Psychological rumination and recovery from work in Intensive Care Professionals : associations with stress, burnout, depression, and health

Background The work demands of critical care can be a major cause of stress in intensive care unit (ICU) professionals and lead to poor health outcomes. In the process of recovery from work, psychological rumination is considered to be an important mediating variable in the relationship between work demands and health outcomes. This study aimed to extend our knowledge of the process by which ICU stressors and differing rumination styles are associated with burnout, depression and risk of psychiatric morbidity among ICU professionals. Methods Ninety-six healthcare professionals (58 doctors and 38 nurses) who work in ICUs in the UK completed a questionnaire on ICU-related stressors, burnout, work-related rumination, depression and risk of psychiatric morbidity. Results Significant associations between ICU stressors, affective rumination, burnout, depression and risk of psychiatric morbidity were found. Longer working hours were also related to increased ICU stressors. Affective rumination (but not problem-solving pondering or distraction detachment) mediated the relationship between ICU stressors, burnout, depression and risk of psychiatric morbidity, such that increased ICU stressors, and greater affective rumination, were associated with greater burnout, depression and risk of psychiatric morbidity. No moderating effects were observed. Conclusions Longer working hours were associated with increased ICU stressors, and increased ICU stressors conferred greater burnout, depression and risk of psychiatric morbidity via increased affective rumination. The importance of screening healthcare practitioners within intensive care for depression, burnout and psychiatric morbidity has been highlighted. Future research should evaluate psychological interventions which target rumination style and could be made available to those at highest risk. The efficacy and cost effectiveness of delivering these interventions should also be considered

Non-linear stimulus-response behavior of the human stance control system is predicted by optimization of a system with sensory and motor noise

We developed a theory of human stance control that predicted (1) how subjects re-weight their utilization of proprioceptive and graviceptive orientation information in experiments where eyes closed stance was perturbed by surface-tilt stimuli with different amplitudes, (2) the experimentally observed increase in body sway variability (i.e. the “remnant” body sway that could not be attributed to the stimulus) with increasing surface-tilt amplitude, (3) neural controller feedback gains that determine the amount of corrective torque generated in relation to sensory cues signaling body orientation, and (4) the magnitude and structure of spontaneous body sway. Responses to surface-tilt perturbations with different amplitudes were interpreted using a feedback control model to determine control parameters and changes in these parameters with stimulus amplitude. Different combinations of internal sensory and/or motor noise sources were added to the model to identify the properties of noise sources that were able to account for the experimental remnant sway characteristics. Various behavioral criteria were investigated to determine if optimization of these criteria could predict the identified model parameters and amplitude-dependent parameter changes. Robust findings were that remnant sway characteristics were best predicted by models that included both sensory and motor noise, the graviceptive noise magnitude was about ten times larger than the proprioceptive noise, and noise sources with signal-dependent properties provided better explanations of remnant sway. Overall results indicate that humans dynamically weight sensory system contributions to stance control and tune their corrective responses to minimize the energetic effects of sensory noise and external stimuli

Racialized Notions of Professionalism and the Law (2023)

Program Keynote Speaker D. Wendy Greene, Director, Center for Law, Policy and Social Action, Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law Panel I: Racialized Notions of Professionalism at the Bar and in Legal Academia Jasmine M. Johnson and Pharoah Sutton-Jackson, Professionalism Reframed as Disparate Treatment: Muting the Expression of an Identity is Discrimination Reginald Oh, The Lonely Asian American: Low Racial Status, Invisibility, and Racialized Notions of Leadership Katherine Macfarlane, Ben Crump and Racialized Professionalism Ieisha Humphrey, Don\u27t Believe the Hype: How Hypervisibility Neutralizes Being a Brave Advocate Panel II: Racialized Notions of Professionalism-Language, Being, and Belonging Jonathan Barry-Blocker and Brooke Girley, The Gatekeepers: How State Bar Associations\u27 Disciplinary Process is Racialized and Classist Jennifer Safstrom, Analyzing Inclusive Language Practices in Clinical Advocacy Julia Mizutani, Barred from the Profession: Mischaracterized as Unfit by La