MÍDIAS SOCIAIS COMO FONTE DE CONHECIMENTO PARA O PROCESSO DE PARTO NORMAL

Objective: To check the knowledge acquired by pregnant women through social media aboutthe normal delivery process and the influence on the delivery experience.Method: A qualitative study with 12 puerperal women from a philanthropic hospital, in the cityof Recife-PE. Individual interviews were conducted between December 2018 and February2019, and the methodology of content analysis was used.Results: Two categories emerged after analysis: The use of social media as information sourcesduring pregnancy, and Expectation towards vaginal delivery with the acquired knowledgeversus the reality of the vaginal delivery experience.Conclusion: In response to the health education deficit, social media gained ground as themain source of information and clarification of pieces of doubt about childbirth. Healthprofessionals, knowing the sources of information used by pregnant women, can contributewith the guidance and indication of safe sources with quality content.Objetivo: verificar o conhecimento adquirido pelas gestantes para o processo de parto normal através das mídias sociais e a influência sobre a experiência do parto.Metodologia: estudo qualitativo com 12 puérperas de um hospital filantrópico, na cidade de Recife-PE. Foram realizadas entrevistas individuais, entre dezembro de 2018 e fevereiro de 2019, e foi utilizada a metodologia de análise de conteúdo.Resultados: após análise, emergiram duas categorias: Uso da mídia social como suporte de informações durante a gestação, e Expectativa para o parto vaginal através do conhecimento adquirido versus a realidade da experiência do parto vaginal.Conclusão: em resposta ao déficit de educação em saúde, as mídias sociais ganharam espaço como principal fonte de informações e esclarecimento de dúvidas a respeito do parto. Os profissionais da saúde, conhecendo as fontes de informação utilizadas pelas gestantes, podem contribuir com as orientações e indicação de fontes seguras e com conteúdo de quaildade.Objetivo: verificar los conocimientos adquiridos por las embarazadas para el proceso de partonormal a través de los medios sociales y la influencia sobre la experiencia del parto.Metodología: estudio cualitativo realizado con 12 puérperas de un hospital filantrópico en laciudad de Recife-PE. Se realizaron entrevistas individuales entre diciembre de 2018 y febrerode 2019 y se utilizó la metodología del análisis de contenido.Resultados: luego del análisis surgieron dos categorías: Uso de los medios sociales comosoporte de información durante el embarazo, y Expectativa con respecto al parto vaginal através del conocimiento adquirido versus la realidad de la experiencia del parto vaginal.Conclusión: en respuesta al déficit de educación en salud, los medios sociales ganaronespacio como fuente principal de información y aclaración de dudas con respecto al parto.Al conocer qué fuentes de información emplearon las embarazadas, los profesionales de lasalud pueden contribuir con pautas orientadoras y con la indicación de fuentes seguras y queaporten contenido de calidad

Núcleos de Ensino da Unesp: artigos 2008

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq

Characterisation of microbial attack on archaeological bone

As part of an EU funded project to investigate the factors influencing bone preservation in the archaeological record, more than 250 bones from 41 archaeological sites in five countries spanning four climatic regions were studied for diagenetic alteration. Sites were selected to cover a range of environmental conditions and archaeological contexts. Microscopic and physical (mercury intrusion porosimetry) analyses of these bones revealed that the majority (68%) had suffered microbial attack. Furthermore, significant differences were found between animal and human bone in both the state of preservation and the type of microbial attack present. These differences in preservation might result from differences in early taphonomy of the bones. © 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved

Brazilian Flora 2020: Leveraging the power of a collaborative scientific network

International audienceThe shortage of reliable primary taxonomic data limits the description of biological taxa and the understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes, complicating biogeographical, ecological, and evolutionary studies. This deficit creates a significant taxonomic impediment to biodiversity research and conservation planning. The taxonomic impediment and the biodiversity crisis are widely recognized, highlighting the urgent need for reliable taxonomic data. Over the past decade, numerous countries worldwide have devoted considerable effort to Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC), which called for the preparation of a working list of all known plant species by 2010 and an online world Flora by 2020. Brazil is a megadiverse country, home to more of the world's known plant species than any other country. Despite that, Flora Brasiliensis, concluded in 1906, was the last comprehensive treatment of the Brazilian flora. The lack of accurate estimates of the number of species of algae, fungi, and plants occurring in Brazil contributes to the prevailing taxonomic impediment and delays progress towards the GSPC targets. Over the past 12 years, a legion of taxonomists motivated to meet Target 1 of the GSPC, worked together to gather and integrate knowledge on the algal, plant, and fungal diversity of Brazil. Overall, a team of about 980 taxonomists joined efforts in a highly collaborative project that used cybertaxonomy to prepare an updated Flora of Brazil, showing the power of scientific collaboration to reach ambitious goals. This paper presents an overview of the Brazilian Flora 2020 and provides taxonomic and spatial updates on the algae, fungi, and plants found in one of the world's most biodiverse countries. We further identify collection gaps and summarize future goals that extend beyond 2020. Our results show that Brazil is home to 46,975 native species of algae, fungi, and plants, of which 19,669 are endemic to the country. The data compiled to date suggests that the Atlantic Rainforest might be the most diverse Brazilian domain for all plant groups except gymnosperms, which are most diverse in the Amazon. However, scientific knowledge of Brazilian diversity is still unequally distributed, with the Atlantic Rainforest and the Cerrado being the most intensively sampled and studied biomes in the country. In times of “scientific reductionism”, with botanical and mycological sciences suffering pervasive depreciation in recent decades, the first online Flora of Brazil 2020 significantly enhanced the quality and quantity of taxonomic data available for algae, fungi, and plants from Brazil. This project also made all the information freely available online, providing a firm foundation for future research and for the management, conservation, and sustainable use of the Brazilian funga and flora