Studio pancreatic cystic follow-up, an international collaboration (PACYFIC study). Prospective Evaluation of pancreatic cysts surveillance based on European consensus of pancreatic cystic tumors

Introduzione Nel 2014 è stato proposto un protocollo di studio riguardante la sorveglianza delle lesioni cistiche del pancreas (intese come IPMN) e denominato PACYFIC Study. Obiettivi Obiettivo primario era di stabilire l’impatto di un programma di sorveglianza in termini di pazienti arruolati e pazienti con indicazione chirurgica. Obiettivi secondari erano: 1) stabilire l’impatto dei fattori demografici, clinici, radiologici e della strategia di sorveglianza sull’indicazione chirurgica, sulla capacità individuare le lesioni maligne, sulla sopravvivenza. Materiali e Metodi Lo studio su cui si è basata la raccolta dei dati è uno studio di tipo prospettico, di coorte, multicentrico, internazionale. Lo studio ha incluso gli individui con una IPMN, di nuova o pregressa diagnosi, che giustifichi una sorveglianza o il trattamento chirurgico. I dati clinici, demografici, radiologici e chirurgici sono stati raccolti in un database prospettico. Le variabili discrete sono state espresse come frequenza e percentuale. Le continue come medie e deviazioni standard o mediane e range interquartile (IQR). Per l’analisi statistica sono stati utilizzati il test di Fischer, il test del Chi quadro, il test di Spearman, il test di Student. L’analisi multivariata è stata eseguita utilizzando la regressione logistica espressa come Odds Ratio e intervallo di confidenza al 95 %. Per la sopravvivenza è stato utilizzato il metodo di Kaplan-Meier. L’analisi multivariata sulle sopravvivenze è stata eseguita mediante la regressione di Cox. Risultati Il protocollo di sorveglianza ha permesso l'arruolamento di 516 pazienti. 53 pazienti hanno raggiunto l'indicazione chirurgica. La sopravvivenza globale della coorte è stata di 326.8± 9.1 mesi. I fattori predittivi la sopravvivenza sono risultati età (OR 1.07, P-value<0.001), sesso (OR 1.82, P-value=0.006), ittero, noduli murali (OR 4.84, P-value=0.018 e OR 2.19, P-value=0.016), chirurgia (OR 0.46, P-value 0.038). Conclusioni L'introduzione del protocollo di sorveglianza ha portato ad un aumento di identificazione di lesioni e ha avuto impatto sulla sopravvivenzaIntroduction Uncertanty regarding behaviour of IPMN has generated numerous guidelines. IN 2014 a prospective international study (PACYFIC) has proposed a surveillance protocol, which is used in this thesis. Objectives Primary objective was to evaluate the impact of the surveillance in terms of patients enrolled and indications to surgery. Secondary objectives were to establish the impact of clinical, demographics and radiologic factors in predicting surgery, malignancy and overall survival Materials and Methods Clinical, demographic and radiological work up data has been collected in prospective database from june 2014 until november 2022. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to establish the impact of the surveillance protocol and of the aforementioned factors in predicting surgical indication, presence of malignancy and overall survival. Discrete variables have been reported as frequency and percentage, continuous variables have been reported as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range. Univariate analysis was performed using Fisher's T test and CHi square test, Spearman test was used for ordinal scales. Multivariate analysisi was performed using logistic regression. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method and multivariat Hazard Ratio was computed usinng Cox's regression. Results The total number of patients enrolled has been 516. 53 patients reached criteria for resection. Surveillance protocol increased the risk of surgical indication (O R 1.11 (0.36) p<0.002). The cohort overall survival was 326.8± 9.1 months. Factors predicting OS were age (OR 1.07, P-value<0.001), sex (OR 1.82, P-value=0.006), jaundice and presence of solid nodule in IPMN (OR 4.84, P-value=0.018 e OR 2.19, P-value=0.016), surgery (OR 0.46, P-value 0.038). Conclusions THe adoption of a surveillance protocol increased the capacity to identify IPMNs and impacted surviva

Appendiceal goblet cell carcinoma has marginal advantages from perioperative chemotherapy: a population-based study with an entropy balancing analysis

PurposeThe aim is to clarify the use of perioperative chemotherapy in resectable goblet cell carcinoma (GCC).MethodsA retrospective study was carried out based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results study. The population was divided: into patients who received only radical surgery (group A) and those who received radical surgery plus chemotherapy (group B). An entropy balancing was carried out to correct the imbalance between the two groups. Two models were generated. Model 1 contained only high-risk patients: group B and a "virtual" group A with similar characteristics. Model 2 included only low-risk patients: group A and "virtual" group B with identical attributes. The efficacy of entropy balancing was evaluated with the d value. The overall survival was compared and reported with Hazard Ratio (HR) within a confidence interval of 95% (95 CI).ResultsThe groups A and B were imbalanced for tumor size (d = 0.392), T (d = 1.128), N (d = 1.340), M (d = 1.456), mean number of positive lymph nodes (d = 0.907), and LNR (d = 0.889). Before the balancing, the risk of death was higher in group B than in A (4.3; 2.5 to 7.4). After reweighting, all large differences were eliminated (d &lt; 0.200). In high-risk patients, the risk of death was higher in patients who underwent surgery alone than those who received perioperative chemotherapy (HR 0.5; 0.2 to 1.3) without statistical significance (p = 0.187). In low-risk patients, the risk of death was similar (HR 1.1; 0.3 to 3.3).ConclusionPerioperative chemotherapy could provide some marginal advantages to high-risk patients

Evolving knowledge in surgical oncology of pancreatic cancer: from theory to clinical practice-a fifteen-year journey at a tertiary referral centre

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an increasing disease having a poor prognosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of different models of care for pancreatic cancer in a tertiary referral centre in the period 2006-2020. Retrospective study of patients with PDAC observed from January 2006 to December 2020. The demographic and clinical data, and data regarding the imaging techniques used, preoperative staging, management, survival and multidisciplinary tumour board (MDTB) evaluation were collected and compared in three different periods characterised by different organisation of pancreatic cancer services: period A (2006-2010); period B (2011-2015) and period C (2016-2020). One thousand four hundred seven patients were analysed: 441(31.3%) in period A; 413 (29.4%) in B and 553 (39.3%) in C. The proportion of patients increased significantly, from 31.3% to 39.3% (P = 0.032). Body mass index (P = 0.033), comorbidity rate (P = 0.002) and Karnofsky performance status (P &lt; 0.001) showed significant differences. Computed tomography scans (P &lt; 0.001), endoscopic ultrasound (P &lt; 0.001), fine needle aspiration, fine needle biopsy (P &lt; 0.001), and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (P &lt; 0.001) increased; contrast-enhanced ultrasound (P = 0.028) decreased. The cTNM was significantly different (P &lt; 0.001). The MDTB evaluation increased significantly (P &lt; 0.001). Up-front surgery and exploratory laparotomy decreased (P &lt; 0.001), neoadjuvant treatment increased (P &lt; 0.001). The present study showed the evolving knowledge in surgical oncology of pancreatic cancer at a tertiary referral centre over the time. The different models of care of pancreatic cancer, in particular the introduction of the MDTB and the institution of a pancreas unit to the decision-making process seemed to be influential

Body composition parameters, immunonutritional indexes, and surgical outcome of pancreatic cancer patients resected after neoadjuvant therapy: A retrospective, multicenter analysis

Background and aims: Body composition parameters and immunonutritional indexes provide useful information on the nutritional and inflammatory status of patients. We sought to investigate whether they predict the postoperative outcome in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) who received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and then pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods: Data from locally advanced PC patients who underwent NAT followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 2012 and December 2019 in four high-volume institutions were collected retrospectively. Only patients with two available CT scans (before and after NAT) and immunonutritional indexes (before surgery) available were included. Body composition was assessed and immunonutritional indexes collected were: VAT, SAT, SMI, SMA, PLR, NLR, LMR, and PNI. The postoperative outcomes evaluated were overall morbidity (any complication occurring), major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3), and length of stay. Results: One hundred twenty-one patients met the inclusion criteria and constituted the study population. The median age at the diagnosis was 64 years (IQR16), and the median BMI was 24 kg/m2 (IQR 4.1). The median time between the two CT-scan examined was 188 days (IQR 48). Skeletal muscle index (SMI) decreased after NAT, with a median delta of −7.8 cm2/m2 (p &lt; 0.05). Major complications occurred more frequently in patients with a lower pre-NAT SMI (p = 0.035) and in those who gained in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) compartment during NAT (p = 0.043). Patients with a gain in SMI experienced fewer major postoperative complications (p = 0.002). The presence of Low muscle mass after NAT was associated with a longer hospital stay [Beta 5.1, 95%CI (1.5, 8.7), p = 0.006]. An increase in SMI from 35 to 40 cm2/m2 was a protective factor with respect to overall postoperative complications [OR 0.43, 95% (CI 0.21, 0.86), p &lt; 0.001]. None of the immunonutritional indexes investigated predicted the postoperative outcome. Conclusion: Body composition changes during NAT are associated with surgical outcome in PC patients who receive pancreaticoduodenectomy after NAT. An increase in SMI during NAT should be favored to ameliorate the postoperative outcome. Immunonutritional indexes did not show to be capable of predicting the surgical outcome

The additive value of CA19.9 monitoring in a pancreatic cyst surveillance program

Background:Surveillance of pancreatic cysts focuses on the detection of (mostly morphologic) features warranting surgery. European guidelines consider elevated CA19.9 as a relative indication for surgery. We aimed to evaluate the role of CA19.9 monitoring for early detection and management in a cyst surveillance population. Methods: The PACYFIC-registry is a prospective collaboration that investigates the yield of pancreatic cyst surveillance performed at the discretion of the treating physician. We included participants for whom at least one serum CA19.9 value was determined by a minimum follow-up of 12 months.Results: Of 1865 PACYFIC participants, 685 met the inclusion criteria for this study (mean age 67 years, SD 10; 61% female). During a median follow-up of 25 months (IQR 24, 1966 visits), 29 participants developed high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or pancreatic cancer. At baseline, CA19.9 ranged from 1 to 591 kU/L (median 10 kU/L [IQR 14]), and was elevated (≥37 kU/L) in 64 participants (9%). During 191 of 1966 visits (10%), an elevated CA19.9 was detected, and these visits more often led to an intensified follow-up (42%) than those without an elevated CA19.9 (27%; p &lt; 0.001). An elevated CA19.9 was the sole reason for surgery in five participants with benign disease (10%). The baseline CA19.9 value was (as continuous or dichotomous variable at the 37 kU/L threshold) not independently associated with HGD or pancreatic cancer development, whilst a CA19.9 of ≥ 133 kU/L was (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.1–13, p = 0.03). Conclusions: In this pancreatic cyst surveillance cohort, CA19.9 monitoring caused substantial harm by shortening surveillance intervals (and performance of unnecessary surgery). The current CA19.9 cutoff was not predictive of HGD and pancreatic cancer, whereas a higher cutoff may decrease false-positive values. The role of CA19.9 monitoring should be critically appraised prior to implementation in surveillance programs and guidelines.</p

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination modelling for safe surgery to save lives : data from an international prospective cohort study

Background: Preoperative SARS-CoV-2 vaccination could support safer elective surgery. Vaccine numbers are limited so this study aimed to inform their prioritization by modelling. Methods: The primary outcome was the number needed to vaccinate (NNV) to prevent one COVID-19-related death in 1 year. NNVs were based on postoperative SARS-CoV-2 rates and mortality in an international cohort study (surgical patients), and community SARS-CoV-2 incidence and case fatality data (general population). NNV estimates were stratified by age (18-49, 50-69, 70 or more years) and type of surgery. Best- and worst-case scenarios were used to describe uncertainty. Results: NNVs were more favourable in surgical patients than the general population. The most favourable NNVs were in patients aged 70 years or more needing cancer surgery (351; best case 196, worst case 816) or non-cancer surgery (733; best case 407, worst case 1664). Both exceeded the NNV in the general population (1840; best case 1196, worst case 3066). NNVs for surgical patients remained favourable at a range of SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates in sensitivity analysis modelling. Globally, prioritizing preoperative vaccination of patients needing elective surgery ahead of the general population could prevent an additional 58 687 (best case 115 007, worst case 20 177) COVID-19-related deaths in 1 year. Conclusion: As global roll out of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination proceeds, patients needing elective surgery should be prioritized ahead of the general population.Peer reviewe

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: which factors are related to open conversion? Lessons learned from 68 consecutive procedures in a high-volume pancreatic center

Background: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy represents a difficult surgical procedure with an high conversion rate to open procedure. The factors related to its difficulty and conversion to open distal pancreatectomy were rarely reported. The aim of the present study was to identify which factors are related to conversion from laparoscopic to open distal pancreatectomy. Methods: A retrospective study of a prospective database of 68 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was conducted at a high-volume center by pancreatic surgeons experienced with laparoscopic surgery. Pre-intra and postoperative data were collected. Patients who completed a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy were compared with those who needed a conversion to the open approach as regard demographic, clinical, radiological, and surgical data. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out. Results: Univariate analysis suggested that the site of the lesion, the extension of pancreatic resection, and the requirement for an extended procedure to adjacent organs were significantly associated with the risk of conversion to the open approach. Multivariate analysis showed that only the extension of the pancreatic resection (subtotal pancreatectomy) was significantly related to the odds of conversion [odds ratio (OR) 19.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1–32.3; P = 0.038]. Preoperative suspicion of malignancy differed between the two groups; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.078). Conclusions: Despite the limitations of the study, only the extension of pancreatic resection seemed to be the main factor related to conversion during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy

Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy in Benign or Premalignant Pancreatic Lesions: Is It Really More Cost-Effective than Open Approach?

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the quality of life in patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy are lacking and no studies have reported a real cost-effectiveness analysis of this surgical procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the quality of life and the cost-effectiveness of a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with respect to an open distal pancreatectomy. METHODS: Forty-one patients who underwent a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and 40 patients who underwent an open distal pancreatectomy were retrospectively studied as regards postoperative results, quality of life and cost-effectiveness analysis. The Italian neutral version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C-30, version 3.0, was used to rate the quality of life. RESULTS: Postoperative results were similar in the two groups; the only difference was that the first oral intake took place significantly earlier in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (P\u2009<\u20090.001). Regarding quality of life, the laparoscopic approach was able to ameliorate physical functioning (P\u2009=\u20090.049), role functioning (P\u2009=\u20090.044) and cognitive functioning (P\u2009=\u20090.030) and reduce the sleep disturbance scale (P\u2009=\u20090.050). The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the acceptability curve for a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy had a higher probability of being more cost-effective than an open distal pancreatectomy when a willingness to pay above 5400 Euros/quality-adjusted life years (QALY) was accepted. CONCLUSION: Despite the limitations of the study, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy can be considered not only safe and feasible but also permits a better quality of life and is acceptable in terms of cost-effectiveness to Italian and European health care services

Intraoperative electrochemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: indications, techniques and results - a single‑center experience

Background Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is usually treated with chemoradiotherapy with poor results. The aim of the study was to assess whether intraoperative electrochemotherapy could be proposed as additional therapy in treat- ing LAPC. Methods Observational study of patients affected by LAPC who underwent intraoperative electrochemotherapy (ECT) after chemoradiotherapy. Data at diagnosis, at restaging and short and long-term outcomes, including assessment of quality of life, were collected for each patient. Results Five patients underwent ECT: in four cases, the tumours were located in the head and, in one, in the body of the pancreas. Preoperative chemotherapy consisted mainly of six cycles of modified Folfirinox. At restaging, the serum value of carbohydrate antigen (Ca 19–9) and tumour size were reduced; however, the vascular involvement did not change. No down- staging was recorded. The ECT procedure was performed using at least four needles with a mean duration time of 27 min (range 15–40). No postoperative mortality or major complications were reported. The mean length of stay (LOS) was 8 days (range 5–14). Four patients were alive and well at the end of the study, while one patient died from disease progression. The mean follow-up was 20.8 months (range 9–34) from diagnosis and 9.4 months (range 2–19) from ECT. The quality of life was good and there was improvement in pain/discomfort. Conclusions Electrochemotherapy could be proposed as a simple, feasible and safe palliative additional treatment in LAPC without progression after chemoradiotherapy. It seems to allow a good quality of life and pain improvement