Proyecto MINENERGYDESIGN: modelo de aplicación de la metodología Design Thinking en el aprendizaje en la gestión de proyectos de ingeniería

La gestión de proyectos en ingeniería se está transformando hacia un proceso dinámico y ágil, donde la interacción e iteración continua con el cliente/usuario es una realidad. Para el éxito del proyecto, y la resolución del problema de ingeniería, se deben considerar nuevas herramientas de aprendizaje, donde el alumno debe trabajar entre otras competencias, la creatividad (aplicada a la resolución de problemas), el trabajo en equipo, la comunicación y el liderazgo. El objetivo de este trabajo es mostrar cómo la metodología Design Thinking incrementa el aprendizaje en el área de gestión de proyectos proponiendo una sencilla iteración en tres etapas hasta alcanzar un prototipo funcional. De esta forma, el alumnado adquiere de una forma práctica las competencias demandadas por el entorno profesional, permitiendo tener una primera aproximación y experiencia en aula sobre la gestión de proyectos

Análisis del impacto en el aprendizaje del entrenamiento mediante ejercicios con errores controlados

En este artículo se presenta la experiencia de innovación docente introducida en asignaturas impartidas en la E.T.S.I. Minas y Energía de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, basada en el entrenamiento con ejercicios que contienen errores controlados. Se analizan los resultados obtenidos con el empleo de esta metodología y su impacto en el aprendizaje. Se han preparado diversos ejercicios de entrenamiento que contienen errores comunes cometidos por los alumnos en tres asignaturas: Química, Gestión de Empresas y Expresión Gráfica. Los ejercicios de entrenamiento consisten en preguntas breves de respuesta rápida con cuatro posibles opciones de respuesta. Para el análisis del impacto en el aprendizaje se han tenido en cuenta los resultados obtenidos por los alumnos en las pruebas de evaluación y la percepción del alumnado consultándoles a través de una encuesta. En las dos primeras asignaturas, los ejercicios de evaluación no contenían errores, mientras que, en Expresión Gráfica éstos se basaron en la detección de errores controlados. En las asignaturas de Química y Gestión de Empresas, el entrenamiento con errores controlados ha mejorado las calificaciones obtenidas por el alumnado. Además, en el caso de Expresión Gráfica, los resultados muestran cómo el uso de errores controlados mejora la clasificación de los alumnos

Análisis de la docencia universitaria por la influencia de la COVID-19: algunas lecciones aprendidas

La crisis sanitaria producida por el virus del SARS-COV-2 produjo un cambio drástico en la educación en marzo de 2020, cuando la enseñanza presencial se vio forzada a adaptarse a la telenseñanza. Esto produjo cambios en las metodologías docentes, los materiales didácticos y los métodos de evaluación. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar cuáles de estos cambios, implementados en la Universidad presencial, han sido positivos y deberían mantenerse en el tiempo. Para ello se ha realizado una encuesta a los alumnos de los distintos cursos de los grados impartidos en la E.T.S.I. Minas y Energía (E.T.S.I.M.E) de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid que permite conocer cómo ha influido la pandemia en el uso de los nuevos materiales didácticos, qué tipo de modalidades de enseñanza prefieren los alumnos y qué recursos utilizan más durante el estudio. A pesar de que los apuntes y diapositivas de clase siguen siendo el recurso predilecto de los alumnos, se ha visto un gran interés por las grabaciones de clases. Otros materiales más tradicionales, como la bibliografía o las tutorías, son menos utilizados por los estudiantes. En cuanto a las modalidades de enseñanza, la opinión está polarizada. Por tanto, es necesario realizar un esfuerzo para combinar eficientemente las metodologías y recursos didácticos de telenseñanza a la docencia presencial, generando recursos asíncronos sin perjuicio de las actividades presenciales tradicionales

Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown in Eating Disorders: A Multicentre Collaborative International Study

Background. The COVID-19 lockdown has had a significant impact on mental health. Patients with eating disorders (ED) have been particularly vulnerable. Aims. (1) To explore changes in eating-related symptoms and general psychopathology during lockdown in patients with an ED from various European and Asian countries; and (2) to assess differences related to diagnostic ED subtypes, age, and geography. Methods. The sample comprised 829 participants, diagnosed with an ED according to DSM-5 criteria from specialized ED units in Europe and Asia. Participants were assessed using the COVID-19 Isolation Scale (CIES). Results. Patients with binge eating disorder (BED) experienced the highest impact on weight and ED symptoms in comparison with other ED subtypes during lockdown, whereas individuals with other specified feeding and eating disorders (OFSED) had greater deterioration in general psychological functioning than subjects with other ED subtypes. Finally, Asian and younger individuals appeared to be more resilient. Conclusions. The psychopathological changes in ED patients during the COVID-19 lockdown varied by cultural context and individual variation in age and ED diagnosis. Clinical services may need to target preventive measures and adapt therapeutic approaches for the most vulnerable patients

Elective Cancer Surgery in COVID-19-Free Surgical Pathways During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: An International, Multicenter, Comparative Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: As cancer surgery restarts after the first COVID-19 wave, health care providers urgently require data to determine where elective surgery is best performed. This study aimed to determine whether COVID-19-free surgical pathways were associated with lower postoperative pulmonary complication rates compared with hospitals with no defined pathway. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This international, multicenter cohort study included patients who underwent elective surgery for 10 solid cancer types without preoperative suspicion of SARS-CoV-2. Participating hospitals included patients from local emergence of SARS-CoV-2 until April 19, 2020. At the time of surgery, hospitals were defined as having a COVID-19-free surgical pathway (complete segregation of the operating theater, critical care, and inpatient ward areas) or no defined pathway (incomplete or no segregation, areas shared with patients with COVID-19). The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications (pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, unexpected ventilation). RESULTS: Of 9,171 patients from 447 hospitals in 55 countries, 2,481 were operated on in COVID-19-free surgical pathways. Patients who underwent surgery within COVID-19-free surgical pathways were younger with fewer comorbidities than those in hospitals with no defined pathway but with similar proportions of major surgery. After adjustment, pulmonary complication rates were lower with COVID-19-free surgical pathways (2.2% v 4.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.86). This was consistent in sensitivity analyses for low-risk patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1/2), propensity score-matched models, and patients with negative SARS-CoV-2 preoperative tests. The postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection rate was also lower in COVID-19-free surgical pathways (2.1% v 3.6%; aOR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.76). CONCLUSION: Within available resources, dedicated COVID-19-free surgical pathways should be established to provide safe elective cancer surgery during current and before future SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks

Elective cancer surgery in COVID-19-free surgical pathways during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: An international, multicenter, comparative cohort study

PURPOSE As cancer surgery restarts after the first COVID-19 wave, health care providers urgently require data to determine where elective surgery is best performed. This study aimed to determine whether COVID-19–free surgical pathways were associated with lower postoperative pulmonary complication rates compared with hospitals with no defined pathway. PATIENTS AND METHODS This international, multicenter cohort study included patients who underwent elective surgery for 10 solid cancer types without preoperative suspicion of SARS-CoV-2. Participating hospitals included patients from local emergence of SARS-CoV-2 until April 19, 2020. At the time of surgery, hospitals were defined as having a COVID-19–free surgical pathway (complete segregation of the operating theater, critical care, and inpatient ward areas) or no defined pathway (incomplete or no segregation, areas shared with patients with COVID-19). The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications (pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, unexpected ventilation). RESULTS Of 9,171 patients from 447 hospitals in 55 countries, 2,481 were operated on in COVID-19–free surgical pathways. Patients who underwent surgery within COVID-19–free surgical pathways were younger with fewer comorbidities than those in hospitals with no defined pathway but with similar proportions of major surgery. After adjustment, pulmonary complication rates were lower with COVID-19–free surgical pathways (2.2% v 4.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.86). This was consistent in sensitivity analyses for low-risk patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1/2), propensity score–matched models, and patients with negative SARS-CoV-2 preoperative tests. The postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection rate was also lower in COVID-19–free surgical pathways (2.1% v 3.6%; aOR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.76). CONCLUSION Within available resources, dedicated COVID-19–free surgical pathways should be established to provide safe elective cancer surgery during current and before future SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks

Outcomes from elective colorectal cancer surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

This study aimed to describe the change in surgical practice and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on mortality after surgical resection of colorectal cancer during the initial phases of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

RICORS2040 : The need for collaborative research in chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a silent and poorly known killer. The current concept of CKD is relatively young and uptake by the public, physicians and health authorities is not widespread. Physicians still confuse CKD with chronic kidney insufficiency or failure. For the wider public and health authorities, CKD evokes kidney replacement therapy (KRT). In Spain, the prevalence of KRT is 0.13%. Thus health authorities may consider CKD a non-issue: very few persons eventually need KRT and, for those in whom kidneys fail, the problem is 'solved' by dialysis or kidney transplantation. However, KRT is the tip of the iceberg in the burden of CKD. The main burden of CKD is accelerated ageing and premature death. The cut-off points for kidney function and kidney damage indexes that define CKD also mark an increased risk for all-cause premature death. CKD is the most prevalent risk factor for lethal coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the factor that most increases the risk of death in COVID-19, after old age. Men and women undergoing KRT still have an annual mortality that is 10- to 100-fold higher than similar-age peers, and life expectancy is shortened by ~40 years for young persons on dialysis and by 15 years for young persons with a functioning kidney graft. CKD is expected to become the fifth greatest global cause of death by 2040 and the second greatest cause of death in Spain before the end of the century, a time when one in four Spaniards will have CKD. However, by 2022, CKD will become the only top-15 global predicted cause of death that is not supported by a dedicated well-funded Centres for Biomedical Research (CIBER) network structure in Spain. Realizing the underestimation of the CKD burden of disease by health authorities, the Decade of the Kidney initiative for 2020-2030 was launched by the American Association of Kidney Patients and the European Kidney Health Alliance. Leading Spanish kidney researchers grouped in the kidney collaborative research network Red de Investigación Renal have now applied for the Redes de Investigación Cooperativa Orientadas a Resultados en Salud (RICORS) call for collaborative research in Spain with the support of the Spanish Society of Nephrology, Federación Nacional de Asociaciones para la Lucha Contra las Enfermedades del Riñón and ONT: RICORS2040 aims to prevent the dire predictions for the global 2040 burden of CKD from becoming true

Virtualización del Título Propio en Olivicultura y Elaiotecnia. Elaboración de Materiales

Es conocido que España es primer país productor de aceite de oliva del mundo, con un 40 % de la producción mundial y el 50 % de la producción de la Unión Europea, siendo la provincia de Jaén, con el 38,4 % de la producción española, la mayor zona productora del mundo en aceite de oliva. Sin embargo, se trata de un sector en el que la escasa profesionalización es, tal vez, su mayor debilidad.La Universidad de Jaén, consciente del importante papel que ha de jugar como Institución dinamizadora del desarrollo de su entorno, en el que el sector del olivar y del aceite de oliva tiene una enorme importancia, considera que es urgente formar titulados universitarios de grado superior que posean conocimientos integrales y solventes en olivicultura y elaiotecnia de modo que incorporados a las empresas del sector del olivar y el aceite de oliva o creando las suyas propias, lo modernicen y desarrollen, contribuyendo a dotarlo de cultura empresarial y al desarrollo socioeconómico y, por ende, al bienestar de los ciudadanos de la provincia