Assessment of ifosfamide pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and relation to CYP3A4 activity as measured by the erythromycin breath test in patients with sarcoma

BACKGROUND. Ifosfamide is a chemotherapeutic agent that requires cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) for bioactivation and metabolism. To the authors' knowledge, the correlation between dose, pharmacokinetics, CYP3A, and toxicity has not been fully evaluated. A randomized Phase II trial was performed on 22 soft tissue sarcoma patients treated with doxorubicin (60 mg/m 2 /cycle) and either high-dose ifosfamide (12 g/m 2 /cycle) or standard-dose ifosfamide (6 g/m 2 /cycle). The pharmacokinetics of ifosfamide and CYP3A measurements observed are reported. METHODS. Pharmacokinetic parameters for ifosfamide, 2-dichloroethylifosfamide (2-DCE), and 3-dichloroethylifosfamide (3-DCE) were collected after the first ifosfamide infusion in 13 patients. Bayesian designed limited pharmacokinetic data were collected from an additional 41 patients. The erythromycin breath test (ERMBT) was performed on 81 patients as an in vivo phenotypic assessment of CYP3A activity. RESULTS. Fourteen-hour (peak) plasma levels of ifosfamide, 2-DCE, and 3-DCE were found to correlate strongly with the respective area under the curve (AUC) 0–24 values ( r = 0.97, 0.94, and 0.95; P < .0001). Patients who experienced a grade 3–4 absolute neutrophil count (ANC), platelet, or creatinine toxicity (using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2]) were found to have statistically significantly higher median 14-hour plasma levels of ifosfamide, 2-DCE, and 3-DCE compared with patients with grade 0–2 toxicity. ERMBT was not found to correlate with pharmacokinetic parameters of ifosfamide and metabolites or toxicity. CONCLUSIONS. The 14-hour plasma level of ifosfamide, 2-DCE, and 3-DCE is a simple and appropriate substitute for describing the AUC of ifosfamide after 1 day of a 1-hour to 2-hour infusion of drug. Fourteen-hour plasma levels of ifosfamide and metabolites are useful predictors of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and creatinine toxicity. ERMBT was not found to accurately correlate with ifosfamide pharmacokinetics or clinical toxicity. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/56045/1/22669_ftp.pd

Drug dosing during pregnancy—opportunities for physiologically based pharmacokinetic models

Drugs can have harmful effects on the embryo or the fetus at any point during pregnancy. Not all the damaging effects of intrauterine exposure to drugs are obvious at birth, some may only manifest later in life. Thus, drugs should be prescribed in pregnancy only if the expected benefit to the mother is thought to be greater than the risk to the fetus. Dosing of drugs during pregnancy is often empirically determined and based upon evidence from studies of non-pregnant subjects, which may lead to suboptimal dosing, particularly during the third trimester. This review collates examples of drugs with known recommendations for dose adjustment during pregnancy, in addition to providing an example of the potential use of PBPK models in dose adjustment recommendation during pregnancy within the context of drug-drug interactions. For many drugs, such as antidepressants and antiretroviral drugs, dose adjustment has been recommended based on pharmacokinetic studies demonstrating a reduction in drug concentrations. However, there is relatively limited (and sometimes inconsistent) information regarding the clinical impact of these pharmacokinetic changes during pregnancy and the effect of subsequent dose adjustments. Examples of using pregnancy PBPK models to predict feto-maternal drug exposures and their applications to facilitate and guide dose assessment throughout gestation are discussed

Impact of gastrointestinal tract variability on oral drug absorption and pharmacokinetics : an UNGAP review

The absorption of oral drugs is frequently plagued by significant variability with potentially serious therapeutic consequences. The source of variability can be traced back to interindividual variability in physiology, differences in special populations (age- and disease-dependent), drug and formulation properties, or food-drug interactions. Clinical evidence for the impact of some of these factors on drug pharmacokinetic variability is mounting: e.g. gastric pH and emptying time, small intestinal fluid properties, differences in pediatrics and the elderly, and surgical changes in gastrointestinal anatomy. However, the link of colonic factors variability (transit time, fluid composition, microbiome), sex differences (male vs. female) and gut-related diseases (chronic constipation, anorexia and cachexia) to drug absorption variability has not been firmly established yet. At the same time, a way to decrease oral drug pharmacokinetic variability is provided by the pharmaceutical industry: clinical evidence suggests that formulation approaches employed during drug development can decrease the variability in oral exposure. This review outlines the main drivers of oral drug exposure variability and potential approaches to overcome them, while highlighting existing knowledge gaps and guiding future studies in this area

Phenotyping CYP3A using midazolam in cancer and noncancer Asian patients

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology553270-277BCPH