVID-19 pandemic shut down institutions in March 2020, many academic programs faced budget cuts and hiring freezes (Friga, 2020). The impact of budget cuts most severely impacted HBCU’s and rural colleges (Kelchen et al., 2021). Yet, as the pandemic restrictions eased and some schools found ways to begin hiring again; however, things were different this time. Many schools conducted their searches entirely virtually (Banks et al., 2020). As many social work educators can attest, a switch from in-person to virtual methods presented unique challenges (Paceley et al., 2021). This 4-person panel included a successful job candidate and three members of search committees. The panel shared tips and tricks that helped the searches run smoothly in the virtual environment. Additionally, there was a focus on making the virtual environment as welcoming and attractive as possible. The panel presented perspectives from rural and urban teaching-focused and research-focused institutions ranging in Carnegie Classifications from “R1: Doctoral Universities – Very high research activity” to “Master\u27s College and University”. These perspectives encompassed both PWI and HBCU. Critical conversations around hiring equity and antiracist search processes are an important part of higher education leadership. As social workers, we must act to eliminate racist hiring trends in higher education and bring equity to the front of the table in hiring conversations (Gates et al., 2021). Participants in this panel confronted their own biases related to antiracist search practices and learned new strategies for faculty searches in the landscape of an ongoing pandemic (Fariña et al., 2021)

Sexual Orientation and Gender Expression in Social Work Practice: Working with Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender People

This volume offers an invaluable resource for both social work educators and practitioners working with gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (GLBT) clients and their families. It is the first such work to specifically address issues affecting bisexual and transgender people as well as the larger concerns of the GLBT community.Contributors present specific, practical suggestions for effective knowledge-based and skills-based practice with GLBT clients. Topics include heterosexism and homophobia, identity development, coming out, GLBT adolescents and older adults, health-care concerns, relationships and families, workplace issues, the history of the GLBT civil rights movement, sex reassignment, AIDS, and the role of spirituality in the lives of GLBT individuals. The contributors also consider intragroup issues of race, ethnicity, age, and socioeconomic status.https://digitalcommons.winthrop.edu/facultybookgallery/1024/thumbnail.jp

Case Studies on Sexual Orientation and Gender Expression in Social Work Practice

This casebook focuses on sexual orientation and gender expression in relation to social work practice. An excellent resource, it offers 29 cases illustrating the variety of issues facing gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (GLBT) people and communities in five practice settings-individuals, couples and families, communities and organizations, groups, and policy and research. The book also contains discussion questions, classroom exercises, and suggested readings for each case, so educators can easily integrate GLBT content into the classroom. Case Studies on Sexual Orientation and Gender Expression in Social Work Practice may be used on its own, in conjunction with another textbook, or as a complement to Deana F. Morrow and Lori Messinger\u27s Sexual Orientation and Gender Expression in Social Work Practice: Working with Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender People (Columbia, 2006). Messinger and Morrow are award-winning teachers and their groundbreaking book is key for culturally competent undergraduate or graduate courses in practice, policy, human behavior and the social environment, research, and field education.https://digitalcommons.winthrop.edu/facultybookgallery/1023/thumbnail.jp

Associations of ARHGAP26 Polymorphisms with Alzheimer’s Disease and Cardiovascular Disease

The Rho GTPase activating protein 26 (ARHGAP26) gene has been reported to be associated with neuropsychiatric diseases and neurodegenerative diseases including Parkinson’s disease. We examined whether the ARHGAP26 gene is associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and/or cardiovascular disease (CVD). Multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine the associations of 154 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the ARHGAP26 gene with AD and CVD using the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 1 (ADNI-1) cohort. Fourteen SNPs were associated with AD (top SNP rs3776362 with p = 3.43 × 10−3), while 37 SNPs revealed associations with CVD (top SNP rs415235 with p = 2.06 × 10−4). Interestingly, 13 SNPs were associated with both AD and CVD. SNP rs3776362 was associated with CVD, Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), and Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB). A replication study using a Caribbean Hispanics sample showed that 17 SNPs revealed associations with AD, and 12 SNPs were associated with CVD. The third sample using a family-based study design showed that 9 SNPs were associated with AD, and 3 SNPs were associated with CVD. SNP rs6836509 within the ARHGAP10 gene (an important paralogon of ARHGAP26) was associated with AD and cerebrospinal fluid total tau (t-tau) level in the ADNI sample. Several SNPs were functionally important using the RegulomeDB, while a number of SNPs were associated with significant expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) using Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) databases. In conclusion, genetic variants within ARHGAP26 were associated with AD and CVD. These findings add important new insights into the potentially shared pathogenesis of AD and CVD