Epigenome‐Wide Scan Identifies a Treatment‐Responsive Pattern of Altered DNA Methylation Among Cytoskeletal Remodeling Genes in Monocytes and CD4+ T Cells From Patients With Behçet's Disease

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/107357/1/art38409.pd

PAK6 phosphorylates 14-3-3γ to regulate steady state phosphorylation of LRRK2

Mutations in Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) are associated with Parkinson's disease (PD) and, as such, LRRK2 is considered a promising therapeutic target for age-related neurodegeneration. Although the cellular functions of LRRK2 in health and disease are incompletely understood, robust evidence indicates that PD-associated mutations alter LRRK2 kinase and GTPase activities with consequent deregulation of the downstream signaling pathways. We have previously demonstrated that one LRRK2 binding partner is P21 (RAC1) Activated Kinase 6 (PAK6). Here, we interrogate the PAK6 interactome and find that PAK6 binds a subset of 14-3-3 proteins in a kinase dependent manner. Furthermore, PAK6 efficiently phosphorylates 14-3-3γ at Ser59 and this phosphorylation serves as a switch to dissociate the chaperone from client proteins including LRRK2, a well-established 14-3-3 binding partner. We found that 14-3-3γ phosphorylated by PAK6 is no longer competent to bind LRRK2 at phospho-Ser935, causing LRRK2 dephosphorylation. To address whether these interactions are relevant in a neuronal context, we demonstrate that a constitutively active form of PAK6 rescues the G2019S LRRK2-associated neurite shortening through phosphorylation of 14-3-3γ. Our results identify PAK6 as the kinase for 14-3-3γ and reveal a novel regulatory mechanism of 14-3-3/LRRK2 complex in the brain

Cadherins: cellular adhesive molecules serving as signalling mediators

The single pass, transmembrane proteins of the cadherin family have been appreciated as important proteins that regulate intercellular adhesion. In addition to this critical function, cadherins contribute to important signalling events that control cellular homeostasis. Many examples exist of classical, desmosomal and atypical cadherins participating in the regulation of signalling events that control homeostatic functions in cells. Much of the work on cadherin mediated signalling focuses on classical cadherins or on specific disease states such as pemphigus vulgaris. Cadherin mediated signalling has been shown to play critical roles during development, in proliferation, apoptosis, disease pathobiology and beyond. It is becoming increasingly clear that cadherins operate through a range of molecular mechanisms. The diversity of pathways and cellular functions regulated by cadherins suggests that we have only scratched the surface in terms of the roles that these versatile proteins play in signalling and cellular function.Modalities of cadherin mediated signalling. Cadherins have been shown to participate in many diverse signalling pathways and mechanisms. Not only is the range of functional outcomes that cadherins regulate wide, the number of different types of mechanisms that cadherins participate in to mediate their signalling is also impressive. Many times cadherins themselves act as scaffolds for important signalling events and the ability of the cadherin to participate in these signalling mechanisms is often dependent upon their participation in cadherin mediated adhesion (A). Other mechanisms requiring cadherin mediated adhesion include cadherin protein association with other transmembrane signalling proteins and receptors (B). There are several reports of cadherin mediated signalling that requires the formation of stable cadherin protein fragments via regulated proteolytic cleavage (C and D). Most of these mechanisms require cadherin extracellular fragment generation and often both stimulate receptor signalling pathways and interfere with cadherin mediated adhesion (C). There are, however, multiple studies describing cadherin intracellular protein fragment generation (D). These mechanisms often entail binding of the intracellular fragment to a cytoplasmic signalling partner, nuclear re‐localization, and regulation of gene transcription.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/145515/1/tjp13128.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/145515/2/tjp13128_am.pd

High genetic diversity of measles virus, World Health Organization European region, 2005-2006

During 2005-2006, nine measles virus (MV) genotypes were identified throughout the World Health Organization European Region. All major epidemics were associated with genotypes D4, D6, and B3. Other genotypes (B2, D5, D8, D9, G2, and H1) were only found in limited numbers of cases after importation from other continents. The genetic diversity of endemic D6 strains was low; genotypes C2 and D7, circulating in Europe until recent years, were no longer identified. The transmission chains of several indigenous MV strains may thus have been interrupted by enhanced vaccination. However, multiple importations from Africa and Asia and virus introduction into highly mobile and unvaccinated communities caused a massive spread of D4 and B3 strains throughout much of the region. Thus, despite the reduction of endemic MV circulation, importation of MV from other continents caused prolonged circulation and large outbreaks after their introduction into unvaccinated and highly mobile communities

Cell Adhesion and Its Endocytic Regulation in Cell Migration during Neural Development and Cancer Metastasis

Cell migration is a crucial event for tissue organization during development, and its dysregulation leads to several diseases, including cancer. Cells exhibit various types of migration, such as single mesenchymal or amoeboid migration, collective migration and scaffold cell-dependent migration. The migration properties are partly dictated by cell adhesion and its endocytic regulation. While an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-mediated mesenchymal cell migration requires the endocytic recycling of integrin-mediated adhesions after the disruption of cell-cell adhesions, an amoeboid migration is not dependent on any adhesions to extracellular matrix (ECM) or neighboring cells. In contrast, a collective migration is mediated by both cell-cell and cell-ECM adhesions, and a scaffold cell-dependent migration is regulated by the endocytosis and recycling of cell-cell adhesion molecules. Although some invasive carcinoma cells exhibit an EMT-mediated mesenchymal or amoeboid migration, other cancer cells are known to maintain cadherin-based cell-cell adhesions and epithelial morphology during metastasis. On the other hand, a scaffold cell-dependent migration is mainly utilized by migrating neurons in normal developing brains. This review will summarize the structures of cell adhesions, including adherens junctions and focal adhesions, and discuss the regulatory mechanisms for the dynamic behavior of cell adhesions by endocytic pathways in cell migration in physiological and pathological conditions, focusing particularly on neural development and cancer metastasis

Heterologous Expression of Membrane Proteins: Choosing the Appropriate Host

International audienceBACKGROUND: Membrane proteins are the targets of 50% of drugs, although they only represent 1% of total cellular proteins. The first major bottleneck on the route to their functional and structural characterisation is their overexpression; and simply choosing the right system can involve many months of trial and error. This work is intended as a guide to where to start when faced with heterologous expression of a membrane protein. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The expression of 20 membrane proteins, both peripheral and integral, in three prokaryotic (E. coli, L. lactis, R. sphaeroides) and three eukaryotic (A. thaliana, N. benthamiana, Sf9 insect cells) hosts was tested. The proteins tested were of various origins (bacteria, plants and mammals), functions (transporters, receptors, enzymes) and topologies (between 0 and 13 transmembrane segments). The Gateway system was used to clone all 20 genes into appropriate vectors for the hosts to be tested. Culture conditions were optimised for each host, and specific strategies were tested, such as the use of Mistic fusions in E. coli. 17 of the 20 proteins were produced at adequate yields for functional and, in some cases, structural studies. We have formulated general recommendations to assist with choosing an appropriate system based on our observations of protein behaviour in the different hosts. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Most of the methods presented here can be quite easily implemented in other laboratories. The results highlight certain factors that should be considered when selecting an expression host. The decision aide provided should help both newcomers and old-hands to select the best system for their favourite membrane protein

PAK4 signaling in development and cancer

Our understanding of cancer biology has been evolving rapidly shaped by groundbreaking discoveries. We now understand that cancer is not one disease but many, and that tumors are not foreign objects in the human body but rather the result of changes in the previously normal tissues and organs. Thus, in order to ask fundamental questions and dissect the complexity of cancer it is essential to grasp how the healthy organs develop and function and the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved. The serine/threonine PAKs are signaling hubs with proven roles in development and disease. Specifically, they are important to several hallmarks of cancer. Thus, the family in general, and PAK4 in particular, is increasingly attracting the interest of the scientific community. In this thesis I have explored the role of PAK4 in normal organ development and cancer. Novel mouse models with PAK4 depletion in the mammary gland and in the pancreas have been established and characterized in Paper I and Paper II. The absence of major tissue abnormalities upon PAK4 depletion in the mammary epithelium allowed me to use this model to study the role of PAK4 in tumorigenesis in vivo, in Paper III, and a counterpart mouse model with PAK4 overexpression in the mammary epithelium was also generated. These complementary in vivo setups showed that PAK4-overexpressing mammary glands occasionally developed mammary tumors while PAK4 abrogation impaired PyMT-driven mammary tumorigenesis. Extensive in vitro experiments, using state of the art techniques, then supported a model in which PAK4 confers selective advantages to cancer cells by overcoming the senescence barrier. This, in turn, constitutes a selective vulnerability of cancer cells that become susceptible to a senescence-like response upon PAK4 inhibition. The data presented also demonstrates a crosstalk between PAK4 and NF-κB signaling, and a direct interaction and phosphorylation site within the REL-homology domain of RELB is found to be relevant for tuning RELB-mediated transcription and cancer cell proliferation via C/EBPβ. Importantly, these findings were largely supported by correlations in clinical data and validated ex vivo in patient-derived cells, thus highlighting PAK4 as an attractive therapeutic opportunity in cancer. Therefore, this thesis contributes to a better understanding of the mechanisms that govern breast tumorigenesis, with hopes that such knowledge will prove relevant in cancer prognosis and treatment