Genetic Distance Based On Ssr And Grain Yield Of Inter And Intrapopulational Maize Single Cross Hybrids

The objective of this work was to correlate the genetic distances between the progenitors obtained by microsatellite markers with the grain yield of inter and intrapopulational maize single cross hybrids. Three S 0 populations derived from commercial single cross hybrids were used to obtain 163 hybrids (110 interpopulational and 53 intrapopulational). The two best hybrids and two worst hybrids of each the inter- and intrapopulational crosses were selected and their progenitors maintained through self-pollination of the second ear of each S 0 plant, genotyped with 47 SSRs. The Modified Roger's Distance (MRD) between each pair of S 1 inbred lines, the number of alleles and the polymorphic information content (PIC) of each primer were estimated. The genetic distances between progenitors were correlated with the grain yield of the inter- and intrapopulational hybrids. The number of obtained alleles was 186, with a mean of 3.96 alleles. The PIC varied from 0.49 to 0.80, with a mean of 0.65. The mean genetic distance between all S 1 inbred lines was 0.75, varying from 0.40 to 0.89, indicating the existence of variability between the S 1 inbred lines. The correlation between MRD and grain yield was high and significant for the interpopulational crosses (r = 0.84, P ≤ 0.01) and low and not significant (r = 0.18, P ≥ 0.05) for intrapopulational crosses.5103/04/15507513Ajmone Marsan, P., Castiglioni, P., Fu Sari, F., Kuiper, M., Motto, M., Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance in maize as revealed by RFLP and AFLP markers (1998) Theor. Appl. Genet., 96, pp. 219-227Árcade, A., Faivre-Rampant, P., Le Guerroué, B., Paques, L.E., Prat, D., Heterozigosity and hybrid performance in larch (1996) Theor. Appl. Genet., 93, pp. 1274-1281Barbosa, A.M.M., Geraldi, I.O., Benchimol, L.L., Garcia, A.A.F., Souza Jr., C.L., Souza, A.P., Relationship of intra and interpopulation tropical maize single cross hybrid performance and genetic distances computed from AFLP and SSR markers (2003) Euphytica, 87, pp. 87-99Benchimol, L.L., Souza Jr., C.L., Garcia, A.A.F., Kono, P.M.S., Mangolin, C.A., Barbosa, A.M.M., Coelho, A.S.G., Souza, A.P., Genetic diversity in tropical maize inbred lines: Heterotic group assignment and hybrid performance determined by RFLP markers (2000) Plant Breed., 119, pp. 491-496Boppenmaier, J., Melchinger, A.E., Brunklaus-Junt, E., Geiger, H.H., Genetic diversity for RFLP in European maize inbreds: Relation to performance of flint x dent crosses for forage traits (1992) Crop Sci., 32, pp. 895-902Butstein, D., White, M., Sholnick, M., David, R.W., Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms (1980) Am. J. Hum. Genet., 32, pp. 314-331Cheres, M.T., Miller, J.F., Crane, J.M., Knapp, S.J., Genetic distance as a predictor of heterosis and hybrid performance within and between heterotic groups in sunflower (2000) Theor. Appl. Genet., 100, pp. 889-894Cruz, C.D., Shuster, I., (2004) GQMOL: Aplicativo Computacional para Análise de Dados Moleculares e de Suas Associações Com Caracteres Quantitativos. Versão 2004.2.1, , Viçosa. MGDhillon, B.S., Boppenmaier, J., Pollmer, R.G., Hermann, R.G., Melchinger, A.E., Relationship of restriction length polymorphisms among european maize inbreds with ear dry matter yield of their hybrids (1993) Maydica, 38, pp. 245-248Drinic, S.M., Trifunovic, S., Drinic, G., Konstantinov, K., Genetic divergence and its correlation to heterosis in maize as revealed by SSR base markers (2002) Maydica, 47, pp. 1-8Goodman, M.M., Stuber, C.W., Races of maize: VI. Isozyme variation among races of maize in Bolivia (1983) Maydica, 28, pp. 169-187Hallauer, A.R., Miranda Filho, J.B., (1988) Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding, 468p. , Iowa State University Press, AmesKruskal, J.B., Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a no metric hypothesis (1964) Psychometrika, 29, pp. 1-27Lanza, L.L.B., Souza Jr., C.L., Ottoboni, I.M.M., Vieira, M.L.C., Souza, A.P., Genetic distance of inbred lines and prediction of maize single-cross performance using RAPD markers (1997) Theor. Appl. Genet., 94, pp. 1023-1030Le Clerc, V., Bazante, F., Baril, C., Guiard, J., Zhang, D., Assessing temporal changes in genetic diversity of maize varieties using microsatellite markers (2005) Theor. Appl. Genet., 110, pp. 294-302Lee, M., Godshalk, E.B., Lamkey, K.R., Woodman, W.W., Association of restriction fragment length polymorphisms among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses (1989) Crop Sci., 29, pp. 1067-1071Lu, H., Bernardo, R., Molecular marker diversity among current and historical maize inbreds (2001) Theor. Appl. Genet., 103, pp. 613-617Malécot, G., (1948) Les Mathématiques de l'Hérédite, , Masson et Cie, ParisMantel, N., The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach (1967) Cancer Res., 37, pp. 209-220Melchinger, A.E., Genetic diversity and heterosis (1999) The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops, pp. 99-118. , J.G. Coors, S. Pandey (Eds.), Am. Soc. Agron. Madison WIMenkir, A., Melake-Berhan, A., Ingelbrecht, A.T., Adepoju, A., Grouping of tropical mid-altitude maize inbred lines on the basis of yield data and molecular markers (2004) Theor. Appl. Genet., 108, pp. 1582-1590Mille, M., (1997) TFPGA: Toll for Population Genetic Analysis, Version 1.3, , Northern Arizona UniversityPejic, I., Ajmone Marsan, P., Morgante, M., Kozumplick, V., Castiglioni, P., Taramino, G., Motto, M., Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs, and AFLPs (1998) Theor. Appl. Genet., 97, pp. 1428-11255Reif, J.C., Melchinger, A.E., Frisch, M., Genetical and mathematical properties of similarity and dissimilarity coefficients applied in plant breeding and seed bank management (2005) Crop Sci., 45, pp. 1-7Reif, J.C., Melchinger, A.E., Xia, X.C., Warburton, M.L., Hoisington, D.A., Vasal, S.K., Srinivasan, G., Frisch, M., Genetic distance based on simple sequence repeats and heterosis in tropical maize populations (2003) Crop Sci., 43, pp. 1275-1282Reif, J.C., Melchinger, A.E., Xia, X.C., Warburton, M.L., Hoisington, D.A., Vasal, S.K., Beck, D., Frisch, M., Use of SSRs for establishing heterotic groups in subtropical maize (2003) Theor. Appl. Genet., 107, pp. 947-957Rohlf, F.J., (2000) NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Version 2.1, , Exeter Software. Setauket. NYSaghai-Maroof, M.A., Soliman, K.M., Jorgensen, R.A., Allard, R.W., Ribosomal DNA spacer length polymorphism in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83, pp. 1757-1761(1998) SAS Language Guide for Personal Computers. Release 6.03 Ed., , SAS INSTITUTE, SAS Inst. Cary. NCSibov, S.T., Souza Jr., C.L., Garcia, A.A.F., Silva, A.R., Garcia, A.F., Mangolin, C.A., Benchimol, L.L., Souza, A.P., Molecular mapping in tropical maize (Zea mays L.) using microsattelite markers. 2. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) for grain yield, plant height, ear height and grain moisture (2003) Hereditas, 139, pp. 107-115Smith, O.S., Smith, J.S.C., Bowen, S.L., Tenborg, R.A., Wall, S.J., Similarities among a group of elite inbreds as measured by pedigree, F 1 heterosis, and RFLPs (1990) Theor. Appl. Genet., 80, pp. 833-840Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H., (1980) Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2. Ed., 633p. , New York: McGraw HillVaz Patto, M.C., Satovic, Z., Pêgo, S., Fevereiro, P., Assessing the genetic diversity of Portuguese maize germoplasm using microsatellite markers (2004) Euphytica, 137, pp. 63-72Xia, X.C., Reif, J.C., Hoisington, D.A., Melchinger, A.E., Frisch, M., Warburton, M.L., Genetic diversity among CIMMYT maize inbred lines investigated with SSR markers (2004) Crop Sci., 44, pp. 2230-2237Xu, S., Liu, J., Liu, G., The use of SSRs for predicting the hybrid yield and yield heterosis in 15 key inbred lines of Chinese maize (2004) Hereditas, 141, pp. 207-21

<i>Gaia</i> Data Release 1. Summary of the astrometric, photometric, and survey properties

Context. At about 1000 days after the launch of Gaia we present the first Gaia data release, Gaia DR1, consisting of astrometry and photometry for over 1 billion sources brighter than magnitude 20.7. Aims. A summary of Gaia DR1 is presented along with illustrations of the scientific quality of the data, followed by a discussion of the limitations due to the preliminary nature of this release. Methods. The raw data collected by Gaia during the first 14 months of the mission have been processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC) and turned into an astrometric and photometric catalogue. Results. Gaia DR1 consists of three components: a primary astrometric data set which contains the positions, parallaxes, and mean proper motions for about 2 million of the brightest stars in common with the HIPPARCOS and Tycho-2 catalogues – a realisation of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution (TGAS) – and a secondary astrometric data set containing the positions for an additional 1.1 billion sources. The second component is the photometric data set, consisting of mean G-band magnitudes for all sources. The G-band light curves and the characteristics of ∼3000 Cepheid and RR-Lyrae stars, observed at high cadence around the south ecliptic pole, form the third component. For the primary astrometric data set the typical uncertainty is about 0.3 mas for the positions and parallaxes, and about 1 mas yr−1 for the proper motions. A systematic component of ∼0.3 mas should be added to the parallax uncertainties. For the subset of ∼94 000 HIPPARCOS stars in the primary data set, the proper motions are much more precise at about 0.06 mas yr−1. For the secondary astrometric data set, the typical uncertainty of the positions is ∼10 mas. The median uncertainties on the mean G-band magnitudes range from the mmag level to ∼0.03 mag over the magnitude range 5 to 20.7. Conclusions. Gaia DR1 is an important milestone ahead of the next Gaia data release, which will feature five-parameter astrometry for all sources. Extensive validation shows that Gaia DR1 represents a major advance in the mapping of the heavens and the availability of basic stellar data that underpin observational astrophysics. Nevertheless, the very preliminary nature of this first Gaia data release does lead to a number of important limitations to the data quality which should be carefully considered before drawing conclusions from the data