61 research outputs found
Locally Regularized Snakes through Smoothing B-Spline Filtering
Publication in the conference proceedings of EUSIPCO, Florence, Italy, 200
Adaptive image compression algorithm for angiograms stored on optical memory card
The main objective of the Cardio-MĂ©dia project is to produce a coronarian multimedia data record stored on an optical car d
in order to offer a better follow-up for the patients treated by angioplasty . In this paper, we present the compression algorithm
implemented to store the angiographĂŹc images of the data record . This algorithm is based on a wavelet decomposition followe d
by an adapted lattice quantization of the wavelet coefficients . An original bit allocation algorithm is used during a learning step i n
orderto provide a fast coding algorithm which is adapted to the angiographic images . A subjective evaluation of the diagnosti c
quality of the images, based on the consensus approach leads to a compression ratio of 12 :1 which insures both a sufficien t
medical quality and a sufficient data compression in regards to the storage capacity of the optical card .Le projet Cardio-Média a pour objectif la création d'un prototype de dossier coronarien sur carte optique afin de faciliter le suivi clinique des patients traités par angioplastie. Dans cet article, nous présentons l'algorithme de compression mis en oeuvre et les résultats obtenus. Notre algorithme utilise une transformation en ondelettes et une quantification vectorielle adaptée des coefficients d'ondelettes. Son originalité repose sur la phase d'apprentissage qui permet de disposer d'un algorithme de compression/décompression rapide adapté à la modalité médicale « angiographie ». Une évaluation subjective par consensus de la qualité diagnostique des images comprimées a permis de retenir un taux de compression de 12 qui répond aux contraintes matérielles et médicales du projet
A cross-center smoothness prior for variational Bayesian brain tissue segmentation
Suppose one is faced with the challenge of tissue segmentation in MR images,
without annotators at their center to provide labeled training data. One option
is to go to another medical center for a trained classifier. Sadly, tissue
classifiers do not generalize well across centers due to voxel intensity shifts
caused by center-specific acquisition protocols. However, certain aspects of
segmentations, such as spatial smoothness, remain relatively consistent and can
be learned separately. Here we present a smoothness prior that is fit to
segmentations produced at another medical center. This informative prior is
presented to an unsupervised Bayesian model. The model clusters the voxel
intensities, such that it produces segmentations that are similarly smooth to
those of the other medical center. In addition, the unsupervised Bayesian model
is extended to a semi-supervised variant, which needs no visual interpretation
of clusters into tissues.Comment: 12 pages, 2 figures, 1 table. Accepted to the International
Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging (2019
Multi-modality image simulation with the Virtual Imaging Platform: Illustration on cardiac echography and MRI
International audienceMedical image simulation is useful for biological modeling, image analysis, and designing new imaging devices but it is not widely available due to the complexity of simulators, the scarcity of object models, and the heaviness of the associated computations. This paper presents the Virtual Imaging Platform, an openly-accessible web platform for multi-modality image simulation. The integration of simulators and models is described and exemplified on simulated cardiac MRIs and ultrasonic images
Global Carbon Budget 2020
Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere in a changing climate â the âglobal carbon budgetâ â is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe and synthesize data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO emissions (E) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land-use change (E), mainly deforestation, are based on land use and land-use change data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO concentration is measured directly and its growth rate (G) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO sink (S) and terrestrial CO sink (S) are estimated with global process models constrained by observations. The resulting carbon budget imbalance (B), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1Ï. For the last decade available (2010â2019), E was 9.6â±â0.5âGtCâyr excluding the cement carbonation sink (9.4â±â0.5âGtCâyrâ1 when the cement carbonation sink is included), and E was 1.6â±â0.7âGtCâyr. For the same decade, G was 5.1â±â0.02âGtCâyr (2.4â±â0.01âppmâyr), S 2.5â±â 0.6âGtCâyr, and S 3.4â±â0.9âGtCâyr, with a budget imbalance B of â0.1âGtCâyr indicating a near balance between estimated sources and sinks over the last decade. For the year 2019 alone, the growth in E was only about 0.1â% with fossil emissions increasing to 9.9â±â0.5âGtCâyr excluding the cement carbonation sink (9.7â±â0.5âGtCâyr when cement carbonation sink is included), and E was 1.8â±â0.7âGtCâyr, for total anthropogenic CO emissions of 11.5â±â0.9âGtCâyr (42.2â±â3.3âGtCO). Also for 2019, G was 5.4â±â0.2âGtCâyr (2.5â±â0.1âppmâyr), S was 2.6â±â0.6âGtCâyr, and S was 3.1â±â1.2âGtCâyr, with a B of 0.3âGtC. The global atmospheric CO concentration reached 409.85â±â0.1âppm averaged over 2019. Preliminary data for 2020, accounting for the COVID-19-induced changes in emissions, suggest a decrease in E relative to 2019 of about â7â% (median estimate) based on individual estimates from four studies of â6â%, â7â%, â7â% (â3â% to â11â%), and â13â%. Overall, the mean and trend in the components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959â2019, but discrepancies of up to 1âGtCâyr persist for the representation of semi-decadal variability in CO fluxes. Comparison of estimates from diverse approaches and observations shows (1) no consensus in the mean and trend in land-use change emissions over the last decade, (2) a persistent low agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO flux in the northern extra-tropics, and (3) an apparent discrepancy between the different methods for the ocean sink outside the tropics, particularly in the Southern Ocean. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget and the progress in understanding of the global carbon cycle compared with previous publications of this data set (Friedlingstein et al., 2019; Le QuĂ©rĂ© et al., 2018b, a, 2016, 2015b, a, 2014, 2013). The data presented in this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/gcp-2020 (Friedlingstein et al., 2020)
Global Carbon Budget 2020
Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere in a changing climate â the âglobal carbon budgetâ â is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe and synthesize data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO2 emissions (EFOS) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land-use change (ELUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land use and land-use change data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly and its growth rate (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) and terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) are estimated with global process models constrained by observations. The resulting carbon budget imbalance (BIM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1Ï. For the last decade available (2010â2019), EFOS was 9.6â±â0.5âGtCâyrâ1 excluding the cement carbonation sink (9.4â±â0.5âGtCâyrâ1 when the cement carbonation sink is included), and ELUC was 1.6â±â0.7âGtCâyrâ1. For the same decade, GATM was 5.1â±â0.02âGtCâyrâ1 (2.4â±â0.01âppmâyrâ1), SOCEAN 2.5â±â 0.6âGtCâyrâ1, and SLAND 3.4â±â0.9âGtCâyrâ1, with a budget imbalance BIM of â0.1âGtCâyrâ1 indicating a near balance between estimated sources and sinks over the last decade. For the year 2019 alone, the growth in EFOS was only about 0.1â% with fossil emissions increasing to 9.9â±â0.5âGtCâyrâ1 excluding the cement carbonation sink (9.7â±â0.5âGtCâyrâ1 when cement carbonation sink is included), and ELUC was 1.8â±â0.7âGtCâyrâ1, for total anthropogenic CO2 emissions of 11.5â±â0.9âGtCâyrâ1 (42.2â±â3.3âGtCO2). Also for 2019, GATM was 5.4â±â0.2âGtCâyrâ1 (2.5â±â0.1âppmâyrâ1), SOCEAN was 2.6â±â0.6âGtCâyrâ1, and SLAND was 3.1â±â1.2âGtCâyrâ1, with a BIM of 0.3âGtC. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration reached 409.85â±â0.1âppm averaged over 2019. Preliminary data for 2020, accounting for the COVID-19-induced changes in emissions, suggest a decrease in EFOS relative to 2019 of about â7â% (median estimate) based on individual estimates from four studies of â6â%, â7â%, â7â% (â3â% to â11â%), and â13â%. Overall, the mean and trend in the components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959â2019, but discrepancies of up to 1âGtCâyrâ1 persist for the representation of semi-decadal variability in CO2 fluxes. Comparison of estimates from diverse approaches and observations shows (1) no consensus in the mean and trend in land-use change emissions over the last decade, (2) a persistent low agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO2 flux in the northern extra-tropics, and (3) an apparent discrepancy between the different methods for the ocean sink outside the tropics, particularly in the Southern Ocean. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget and the progress in understanding of the global carbon cycle compared with previous publications of this data set (Friedlingstein et al., 2019; Le QuĂ©rĂ© et al., 2018b, a, 2016, 2015b, a, 2014, 2013). The data presented in this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/gcp-2020 (Friedlingstein et al., 2020)
Color space influence on mean shift filtering
International audienceMean shift is an efficient filtering algorithm processing multidimensional data as color images. Such algorithm needs few tuning parameters named scale parameters. In this paper, we study the impact of the color space used on the results quality. Two linear transformations of the RGB space (Y\textquoterightUV and PC A) and a non linear one (L*a*b* color space) are addressed. The results quality is assessed using the PSNR and the SSIM, a consistent measure with human eye perception. To determine the optimal color space, we use an exhaustive search of the scale parameters. This study reminds that PC A transformation is useless for mean shift and shows (using 5 natural color images and 2 synthesized data) that optimizing the bandwidth parameters in the L*a*b* space helps in improving the mean shift filtering assessed by PSNR. © 2011 IEEE
- âŠ