Fordham University

Fordham University School of Law
Not a member yet
    17238 research outputs found


    Get PDF

    Gina Argento Trust v. Franco

    Get PDF
    Handwritten Opinion. LAS: This case was litigated by Charles McCracken and Spencer Luchs. Here the court denied the landlord’s cross motion to amend the final judgment and for a money judgment as the stipulation did not provide for such relief

    Originalism, Bruen, and Constitutional Insanity

    Get PDF

    Mei Ling Chow v. English

    Get PDF

    Matter of 10 W. 65th St. Tenants Assn. v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal

    Get PDF
    For a Judgment Pursuant to CPLR article 78

    Decision in Art. 78 proceeding - Perry, Armond (2023-11-30)

    Get PDF

    Segal v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal

    Get PDF

    Taking Aim at New York\u27s Concealed Carry Improvement Act

    Get PDF
    In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court held in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen that New York’s requirement, which mandated that applicants for concealed carry licenses show proper cause for carrying a handgun in public, violated the Second and Fourteenth Amendments. Responding to the likely increase in individuals licensed to carry handguns in the state, New York enacted the Concealed Carry Improvement Act (CCIA). This law bans all firearms from many places of public congregation, establishes a default rule that firearms are not allowed on private property without the owner or lessee’s permission, and sets additional requirements for concealed carry license applicants to satisfy. This Note explores the constitutionality of three major portions of the CCIA: (1) its requirement that applicants for concealed carry licenses prove good moral character, (2) its list of sensitive locations from which firearms are prohibited, and (3) its default rule that firearms are banned on private property without consent of the owner or lessee. Bruen held that laws infringing on the plain text of the Second Amendment are only constitutional if they are consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. The CCIA’s restrictions on public carry, as well as its rule mandating that applicants prove good moral character before being issued a license, make no effort to conform with that tradition. For that reason, this Note concludes that these provisions of the CCIA violate the Constitution

    Mohammad v. Kaur

    Get PDF

    Offshore Wind in New Jersey: Launching a Domestic Industry While Creating a Workforce Rising Tide

    Get PDF


    full texts


    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Fordham University School of Law is based in United States
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇