Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study

Background: The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on postoperative recovery needs to be understood to inform clinical decision making during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reports 30-day mortality and pulmonary complication rates in patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: This international, multicentre, cohort study at 235 hospitals in 24 countries included all patients undergoing surgery who had SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality and was assessed in all enrolled patients. The main secondary outcome measure was pulmonary complications, defined as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or unexpected postoperative ventilation. Findings: This analysis includes 1128 patients who had surgery between Jan 1 and March 31, 2020, of whom 835 (74·0%) had emergency surgery and 280 (24·8%) had elective surgery. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed preoperatively in 294 (26·1%) patients. 30-day mortality was 23·8% (268 of 1128). Pulmonary complications occurred in 577 (51·2%) of 1128 patients; 30-day mortality in these patients was 38·0% (219 of 577), accounting for 81·7% (219 of 268) of all deaths. In adjusted analyses, 30-day mortality was associated with male sex (odds ratio 1·75 [95% CI 1·28–2·40], p\textless0·0001), age 70 years or older versus younger than 70 years (2·30 [1·65–3·22], p\textless0·0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 3–5 versus grades 1–2 (2·35 [1·57–3·53], p\textless0·0001), malignant versus benign or obstetric diagnosis (1·55 [1·01–2·39], p=0·046), emergency versus elective surgery (1·67 [1·06–2·63], p=0·026), and major versus minor surgery (1·52 [1·01–2·31], p=0·047). Interpretation: Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality. Thresholds for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic should be higher than during normal practice, particularly in men aged 70 years and older. Consideration should be given for postponing non-urgent procedures and promoting non-operative treatment to delay or avoid the need for surgery. Funding: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, NIHR Academy, Sarcoma UK, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research

From an interventional study to a national scale-up: lessons learned from the Malakit strategy at the French Guiana–Suriname border

Abstract Scaling-up an experimental intervention is always a challenge. On the border between French Guiana, Brazil and Suriname, an interventional study demonstrated the effectiveness of distributing self-diagnosis and self-treatment kits (Malakits) to control malaria in mobile and hard-to-reach populations. Its integration into the Suriname’s National Malaria Elimination Plan after a 2-year experiment faced numerous challenges, including human resources to cope with the additional workload of coordinators and to maintain the motivation of community health workers. The economic recession in Suriname, the Covid pandemic, and logistical issues also hampered the scale-up. Finally, thanks to the commitment of stakeholders in Suriname and French Guiana, the integration of Malakit distribution into the Surinamese national programme was proved possible

Self-diagnosis and self-treatment of malaria in hard-to-reach and mobile populations of the Amazon: results of Malakit, an international multicentric intervention research project.

International audienceBackgroundIllegal gold miners are currently key hosts for malaria in French Guiana (FG), with a risk of emergence of resistance linked to improper use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). The remoteness of the mines and regulatory issues hinder their access to health care.MethodsA quasi-experimental researched project (Malakit) implemented in FG borders with Brazil and Suriname aimed at determining the effectiveness of distributed kits for self-diagnosis and self-treatment to illegal gold miners, after training, at strategic border staging areas. Evaluation relied on questionnaires at inclusion and follow-up visits, and pre/post intervention surveys. The primary outcome was the proportion of persons reporting a use of certified ACT after a positive malaria diagnosis. The secondary outcomes assessed antimalarial adherence, kit use and impact on malaria epidemiology.FindingsThe proportion of patients reporting a use of certified ACT after a positive diagnosis increased after the intervention (OR 1.8, 95%CI [1.1-3.0]). From April 2018 to March 2020, 3,733 persons participated in the intervention. The kit was used correctly by 71.7% [65.8-77.7] of the 223 persons reporting having used a malakit during the follow-up visits. No serious adverse events related to the misuse of malakit have been reported. The intervention appears to have accelerated the decline in malaria incidence in the region by 42.9%.InterpretationThis innovative international project showed that people with low education can correctly self-manage their malaria symptoms. This strategy could be integrated in the malaria control programs of the countries involved and considered in other regions with residual malaria in remote areas.ContexteLes chercheurs d'or illégaux sont actuellement un réservoir clé du paludisme en Guyane, avec un risque d'émergence de résistance lié à une mauvaise utilisation des combinaisons thérapeutiques à base d'artémisinine (ACT). L'isolement de ces sites miniers clandestins et des contraintes règlementaires entravent leur accès aux soins.MéthodesUn projet de recherche opérationnelle quasi-expérimental (Malakit) a été mis en œuvre aux frontières de la Guyane avec le Brésil et le Suriname. Il visait à déterminer l'efficacité de la distribution de kits d'autodiagnostic et d'autotraitement à des orpailleurs illégaux, après une formation adaptée, dans des zones stratégiques transfrontalières. L'évaluation s'est appuyée sur des questionnaires lors des visites d'inclusion et de suivi, et sur des enquêtes pré/post intervention. L'indicateur principal était la proportion de personnes déclarant avoir utilisé une ACT certifiée après un diagnostic positif de paludisme. Les indicateurs secondaires reposaient sur l'adhérence aux traitements antipaludiques, l'utilisation des kits et l'impact sur l'épidémiologie du paludisme.RésultatsLa proportion de patients déclarant une utilisation d'ACT certifiée après un diagnostic positif a augmenté après l'intervention (OR 1,8, 95%CI [1,1-3,0]). D'avril 2018 à mars 2020, 3 733 personnes ont participé à l'intervention. Le kit a été utilisé correctement par 71,7% [65,8-77,7] des 223 personnes revues en visites de suivi ayant déclaré avoir utilisé un malakit. Aucun événement indésirable grave lié à une mauvaise utilisation du malakit n'a été signalé. L'intervention semble avoir accéléré la diminution de l'incidence du paludisme dans la région de 42,9%.InterprétationCe projet international innovant a montré que les personnes ayant un faible niveau d'éducation peuvent se prendre en charge par eux-mêmes pour des symptômes de paludisme. Cette stratégie pourrait être intégrée dans les programmes de lutte contre le paludisme des pays impliqués et envisagée dans d'autres régions où du paludisme résiduel persiste dans des zones isolées

Self-diagnosis and self-treatment of malaria in hard-to-reach and mobile populations of the Amazon: results of Malakit, an international multicentric intervention research project.

International audienceBackgroundIllegal gold miners are currently key hosts for malaria in French Guiana (FG), with a risk of emergence of resistance linked to improper use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). The remoteness of the mines and regulatory issues hinder their access to health care.MethodsA quasi-experimental researched project (Malakit) implemented in FG borders with Brazil and Suriname aimed at determining the effectiveness of distributed kits for self-diagnosis and self-treatment to illegal gold miners, after training, at strategic border staging areas. Evaluation relied on questionnaires at inclusion and follow-up visits, and pre/post intervention surveys. The primary outcome was the proportion of persons reporting a use of certified ACT after a positive malaria diagnosis. The secondary outcomes assessed antimalarial adherence, kit use and impact on malaria epidemiology.FindingsThe proportion of patients reporting a use of certified ACT after a positive diagnosis increased after the intervention (OR 1.8, 95%CI [1.1-3.0]). From April 2018 to March 2020, 3,733 persons participated in the intervention. The kit was used correctly by 71.7% [65.8-77.7] of the 223 persons reporting having used a malakit during the follow-up visits. No serious adverse events related to the misuse of malakit have been reported. The intervention appears to have accelerated the decline in malaria incidence in the region by 42.9%.InterpretationThis innovative international project showed that people with low education can correctly self-manage their malaria symptoms. This strategy could be integrated in the malaria control programs of the countries involved and considered in other regions with residual malaria in remote areas.ContexteLes chercheurs d'or illégaux sont actuellement un réservoir clé du paludisme en Guyane, avec un risque d'émergence de résistance lié à une mauvaise utilisation des combinaisons thérapeutiques à base d'artémisinine (ACT). L'isolement de ces sites miniers clandestins et des contraintes règlementaires entravent leur accès aux soins.MéthodesUn projet de recherche opérationnelle quasi-expérimental (Malakit) a été mis en œuvre aux frontières de la Guyane avec le Brésil et le Suriname. Il visait à déterminer l'efficacité de la distribution de kits d'autodiagnostic et d'autotraitement à des orpailleurs illégaux, après une formation adaptée, dans des zones stratégiques transfrontalières. L'évaluation s'est appuyée sur des questionnaires lors des visites d'inclusion et de suivi, et sur des enquêtes pré/post intervention. L'indicateur principal était la proportion de personnes déclarant avoir utilisé une ACT certifiée après un diagnostic positif de paludisme. Les indicateurs secondaires reposaient sur l'adhérence aux traitements antipaludiques, l'utilisation des kits et l'impact sur l'épidémiologie du paludisme.RésultatsLa proportion de patients déclarant une utilisation d'ACT certifiée après un diagnostic positif a augmenté après l'intervention (OR 1,8, 95%CI [1,1-3,0]). D'avril 2018 à mars 2020, 3 733 personnes ont participé à l'intervention. Le kit a été utilisé correctement par 71,7% [65,8-77,7] des 223 personnes revues en visites de suivi ayant déclaré avoir utilisé un malakit. Aucun événement indésirable grave lié à une mauvaise utilisation du malakit n'a été signalé. L'intervention semble avoir accéléré la diminution de l'incidence du paludisme dans la région de 42,9%.InterprétationCe projet international innovant a montré que les personnes ayant un faible niveau d'éducation peuvent se prendre en charge par eux-mêmes pour des symptômes de paludisme. Cette stratégie pourrait être intégrée dans les programmes de lutte contre le paludisme des pays impliqués et envisagée dans d'autres régions où du paludisme résiduel persiste dans des zones isolées

High Risk of Anal and Rectal Cancer in Patients With Anal and/or Perianal Crohn’s Disease

International audienceBackground & AimsLittle is known about the magnitude of the risk of anal and rectal cancer in patients with anal and/or perineal Crohn’s disease. We aimed to assess the risk of anal and rectal cancer in patients with Crohn’s perianal disease followed up in the Cancers Et Surrisque Associé aux Maladies Inflammatoires Intestinales En France (CESAME) cohort.MethodsWe collected data from 19,486 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) enrolled in the observational CESAME study in France, from May 2004 through June 2005; 14.9% of participants had past or current anal and/or perianal Crohn’s disease. Subjects were followed up for a median time of 35 months (interquartile range, 29–40 mo). To identify risk factors for anal cancer in the total CESAME population, we performed a case-control study in which participants were matched for age and sex.ResultsAmong the total IBD population, 8 patients developed anal cancer and 14 patients developed rectal cancer. In the subgroup of 2911 patients with past or current anal and/or perianal Crohn’s lesions at cohort entry, 2 developed anal squamous-cell carcinoma, 3 developed perianal fistula–related adenocarcinoma, and 6 developed rectal cancer. The corresponding incidence rates were 0.26 per 1000 patient-years for anal squamous-cell carcinoma, 0.38 per 1000 patient-years for perianal fistula–related adenocarcinoma, and 0.77 per 1000 patient-years for rectal cancer. Among the 16,575 patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease without anal or perianal lesions, the incidence rate of anal cancer was 0.08 per 1000 patient-years and of rectal cancer was 0.21 per 1000 patient-years. Among factors tested by univariate conditional regression (IBD subtype, disease duration, exposure to immune-suppressive therapy, presence of past or current anal and/or perianal lesions), the presence of past or current anal and/or perianal lesions at cohort entry was the only factor significantly associated with development of anal cancer (odds ratio, 11.2; 95% CI, 1.18-551.51; P = .03).ConclusionsIn an analysis of data from the CESAME cohort in France, patients with anal and/or perianal Crohn’s disease have a high risk of anal cancer, including perianal fistula–related cancer, and a high risk of rectal cancer