THE APPLICATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS TO HOUSING COOPERATIVES: ARE CO-OPS BASTIONS OF DISCRIMINATORY EXCLUSION OR SELF-SELECTING MODELS OF COMMUNITY-BASED LIVING?

Despite one of the nation\u27s broadest civil rights laws for residents of housing cooperatives, few of New York City\u27s discrimination claims in the cooperative housing market are pursued. In this article, the authors provide an overview of the cooperative housing market in New York City, including anecdotal evidence of discrimination. Next, the article discusses the legal framework of the housing cooperative before a brief analysis of city, state and federal anti-discrimination laws applicable to cooperatives. Finally, the article undertakes an analysis of cases in which antidiscrimination laws have been applied to cooperatives. The author concludes with recommendations for cooperatives and prospective applicants

Encouraging greater empowerment for adolescents in consent procedures in social science research and policy projects

The CO-CREATE project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 774210.The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child emphasizes the importance of allowing children and adolescents to influence decisions that are important to them following their age and maturity. This paper explores the principles, practices, and implications around using parental versus child/adolescent consent when participating in social science research and policy development. Experiences from two studies are presented: The Confronting Obesity: Co-creating policy with youth (CO-CREATE) and the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study, a World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborative Cross-National study. Although parental consent may be an important gatekeeper for protecting children and adolescents from potentially harmful research participation, it may also be considered an obstacle to the empowerment of children and adolescents in case they want to share their views and experiences directly. This paper argues that evaluation of possible harm should be left to ethics committees and that, if no harm related to the research participation processes is identified and the project has a clear perspective on collaborating with the target group, adolescents from the age of 12 years should be granted the legal capacity to give consent to participate in the research project. Collaboration with adolescents in the development of the research project is encouraged.Publisher PDFPeer reviewe

THE APPLICATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS TO HOUSING COOPERATIVES: ARE CO-OPS BASTIONS OF DISCRIMINATORY EXCLUSION OR SELF-SELECTING MODELS OF COMMUNITY-BASED LIVING?

Despite one of the nation\u27s broadest civil rights laws for residents of housing cooperatives, few of New York City\u27s discrimination claims in the cooperative housing market are pursued. In this article, the authors provide an overview of the cooperative housing market in New York City, including anecdotal evidence of discrimination. Next, the article discusses the legal framework of the housing cooperative before a brief analysis of city, state and federal anti-discrimination laws applicable to cooperatives. Finally, the article undertakes an analysis of cases in which antidiscrimination laws have been applied to cooperatives. The author concludes with recommendations for cooperatives and prospective applicants

Institution of a difficult airway response team for emergency department patients with anticipated or encountered difficult airways: Descriptive analysis of a 5‐year experience at an academic teaching hospital

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to describe characteristics and outcomes associated with difficult airway response team (DART) encounters in the emergency department (ED). Methods We performed a descriptive analysis of a prospective, single‐center database of DART encounters in the ED from April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2021 cross‐referenced with retrospective chart review. Adult ED patients ≥18 years old for whom a DART was activated were eligible. We prospectively collected activation characteristics, intubation indications, operator characteristics, and intubation methods used for DART encounters. Retrospective chart review was conducted to obtain patient demographics and outcome variables. Descriptive analyses were computed for all outcomes. Results We analyzed 89 DART encounters. No intubation attempts were made prior to DART activation in 52 cases (58.4%). The most common indications for intubation were angioedema (n = 17, 19.1%) or other airway obstruction (n = 15, 16.9%). A definitive airway was established by anesthesiology (n = 46, 51.7%), emergency medicine (n = 25, 28.1%), trauma surgery (n = 9, 10.1%), and ENT (n = 5, 5.6%). The most common method of intubation used to establish a definitive airway was video laryngoscopy with a bougie or D‐blade (n = 29, 32.6%) followed by flexible fiberoptic intubation (n = 19, 21.3%). A surgical airway was required in eight encounters (cricothyrotomy [n = 4, 4.5%]; tracheostomy [n = 4, 4.5%]). Cases were managed in the ED (n = 73, 82%), operating room (OR) (n = 10, 11.2%), and intensive care unit (ICU) (n = 1, 1.1%). All patients requiring intubation had an endotracheal or surgical airway established. Conclusion Our findings provide important insights regarding ED DART utilization and have implications when considering institution of a DART in the ED

Encouraging greater empowerment for adolescents in consent procedures in social science research and policy projects

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child emphasizes the importance of allowing children and adolescents to influence decisions that are important to them following their age and maturity. This paper explores the principles, practices, and implications around using parental versus child/adolescent consent when participating in social science research and policy development. Experiences from two studies are presented: The Confronting Obesity: Co-creating policy with youth (CO-CREATE) and the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study, a World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborative Cross-National study. Although parental consent may be an important gatekeeper for protecting children and adolescents from potentially harmful research participation, it may also be considered an obstacle to the empowerment of children and adolescents in case they want to share their views and experiences directly. This paper argues that evaluation of possible harm should be left to ethics committees and that, if no harm related to the research participation processes is identified and the project has a clear perspective on collaborating with the target group, adolescents from the age of 12 years should be granted the legal capacity to give consent to participate in the research project. Collaboration with adolescents in the development of the research project is encouraged.</p