78 research outputs found
Ecology and conservation of Mediterranean temporary ponds in the UK
Macroinvertebrate and plant assemblage composition and abiotic habitat characteristics were
examined in seventy-six ponds, in the New Forest (Hampshire, UK) and on the Lizard Peninsula
(Cornwall, UK), in order to unravel the ecological processes influencing ponds at a range of spatial
scales and provide a clear definition of Mediterranean Temporary Pond (MTP) habitat (92/43/EEC)
in the UK. In addition, a set of newly created experimental ponds were monitored on the Lizard to
examine patterns of colonisation and evaluate the use of habitat creation in temporary pond
conservation. The findings are synthesised into a number of management recommendations for
ponds in the regions, with a particular focus on MTPs.
MTPs equated to ephemeral, winter-flooded ponds occurring in shallow depressions on the Lizard,
which had some floristic similarities to other western Atlantic fringe sites. They were dominated by
low growing grasses, rushes and rare annual species of the Nanocyperion alliance along with a
depauperate macroinvertebrate assemblage comprising Coleoptera (including characteristic rare
taxa), Trichoptera and Chironomidae.
The strength of physicochemical and spatial pattern in assemblage composition varied between
the regions. Lizard macroinvertebrate assemblage similarity was spatially autocorrelated and
related to water chemistry and pond area but New Forest macroinvertebrate similarity was not
related to any of the measured physicochemical parameters. Plant assemblage composition was
only weakly related to wet phase physicochemistry. Pond vegetation structured macroinvertebrate
assemblages in different ways at different spatial scales. At large-scales, macrophyte richness
and composition affected macroinvertebrate assemblage composition in both regions, whereas, at
smaller-scales, macrophyte structural complexity (measured using fractals) influenced body size
scaling and overall biomass of macroinvertebrates.
Assemblages in both regions were significantly nested, indicating that species-poor sites tended to
be subsets of rich sites. Macroinvertebrate nesting, on the Lizard, was not due to passive
sampling, and was best explained by pond area, with habitat parameters and isolation being of
secondary importance. Nested and idiosyncratic taxa differed in their spatial response to factors
which structured assemblage-level nestedness; idiosyncratic taxa tended to possess broad
ecological tolerance and good dispersal capacity, whilst nested species had narrower tolerance or
limited powers of dispersal.
Experimental pond macroinvertebrate assemblage similarity converged with pond age, despite
continued variation in physicochemistry, and the assemblages that developed were not significantly
different from small natural ponds in the region. Augmentation of current MTP habitat could
therefore be achieved by creating new sites in close proximity to existing water bodies
The distribution of pond snail communities across a landscape: separating out the influence of spatial position from local habitat quality for ponds in south-east Northumberland, UK
Ponds support a rich biodiversity because the heterogeneity of individual ponds creates, at the landscape scale, a diversity of habitats for wildlife. The distribution of pond animals and plants will be influenced by both the local conditions within a pond and the spatial distribution of ponds across the landscape. Separating out the local from the spatial is difficult because the two are often linked. Pond snails are likely to be affected by both local conditions, e.g. water hardness, and spatial patterns, e.g. distance between ponds, but studies of snail communities struggle distinguishing between the two. In this study, communities of snails were recorded from 52 ponds in a biogeographically coherent landscape in north-east England. The distribution of snail communities was compared to local environments characterised by the macrophyte communities within each pond and to the spatial pattern of ponds throughout the landscape. Mantel tests were used to partial out the local versus the landscape respective influences. Snail communities became more similar in ponds that were closer together and in ponds with similar macrophyte communities as both the local and the landscape scale were important for this group of animals. Data were collected from several types of ponds, including those created on nature reserves specifically for wildlife, old field ponds (at least 150 years old) primarily created for watering livestock and subsidence ponds outside protected areas or amongst coastal dunes. No one pond type supported all the species. Larger, deeper ponds on nature reserves had the highest numbers of species within individual ponds but shallow, temporary sites on farm land supported a distinct temporary water fauna. The conservation of pond snails in this region requires a diversity of pond types rather than one idealised type and ponds scattered throughout the area at a variety of sites, not just concentrated on nature reserves
Interactive effects of temperature and habitat complexity on freshwater communities
Warming can lead to increased growth of plants or algae at the base of the food web, which may increase the overall complexity of habitat available for other organisms. Temperature and habitat complexity have both been shown to alter the structure and functioning of communities, but they may also have interactive effects, for example, if the shade provided by additional habitat negates the positive effect of temperature on understory plant or algal growth. This study explored the interactive effects of these two major environmental factors in a manipulative field experiment, by assessing changes in ecosystem functioning (primary production and decomposition) and community structure in the presence and absence of artificial plants along a natural stream temperature gradient of 5–18°C. There was no effect of temperature or habitat complexity on benthic primary production, but epiphytic production increased with temperature in the more complex habitat. Cellulose decomposition rate increased with temperature, but was unaffected by habitat complexity. Macroinvertebrate communities were less similar to each other as temperature increased, while habitat complexity only altered community composition in the coldest streams. There was also an overall increase in macroinvertebrate abundance, body mass, and biomass in the warmest streams, driven by increasing dominance of snails and blackfly larvae. Presence of habitat complexity, however, dampened the strength of this temperature effect on the abundance of macroinvertebrates in the benthos. The interactive effects that were observed suggest that habitat complexity can modify the effects of temperature on important ecosystem functions and community structure, which may alter energy flow through the food web. Given that warming is likely to increase habitat complexity, particularly at higher latitudes, more studies should investigate these two major environmental factors in combination to improve our ability to predict the impacts of future global change
Application of computer-aided tomography techniques to visualize kelp holdfast structure reveals the importance of habitat complexity for supporting marine biodiversity
Ecosystem engineers that increase habitat complexity are keystone species in marine systems, increasing shelter and niche availability, and therefore biodiversity. For example, kelp holdfasts form intricate structures and host the largest number of organisms in kelp ecosystems. However, methods that quantify 3D habitat complexity have only seldom been used in marine habitats, and never in kelp holdfast communities. This study investigated the role of kelp holdfasts (Laminaria hyperborea) in supporting benthic faunal biodiversity. Computer-aided tomography (CT-) scanning was used to quantify the three-dimensional geometrical complexity of holdfasts, including volume, surface area and surface fractal dimension (FD). Additionally, the number of haptera, number of haptera per unit of volume, and age of kelps were estimated. These measurements were compared to faunal biodiversity and community structure, using partial least-squares regression and multivariate ordination. Holdfast volume explained most of the variance observed in biodiversity indices, however all other complexity measures also strongly contributed to the variance observed. Multivariate ordinations further revealed that surface area and haptera per unit of volume accounted for the patterns observed in faunal community structure. Using 3D image analysis, this study makes a strong contribution to elucidate quantitative mechanisms underlying the observed relationship between biodiversity and habitat complexity. Furthermore, the potential of CT-scanning as an ecological tool is demonstrated, and a methodology for its use in future similar studies is established. Such spatially resolved imager analysis could help identify structurally complex areas as biodiversity hotspots, and may support the prioritization of areas for conservation
Eco-engineering urban infrastructure for marine and coastal biodiversity: which interventions have the greatest ecological benefit?
Along urbanised coastlines, urban infrastructure is increasingly becoming the dominant habitat. These structures are often poor surrogates for natural habitats, and a diversity of eco-engineering approaches have been trialled to enhance their biodiversity, with varying success. We undertook a quantitative meta-analysis and qualitative review of 109 studies to compare the efficacy of common eco-engineering approaches (e.g. increasing texture, crevices, pits, holes, elevations and habitat-forming taxa) in enhancing the biodiversity of key functional groups of organisms, across a variety of habitat settings and spatial scales. All interventions, with one exception, increased the abundance or number of species of one or more of the functional groups considered. Nevertheless, the magnitude of effect varied markedly among groups and habitat settings. In the intertidal, interventions that provided moisture and shade had the greatest effect on the richness of sessile and mobile organisms, while water-retaining features had the greatest effect on the richness of fish. In contrast, in the subtidal, small-scale depressions which provide refuge to new recruits from predators and other environmental stressors such as waves, had higher abundances of sessile organisms while elevated structures had higher numbers and abundances of fish. The taxa that responded most positively to eco-engineering in the intertidal were those whose body size most closely matched the dimensions of the resulting intervention. Synthesis and applications. The efficacy of eco-engineering interventions varies among habitat settings and functional groups. This indicates the importance of developing site-specific approaches that match the target taxa and dominant stressors. Furthermore, because different types of intervention are effective at enhancing different groups of organisms, ideally a range of approaches should be applied simultaneously to maximise niche diversity
- …