7 research outputs found
Heart Rate Variability in Patients with Post-infarction Left Ventricular Aneurysm
The parameters of heart rate variability are known to be widely used for screening the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with post-infarction left ventricular aneurysm. However, in literature, there are not much data on changes in heart rate variability in patients with post-infarction left ventricular aneurysm depending on different therapeutic approaches, and this issue is not sufficiently studied.Β The objective of the researchΒ was to study the peculiarities of heart rate variability in patients with post-infarction left ventricular aneurysms depending on therapeutic approach.Materials and methods.Β We analyzed heart rate variability of 238 patients with post-infarction left ventricular aneurysm. All patients were divided into 3 groups depending on therapeutic approach: optimal basic therapy, patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions and those after coronary artery bypass grafting. All patients underwent 24-hours standard ECG monitoring with the analysis of heart rate variability.Results.Β The study showed that heart rate variability of patients with post-infarction left ventricular aneurysm depended on treatment tactics; hypersympathicotonia was typical. The values of the low-frequency range in patients of Group I and Group III constituted 3103Β±93.6 ms2Β and 3295Β±45.4 ms2, respectively, which was higher compared to those in the control group and Group II, Ρ<0.05. Parasympathetic influences in patients with post-infarction left ventricular aneurysm were weakened. The analysis of the integral parameters showed that in patients with post-infarction left ventricular aneurysm the autonomous mechanisms of regulation predominated over the central ones. The centralization index was the lowest in patients of Group I and Group II, 2.9Β±0.3 and 2.3Β±0.1, respectively, being lower compared to the control group, Ρ<0.05. The other peculiarities were detected as well.Conclusions.Β The parameters of heart rate variability in patients with post-infarction left ventricular aneurysm were found to depend on treatment tactics. The patients with non-surgical treatment tactics had the most unfavorable heart rate variability characteristics. They developed hypersympathicotonia and high humoral regulatory influences. The application of revascularization when treating patients with post-infarction left ventricular aneurysm using percutaneous coronary interventions can reduce the aggressive sympathetic influences, as well as the value of the Baevsky index. Revascularization with the use of coronary artery bypass grafting does not allow optimizing the autonomous imbalance, although it reduces stress index
ECG Phenomena in Patients with Post-Infarction Left Ventricular Aneurysm
The objective of the research was to study the ECG phenomena in patients with post-infarction left ventricular aneurysm (PLVA) depending on the treatment approach.Materials and methods. We analyzed results of 24-hour ECG monitoring of 238 patients with PLVA. The main group was divided into 3 subgroups depending on the treatment approach: patients who were treated with optimal background therapy (OBT), percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. All patients underwent 24-hours standard ECG monitoring.Results. Our research showed that 50.0% of patients of the first group had tachycardia. AV-junction conduction problems often were observed in those persons (PQ interval was 179.7Β±8.4 ms, which was significantly higher than in the control group, 149.3Β±5.4 ms, Ρ<0.05). The longest QT interval was also stated for the first group, 532.4Β±27.3 ms, which was significantly longer than the average values of the control group (438.7Β±24.6 ms) and the second group (460.2Β±20.5 ms) respectively, Ρ<0.05. Revascularization procedures (in the second and third groups) allowed achieving heart rate (HR) control in 66.1% and 62.5% of patients respectively. Complete right bundle branch block (CRBBB) was the most frequent phenomenon of patients of the third group (47.9%), which was significantly higher than in the patients of the first and control groups. We also detected a high frequency of supraventricular ectopic complexes in patients of the first and the third groups. A percentage of ventricular ectopic beats was the highest in the third group (17.7%).Conclusions. Patients with PLVA tended to have tachycardia, but the use of LV revascularization procedures allowed improvement of heart rate control. The patients were also characterized by a high percentage of impulse conduction in the atria, βAV-junctionβ and His bundle branches and the use of LV revascularization procedures did not improve the mentioned phenomena, and increased the risk of ectopic complexes in some cases (after CABG).Patients with PLVA had significantly prolonged βQT-intervalβ and therefore (along with the frequent disorders of repolarization) increased risk of sudden death. However, the use of LV revascularization (PCI) reduced it significantly
ΠΡΡΠ½ΠΊΠ° ΡΠΊΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΆΠΈΡΡΡ ΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π΄ΡΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Ρ Ρ Π²ΠΎΡΠΈΡ Π· ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π°Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π»ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΊΠ°
A formation of post-infarction left ventricular aneurysm (PLVA) is one of the markers of unfavorable prognosisΒ and one of the leading causes of coronary heart disease mortality [2, 3]. It is believed that half of the cases of ventricularΒ aneurysms involve formation of LV thrombotic masses [5], and this, in turn, may increase the risk of thromboembolismΒ [7], induce subclinical disorders of cognitive abilities and worsen life quality (QOL). That is why we studied in a givenΒ subpopulation of patients QOL and cognitive abilities.Β It was stated that patients with PLVA have worse QOL and decreased cognitive abilities, which to some extent dependΒ on treating strategy. The patients with medicament approach only have the worst QOL. Procedures of LV revascularizationΒ improve QOL, but not enough to achieve the quality of control group.ΠΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ· ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΠΠΠ‘ Π΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π΅ Π°Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° (ΠΠΠΠ) β ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΊΠ΅ΡΠ°, Π² Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π², Π½Π΅Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π° [2, 3]. Π‘ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Π° ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π² Π°Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌ ΠΠ ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ [5], Π° ΡΡΠΎ, Π² ΡΠ²ΠΎΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ, ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΠΊ ΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΎΡΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° [7], Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΡΠ±ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ (ΠΠ),Β ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅.Β ΠΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΠΠΠ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎ Π² Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΡ Π²ΡΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
. Π‘Π°ΠΌΠΎΠ΅ Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΠ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π΄Π»Ρ Π»ΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΠΠΠ ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΒ ΡΠ΅Π²Π°ΡΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΠ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΠ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ΅, ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π΄Π°, Π½Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ³Π°Π΅Ρ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π±Π΅Π· ΠΠΠΠ.ΠΠ΄Π½ΡΡΡ Π· ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π²ΡΠ΄ ΠΠ₯Π‘ ΡΒ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π°Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΈ Π»ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° (ΠΠΠΠ¨) β Ρ Π±ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΎΡΡΡ Π²ΠΈΠΏΠ°Π΄ΠΊΡΠ² ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΊΠ΅ΡΠ°Β Π½Π΅ΡΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠ»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·Ρ [2, 3]. ΠΠ²Π°ΠΆΠ°ΡΡΡΡΡ, ΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Π° Π²ΠΈΠΏΠ°Π΄ΠΊΡΠ² Π°Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌ ΠΠ¨ ΡΡΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΆΡΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ [5], Π° ΡΠ΅, Ρ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ³Ρ, ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π·Π±ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΊ ΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΌΡ [7], Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΆ ΡΡΠ±ΠΊΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Β ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΡΡ ΡΠ° ΡΠΊΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΆΠΈΡΡΡ (Π―Π),Β Π²ΠΈΠ²ΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π΅ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ. ΠΠ° ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π²ΠΈΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΠΎ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈ Π·Β ΠΠΠΠ¨ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ Π·Π½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΠΆΠΈΡΡΡ ΡΠ° Π½ΠΈΠΆΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ Π·Π΄ΡΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ, ΡΠΊΡ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡ ΠΌΡΡΠΎΡ Π·Π°Π»Π΅ΠΆΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΆ Π²ΡΠ΄Β ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
Ρ
Π²ΠΎΡΠΈΡ
. ΠΠ°ΠΉΠ³ΡΡΡΠ° Π―ΠΒ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΡΠ± ΡΠ· ΠΠΠΠ¨ ΡΠ° Π²ΠΈΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΡ Π»ΡΠΊΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ. ΠΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΒ ΡΠ΅Π²Π°ΡΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΈ Π―Π, ΡΠΊΠ°, ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅,Β Π½Π΅ ΡΡΠ³Π°Ρ ΡΡΠ²Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΡΠ± Π±Π΅Π· ΠΠΠΠ¨