Performance of Agronomic Crop Varieties in Alaska 1978 –2002

There is no such thing as the perfect variety for Alaska. Some varieties are adapted to a wide range of climatic and geographic locations, while others are more specific in their adaptation. The change in elevation of a few hundred feet or a move of a few miles can have a considerable effect on the performance of any variety. Also, cultural practices such as tillage, fertilizer rates, planting date, seeding rate, pest control, and a multitude of other factors can also influence crop yields. This is especially noticeable in northern environments such as Alaska. For example, date-of-planting studies done by F.J. Wooding (1973) and C.W. Knight (1989) found that any date after the middle of May for planting an agronomic crop can result in delayed maturity, low yields, and low quality grain, even for the best adapted varieties for Alaska

Harvest and Nitrogen Management of Three Perennial Grasses as Biomass Feedstock in Subarctic Alaska

High energy costs in high-latitude regions have generated interest in the feasibility of bioenergy cropping. The goal of this study was to determine the N response and best harvest regime for biomass production of three perennial, cool-season grass species—tufted hairgrass (Deschampsia caespitosa (L.) P. Beauv.), slender wheatgrass (Elymus trachy­caulus (Link) Gould ex Shinners), and smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss)—at two locations in central Alaska. Maximum dry matter yields were 11.3 Mg ha-1 for smooth bromegrass, 8.1 Mg ha-1 for tufted hairgrass, and 8.0 Mg ha-1 for slender wheatgrass, but yields varied greatly among years. We found a linear N response in most cases, with highest yields at the 100 kg N ha-1 application rate. Yields for the double-harvest regime usually did not vary significantly from those of the fall harvest, but spring harvest sometimes reduced yields dramatically. Biomass in the spring harvest was usually dry enough not to require additional drying for storage. Results of this study indicate it may be possible to produce grass biomass yields high enough for use as bioenergy feedstocks in central Alaska, but questions remain about the best management practices and the economics of growing bioenergy crops in Alaska.Les coûts élevés de l’énergie en haute latitude incitent les gens à se pencher sur la faisabilité d’entreprendre des cultures bioénergétiques. L’objectif de cette étude consistait à déterminer la réponse à l’azote et le meilleur régime d’exploitation pour la bioproduction de trois espèces de graminées vivaces en saison fraîche, soit la deschampsie cespiteuse (Deschampsia caespitosa (L.) P. Beauv.), l’élyme à chaumes rudes (Elymus trachycaulus (Link) Gould ex Shinners) et le brome inerme (Bromus inermis Leyss), à deux endroits du centre de l’Alaska. Le rendement maximum de matière sèche était de 11,3 tm ha-1 dans le cas du brome inerme, de 8,1 tm ha-1 dans le cas de la deschampsie cespiteuse et de 8,0 tm ha-1 dans le cas de l’élyme à chaumes rudes, bien que les rendements aient connu d’importantes variations d’une année à l’autre. Nous avons trouvé une réponse linéaire à l’azote dans la plupart des cas, les rendements les plus élevés étant ceux de la dose d’application de 100 kg N ha-1. Le rendement du régime à double récolte ne variait généralement pas beaucoup du régime à récolte d’automne, bien que les récoltes du printemps donnaient parfois un rendement considérablement réduit. De manière générale, la biomasse de la récolte du printemps était suffisamment sèche pour ne pas avoir besoin d’être asséchée davantage avant d’être stockée. Les résultats de cette étude indiquent qu’il peut être possible de produire des rendements en biomasse suffisamment élevés à partir de graminées pour être utilisés comme charge bioénergétique dans le centre de l’Alaska, mais cela dit, il y a toujours lieu de répondre aux questions portant sur les pratiques de gestion exemplaires et le caractère économique des productions bioéner­gétiques en Alaska

Alveolar Dynamics and Beyond – The Importance of Surfactant Protein C and Cholesterol in Lung Homeostasis and Fibrosis

Surfactant protein C (SP-C) is an important player in enhancing the interfacial adsorption of lung surfactant lipid films to the alveolar air-liquid interface. Doing so, surface tension drops down enough to stabilize alveoli and the lung, reducing the work of breathing. In addition, it has been shown that SP-C counteracts the deleterious effect of high amounts of cholesterol in the surfactant lipid films. On its side, cholesterol is a wellknown modulator of the biophysical properties of biological membranes and it has been proven that it activates the inflammasome pathways in the lung. Even though the molecular mechanism is not known, there are evidences suggesting that these two molecules may interplay with each other in order to keep the proper function of the lung. This review focuses in the role of SP-C and cholesterol in the development of lung fibrosis and the potential pathways in which impairment of both molecules leads to aberrant lung repair, and therefore impaired alveolar dynamics. From molecular to cellular mechanisms to evidences in animal models and human diseases. The evidences revised here highlight a potential SP-C/cholesterol axis as target for the treatment of lung fibrosis

More Than Smell—COVID-19 Is Associated With Severe Impairment of Smell, Taste, and Chemesthesis

Correction: Chemical Senses, Volume 46, 2021, bjab050, https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjab050 Published: 08 December 2021Recent anecdotal and scientific reports have provided evidence of a link between COVID-19 and chemosensory impairments, such as anosmia. However, these reports have downplayed or failed to distinguish potential effects on taste, ignored chemesthesis, and generally lacked quantitative measurements. Here, we report the development, implementation, and initial results of a multilingual, international questionnaire to assess self-reported quantity and quality of perception in 3 distinct chemosensory modalities (smell, taste, and chemesthesis) before and during COVID-19. In the first 11 days after questionnaire launch, 4039 participants (2913 women, 1118 men, and 8 others, aged 19-79) reported a COVID-19 diagnosis either via laboratory tests or clinical assessment. Importantly, smell, taste, and chemesthetic function were each significantly reduced compared to their status before the disease. Difference scores (maximum possible change +/- 100) revealed a mean reduction of smell (-79.7 +/- 28.7, mean +/- standard deviation), taste (-69.0 +/- 32.6), and chemesthetic (-37.3 +/- 36.2) function during COVID-19. Qualitative changes in olfactory ability (parosmia and phantosmia) were relatively rare and correlated with smell loss. Importantly, perceived nasal obstruction did not account for smell loss. Furthermore, chemosensory impairments were similar between participants in the laboratory test and clinical assessment groups. These results show that COVID-19-associated chemosensory impairment is not limited to smell but also affects taste and chemesthesis.The multimodal impact of COVID-19 and the lack of perceived nasal obstruction suggest that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus strain 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection may disrupt sensory-neural mechanisms.Peer reviewe

Plasma–liquid interactions: a review and roadmap

Plasma–liquid interactions represent a growing interdisciplinary area of research involving plasma science, fluid dynamics, heat and mass transfer, photolysis, multiphase chemistry and aerosol science. This review provides an assessment of the state-of-the-art of this multidisciplinary area and identifies the key research challenges. The developments in diagnostics, modeling and further extensions of cross section and reaction rate databases that are necessary to address these challenges are discussed. The review focusses on non-equilibrium plasmas

Studies on the Radulae of Taiwan Molluscs III. Comparison on the Radulae of Landsnails and Marine Molluscs

Decisions in asylum seeking procedures tend to be based on a credibility assessment. This meansthat the story on which the asylum claim is based is probed. Fourindicators are typically used to assess credibility, namely internal consistency, external consistency, sufficiency of detail and specificity, and plausibility. The relation between these indicators, and the problematic lack of understanding of the plausibility concept have been insufficiently addressed in previous research. According to the findings in this study, none of the indicators seem to be rated objectively or independently of each other. There appears to be an unconscious problem of subjectivity in the credibility assessment. This issue could arise from the use of the ill-defined plausibility indicator, or could be due to another factor influencing all four indicators. The limitations of this study point to the need for further research to elucidate the unidentified influences on the indicators used in the credibility assessment in asylum procedures