259 research outputs found

    Recommended Implementation of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Clinical Research in The Brain: A Consensus of the ISMRM Electro-Magnetic Tissue Properties Study Group

    Get PDF
    This article provides recommendations for implementing quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) for clinical brain research. It is a consensus of the ISMRM Electro-Magnetic Tissue Properties Study Group. While QSM technical development continues to advance rapidly, the current QSM methods have been demonstrated to be repeatable and reproducible for generating quantitative tissue magnetic susceptibility maps in the brain. However, the many QSM approaches available give rise to the need in the neuroimaging community for guidelines on implementation. This article describes relevant considerations and provides specific implementation recommendations for all steps in QSM data acquisition, processing, analysis, and presentation in scientific publications. We recommend that data be acquired using a monopolar 3D multi-echo GRE sequence, that phase images be saved and exported in DICOM format and unwrapped using an exact unwrapping approach. Multi-echo images should be combined before background removal, and a brain mask created using a brain extraction tool with the incorporation of phase-quality-based masking. Background fields should be removed within the brain mask using a technique based on SHARP or PDF, and the optimization approach to dipole inversion should be employed with a sparsity-based regularization. Susceptibility values should be measured relative to a specified reference, including the common reference region of whole brain as a region of interest in the analysis, and QSM results should be reported with - as a minimum - the acquisition and processing specifications listed in the last section of the article. These recommendations should facilitate clinical QSM research and lead to increased harmonization in data acquisition, analysis, and reporting

    Denoising Diffusion MRI: Considerations and implications for analysis

    Get PDF
    Development of diffusion MRI (dMRI) denoising approaches has experienced considerable growth over the last years. As noise can inherently reduce accuracy and precision in measurements, its effects have been well characterised both in terms of uncertainty increase in dMRI-derived features and in terms of biases caused by the noise floor, the smallest measurable signal given the noise level. However, gaps in our knowledge still exist in objectively characterising dMRI denoising approaches in terms of both of these effects and assessing their efficacy. In this work, we reconsider what a denoising method should and should not do and we accordingly define criteria to characterise the performance. We propose a comprehensive set of evaluations, including i) benefits in improving signal quality and reducing noise variance, ii) gains in reducing biases and the noise floor and improving, iii) preservation of spatial resolution, iv) agreement of denoised data against a gold standard, v) gains in downstream parameter estimation (precision and accuracy), vi) efficacy in enabling noise-prone applications, such as ultra-high-resolution imaging. We further provide newly acquired complex datasets (magnitude and phase) with multiple repeats that sample different SNR regimes to highlight performance differences under different scenarios. Without loss of generality, we subsequently apply a number of exemplar patch-based denoising algorithms to these datasets, including Non-Local Means, Marchenko-Pastur PCA (MPPCA) in the magnitude and complex domain and NORDIC, and compare them with respect to the above criteria and against a gold standard complex average of multiple repeats. We demonstrate that all tested denoising approaches reduce noise-related variance, but not always biases from the elevated noise floor. They all induce a spatial resolution penalty, but its extent can vary depending on the method and the implementation. Some denoising approaches agree with the gold standard more than others and we demonstrate challenges in even defining such a standard. Overall, we show that dMRI denoising performed in the complex domain is advantageous to magnitude domain denoising with respect to all the above criteria

    Diffusion MRI tractography for oncological neurosurgery planning:Clinical research prototype

    Get PDF

    Brain Computations and Connectivity [2nd edition]

    Get PDF
    This is an open access title available under the terms of a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licence. It is free to read on the Oxford Academic platform and offered as a free PDF download from OUP and selected open access locations. Brain Computations and Connectivity is about how the brain works. In order to understand this, it is essential to know what is computed by different brain systems; and how the computations are performed. The aim of this book is to elucidate what is computed in different brain systems; and to describe current biologically plausible computational approaches and models of how each of these brain systems computes. Understanding the brain in this way has enormous potential for understanding ourselves better in health and in disease. Potential applications of this understanding are to the treatment of the brain in disease; and to artificial intelligence which will benefit from knowledge of how the brain performs many of its extraordinarily impressive functions. This book is pioneering in taking this approach to brain function: to consider what is computed by many of our brain systems; and how it is computed, and updates by much new evidence including the connectivity of the human brain the earlier book: Rolls (2021) Brain Computations: What and How, Oxford University Press. Brain Computations and Connectivity will be of interest to all scientists interested in brain function and how the brain works, whether they are from neuroscience, or from medical sciences including neurology and psychiatry, or from the area of computational science including machine learning and artificial intelligence, or from areas such as theoretical physics

    Applications

    Get PDF
    Volume 3 describes how resource-aware machine learning methods and techniques are used to successfully solve real-world problems. The book provides numerous specific application examples: in health and medicine for risk modelling, diagnosis, and treatment selection for diseases in electronics, steel production and milling for quality control during manufacturing processes in traffic, logistics for smart cities and for mobile communications

    Diffusion MRI tractography for oncological neurosurgery planning:Clinical research prototype

    Get PDF

    On noise, uncertainty and inference for computational diffusion MRI

    Get PDF
    Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (dMRI) has revolutionised the way brain microstructure and connectivity can be studied. Despite its unique potential in mapping the whole brain, biophysical properties are inferred from measurements rather than being directly observed. This indirect mapping from noisy data creates challenges and introduces uncertainty in the estimated properties. Hence, dMRI frameworks capable to deal with noise and uncertainty quantification are of great importance and are the topic of this thesis. First, we look into approaches for reducing uncertainty, by de-noising the dMRI signal. Thermal noise can have detrimental effects for modalities where the information resides in the signal attenuation, such as dMRI, that has inherently low-SNR data. We highlight the dual effect of noise, both in increasing variance, but also introducing bias. We then design a framework for evaluating denoising approaches in a principled manner. By setting objective criteria based on what a well-behaved denoising algorithm should offer, we provide a bespoke dataset and a set of evaluations. We demonstrate that common magnitude-based denoising approaches usually reduce noise-related variance from the signal, but do not address the bias effects introduced by the noise floor. Our framework also allows to better characterise scenarios where denoising can be beneficial (e.g. when done in complex domain) and can open new opportunities, such as pushing spatio-temporal resolution boundaries. Subsequently, we look into approaches for mapping uncertainty and design two inference frameworks for dMRI models, one using classical Bayesian methods and another using more recent data-driven algorithms. In the first approach, we build upon the univariate random-walk Metropolis-Hastings MCMC, an extensively used sampling method to sample from the posterior distribution of model parameters given the data. We devise an efficient adaptive multivariate MCMC scheme, relying upon the assumption that groups of model parameters can be jointly estimated if a proper covariance matrix is defined. In doing so, our algorithm increases the sampling efficiency, while preserving accuracy and precision of estimates. We show results using both synthetic and in-vivo dMRI data. In the second approach, we resort to Simulation-Based Inference (SBI), a data-driven approach that avoids the need for iterative model inversions. This is achieved by using neural density estimators to learn the inverse mapping from the forward generative process (simulations) to the parameters of interest that have generated those simulations. By addressing the problem via learning approaches offers the opportunity to achieve inference amortisation, boosting efficiency by avoiding the necessity of repeating the inference process for each new unseen dataset. It also allows inversion of forward processes (i.e. a series of processing steps) rather than only models. We explore different neural network architectures to perform conditional density estimation of the posterior distribution of parameters. Results and comparisons obtained against MCMC suggest speed-ups of 2-3 orders of magnitude in the inference process while keeping the accuracy in the estimates
    • …
    corecore