A computational evaluation of constructive and improvement heuristics for the blocking flow shop to minimize total flowtime

This paper focuses on the blocking flow shop scheduling problem with the objective of total flowtime minimisation. This problem assumes that there are no buffers between machines and, due to its application to many manufacturing sectors, it is receiving a growing attention by researchers during the last years. Since the problem is NP-hard, a large number of heuristics have been proposed to provide good solutions with reasonable computational times. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the available heuristics for the problem and for related problems, resulting in the implementation and testing of a total of 35 heuristics. Furthermore, we propose an efficient constructive heuristic which successfully combines a pool of partial sequences in parallel, using a beam-search-based approach. The computational experiments show the excellent performance of the proposed heuristic as compared to the best-so-far algorithms for the problem, both in terms of quality of the solutions and of computational requirements. In fact, despite being a relative fast constructive heuristic, new best upper bounds have been found for more than 27% of Taillard’s instances.Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación DPI2013-44461-P/DP

Benders decomposition for the mixed no-idle permutation flowshop scheduling problem

[EN] The mixed no-idle flowshop scheduling problem arises in modern industries including integrated circuits, ceramic frit and steel production, among others, and where some machines are not allowed to remain idle between jobs. This paper describes an exact algorithm that uses Benders decomposition with a simple yet effective enhancement mechanism that entails the generation of additional cuts by using a referenced local search to help speed up convergence. Using only a single additional optimality cut at each iteration, and combined with combinatorial cuts, the algorithm can optimally solve instances with up to 500 jobs and 15 machines that are otherwise not within the reach of off-the-shelf optimization software, and can easily surpass ad-hoc existing metaheuristics. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the algorithm described here is the only exact method for solving the mixed no-idle permutation flowshop scheduling problem.This research project was partially supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TuBITAK) under Grant 1059B191600107. While writing this paper, Dr Hamzaday was a visiting researcher at the Southampton Business School at the University of Southampton. Ruben Ruiz is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, under the Project 'OPTEP-Port Terminal Operations Optimization' (No. RTI2018-094940-B-I00) financed with FEDER funds. Thanks are due to two anonymous reviewers for their careful reading of the paper and helpful suggestions.Bektas, T.; Hamzadayi, A.; Ruiz García, R. (2020). Benders decomposition for the mixed no-idle permutation flowshop scheduling problem. Journal of Scheduling. 23(4):513-523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-020-00637-8S513523234Adiri, I., & Pohoryles, D. (1982). Flowshop no-idle or no-wait scheduling to minimize the sum of completion times. Naval Research Logistics, 29(3), 495–504.Baker, K. R. (1974). Introduction to sequencing and scheduling. New York: Wiley.Baptiste, P., & Hguny, L. K. (1997). A branch and bound algorithm for the $$F$$/no-idle/$$C_{max}$$. In Proceedings of the international conference on industrial engineering and production management, IEPM’97, Lyon, France (Vol. 1, pp. 429–438).Benders, J. F. (1962). Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems. Numerische Mathematik, 4(1), 238–252.Cordeau, J. F., Pasin, F., & Solomon, M. (2006). An integrated model for logistics network design. Annals of Operations Research, 144(1), 59–82.Costa, A. M., Cordeau, J. F., Gendron, B., & Laporte, G. (2012). Accelerating benders decomposition with heuristic master problem solutions. Pesquisa Operacional, 32(1), 3–20.Deng, G., & Gu, X. (2012). A hybrid discrete differential evolution algorithm for the no-idle permutation flow shop scheduling problem with makespan criterion. Computers & Operations Research, 39(9), 2152–2160.Goncharov, Y., & Sevastyanov, S. (2009). The flow shop problem with no-idle constraints: A review and approximation. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(2), 450–456.Kalczynski, P. J., & Kamburowski, J. (2005). A heuristic for minimizing the makespan in no-idle permutation flow shops. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 49(1), 146–154.Magnanti, T. L., & Wong, R. T. (1981). Accelerating benders decomposition: Algorithmic enhancement and model selection criteria. Operations Research, 29(3), 464–484.Pan, Q. K., & Ruiz, R. (2014). An effective iterated greedy algorithm for the mixed no-idle flowshop scheduling problem. Omega, 44(1), 41–50.Pan, Q. K., Tasgetiren, M. F., & Liang, Y. C. (2008). A discrete differential evolution algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 55(4), 795–816.Pan, Q. K., & Wang, L. (2008a). No-idle permutation flow shop scheduling based on a hybrid discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(7–8), 796–807.Pan, Q. K., & Wang, L. (2008b). A novel differential evolution algorithm for no-idle permutation flow-shop scheduling problems. European Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2(3), 279–297.Papadakos, N. (2008). Practical enhancements to the Magnanti–Wong method. Operations Research Letters, 36(4), 444–449.Röck, H. (1984). The three-machine no-wait flow shop is NP-complete. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 31(2), 336–345.Ruiz, R., & Maroto, C. (2005). A comprehensive review and evaluation of permutation flowshop heuristics. European Journal of Operational Research, 165(2), 479–494.Ruiz, R., Vallada, E., & Fernández-Martínez, C. (2009). Scheduling in flowshops with no-idle machines. In U. Chakraborty (Ed.), Computational intelligence in flow shop and job shop scheduling, chap 2 (pp. 21–51). New York: Springer.Saadani, N. E. H., Guinet, A., & Moalla, M. (2003). Three stage no-idle flow-shops. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 44(3), 425–434.Saharidis, G., & Ierapetritou, M. (2013). Speed-up Benders decomposition using maximum density cut (MDC) generation. Annals of Operations Research, 210, 101–123.Shao, W., Pi, D., & Shao, Z. (2017). Memetic algorithm with node and edge histogram for no-idle flow shop scheduling problem to minimize the makespan criterion. Applied Soft Computing, 54, 164–182.Tasgetiren, M. F., Buyukdagli, O., Pan, Q. K., & Suganthan, P. N. (2013). A general variable neighborhood search algorithm for the no-idle permutation flowshop scheduling problem. In B. K. Panigrahi, P. N. Suganthan, S. Das, & S. S. Dash (Eds.), Swarm, evolutionary, and memetic computing (pp. 24–34). Cham: Springer.Vachajitpan, P. (1982). Job sequencing with continuous machine operation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 6(3), 255–259

An effective iterated greedy algorithm for the mixed no-idle flowshop scheduling problem

In the no-idle flowshop, machines cannot be idle after finishing one job and before starting the next one. Therefore, start times of jobs must be delayed to guarantee this constraint. In practice machines show this behavior as it might be technically unfeasible or uneconomical to stop a machine in between jobs. This has important ramifications in the modern industry including fiber glass processing, foundries, production of integrated circuits and the steel making industry, among others. However, to assume that all machines in the shop have this no-idle constraint is not realistic. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to study the mixed no-idle extension where only some machines have the no-idle constraint. We present a mixed integer programming model for this new problem and the equations to calculate the makespan. We also propose a set of formulas to accelerate the calculation of insertions that is used both in heuristics as well as in the local search procedures. An effective iterated greedy (IG) algorithm is proposed. We use an NEH-based heuristic to construct a high quality initial solution. A local search using the proposed accelerations is employed to emphasize intensification and exploration in the IG. A new destruction and construction procedure is also shown. To evaluate the proposed algorithm, we present several adaptations of other well-known and recent metaheuristics for the problem and conduct a comprehensive set of computational and statistical experiments with a total of 1750 instances. The results show that the proposed IG algorithm outperforms existing methods in the no-idle and in the mixed no-idle scenarios by a significant margin.Quan-Ke Pan is partially supported by the National Science Foundation of China 61174187, Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-13-0106), Science Foundation of Liaoning Province in China (2013020016), Basic scientific research foundation of Northeast University under Grant N110208001, Starting foundation of Northeast University under Grant 29321006, and Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing and Network Security (Liaocheng University). Ruben Ruiz is partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, under the project "RESULT - Realistic Extended Scheduling Using Light Techniques" with reference DPI2012-36243-C02-01 co-financed by the European Union and FEDER funds and by the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, for the project MRPIV with reference PAID/2012/202.Pan, Q.; Ruiz García, R. (2014). An effective iterated greedy algorithm for the mixed no-idle flowshop scheduling problem. Omega. 44:41-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.10.002S41504

Heuristic for flow shop sequencing with separated and sequence independent setup times

This paper deals with the permutation flow shop scheduling problem with separated and sequence-independent machine setup times. A heuristic method with the objective of minimizing the total time to complete the schedule is introduced. The proposed heuristic is based on a structural property of this scheduling problem, which provides an upper bound on the idle time of the machines between the completion of the setup task and the beginning of job processing. Experimental results show that the new heuristic outperforms two existing ones.(CNPq) National Council for Scientific and Technological Developmen

Comparative Analysis of Metaheuristic Approaches for Makespan Minimization for No Wait Flow Shop Scheduling Problem

This paper provides comparative analysis of various metaheuristic approaches for m-machine no wait flow shop scheduling (NWFSS) problem with makespan as an optimality criterion. NWFSS problem is NP hard and brute force method unable to find the solutions so approximate solutions are found with metaheuristic algorithms. The objective is to find out the scheduling sequence of jobs to minimize total completion time. In order to meet the objective criterion, existing metaheuristic techniques viz. Tabu Search (TS), Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) are implemented for small and large sized problems and effectiveness of these techniques are measured with statistical metric

New efficient constructive heuristics for the hybrid flowshop to minimise makespan: A computational evaluation of heuristics

This paper addresses the hybrid flow shop scheduling problem to minimise makespan, a well-known scheduling problem for which many constructive heuristics have been proposed in the literature. Nevertheless, the state of the art is not clear due to partial or non homogeneous comparisons. In this paper, we review these heuristics and perform a comprehensive computational evaluation to determine which are the most efficient ones. A total of 20 heuristics are implemented and compared in this study. In addition, we propose four new heuristics for the problem. Firstly, two memory-based constructive heuristics are proposed, where a sequence is constructed by inserting jobs one by one in a partial sequence. The most promising insertions tested are kept in a list. However, in contrast to the Tabu search, these insertions are repeated in future iterations instead of forbidding them. Secondly, we propose two constructive heuristics based on Johnson’s algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem. The computational results carried out on an extensive testbed show that the new proposals outperform the existing heuristics.Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación DPI2016-80750-

ADAPTIVE SCHEDULING FOR OPERATING ROOM MANAGEMENT

The perioperative process in hospitals can be modelled as a 3-stage no-wait flow shop. The utilization of OR units and the average waiting time of patients are related to makespan and total completion time, respectively. However, minimizations of makespan and total completion time are NP-hard and NP-complete. Consequently, achieving good effectiveness and efficiency is a challenge in no-wait flow shop scheduling. The average idle time (AIT) and current and future idle time (CFI) heuristics are proposed to minimize makespan and total completion time, respectively. To improve effectiveness, current idle times and future idle times are taken into consideration and the insertion and neighborhood exchanging techniques are used. To improve efficiency, an objective increment method is introduced and the number of iterations is determined to reduce the computation times. Compared with three best-known heuristics for each objective, AIT and CFI heuristics can achieve greater effectiveness in the same computational complexity based on a variety of benchmarks. Furthermore, AIT and CFI heuristics perform better on trade-off balancing compared with other two best-known heuristics. Moreover, using the CFI heuristic for operating room (OR) scheduling, the average patient flow times are decreased by 11.2% over historical ones at University of Kentucky Health Care

An estimation of distribution algorithm for lot-streaming flow shop problems with setup times

Lot-streaming flow shops have important applications in different industries including textile, plastic, chemical, semiconductor and many others. This paper considers an n-job m-machine lot-streaming flow shop scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times under both the idling and noidling production cases. The objective is to minimize the maximum completion time or makespan. To solve this important practical problem, a novel estimation of distribution algorithm (EDA) is proposed with a job permutation based representation. In the proposed EDA, an efficient initialization scheme based on the NEH heuristic is presented to construct an initial population with a certain level of quality and diversity. An estimation of a probabilistic model is constructed to direct the algorithm search towards good solutions by taking into account both job permutation and similar blocks of jobs. A simple but effective local search is added to enhance the intensification capability. A diversity controlling mechanism is applied to maintain the diversity of the population. In addition, a speed-up method is presented to reduce the computational effort needed for the local search technique and the NEH-based heuristics. A comparative evaluation is carried out with the best performing algorithms from the literature. The results show that the proposed EDA is very effective in comparison after comprehensive computational and statistical analyses.This research is partially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (60874075, 70871065), and Science Foundation of Shandong Province in China under Grant BS2010DX005, and Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China under Grant 20100480897. Ruben Ruiz is partially funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, under the project "SMPA-Advanced Parallel Multiobjective Sequencing: Practical and Theoretical Advances" with reference DPI2008-03511/DPI and by the IMPIVA-Institute for the Small and Medium Valencian Enterprise, for the project OSC with references IMIDIC/2008/137, IMIDIC/2009/198 and IMIDIC/2010/175.Pan, Q.; Ruiz García, R. (2012). An estimation of distribution algorithm for lot-streaming flow shop problems with setup times. Omega. 40(2):166-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2011.05.002S16618040

Bottleneck Management through Strategic Sequencing in Smart Manufacturing Systems

Nowadays, industries put a significant emphasis on finding the optimum order for carrying out jobs in sequence. This is a crucial element in determining net productivity. Depending on the demand criterion, all production systems, including flexible manufacturing systems, follow a predefined sequence of job-based machine operations. The complexity of the problem increases with increasing machines and jobs to sequence, demanding the use of an appropriate sequencing technique. The major contribution of this work is to modify an existing algorithm with a very unusual machine setup and find the optimal sequence which will really minimize the makespan. This custom machine setup completes all tasks by maintaining precedence and satisfying all other constraints. This thesis concentrates on identifying the most effective technique of sequencing which will be validated in a lab environment and a simulated environment. It illustrates some of the key methods of addressing a circular non permutation flow shop sequencing problem with some additional constraints. Additionally, comparisons among the various heuristics algorithms are presented based on different sequencing criteria. The optimum sequence is provided as an input to a real-life machine set up and a simulated environment for selecting the best performing algorithm which is the basic goal of this research. To achieve this goal, at first, a code using python programming language was generated to find an optimum sequence. By analyzing the results, the makespan is increasing with the number of jobs but additional pallet constraint shows, adding more pallets will help to reduce makespan for both flow shops and job shops. Though the sequence obtained from both algorithms is different, for flow shops the makespan remains same for both cases but in the job shop scenario Nawaz, Enscore and Ham (NEH) algorithms always perform better than Campbell Dudek Smith (CDS) algorithms. For job shops with different combinations the makespan decreases mostly for maximum percentage of easy category jobs combined with equal percentage of medium and complex category jobs