Uso de Internet en la Educación médica continua: Difusión de una base de datos de tumores de glándulas salivales humanas

Fil: Ávila, Rodolfo Esteban. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Cátedra de Biología Celular, Histología y Embriología; Argentina.Fil: Samar, María Elena. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.Fil: Vera Sabio, Federico Luis. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina.Introducción Internet aplicada a la educación, satisface en gran medida las necesidades de información, tanto en contenidos como en metodologías y recursos, lo que permite sostener que el mayor valor de esta red para la educación, consiste en ser un sistema de difusión del conocimiento y un espacio de encuentro y colaboración, imprescindibles en los procesos educativos. Por otra parte, los tumores de glándulas salivales son neoplasias raras y con potencial maligno diferente. Los estudios realizados y publicados de los tumores de glándulas salivales, especialmente malignos, son pocos en Latinoamérica, especialmente en Argentina y en Córdoba. Desde un enfoque del aprendizaje colaborativo a través de la computadora hemos propuesto el uso de internet para la difusión de la morfología tumoral. Desarrollo Usaremos la mediateca digital (base de imágenes) de la morfología tumoral de glándulas salivales obtenidas en nuestro laboratorio de histopatología durante el desarrollo de proyectos de investigación subsidiados por la Secretaría de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina (SeCyT-UNC). Conclusiones El uso de las TIC en la educación médica permite difundir imágenes de los cambios histopatológicos producidos en la morfología tumoral de glándulas salivales. Creemos importante la difusión de nuestra mediateca digital por medio de internet como una vía universal y común de la comunicación en la educación médica continua.Fil: Ávila, Rodolfo Esteban. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Cátedra de Biología Celular, Histología y Embriología; Argentina.Fil: Samar, María Elena. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.Fil: Vera Sabio, Federico Luis. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina.Patologí

Melatonina revierte el daño oxidativo en glándula submandibular de ratas tratadas con Ciclofosfamida

OBJETIVO: Ciclofosfamida (Cf) produce daño oxidativo en glándula submandibular (GSM) de ratas. En el presente trabajo se evaluó el efecto protector antioxidante de melatonina (MLT) en GSM de ratas tratadas con Cf. METODO: Se utilizaron 40 ratas Wistar machos adultas divididas en 5 grupos (G): G1: control; G2: Control+Etanol: tratados con etanol al 1% durante 10 días consecutivos. Los días 11 y 12 recibieron una dosis de solución salina; G3: Cf: tratados con etanol al 1% durante 12 días, días 11 y 12 recibieron una dosis intraperitoneal (i.p.) de Cf de 50 mg/Kg de pc; G4: Cf + MLT: se administró diariamente MLT (5 mg/Kg pc, intraperitoneal, disuelta en etanol al 1%), días 11 y 12 recibieron Cf igual que G3; G5: MLT: tratamiento 12 días consecutivos con MLT (igual dosis de G4). Los animales fueron anestesiados, extirpándose ambas GSM y sacrificados, previo ayuno 24 hs. Se midió la concentración de ácido úrico (AU), peróxidos lipídicos (PL) y acuosos (PA) y actividad de superóxido dismutasa (SOD) en homogenato de GSM. Análisis estadístico: ANOVA y test de Bonferroni, considerando significativo p<0,05. RESULTADOS: El tratamiento con Cf disminuyó la concentración de AU y la actividad de SOD (AU, mg/mg prot., G1: 2,50±0,68; G2: 2,18±0,13; G3: 0,54±0,09* G4: 1,95±0,24#, G5: 2,64±0,47, *p< 0,01 G3 vs G1, G2, G4; #p< 0,01 G4 vs G3 y G5; SOD, U/mg prot., G1: 4,57±0.95, G2: 4,79±0,94, G3: 2,18±0,53*, G4: 5,13±1,10, G5: 5,09±0,39, *p< 0,01 G3 vs G1, G2, G4 y G5). El tratamiento con MLT previno esos efectos. Además, Cf aumentó la formación PL y PA. CONCLUSION: MLT mejoró el estado redox en GSM de ratas tratadas con Cf. MLT podría prevenir los procesos oxidativos en GSM producidos por Cf

Histology and embryology teaching virtualization during the COVID-19 pandemic

Fil: Fernández, Javier Elías. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.Fil: Fernández, Javier Elías. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Diagnóstico por Imágenes A. Departamento de Patología Bucal; Argentina.Fil: Fernández, Javier Elías. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Área de Imagenología y Diagnóstico Digital; Argentina.Fil: Lucero, Rosita. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.Fil: Plavnik, Luis Mario. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.Fil: Fontana, Sebastián. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.Fil: Méndez, Emilce. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.Fil: Gómez Rosso, Araceli. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.Fil: Hernández, Lea Florencia. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.Fil: Samar, Maria Elena. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.La enfermedad Covid-19 es una pandemia mundial con graves con secuencias. La Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina, al igual que todas las universidades del país, suspendió el dictado de clases presenciales y desarrolló unproceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje centrado en un entorno virtual para cumplir con el aislamiento obligatorio y continuar con el dictado de los contenidos en sus facultades y escuelas. Objetivo: El objetivo del presente trabajo fue analizar las condiciones de acceso tecnológico y competencias informáticas con las que los estudiantes desarrollaron el aprendizaje virtual de las CienciasMorfológicas en el actual contexto de pandemia Covid-19. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal y descriptivo de los datos obtenidos en una encuesta anónima y voluntaria que se distribuyó y circuló aleatoriamente entre los alumnos del curso de Histología y Embriología ?A? de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.Resultados:El 95,7% de los estudiantes tenía los dispositivos tecnológicos necesarios y el 49,3% se consideró competente digital y el 37.9% principiante. Solo el 26,4% de los estudiantes requirió ayuda para el empleo de la tecnología.Conclusiones: El análisis de loslogros y las dificultades con que docentes y estudiantes transitamos la enseñanza de las Ciencias Morfológicas en pandemia permitió crear un espacio enriquecedor de reflexión para los desafíos de la educación post-pandemia y promover nuevas formas del proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje que integren instancias presenciales y virtuales que contribuyan al enriquecimiento de la formación universitaria de los futuros profesionales de las Ciencias de la Salud.The Covid-19 disease is a globally spreading pandemic with serious consequences. The Universidad Nacional de Córdoba like all universities of Argentina ordered the suspension of face-to-face education and developed a teaching-learning process focused on a virtual environment that would allow compliance with mandatory isolation and at the same time continue with the dictation of the contents in their schools. Objective: The aim of this work was to obtain and analyze information regarding the conditions of technological access and e-competences with which the students developed the virtual activities for morphological sciences learning in the current context of covid-19 pandemic. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional and descriptive study of the data obtained of anonymous and voluntary survey among students course of Histology and Embryology A was carried out. Facultad de Odontología. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Results: 95.7% of the students had the necessary technological devices and 49.3% considered themselves digitally proficient and 37.9% beginners. Only 26.4% of the students required help for the use of technology. Conclusion: The analysis of successes and difficulties with which we go through the teaching of morphological sciences in pandemic will allow creating a reflection space for us to be better prepared for the challenges of a post-pandemic education and promoting new teaching-learning forms that combine and integrate elements of the face-to-face class and virtual learning thus contributing to improving the future health professional’s university education.https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RevFacOdonto/article/view/38415/38443info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionFil: Fernández, Javier Elías. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.Fil: Fernández, Javier Elías. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Diagnóstico por Imágenes A. Departamento de Patología Bucal; Argentina.Fil: Fernández, Javier Elías. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Área de Imagenología y Diagnóstico Digital; Argentina.Fil: Lucero, Rosita. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.Fil: Plavnik, Luis Mario. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.Fil: Fontana, Sebastián. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.Fil: Méndez, Emilce. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.Fil: Gómez Rosso, Araceli. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.Fil: Hernández, Lea Florencia. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.Fil: Samar, Maria Elena. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de Histología y Embriología A; Argentina.Otras Ciencias de la Salu

Antimicrobial resistance among migrants in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Rates of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are rising globally and there is concern that increased migration is contributing to the burden of antibiotic resistance in Europe. However, the effect of migration on the burden of AMR in Europe has not yet been comprehensively examined. Therefore, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and synthesise data for AMR carriage or infection in migrants to Europe to examine differences in patterns of AMR across migrant groups and in different settings. METHODS: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus with no language restrictions from Jan 1, 2000, to Jan 18, 2017, for primary data from observational studies reporting antibacterial resistance in common bacterial pathogens among migrants to 21 European Union-15 and European Economic Area countries. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to report data on carriage or infection with laboratory-confirmed antibiotic-resistant organisms in migrant populations. We extracted data from eligible studies and assessed quality using piloted, standardised forms. We did not examine drug resistance in tuberculosis and excluded articles solely reporting on this parameter. We also excluded articles in which migrant status was determined by ethnicity, country of birth of participants' parents, or was not defined, and articles in which data were not disaggregated by migrant status. Outcomes were carriage of or infection with antibiotic-resistant organisms. We used random-effects models to calculate the pooled prevalence of each outcome. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42016043681. FINDINGS: We identified 2274 articles, of which 23 observational studies reporting on antibiotic resistance in 2319 migrants were included. The pooled prevalence of any AMR carriage or AMR infection in migrants was 25·4% (95% CI 19·1-31·8; I2 =98%), including meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (7·8%, 4·8-10·7; I2 =92%) and antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (27·2%, 17·6-36·8; I2 =94%). The pooled prevalence of any AMR carriage or infection was higher in refugees and asylum seekers (33·0%, 18·3-47·6; I2 =98%) than in other migrant groups (6·6%, 1·8-11·3; I2 =92%). The pooled prevalence of antibiotic-resistant organisms was slightly higher in high-migrant community settings (33·1%, 11·1-55·1; I2 =96%) than in migrants in hospitals (24·3%, 16·1-32·6; I2 =98%). We did not find evidence of high rates of transmission of AMR from migrant to host populations. INTERPRETATION: Migrants are exposed to conditions favouring the emergence of drug resistance during transit and in host countries in Europe. Increased antibiotic resistance among refugees and asylum seekers and in high-migrant community settings (such as refugee camps and detention facilities) highlights the need for improved living conditions, access to health care, and initiatives to facilitate detection of and appropriate high-quality treatment for antibiotic-resistant infections during transit and in host countries. Protocols for the prevention and control of infection and for antibiotic surveillance need to be integrated in all aspects of health care, which should be accessible for all migrant groups, and should target determinants of AMR before, during, and after migration. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College Healthcare Charity, the Wellcome Trust, and UK National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare-associated Infections and Antimictobial Resistance at Imperial College London

Associations of baseline use of biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs with COVID-19 severity in rheumatoid arthritis : Results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician registry

Funding Information: Competing interests JAS is supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Funding Information: Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (grant numbers K23 AR069688, R03 AR075886, L30 AR066953, P30 AR070253 and P30 AR072577), the Rheumatology Research Foundation (K Supplement Award and R Bridge Award), the Brigham Research Institute, and the R Bruce and Joan M Mickey Research Scholar Fund. JAS has received research support from Amgen and Bristol-Myers Squibb and performed consultancy for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Inova, Janssen and Optum, unrelated to this work. ZSW reports grant support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Principia/ Sanofi and performed consultancy for Viela Bio and MedPace, outside the submitted work. His work is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health. MG is supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (grant numbers K01 AR070585 and K24 AR074534; JY). KLH reports she has received speaker’s fees from AbbVie and grant income from BMS, UCB and Pfizer, all unrelated to this study. KLH is also supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. LC has not received fees or personal grants from any laboratory, but her institute works by contract for laboratories such as, among other institutions, AbbVie Spain, Eisai, Gebro Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme España, Novartis Farmaceutica, Pfizer, Roche Farma, Sanofi Aventis, Astellas Pharma, Actelion Pharmaceuticals España, Grünenthal and UCB Pharma. LG reports research grants from Amgen, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Sandoz and Sanofi; consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Biogen, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi Aventis and UCB, all unrelated to this study. EFM reports that LPCDR received support for specific activities: grants from AbbVie, Novartis, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly Portugal, Sanofi, Grünenthal, MSD, Celgene, Medac, Pharma Kern and GAfPA; grants and non-financial support from Pfizer; and non-financial support from Grünenthal, outside the submitted work. AS reports grants from a consortium of 13 companies (among them AbbVie, BMS, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Lilly, Mylan, Hexal, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi Aventis and UCB) supporting the German RABBIT register, and personal fees from lectures for AbbVie, MSD, Roche, BMS and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. AD-G has no disclosures relevant to this study. His work is supported by grants from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Rheumatology Research Foundation. KMD is supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (T32-AR-007258) and the Rheumatology Research Foundation. NJP is supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (T32-AR-007258). PD has received research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai and Pfizer, and performed consultancy for Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Sanofi, Pfizer, Chugai, Roche and Janssen, unrelated to this work. NS is supported by the RRF Investigator Award and the American Heart Association. MFU-G reports grant support from Janssen and Pfizer. SB reports no competing interests related to this work. He reports non-branded consulting fees for AbbVie, Horizon, Novartis and Pfizer (all <$10 000). RG reports no competing interests related to this work. Outside of this work she reports personal and/or speaking fees from AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and Cornerstones, and travel assistance from Pfizer (all <$10 000). JH reports no competing interests related to this work. He is supported by grants from the Rheumatology Research Foundation and the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance. He has performed consulting for Novartis, Sobi and Biogen, all unrelated to this work (<$10 000). JL has received research funding from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. ES is a Board Member of the Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance, a patient-run, volunteer-based organisation whose activities are largely supported by independent grants from pharmaceutical companies. PS reports no competing interests related to this work. He reports honorarium for doing social media for American College of Rheumatology journals (<$10 000). PMM has received consulting/speaker’s fees from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, all unrelated to this study (all <$10 000). PMM is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals (UCLH) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). PCR reports no competing interests related to this work. Outside of this work he reports personal consulting and/or speaking fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, and travel assistance from Roche (all <$10 000). JY reports no competing interests related to this work. Her work is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Control, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. She has performed consulting for Eli Lilly and AstraZeneca, unrelated to this project. Publisher Copyright: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Objective To investigate baseline use of biologic or targeted synthetic (b/ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and COVID-19 outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods We analysed the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician registry (from 24 March 2020 to 12 April 2021). We investigated b/tsDMARD use for RA at the clinical onset of COVID-19 (baseline): abatacept (ABA), rituximab (RTX), Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), interleukin 6 inhibitors (IL-6i) or tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi, reference group). The ordinal COVID-19 severity outcome was (1) no hospitalisation, (2) hospitalisation without oxygen, (3) hospitalisation with oxygen/ventilation or (4) death. We used ordinal logistic regression to estimate the OR (odds of being one level higher on the ordinal outcome) for each drug class compared with TNFi, adjusting for potential baseline confounders. Results Of 2869 people with RA (mean age 56.7 years, 80.8% female) on b/tsDMARD at the onset of COVID-19, there were 237 on ABA, 364 on RTX, 317 on IL-6i, 563 on JAKi and 1388 on TNFi. Overall, 613 (21%) were hospitalised and 157 (5.5%) died. RTX (OR 4.15, 95% CI 3.16 to 5.44) and JAKi (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.60 to 2.65) were each associated with worse COVID-19 severity compared with TNFi. There were no associations between ABA or IL6i and COVID-19 severity. Conclusions People with RA treated with RTX or JAKi had worse COVID-19 severity than those on TNFi. The strong association of RTX and JAKi use with poor COVID-19 outcomes highlights prioritisation of risk mitigation strategies for these people.publishersversionPeer reviewe

Clinical and laboratory features associated with macrophage activation syndrome in Still's disease: data from the international AIDA Network Still's Disease Registry

: To characterize clinical and laboratory signs of patients with still's disease experiencing macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) and identify factors associated with MAS development. patients with still's disease classified according to internationally accepted criteria were enrolled in the autoInflammatory disease alliance (AIDA) still's disease registry. clinical and laboratory features observed during the inflammatory attack complicated by MAS were included in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated to MAS development. A total of 414 patients with Still's disease were included; 39 (9.4%) of them developed MAS during clinical history. At univariate analyses, the following variables were significantly associated with MAS: classification of arthritis based on the number of joints involved (p = 0.003), liver involvement (p = 0.04), hepatomegaly (p = 0.02), hepatic failure (p = 0.01), axillary lymphadenopathy (p = 0.04), pneumonia (p = 0.03), acute respiratory distress syndrome (p &lt; 0.001), platelet abnormalities (p &lt; 0.001), high serum ferritin levels (p = 0.009), abnormal liver function tests (p = 0.009), hypoalbuminemia (p = 0.002), increased LDH (p = 0.001), and LDH serum levels (p &lt; 0.001). at multivariate analysis, hepatomegaly (OR 8.7, 95% CI 1.9-52.6, p = 0.007) and monoarthritis (OR 15.8, 95% CI 2.9-97.1, p = 0.001), were directly associated with MAS, while the decade of life at Still's disease onset (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9, p = 0.045), a normal platelet count (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.01-0.8, p = 0.034) or thrombocytosis (OR 0.01, 95% CI 0.0-0.2, p = 0.008) resulted to be protective. clinical and laboratory factors associated with MAS development have been identified in a large cohort of patients based on real-life data

Racial differences in systemic sclerosis disease presentation: a European Scleroderma Trials and Research group study

Objectives. Racial factors play a significant role in SSc. We evaluated differences in SSc presentations between white patients (WP), Asian patients (AP) and black patients (BP) and analysed the effects of geographical locations.Methods. SSc characteristics of patients from the EUSTAR cohort were cross-sectionally compared across racial groups using survival and multiple logistic regression analyses.Results. The study included 9162 WP, 341 AP and 181 BP. AP developed the first non-RP feature faster than WP but slower than BP. AP were less frequently anti-centromere (ACA; odds ratio (OR) = 0.4, P &lt; 0.001) and more frequently anti-topoisomerase-I autoantibodies (ATA) positive (OR = 1.2, P = 0.068), while BP were less likely to be ACA and ATA positive than were WP [OR(ACA) = 0.3, P &lt; 0.001; OR(ATA) = 0.5, P = 0.020]. AP had less often (OR = 0.7, P = 0.06) and BP more often (OR = 2.7, P &lt; 0.001) diffuse skin involvement than had WP.AP and BP were more likely to have pulmonary hypertension [OR(AP) = 2.6, P &lt; 0.001; OR(BP) = 2.7, P = 0.03 vs WP] and a reduced forced vital capacity [OR(AP) = 2.5, P &lt; 0.001; OR(BP) = 2.4, P &lt; 0.004] than were WP. AP more often had an impaired diffusing capacity of the lung than had BP and WP [OR(AP vs BP) = 1.9, P = 0.038; OR(AP vs WP) = 2.4, P &lt; 0.001]. After RP onset, AP and BP had a higher hazard to die than had WP [hazard ratio (HR) (AP) = 1.6, P = 0.011; HR(BP) = 2.1, P &lt; 0.001].Conclusion. Compared with WP, and mostly independent of geographical location, AP have a faster and earlier disease onset with high prevalences of ATA, pulmonary hypertension and forced vital capacity impairment and higher mortality. BP had the fastest disease onset, a high prevalence of diffuse skin involvement and nominally the highest mortality

A patient-driven registry on Behçet’s disease: the AIDA for patients pilot project

IntroductionThis paper describes the creation and preliminary results of a patient-driven registry for the collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported experiences (PREs) in Behçet’s disease (BD).MethodsThe project was coordinated by the University of Siena and the Italian patient advocacy organization SIMBA (Associazione Italiana Sindrome e Malattia di Behçet), in the context of the AIDA (AutoInflammatory Diseases Alliance) Network programme. Quality of life, fatigue, socioeconomic impact of the disease and therapeutic adherence were selected as core domains to include in the registry.ResultsRespondents were reached via SIMBA communication channels in 167 cases (83.5%) and the AIDA Network affiliated clinical centers in 33 cases (16.5%). The median value of the Behçet’s Disease Quality of Life (BDQoL) score was 14 (IQR 11, range 0–30), indicating a medium quality of life, and the median Global Fatigue Index (GFI) was 38.7 (IQR 10.9, range 1–50), expressing a significant level of fatigue. The mean Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) necessity-concern differential was 0.9 ± 1.1 (range – 1.8–4), showing that the registry participants prioritized necessity belief over concerns to a limited extent. As for the socioeconomic impact of BD, in 104 out of 187 cases (55.6%), patients had to pay from their own pocket for medical exams required to reach the diagnosis. The low family socioeconomic status (p &lt; 0.001), the presence of any major organ involvement (p &lt; 0.031), the presence of gastro-intestinal (p &lt; 0.001), neurological (p = 0.012) and musculoskeletal (p = 0.022) symptoms, recurrent fever (p = 0.002), and headache (p &lt; 0.001) were associated to a higher number of accesses to the healthcare system. Multiple linear regression showed that the BDQoL score could significantly predict the global socioeconomic impact of BD (F = 14.519, OR 1.162 [CI 0.557–1.766], p &lt; 0.001).DiscussionPreliminary results from the AIDA for Patients BD registry were consistent with data available in the literature, confirming that PROs and PREs could be easily provided by the patient remotely to integrate physician-driven registries with complementary and reliable information

Surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common infections associated with health care, but its importance as a global health priority is not fully understood. We quantified the burden of SSI after gastrointestinal surgery in countries in all parts of the world. Methods: This international, prospective, multicentre cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing elective or emergency gastrointestinal resection within 2-week time periods at any health-care facility in any country. Countries with participating centres were stratified into high-income, middle-income, and low-income groups according to the UN's Human Development Index (HDI). Data variables from the GlobalSurg 1 study and other studies that have been found to affect the likelihood of SSI were entered into risk adjustment models. The primary outcome measure was the 30-day SSI incidence (defined by US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for superficial and deep incisional SSI). Relationships with explanatory variables were examined using Bayesian multilevel logistic regression models. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02662231. Findings: Between Jan 4, 2016, and July 31, 2016, 13 265 records were submitted for analysis. 12 539 patients from 343 hospitals in 66 countries were included. 7339 (58·5%) patient were from high-HDI countries (193 hospitals in 30 countries), 3918 (31·2%) patients were from middle-HDI countries (82 hospitals in 18 countries), and 1282 (10·2%) patients were from low-HDI countries (68 hospitals in 18 countries). In total, 1538 (12·3%) patients had SSI within 30 days of surgery. The incidence of SSI varied between countries with high (691 [9·4%] of 7339 patients), middle (549 [14·0%] of 3918 patients), and low (298 [23·2%] of 1282) HDI (p < 0·001). The highest SSI incidence in each HDI group was after dirty surgery (102 [17·8%] of 574 patients in high-HDI countries; 74 [31·4%] of 236 patients in middle-HDI countries; 72 [39·8%] of 181 patients in low-HDI countries). Following risk factor adjustment, patients in low-HDI countries were at greatest risk of SSI (adjusted odds ratio 1·60, 95% credible interval 1·05–2·37; p=0·030). 132 (21·6%) of 610 patients with an SSI and a microbiology culture result had an infection that was resistant to the prophylactic antibiotic used. Resistant infections were detected in 49 (16·6%) of 295 patients in high-HDI countries, in 37 (19·8%) of 187 patients in middle-HDI countries, and in 46 (35·9%) of 128 patients in low-HDI countries (p < 0·001). Interpretation: Countries with a low HDI carry a disproportionately greater burden of SSI than countries with a middle or high HDI and might have higher rates of antibiotic resistance. In view of WHO recommendations on SSI prevention that highlight the absence of high-quality interventional research, urgent, pragmatic, randomised trials based in LMICs are needed to assess measures aiming to reduce this preventable complication