88 research outputs found
'A bed in the middle of nowhere': parents' meanings of place of death for adults with cystic fibrosis
As populations age and chronic conditions become more prevalent, an individual's ability to choose the location of their end-of-life care and death is increasingly considered important in the provision of good healthcare, with home implied as the 'best' place of death through UK government policy and specialist and voluntary palliative care services. However, considering meanings of place of end-of-life care and death is complex for young adults with life-limiting conditions where the disease course is variable and uncertain, and aggressive and palliative treatments are administered both at home and in hospital often until death. Although 'place' is a pivotal element in healthcare practice, research and policy, there has been little attempt to understand the meaning and importance of place in understanding experiences of care at end of life. Through analysis of in-depth interviews and letters received from parents of 27 young adults in England, Scotland and Wales who died from cystic fibrosis from 1999 to 2002 aged 17-36 years, key factors that influence families' meanings of place at end of life are presented. Both home and hospital deaths are reported, with no deaths in hospices. Preferences for possible locations of death are generally limited early in the disease course by choice of aggressive treatment, particularly lung transplantation. Rate of health decline, organisation and delivery of services, and relationships with specialist and general healthcare staff strongly influence parents' experience of death at home or in hospital, although no physical location was regarded a 'better' place of death. Meanings of, and attachment to place are mediated for families through these factors, questioning the appropriateness of a 'home is best' policy for those dying from life-limiting conditions. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
End of life care:A qualitative study comparing the views of people with dementia and family carers
Background:
In recent years, UK policy has increasingly recognised the importance of end-of-life care in dementia. While professional consensus on optimal palliative care in dementia has been reported, little is known about the perspectives of people with dementia and family carers.
Aim:
To compare the views of people with dementia and family carers of people with dementia (current and recently bereaved) on optimal end-of-life care.
Design:
Qualitative interviews (32) and a focus group were conducted. Data were thematically analysed.
Setting/participants:
Participants comprised people with early stage dementia, living at home in the north-east of England (n = 11); and current and bereaved carers (n = 25) from six services providing end-of-life care in England.
Findings:
Seven areas were identified as important to end-of-life care for people with dementia and/or family carers. People with dementia and carers expressed the need for receiving care in place, ensuring comfort and a skilled care team. However, they disagreed about the importance of planning for the future and the role of families in organising care and future decision-making.
Conclusion:
Further comparison of our findings with expert consensus views highlighted key areas of divergence and agreement. Discordant views concerning perceptions of dementia as a palliative condition, responsibility for future decision-making and the practical co-ordination of end-of-life care may undermine the provision of optimal palliative care. Professionals must explore and recognise the individual perspectives of people with dementia and family carers
Health effects of climate change (HECC) in the UK: 2023 report. Chapter 4. Impacts of climate change and policy on air pollution and human health
•Air pollution is one of the greatest environmental risks to public health in the UK and is associated with an estimated 29,000 to 43,000 deaths a year. Chapter 4 considers the relationship between climate change and outdoor air pollution and includes new analyses of the health burden from long-term and short-term exposure to air pollution. The chapter was led by expert scientists in the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), with contributions from experts in the University of Edinburgh, UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology and University College London. •Key outdoor air pollutants include particulate matter (PM), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3). Exposure to these is known to reduce life expectancy and is associated with a range of negative health effects, including respiratory and cardiovascular disease. People who live near busy roads are generally exposed to higher concentrations of air pollution. Some people are more susceptible to the health effects of air pollution including those with pre-existing cardiovascular and respiratory disease, young people, pregnant women, older people and low income communities. •Climate change will have an impact on air pollution. Changes in weather patterns, particularly temperature, rainfall and wind speed, are expected to have an effect on dispersal and concentrations of PM and O3. However, climate change mitigation measures that reduce emissions of greenhouse gases will help reduce air pollutants and lead to improvements in health outcomes. Evidence shows that emissions of air pollutants will be the dominant driver of air pollution concentrations over the coming decades. In this context, the analyses in the chapter focus on air pollutant emissions rather than climate change projections. •Future air quality in the UK will be determined by recent policy announcements and new legislation, such as the Environment Act 2021, the Environmental Improvement Plan 2023, and the Air Quality Strategy (England), the Environment (Air Quality and Soundscapes) (Wales) Bill, Cleaner Air for Scotland 2 strategy and Clean Air strategy for Northern Ireland. In 2018, the UK government published the 25 Year Environment Plan, which set out the framework and vision for reducing emissions of key air pollutants by setting or meeting legally binding targets. •Analysis of the impacts of air quality controls over the next 2 decades indicate that by 2050, exposure to PM2.5 will decrease by between 28% and 36%, and NO2 exposure will decrease by between 35% and 49%, depending on the region. By 2050, annual mortality attributable to the effects of long-term exposure to PM2.5 and NO2 is projected to decrease roughly by between 25% and 37% compared with a 2018 baseline, depending on future demographic change in the UK. Reducing emissions, therefore, results in benefits to population health. However, due to the complex chemistry in the air, as NO2 levels decrease, there can be local increases in O3 in urban centres, which may increase some harms to health. The analyses in the chapter show that annual estimated emergency respiratory hospital admissions associated with short-term Chapter 4. Impacts of climate change and policy on air pollution and human health 3 effects from O3 exposure are projected to increase by between 4% and 12% by 2050 from a 2018 baseline of 60,488, depending on demographic change. •Overall, these projections reflect significant improvements in outdoor air quality and associated reductions in the burden of long-term health impacts arising from recent and upcoming air quality controls, and the greater the efforts to mitigate emissions of air pollutants, the greater the improvement in air quality. •The results presented in the chapter have several implications for public health. Although air pollutant emission controls will reduce concentrations of some air pollutants (such as PM2.5 and NO2), there may be local increases in O3, which may be exacerbated during heatwaves. Therefore, provision of localised alerting and monitoring will become particularly important. Ensuring that public health professionals and other stakeholders have accessible and high quality information to provide health advice and raise awareness will continue to be important. •This chapter highlights several priority research gaps, including the need to: • develop modelling techniques that consider climate-driven changes in both pollutant emissions and meteorology at spatial resolutions sufficient to quantify exposures to improve health impact assessment projections • develop an evidence base estimating the economic benefits associated with improvements in health from air pollution reduction as a result of strategies to tackle climate change • undertake further work to consider the potential combined effects of air pollution and other environment stressors that may be affected by climate change, such as heat and aeroallergens • advance our understanding of how climate change-driven behavioural change could modify personal exposure to air pollution, such as increased time spent outdoors in warmer temperatures •The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and UKHSA are undertaking a comprehensive review of how to communicate air quality information. The aim is to ensure members of the public, and vulnerable groups in particular, have what they need to protect themselves. UKHSA has also been developing an Air Pollution Exposure Surveillance (APES) vulnerability indicator which aims to indicate areas where population vulnerability to air pollution is elevated
Environmental factors associated with general practitioner consultations for allergic rhinitis in London, England: a retrospective time series analysis
Objectives: To identify key predictors of general practitioner (GP) consultations for allergic rhinitis (AR) using meteorological and environmental data. Design: A retrospective, time series analysis of GP consultations for AR. Setting: A large GP surveillance network of GP practices in the London area. Participants: The study population was all persons who presented to general practices in London that report to the Public Health England GP in-hours syndromic surveillance system during the study period (3 April 2012 to 11 August 2014). Primary measure: Consultations for AR (numbers of consultations). Results: During the study period there were 186 401 GP consultations for AR. High grass and nettle pollen counts (combined) were associated with the highest increases in consultations (for the category 216-270 grains/m3, relative risk (RR) 3.33, 95% CI 2.69 to 4.12) followed by high tree (oak, birch and plane combined) pollen counts (for the category 260–325 grains/m3, RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.15) and average daily temperatures between 15°C and 20°C (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.81). Higher levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) appeared to be associated with increased consultations (for the category 70–85 µg/m3, RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.71), but a significant effect was not found with ozone. Higher daily rainfall was associated with fewer consultations (15–20 mm/day; RR 0.812, 95% CI 0.674 to 0.980). Conclusions: Changes in grass, nettle or tree pollen counts, temperatures between 15°C and 20°C, and (to a lesser extent) NO2 concentrations were found to be associated with increased consultations for AR. Rainfall has a negative effect. In the context of climate change and continued exposures to environmental air pollution, intelligent use of these data will aid targeting public health messages and plan healthcare demand
First steps toward harmonized human biomonitoring in Europe : demonstration project to perform human biomonitoring on a European scale
'Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives'Background: For Europe as a whole, data on internal exposure to environmental chemicals do not
yet exist. Characterization of the internal individual chemical environment is expected to enhance
understanding of the environmental threats to health.
Objectives: We developed and applied a harmonized protocol to collect comparable human
biomonitoring data all over Europe.
Methods: In 17 European countries, we measured mercury in hair and cotinine, phthalate metabolites,
and cadmium in urine of 1,844 children (5–11 years of age) and their mothers. Specimens were collected
over a 5-month period in 2011–2012. We obtained information on personal characteristics, environment,
and lifestyle. We used the resulting database to compare concentrations of exposure biomarkers within
Europe, to identify determinants of exposure, and to compare exposure biomarkers with healthbased
guidelines.
Results: Biomarker concentrations showed a wide variability in the European population. However,
levels in children and mothers were highly correlated. Most biomarker concentrations were below the
health-based guidance values.
Conclusions: We have taken the first steps to assess personal chemical exposures in Europe as a whole.
Key success factors were the harmonized protocol development, intensive training and capacity building for
field work, chemical analysis and communication, as well as stringent quality control programs for chemical
and data analysis. Our project demonstrates the feasibility of a Europe-wide human biomonitoring
framework to support the decision-making process of environmental measures to protect public health.The research leading to these results received funding for the COPHES project (COnsortium to Perform Human biomonitoring on a European Scale) from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007–2013] under grant agreement 244237. DEMOCOPHES (DEMOnstration of a study to COordinate and Perform Human biomonitoring on a European Scale) was co-funded (50%:50%) by the European Commission LIFE+ Programme (LIFE09/ENV/BE/000410) and the partners. For information on both projects as well as on the national co-funding institutions, see http://www.eu-hbm.info/. The sponsors had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report
Economic benefits of methylmercury exposure control in Europe : monetary value of neurotoxicity prevention
© 2013 Bellanger et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Background: Due to global mercury pollution and the adverse health effects of prenatal exposure to methylmercury (MeHg), an assessment of the economic benefits of prevented developmental neurotoxicity is necessary for any cost-benefit analysis.
Methods: Distributions of hair-Hg concentrations among women of reproductive age were obtained from the DEMOCOPHES project (1,875 subjects in 17 countries) and literature data (6,820 subjects from 8 countries). The exposures were assumed to comply with log-normal distributions. Neurotoxicity effects were estimated from a linear dose-response function with a slope of 0.465 Intelligence Quotient (IQ) point reduction per μg/g increase in
the maternal hair-Hg concentration during pregnancy, assuming no deficits below a hair-Hg limit of 0.58 μg/g thought to be safe. A logarithmic IQ response was used in sensitivity analyses. The estimated IQ benefit cost was based on lifetime income, adjusted for purchasing power parity.
Results: The hair-mercury concentrations were the highest in Southern Europe and lowest in Eastern Europe. The results suggest that, within the EU, more than 1.8 million children are born every year with MeHg exposures above the limit of 0.58 μg/g, and about 200,000 births exceed a higher limit of 2.5 μg/g proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO). The total annual benefits of exposure prevention within the EU were estimated at more than
600,000 IQ points per year, corresponding to a total economic benefit between €8,000 million and €9,000 million per year. About four-fold higher values were obtained when using the logarithmic response function, while adjustment for productivity resulted in slightly lower total benefits. These calculations do not include the less
tangible advantages of protecting brain development against neurotoxicity or any other adverse effects.
Conclusions: These estimates document that efforts to combat mercury pollution and to reduce MeHg exposures will have very substantial economic benefits in Europe, mainly in southern countries. Some data may not be entirely representative, some countries were not covered, and anticipated changes in mercury pollution all suggest a need for extended biomonitoring of human MeHg exposure.Exposure data were contributed from the DEMOCOPHES project (LIFE09 ENV/BE/000410) carried out thanks to joint financing of 50% from the European Commission programme LIFE + along with 50% from each
participating country (see the national implementation websites accessible
via http://www.eu-hbm.info/democophes/project-partners). Special thanks go to the national implementation teams. The COPHES project that provided the operational and scientific framework was funded by the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme - DG Research (Grant Agreement Number 244237). Additional exposure data were supported by the PHIME project (FOOD-CT-2006-016253) and ArcRisk (GA 226534). We are grateful to Yue Gao and colleagues for sharing Flanders exposure data from the Flemish Center of Expertise on Environment and Health, financed and steered by the Ministry of the Flemish Community.
National exposure data from the 2006–2007 French national survey on nutrition and health (Etude Nationale Nutrition Santé) were made available by Nadine Fréry, French Institute for Public Health Surveillance. Data from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (a validation sample) were kindly provided by Anne Lise Brantsæter, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo. The UK mercury data were obtained from the ALSPAC pregnancy blood analyses carried out at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with funding from NOAA (the US National Oceanographic and Atmospheric
Administration). The studies in the Faroe Islands were supported by the US
National Institutes of Health (ES009797 and ES012199). The contents of this
paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies
Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study
Background: The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on postoperative recovery needs to be understood to inform clinical decision making during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reports 30-day mortality and pulmonary complication rates in patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: This international, multicentre, cohort study at 235 hospitals in 24 countries included all patients undergoing surgery who had SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality and was assessed in all enrolled patients. The main secondary outcome measure was pulmonary complications, defined as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or unexpected postoperative ventilation. Findings: This analysis includes 1128 patients who had surgery between Jan 1 and March 31, 2020, of whom 835 (74·0%) had emergency surgery and 280 (24·8%) had elective surgery. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed preoperatively in 294 (26·1%) patients. 30-day mortality was 23·8% (268 of 1128). Pulmonary complications occurred in 577 (51·2%) of 1128 patients; 30-day mortality in these patients was 38·0% (219 of 577), accounting for 81·7% (219 of 268) of all deaths. In adjusted analyses, 30-day mortality was associated with male sex (odds ratio 1·75 [95% CI 1·28–2·40], p\textless0·0001), age 70 years or older versus younger than 70 years (2·30 [1·65–3·22], p\textless0·0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 3–5 versus grades 1–2 (2·35 [1·57–3·53], p\textless0·0001), malignant versus benign or obstetric diagnosis (1·55 [1·01–2·39], p=0·046), emergency versus elective surgery (1·67 [1·06–2·63], p=0·026), and major versus minor surgery (1·52 [1·01–2·31], p=0·047). Interpretation: Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality. Thresholds for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic should be higher than during normal practice, particularly in men aged 70 years and older. Consideration should be given for postponing non-urgent procedures and promoting non-operative treatment to delay or avoid the need for surgery. Funding: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, NIHR Academy, Sarcoma UK, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research
Exposure determinants of cadmium in European mothers and their children
© 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CCBY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).The metal cadmium (Cd) is a widespread environmental pollutant with documented adverse effects on the kidneys and bones from long-term environmental exposure, but with insufficiently elucidated public health consequences such as risk of cardiovascular disease, hormone-related cancer in adults and developmental effects in children. This study is the first pan-European human biomonitoring project that succeeded in performing harmonized measurements of Cd in urine in a comparable way in mother–child couples from 16 European countries. The aim of the study was to evaluate the overall Cd exposure and significant determinants of Cd exposure.
A study population of 1632 women (24–52 years of age), and 1689 children (5–12 years of age), from 32 rural and urban areas, was examined within a core period of 6 months in 2011–2012. Women were stratified as smokers and non-smokers. As expected, smoking mothers had higher geometric mean (gm) urinary cadmium (UCd; 0.24 µg/g crea; n=360) than non-smoking mothers (gm 0.18 µg/g crea; n=1272; p<0.0001), and children had lower UCd (gm 0.065 µg/g crea; n=1689) than their mothers at the country level. Non-smoking women exposed to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) at home had 14% (95% CI 1–28%) higher UCd than those who were not exposed to ETS at home (p=0.04). No influence of ETS at home or other places on UCd levels was detected in children. Smoking women with primary education as the highest educational level of the household had 48% (95% CI 18–86%) higher UCd than those with tertiary education (p=0.0008). The same observation was seen in non-smoking women and in children; however they were not statistically significant. In children, living in a rural area was associated with 7% (95% CI 1–13%) higher UCd (p=0.03) compared to living in an urban area. Children, 9–12 years had 7% (95% CI 1–13%) higher UCd (p=0.04) than children 5–8 years.
About 1% of the mothers, and 0.06% of the children, exceeded the tolerable weekly intake (TWI) appointed by EFSA, corresponding to 1.0 µg Cd/g crea in urine. Poland had the highest UCd in comparison between the 16 countries, while Denmark had the lowest. Whether the differences between countries are related to differences in the degree of environmental Cd contamination or to differences in lifestyle, socioeconomic status or dietary patterns is not clear.Financially supported by the 7th EU framework
programe(DGResearch – No. 244237-COPHES),LIFE+ 2009(DG Environment – LIFE09ENV/BE000410-DEMOCOPHES),with addi-
tional co-funding from DEMOCOPHES partners
- …