Sobre algunos errores comunes en desarrollos algebraicos.

En este documento se muestran los resultados de una investigación cuyo objetivo era describir algunos tipos de errores que, con mayor frecuencia, presentan los alumnos en los primeros cursos de pre-grado cuando pretenden solucionar ejercicios que requieren manipulaciones algebraicas; además, se trató de identificar las posibles fuentes del error y establecer una alternativa metodológica que permitiera minimizar la presencia de estos tipos de errores.This paper presents the results of a research which attempted to describe some types of mistakes first semester undergraduate students frequently show when they want to find solutions for problems that need algebraic manipulations. In addition, the study aimed at identifying some possible mistakes sources and proposing a methodological alternative way in order to minimize these mistakes

Innovación en las clases de matemáticas: experiencias metodológicas

Comparación entre los procesos de argumentación deductiva y demostración en un grupo de alumnos -- La solución de problemas reales y la competencia en la medida -- La estimación y el cálculo de una integral definida -- Impacto de clases interactivas con tarjetas de respuesta inmediata (citri) en el aprendizaje de las matemáticas -- Impacto del método “instrucción por pares” con el apoyo de “clickers” en el aprendizaje de matemáticas básicas.Editorial Universidad del Nort

Sábado del docente: comunidad de práctica para la investigación e innovación en la enseñanza de las ciencias

“Sábado del Docente” es un programa gratuito de formación docente en educación en Ciencias Naturales y en matemática, que ofrece de manera y continuada, la División de Ciencias Básicas de la Universidad del Norte. Los participantes constituyen una comunidad de práctica en la que profesores de colegios, profesores universitarios y grupos de estudiantes de semilleros de investigación, interesados en mejorar su práctica docente propician mejores aprendizajes, mediante experiencias innovadoras integrando la reflexión fundamentada y crítica de su quehacer pedagógico promoviendo el desarrollo de competencias científicas, como un mecanismo promotor del mejoramiento de su práctica (Acuña y Zea, 2009). Se reconoce y articula la enseñanza de una ciencia que evidencia el cómo, para qué y el qué de la misma. (Ruíz, 2007)

Aulas develadas 3: la práctica, con investigación, se cambia

Este tercer libro de la colección “Aulas develadas: La práctica, con investigación, se cambia”, producto de las investigaciones de aula adelantadas por docentes de la Universidad del Norte, con el apoyo del Centro para la Excelencia Docente (CEDU) en el programa Círculo de Escritura, lo componen seis capítulos que recopilan los resultados de trabajos realizados por docentes de las áreas Ciencia política y Relaciones internacionales, Matemáticas, Psicología e Ingeniería. Confiamos en que los hallazgos que aquí se presentan sean de interés para los lectores y puedan ser compartidos de manera amplia entre distintos públicos

Aulas develadas 3: La práctica, con investigación, se cambia

Este tercer libro de la colección “Aulas develadas: La práctica, con investigación, se cambia”, producto de las investigaciones de aula adelantadas por docentes de la Universidad del Norte, con el apoyo del Centro para la Excelencia Docente (CEDU) en el programa Círculo de Escritura, lo componen seis capítulos que recopilan los resultados de trabajos realizados por docentes de las áreas Ciencia política y Relaciones internacionales, Matemáticas, Psicología e Ingeniería. Confiamos en que los hallazgos que aquí se presentan sean de interés para los lectores y puedan ser compartidos de manera amplia entre distintos públicos

The European Hematology Association Roadmap for European Hematology Research: a consensus document

The European Hematology Association (EHA) Roadmap for European Hematology Research highlights major achievements in diagnosis and treatment of blood disorders and identifies the greatest unmet clinical and scientific needs in those areas to enable better funded, more focused European hematology research. Initiated by the EHA, around 300 experts contributed to the consensus document, which will help European policy makers, research funders, research organizations, researchers, and patient groups make better informed decisions on hematology research. It also aims to raise public awareness of the burden of blood disorders on European society, which purely in economic terms is estimated at €23 billion per year, a level of cost that is not matched in current European hematology research funding. In recent decades, hematology research has improved our fundamental understanding of the biology of blood disorders, and has improved diagnostics and treatments, sometimes in revolutionary ways. This progress highlights the potential of focused basic research programs such as this EHA Roadmap. The EHA Roadmap identifies nine ‘sections’ in hematology: normal hematopoiesis, malignant lymphoid and myeloid diseases, anemias and related diseases, platelet disorders, blood coagulation and hemostatic disorders, transfusion medicine, infections in hematology, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. These sections span 60 smaller groups of diseases or disorders. The EHA Roadmap identifies priorities and needs across the field of hematology, including those to develop targeted therapies based on genomic profiling and chemical biology, to eradicate minimal residual malignant disease, and to develop cellular immunotherapies, combination treatments, gene therapies, hematopoietic stem cell treatments, and treatments that are better tolerated by elderly patients

The European Hematology Association Roadmap for European Hematology Research. A Consensus Document

Abstract The European Hematology Association (EHA) Roadmap for European Hematology Research highlights major achievements in diagnosis and treatment of blood disorders and identifies the greatest unmet clinical and scientific needs in those areas to enable better funded, more focused European hematology research. Initiated by the EHA, around 300 experts contributed to the consensus document, which will help European policy makers, research funders, research organizations, researchers, and patient groups make better informed decisions on hematology research. It also aims to raise public awareness of the burden of blood disorders on European society, which purely in economic terms is estimated at Euro 23 billion per year, a level of cost that is not matched in current European hematology research funding. In recent decades, hematology research has improved our fundamental understanding of the biology of blood disorders, and has improved diagnostics and treatments, sometimes in revolutionary ways. This progress highlights the potential of focused basic research programs such as this EHA Roadmap. The EHA Roadmap identifies nine sections in hematology: normal hematopoiesis, malignant lymphoid and myeloid diseases, anemias and related diseases, platelet disorders, blood coagulation and hemostatic disorders, transfusion medicine, infections in hematology, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. These sections span 60 smaller groups of diseases or disorders. The EHA Roadmap identifies priorities and needs across the field of hematology, including those to develop targeted therapies based on genomic profiling and chemical biology, to eradicate minimal residual malignant disease, and to develop cellular immunotherapies, combination treatments, gene therapies, hematopoietic stem cell treatments, and treatments that are better tolerated by elderly patients. Received December 15, 2015. Accepted January 27, 2016. Copyright © 2016, Ferrata Storti Foundatio

Hyperoxemia and excess oxygen use in early acute respiratory distress syndrome : Insights from the LUNG SAFE study

Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s). Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.Background: Concerns exist regarding the prevalence and impact of unnecessary oxygen use in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We examined this issue in patients with ARDS enrolled in the Large observational study to UNderstand the Global impact of Severe Acute respiratory FailurE (LUNG SAFE) study. Methods: In this secondary analysis of the LUNG SAFE study, we wished to determine the prevalence and the outcomes associated with hyperoxemia on day 1, sustained hyperoxemia, and excessive oxygen use in patients with early ARDS. Patients who fulfilled criteria of ARDS on day 1 and day 2 of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure were categorized based on the presence of hyperoxemia (PaO2 > 100 mmHg) on day 1, sustained (i.e., present on day 1 and day 2) hyperoxemia, or excessive oxygen use (FIO2 ≥ 0.60 during hyperoxemia). Results: Of 2005 patients that met the inclusion criteria, 131 (6.5%) were hypoxemic (PaO2 < 55 mmHg), 607 (30%) had hyperoxemia on day 1, and 250 (12%) had sustained hyperoxemia. Excess FIO2 use occurred in 400 (66%) out of 607 patients with hyperoxemia. Excess FIO2 use decreased from day 1 to day 2 of ARDS, with most hyperoxemic patients on day 2 receiving relatively low FIO2. Multivariate analyses found no independent relationship between day 1 hyperoxemia, sustained hyperoxemia, or excess FIO2 use and adverse clinical outcomes. Mortality was 42% in patients with excess FIO2 use, compared to 39% in a propensity-matched sample of normoxemic (PaO2 55-100 mmHg) patients (P = 0.47). Conclusions: Hyperoxemia and excess oxygen use are both prevalent in early ARDS but are most often non-sustained. No relationship was found between hyperoxemia or excessive oxygen use and patient outcome in this cohort. Trial registration: LUNG-SAFE is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02010073publishersversionPeer reviewe

COVID-19 symptoms at hospital admission vary with age and sex: results from the ISARIC prospective multinational observational study

Background: The ISARIC prospective multinational observational study is the largest cohort of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We present relationships of age, sex, and nationality to presenting symptoms. Methods: International, prospective observational study of 60 109 hospitalized symptomatic patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 recruited from 43 countries between 30 January and 3 August 2020. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate relationships of age and sex to published COVID-19 case definitions and the most commonly reported symptoms. Results: ‘Typical’ symptoms of fever (69%), cough (68%) and shortness of breath (66%) were the most commonly reported. 92% of patients experienced at least one of these. Prevalence of typical symptoms was greatest in 30- to 60-year-olds (respectively 80, 79, 69%; at least one 95%). They were reported less frequently in children (≤ 18 years: 69, 48, 23; 85%), older adults (≥ 70 years: 61, 62, 65; 90%), and women (66, 66, 64; 90%; vs. men 71, 70, 67; 93%, each P &lt; 0.001). The most common atypical presentations under 60 years of age were nausea and vomiting and abdominal pain, and over 60 years was confusion. Regression models showed significant differences in symptoms with sex, age and country. Interpretation: This international collaboration has allowed us to report reliable symptom data from the largest cohort of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. Adults over 60 and children admitted to hospital with COVID-19 are less likely to present with typical symptoms. Nausea and vomiting are common atypical presentations under 30 years. Confusion is a frequent atypical presentation of COVID-19 in adults over 60 years. Women are less likely to experience typical symptoms than men

Sobre algunos errores comunes en desarrollos algebraicos.

En este documento se muestran los resultados de una investigación cuyo objetivo era describir algunos tipos de errores que, con mayor frecuencia, presentan los alumnos en los primeros cursos de pre-grado cuando pretenden solucionar ejercicios que requieren manipulaciones algebraicas; además, se trató de identificar las posibles fuentes del error y establecer una alternativa metodológica que permitiera minimizar la presencia de estos tipos de errores.This paper presents the results of a research which attempted to describe some types of mistakes first semester undergraduate students frequently show when they want to find solutions for problems that need algebraic manipulations. In addition, the study aimed at identifying some possible mistakes sources and proposing a methodological alternative way in order to minimize these mistakes