Exploring antidiabetic drug targets as potential disease-modifying agents in osteoarthritis

Background: Osteoarthritis is a leading cause of disability, and disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs (DMOADs) could represent a pivotal advancement in treatment. Identifying the potential of antidiabetic medications as DMOADs could impact patient care significantly. Methods: We designed a comprehensive analysis pipeline involving two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) (genetic proxies for antidiabetic drug targets), summary-based MR (SMR) (for mRNA), and colocalisation (for drug-target genes) to assess their causal relationship with 12 osteoarthritis phenotypes. Summary statistics from the largest genome-wide association meta-analysis (GWAS) of osteoarthritis and gene expression data from the eQTLGen consortium were utilised. Findings: Seven out of eight major types of clinical antidiabetic medications were identified, resulting in fourteen potential drug targets. Sulfonylurea targets ABCC8/KCNJ11 were associated with increased osteoarthritis risk at any site (odds ratio (OR): 2.07, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.50–2.84, P &lt; 3 × 10−4), while PPARG, influenced by thiazolidinediones (TZDs), was associated with decreased risk of hand (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.48–0.76, P &lt; 3 × 10−4), finger (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.35–0.73, P &lt; 3 × 10−4), and thumb (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.34–0.71, P &lt; 3 × 10−4) osteoarthritis. Metformin and GLP1-RA, targeting GPD1 and GLP1R respectively, were associated with reduced risk of knee and finger osteoarthritis. In the SMR analyses, gene expression of KCNJ11, GANAB, ABCA1, and GSTP1, targeted by antidiabetic drugs, was significantly linked to at least one osteoarthritis phenotype and was replicated across at least two gene expression datasets. Additionally, increased KCNJ11 expression was related to decreased osteoarthritis risk and co-localised with at least one osteoarthritis phenotype. Interpretation: Our findings suggest a potential therapeutic role for antidiabetic drugs in treating osteoarthritis. The results indicate that certain antidiabetic drug targets may modify disease progression, with implications for developing targeted DMOADs. </p

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure: a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.

The coexistence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure (HF), either with reduced (HFrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), is frequent (30-40% of patients) and associated with a higher risk of HF hospitalization, all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. The most important causes of HF in T2DM are coronary artery disease, arterial hypertension and a direct detrimental effect of T2DM on the myocardium. T2DM is often unrecognized in HF patients, and vice versa, which emphasizes the importance of an active search for both disorders in the clinical practice. There are no specific limitations to HF treatment in T2DM. Subanalyses of trials addressing HF treatment in the general population have shown that all HF therapies are similarly effective regardless of T2DM. Concerning T2DM treatment in HF patients, most guidelines currently recommend metformin as the first-line choice. Sulphonylureas and insulin have been the traditional second- and third-line therapies although their safety in HF is equivocal. Neither glucagon-like preptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, nor dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors reduce the risk for HF hospitalization. Indeed, a DPP4 inhibitor, saxagliptin, has been associated with a higher risk of HF hospitalization. Thiazolidinediones (pioglitazone and rosiglitazone) are contraindicated in patients with (or at risk of) HF. In recent trials, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, empagliflozin and canagliflozin, have both shown a significant reduction in HF hospitalization in patients with established CV disease or at risk of CV disease. Several ongoing trials should provide an insight into the effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with HFrEF and HFpEF in the absence of T2DM

Nematode effector proteins: an emerging paradigm of parasitism

Phytonematodes use a stylet and secreted effectors to modify host cells and ingest nutrients to support their growth and development. The molecular function of nematode effectors is currently the subject of intense investigation. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of nematode effectors, with a particular focus on proteinaceous stylet-secreted effectors of sedentary endoparasitic phytonematodes, for which a wealth of information has surfaced in the past 10 yr. We provide an update on the effector repertoires of several of the most economically important genera of phytonematodes and discuss current approaches to dissecting their function. Lastly, we highlight the latest breakthroughs in effector discovery that promise to shed new light on effector diversity and function across the phylum Nematoda

Influence of visual force feedback on tissue handling in minimally invasive surgery

Cervix cance