Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study

Background: The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on postoperative recovery needs to be understood to inform clinical decision making during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reports 30-day mortality and pulmonary complication rates in patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: This international, multicentre, cohort study at 235 hospitals in 24 countries included all patients undergoing surgery who had SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality and was assessed in all enrolled patients. The main secondary outcome measure was pulmonary complications, defined as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or unexpected postoperative ventilation. Findings: This analysis includes 1128 patients who had surgery between Jan 1 and March 31, 2020, of whom 835 (74·0%) had emergency surgery and 280 (24·8%) had elective surgery. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed preoperatively in 294 (26·1%) patients. 30-day mortality was 23·8% (268 of 1128). Pulmonary complications occurred in 577 (51·2%) of 1128 patients; 30-day mortality in these patients was 38·0% (219 of 577), accounting for 81·7% (219 of 268) of all deaths. In adjusted analyses, 30-day mortality was associated with male sex (odds ratio 1·75 [95% CI 1·28–2·40], p\textless0·0001), age 70 years or older versus younger than 70 years (2·30 [1·65–3·22], p\textless0·0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 3–5 versus grades 1–2 (2·35 [1·57–3·53], p\textless0·0001), malignant versus benign or obstetric diagnosis (1·55 [1·01–2·39], p=0·046), emergency versus elective surgery (1·67 [1·06–2·63], p=0·026), and major versus minor surgery (1·52 [1·01–2·31], p=0·047). Interpretation: Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality. Thresholds for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic should be higher than during normal practice, particularly in men aged 70 years and older. Consideration should be given for postponing non-urgent procedures and promoting non-operative treatment to delay or avoid the need for surgery. Funding: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, NIHR Academy, Sarcoma UK, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research

Study of Diverse Mechanisms of Cell-mediated Cytotoxicity in Gene-targeted Mice Using Flow Cytometric Cytotoxicity Assay

Cytotoxic lymphocytes kill tumor or virus-infected target cells utilizing two mechanisms - (1) release of lytic granules (containing perforin and granzymes), and (2) Fas ligand (FasL)/Fas or TNF-initiated apoptosis. We have examined mechanisms of target cell lysis by effector T cells from gene-targeted and mutant mice using a new Flow Cytometric Cytotoxicity Assay (FC Assay). Target cells were labeled with PKH67 dye. Cell death was estimated by 7-AAD inclusion and annexin V-PE binding. A direct correlation has been found between the percentage of dead target cells in FC Assay and the results of 111In release cytotoxicity assay when effector T cells from either Pfp -/- (perforin knockout) or gld (non-functional Fas Ligand) mice were used. As shown by the 4 h FC assay, the granule-mediated mechanism was utilized by T cells from gld mice. In contrast, T cells from Pfp -/- mice used death receptor-mediated lysis. Therefore, cytotoxic cells from gene-targeted and mutant mice can serve as valuable tools for studying different mechanisms of cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and the FC assay could be applied irrespective of which cytotoxic effector pathway is involved. © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved

Three-color Flow Cytometric Assay for the Study of the Mechanisms of Cell-mediated Cytotoxicity

Cytotoxic lymphocytes kill tumor or virus-infected target cells utilizing two mechanisms (1) release of lytic granules (containing perforin and granzymes) and (2) Fas ligand (FasL)/Fas or TNF initiated apoptosis. We have examined mechanisms of target cell lysis using a new Flow Cytometric Cytotoxicity Assay (FC Assay). Target cells were labeled with PKH 67 dye. Cell death was estimated by 7-amino-actinomycin (7-AAD) inclusion and annexin V-PE binding. A strong direct correlation has been found between the percentage of dead target cells in the FC Assay and the results of 51Cr release assay when human LAK and CTL were used as a model system. We have shown that both NK and CTL kill tumor cells mostly by granule-mediated mechanisms, as lysis was blocked by a perforin inhibitor Concanamycin A (Folimycin) but was significantly less sensitive to zVAD-FMK caspase inhibition. The FC assay allows accurate measurement of cell-mediated cytotoxicity as individual target cell death is detected directly. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved

Correlation of Human CD56+ Cell Cytotoxicity and IFN-γ Production

The use of an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay to evaluate cellular immune responses has gained increasing popularity, especially as a surrogate measure for cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses. We have compared the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay and the traditional 51Cr release assay for detection of human natural killer (NK) cell activity. The cell populations used for evaluation of these assays included freshly isolated and IL-2-activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). CD56-positive cells were demonstrated to be the primary source of the IFN-γ signal when PBMC were evaluated with NK-sensitive targets in the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. IFN-γ ELISPOT and 51Cr release assays showed excellent correlation suggesting that NK activity can be reliably evaluated with methods other than the traditional 51Cr release assays. © 2001 Academic Press

Investigation of antihypertensive class, dementia, and cognitive decline: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: High blood pressure is one of the main modifiable risk factors for dementia. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the best antihypertensive class for optimizing cognition. Our objective was to determine whether any particular antihypertensive class was associated with a reduced risk of cognitive decline or dementia using comprehensive meta-analysis including reanalysis of original participant data. METHODS: To identify suitable studies, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO and preexisting study consortia were searched from inception to December 2017. Authors of prospective longitudinal human studies or trials of antihypertensives were contacted for data sharing and collaboration. Outcome measures were incident dementia or incident cognitive decline (classified using the reliable change index method). Data were separated into mid and late-life (>65 years) and each antihypertensive class was compared to no treatment and to treatment with other antihypertensives. Meta-analysis was used to synthesize data. RESULTS: Over 50,000 participants from 27 studies were included. Among those aged >65 years, with the exception of diuretics, we found no relationship by class with incident cognitive decline or dementia. Diuretic use was suggestive of benefit in some analyses but results were not consistent across follow-up time, comparator group, and outcome. Limited data precluded meaningful analyses in those ≤65 years of age. CONCLUSION: Our findings, drawn from the current evidence base, support clinical freedom in the selection of antihypertensive regimens to achieve blood pressure goals. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: The review was registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO), registration number CRD42016045454.No funding was received specifically for this project. The lead author is funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, National Institute for Dementia Research, Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration (NHMRC NNIDR DCRC). Other authors are funded from various sources

Investigation of antihypertensive class, dementia, and cognitive decline: A meta-analysis.

ObjectiveHigh blood pressure is one of the main modifiable risk factors for dementia. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the best antihypertensive class for optimizing cognition. Our objective was to determine whether any particular antihypertensive class was associated with a reduced risk of cognitive decline or dementia using comprehensive meta-analysis including reanalysis of original participant data.MethodsTo identify suitable studies, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO and preexisting study consortia were searched from inception to December 2017. Authors of prospective longitudinal human studies or trials of antihypertensives were contacted for data sharing and collaboration. Outcome measures were incident dementia or incident cognitive decline (classified using the reliable change index method). Data were separated into mid and late-life (>65 years) and each antihypertensive class was compared to no treatment and to treatment with other antihypertensives. Meta-analysis was used to synthesize data.ResultsOver 50,000 participants from 27 studies were included. Among those aged >65 years, with the exception of diuretics, we found no relationship by class with incident cognitive decline or dementia. Diuretic use was suggestive of benefit in some analyses but results were not consistent across follow-up time, comparator group, and outcome. Limited data precluded meaningful analyses in those ≤65 years of age.ConclusionOur findings, drawn from the current evidence base, support clinical freedom in the selection of antihypertensive regimens to achieve blood pressure goals.Clinical trials registrationThe review was registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO), registration number CRD42016045454