24 research outputs found

    On dynamic monopolies of graphs with general thresholds

    Get PDF
    Let GG be a graph and τ:V(G)N{\mathcal{\tau}}: V(G)\rightarrow \Bbb{N} be an assignment of thresholds to the vertices of GG. A subset of vertices DD is said to be dynamic monopoly (or simply dynamo) if the vertices of GG can be partitioned into subsets D0,D1,...,DkD_0, D_1,..., D_k such that D0=DD_0=D and for any i=1,...,k1i=1,..., k-1 each vertex vv in Di+1D_{i+1} has at least t(v)t(v) neighbors in D0...DiD_0\cup ...\cup D_i. Dynamic monopolies are in fact modeling the irreversible spread of influence such as disease or belief in social networks. We denote the smallest size of any dynamic monopoly of GG, with a given threshold assignment, by dyn(G)dyn(G). In this paper we first define the concept of a resistant subgraph and show its relationship with dynamic monopolies. Then we obtain some lower and upper bounds for the smallest size of dynamic monopolies in graphs with different types of thresholds. Next we introduce dynamo-unbounded families of graphs and prove some related results. We also define the concept of a homogenious society that is a graph with probabilistic thresholds satisfying some conditions and obtain a bound for the smallest size of its dynamos. Finally we consider dynamic monopoly of line graphs and obtain some bounds for their sizes and determine the exact values in some special cases

    On dynamic monopolies of graphs: the average and strict majority thresholds

    Full text link
    Let GG be a graph and τ:V(G)N{0}{\mathcal{\tau}}: V(G)\rightarrow \Bbb{N}\cup \{0\} be an assignment of thresholds to the vertices of GG. A subset of vertices DD is said to be a dynamic monopoly corresponding to (G,τ)(G, \tau) if the vertices of GG can be partitioned into subsets D0,D1,...,DkD_0, D_1,..., D_k such that D0=DD_0=D and for any i0,...,k1i\in {0, ..., k-1}, each vertex vv in Di+1D_{i+1} has at least τ(v)\tau(v) neighbors in D0...DiD_0\cup ... \cup D_i. Dynamic monopolies are in fact modeling the irreversible spread of influence in social networks. In this paper we first obtain a lower bound for the smallest size of any dynamic monopoly in terms of the average threshold and the order of graph. Also we obtain an upper bound in terms of the minimum vertex cover of graphs. Then we derive the upper bound G/2|G|/2 for the smallest size of any dynamic monopoly when the graph GG contains at least one odd vertex, where the threshold of any vertex vv is set as (deg(v)+1)/2\lceil (deg(v)+1)/2 \rceil (i.e. strict majority threshold). This bound improves the best known bound for strict majority threshold. We show that the latter bound can be achieved by a polynomial time algorithm. We also show that α(G)+1\alpha'(G)+1 is an upper bound for the size of strict majority dynamic monopoly, where α(G)\alpha'(G) stands for the matching number of GG. Finally, we obtain a basic upper bound for the smallest size of any dynamic monopoly, in terms of the average threshold and vertex degrees. Using this bound we derive some other upper bounds

    Latency-bounded target set selection in signed networks

    Get PDF
    It is well-documented that social networks play a considerable role in information spreading. The dynamic processes governing the diffusion of information have been studied in many fields, including epidemiology, sociology, economics, and computer science. A widely studied problem in the area of viral marketing is the target set selection: in order to market a new product, hoping it will be adopted by a large fraction of individuals in the network, which set of individuals should we “target” (for instance, by offering them free samples of the product)? In this paper, we introduce a diffusion model in which some of the neighbors of a node have a negative influence on that node, namely, they induce the node to reject the feature that is supposed to be spread. We study the target set selection problem within this model, first proving a strong inapproximability result holding also when the diffusion process is required to reach all the nodes in a couple of rounds. Then, we consider a set of restrictions under which the problem is approximable to some extent

    Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory

    Full text link
    The current understanding of astrophysical magnetic fields is reviewed, focusing on their generation and maintenance by turbulence. In the astrophysical context this generation is usually explained by a self-excited dynamo, which involves flows that can amplify a weak 'seed' magnetic field exponentially fast. Particular emphasis is placed on the nonlinear saturation of the dynamo. Analytic and numerical results are discussed both for small scale dynamos, which are completely isotropic, and for large scale dynamos, where some form of parity breaking is crucial. Central to the discussion of large scale dynamos is the so-called alpha effect which explains the generation of a mean field if the turbulence lacks mirror symmetry, i.e. if the flow has kinetic helicity. Large scale dynamos produce small scale helical fields as a waste product that quench the large scale dynamo and hence the alpha effect. With this in mind, the microscopic theory of the alpha effect is revisited in full detail and recent results for the loss of helical magnetic fields are reviewed.Comment: 285 pages, 72 figures, accepted by Phys. Re

    COM Outlook Winter 2016

    Get PDF
    https://nsuworks.nova.edu/hpd_com_outlook/1065/thumbnail.jp
    corecore