Effector memory differentiation increases detection of replication-competent HIV-l in resting CD4+ T cells from virally suppressed individuals.

Studies have demonstrated that intensive ART alone is not capable of eradicating HIV-1, as the virus rebounds within a few weeks upon treatment interruption. Viral rebound may be induced from several cellular subsets; however, the majority of proviral DNA has been found in antigen experienced resting CD4+ T cells. To achieve a cure for HIV-1, eradication strategies depend upon both understanding mechanisms that drive HIV-1 persistence as well as sensitive assays to measure the frequency of infected cells after therapeutic interventions. Assays such as the quantitative viral outgrowth assay (QVOA) measure HIV-1 persistence during ART by ex vivo activation of resting CD4+ T cells to induce latency reversal; however, recent studies have shown that only a fraction of replication-competent viruses are inducible by primary mitogen stimulation. Previous studies have shown a correlation between the acquisition of effector memory phenotype and HIV-1 latency reversal in quiescent CD4+ T cell subsets that harbor the reservoir. Here, we apply our mechanistic understanding that differentiation into effector memory CD4+ T cells more effectively promotes HIV-1 latency reversal to significantly improve proviral measurements in the QVOA, termed differentiation QVOA (dQVOA), which reveals a significantly higher frequency of the inducible HIV-1 replication-competent reservoir in resting CD4+ T cells

HIV risk behavior profiles among men who have sex with men interested in donating blood: Findings from the Assessing Donor Variability and New Concepts in Eligibility study.

BACKGROUND: Individual risk assessment allows donors to be evaluated based on their own behaviors. Study objectives were to assess human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk behaviors in men who have sex with men (MSM) and estimate the proportion of the study population who would not be deferred for higher risk HIV sexual behaviors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional survey and biomarker assessment were conducted in eight U.S. cities. Participants were sexually active MSM interested in blood donation aged 18-39 years, assigned male sex at birth. Participants completed surveys during two study visits to define eligibility, and self-reported sexual and HIV prevention behaviors. Blood was drawn at study visit 1 and tested for HIV and the presence of tenofovir, one of the drugs in oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Associations were assessed between HIV infection status or HIV PrEP use and behaviors, including sex partners, new partners, and anal sex. RESULTS: A total of 1566 MSM completed the visit 1 questionnaire and blood draw and 1197 completed the visit 2 questionnaire. Among 1562 persons without HIV, 789 (50.4%) were not taking PrEP. Of those not taking PrEP, 66.2% reported one sexual partner or no anal sex and 69% reported no new sexual partners or no anal sex with a new partner in the past 3 months. CONCLUSION: The study found that questions were able to identify sexually active, HIV-negative MSM who report lower risk sexual behaviors. About a quarter of enrolled study participants would be potentially eligible blood donors using individual risk assessment questions

Detection of Nucleocapsid Antibodies Associated with Primary SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Unvaccinated and Vaccinated Blood Donors.

Nucleocapsid antibody assays can be used to estimate SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence in regions implementing spike-based COVID-19 vaccines. However, poor sensitivity of nucleocapsid antibody assays in detecting infection after vaccination has been reported. We derived a lower cutoff for identifying previous infections in a large blood donor cohort (N = 142,599) by using the Ortho VITROS Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total-N Antibody assay, improving sensitivity while maintaining specificity >98%. We validated sensitivity in samples donated after self-reported swab-confirmed infections diagnoses. Sensitivity for first infections in unvaccinated donors was 98.1% (95% CI 98.0-98.2) and for infection after vaccination was 95.6% (95% CI 95.6-95.7) based on the standard cutoff. Regression analysis showed sensitivity was reduced in the Delta compared with Omicron period, in older donors, in asymptomatic infections, <30 days after infection, and for infection after vaccination. The standard Ortho N antibody threshold demonstrated good sensitivity, which was modestly improved with the revised cutoff

Donor sex, age and ethnicity impact stored red blood cell antioxidant metabolism through mechanisms in part explained by glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase levels and activity

Red blood cell storage in the blood bank promotes the progressive accumulation of metabolic alterations that may ultimately impact the erythrocyte capacity to cope with oxidant stressors. However, the metabolic underpinnings of the capacity of RBCs to resist oxidant stress and the potential impact of donor biology on this phenotype are not known. Within the framework of the REDS-III RBC-Omics study, RBCs from 8,502 healthy blood donors were stored for 42 days and tested for their propensity to hemolyze following oxidant stress. A subset of extreme hemolyzers donated a second unit of blood, which was stored for 10, 23, and 42 days and profiled again for oxidative hemolysis and metabolomics (599 samples). Alterations of RBC energy and redox homeostasis were noted in donors with high oxidative hemolysis. RBCs from females, donors over 60 years old, donors of Asian/South Asian race-ethnicity, and RBCs stored in additive solution-3 were each independently characterized by improved antioxidant metabolism compared to, respectively, males, donors under 30 years old, Hispanic and African American race ethnicity donors, and RBCs stored in additive solution-1. Merging metabolomics data with results from an independent GWAS study on the same cohort, we identified metabolic markers of hemolysis and G6PD-deficiency, which were associated with extremes in oxidative hemolysis and dysregulation in NADPH and glutathione-dependent detoxification pathways of oxidized lipids. Donor sex, age, ethnicity, additive solution and G6PD status impact the metabolism of the stored erythrocyte and its susceptibility to hemolysis following oxidative insults

Sexual risk behavior and pregnancy in detained adolescent females: a study in Dutch detention centers

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the lifetime prevalence of teenage pregnancy in the histories of detained adolescent females and to examine the relationship between teenage pregnancy on the one hand and mental health and sexuality related characteristics on the other.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Of 256 admitted detained adolescent females aged 12–18 years, a representative sample (N = 212, 83%) was examined in the first month of detention. Instruments included a semi-structured interview, standardized questionnaires and file information on pregnancy, sexuality related characteristics (sexual risk behavior, multiple sex partners, sexual trauma, lack of assertiveness in sexual issues and early maturity) and mental health characteristics (conduct disorder, alcohol and drug use disorder and suicidality).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Approximately 20% of the participants reported having been pregnant (before detention), although none had actually given birth. Sexuality related characteristics were more prevalent in the pregnancy group, while this was not so for the mental health characteristics. Age at assessment, early maturity, sexual risk behavior, and suicidality turned out to be the best predictors for pregnancy.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The lifetime prevalence of pregnancy in detained adolescent females is high and is associated with both sexuality related risk factors and mental health related risk factors. Therefore, prevention and intervention programs targeting sexual risk behavior and mental health are warranted during detention.</p

Virtual Reality in Marketing: A Framework, Review, and Research Agenda

[EN] Marketing scholars and practitioners are showing increasing interest in Extended Reality (XR) technologies (XRs), such as virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR), as very promising technological tools for producing satisfactory consumer experiences that mirror those experienced in physical stores. However, most of the studies published to date lack a certain measure of methodological rigor in their characterization of XR technologies and in the assessment techniques used to characterize the consumer experience, which limits the generalization of the results. We argue that it is necessary to define a rigorous methodological framework for the use of XRs in marketing. This article reviews the literature on XRs in marketing, and provides a conceptual framework to organize this disparate body of work.This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities funded project - ATHENEA-DPI2017-91537-EXP and by the European Commission project RHUMBO - H2020-MSCA-ITN-2018-813234Alcañiz Raya, ML.; Bigné, E.; Guixeres, J. (2019). Virtual Reality in Marketing: A Framework, Review, and Research Agenda. Frontiers in Psychology. 10:1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01530S11510Alcañiz, M., Parra, E., & Chicchi Giglioli, I. A. (2018). Virtual Reality as an Emerging Methodology for Leadership Assessment and Training. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01658Alshaal, S. E., Michael, S., Pamporis, A., Herodotou, H., Samaras, G., & Andreou, P. (2016). Enhancing Virtual Reality Systems with Smart Wearable Devices. 2016 17th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM). doi:10.1109/mdm.2016.60Ausin, J. M., Guixeres, J., Bigné, E., & Alcañiz, M. (2017). Facial Expressions to Evaluate Advertising: A Laboratory versus Living Room Study. Advances in Advertising Research VIII, 109-122. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-18731-6_9Babić Rosario, A., Sotgiu, F., De Valck, K., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2016). The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales: A Meta-Analytic Review of Platform, Product, and Metric Factors. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(3), 297-318. doi:10.1509/jmr.14.0380Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Rubió, I., Quero, S., García-Palacios, A., & Alcañiz, M. (2008). Presence and Emotions in Virtual Environments: The Influence of Stereoscopy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 1-8. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.9936Barlow, A. K. J., Siddiqui, N. Q., & Mannion, M. (2004). Developments in information and communication technologies for retail marketing channels. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 32(3), 157-163. doi:10.1108/09590550410524948Barnes, S. J. (2011). Understanding use continuance in virtual worlds: Empirical test of a research model. Information & Management, 48(8), 313-319. doi:10.1016/j.im.2011.08.004Bayousuf, A., Al-Khalifa, H. S., & Al-Salman, A. (2018). Haptics-Based Systems Characteristics, Classification, and Applications. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fourth Edition, 4652-4665. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2255-3.ch404Bearden, W. O., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1999). Handbook of Marketing Scales. doi:10.4135/9781412984379Bigné, E., Llinares, C., & Torrecilla, C. (2016). Elapsed time on first buying triggers brand choices within a category: A virtual reality-based study. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1423-1427. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.119Bonetti, F., Warnaby, G., & Quinn, L. (2017). Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Physical and Online Retailing: A Review, Synthesis and Research Agenda. Progress in IS, 119-132. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64027-3_9Brady, M., Fellenz, M. R., & Brookes, R. (2008). Researching the role of information and communications technology (ICT) in contemporary marketing practices. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 23(2), 108-114. doi:10.1108/08858620810850227Bressoud, E. (2013). Testing FMCG innovations: experimental real store versus virtual. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(4), 286-292. doi:10.1108/jpbm-05-2012-0141Brody, A. B., & Gottsman, E. J. (1999). Pocket BargainFinder: A Handheld Device for Augmented Commerce. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 44-51. doi:10.1007/3-540-48157-5_6Bruer, J. T. (s. f.). Building bridges in neuroeducation. The Educated Brain, 43-58. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511489907.005Burke, R. R. (2017). Virtual Reality for Marketing Research. Innovative Research Methodologies in Management, 63-82. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64400-4_3Burke, R. R. (2002). Technology and the Customer Interface: What Consumers Want in the Physical and Virtual Store. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 411-432. doi:10.1177/009207002236914Carpenter, I. D., Simmons, J. E. L., Ritchie, J. M., & Dewar, R. G. (1997). Virtual manufacturing. Manufacturing Engineer, 76(3), 113-116. doi:10.1049/me:19970309Castellanos, M. C., Ausin, J. M., Guixeres, J., & Bigné, E. (2018). Emotion in a 360-Degree vs. Traditional Format Through EDA, EEG and Facial Expressions. Advances in Advertising Research IX, 3-15. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-22681-7_1Chen, L.-D., & Tan, J. (2004). Technology Adaptation in E-commerce: European Management Journal, 22(1), 74-86. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2003.11.014Chicchi Giglioli, I. A., Pravettoni, G., Sutil Martín, D. L., Parra, E., & Raya, M. A. (2017). A Novel Integrating Virtual Reality Approach for the Assessment of the Attachment Behavioral System. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00959Clemente, M., Rey, B., Rodriguez-Pujadas, A., Barros-Loscertales, A., Banos, R. M., Botella, C., … Avila, C. (2013). An fMRI Study to Analyze Neural Correlates of Presence during Virtual Reality Experiences. Interacting with Computers, 26(3), 269-284. doi:10.1093/iwc/iwt037Clemente, M., Rodríguez, A., Rey, B., & Alcañiz, M. (2014). Assessment of the influence of navigation control and screen size on the sense of presence in virtual reality using EEG. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(4), 1584-1592. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.055Daugherty, T., Li, H., & Biocca, F. (2008). Consumer learning and the effects of virtual experience relative to indirect and direct product experience. Psychology and Marketing, 25(7), 568-586. doi:10.1002/mar.20225Dellarocas, C., Katona, Z., & Rand, W. (2013). Media, Aggregators, and the Link Economy: Strategic Hyperlink Formation in Content Networks. Management Science, 59(10), 2360-2379. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1710DONNA L. HOFFMAN THOMAS P. NOVAK. (1997). A New Marketing Paradigm for Electronic Commerce. The Information Society, 13(1), 43-54. doi:10.1080/019722497129278Farah, M. F., Ramadan, Z. B., & Harb, D. H. (2019). The examination of virtual reality at the intersection of consumer experience, shopping journey and physical retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 48, 136-143. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.02.016Fisher, C. E., Chin, L., & Klitzman, R. (2010). Defining Neuromarketing: Practices and Professional Challenges. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 18(4), 230-237. doi:10.3109/10673229.2010.496623Fox, J., Arena, D., & Bailenson, J. N. (2009). Virtual Reality. Journal of Media Psychology, 21(3), 95-113. doi:10.1027/1864-1105.21.3.95Fusaro, M., Tieri, G., & Aglioti, S. M. (2016). Seeing pain and pleasure on self and others: behavioral and psychophysiological reactivity in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Neurophysiology, 116(6), 2656-2662. doi:10.1152/jn.00489.2016Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A. L., & Nordfält, J. (2017). The Future of Retailing. Journal of Retailing, 93(1), 1-6. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2016.12.008Gummesson, E. (1987). The new marketing—Developing long-term interactive relationships. Long Range Planning, 20(4), 10-20. doi:10.1016/0024-6301(87)90151-8Higuera-Trujillo, J. L., López-Tarruella Maldonado, J., & Llinares Millán, C. (2017). Psychological and physiological human responses to simulated and real environments: A comparison between Photographs, 360° Panoramas, and Virtual Reality. Applied Ergonomics, 65, 398-409. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.05.006Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50-68. doi:10.1177/002224299606000304Homburg, C., Jozić, D., & Kuehnl, C. (2015). Customer experience management: toward implementing an evolving marketing concept. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(3), 377-401. doi:10.1007/s11747-015-0460-7Huang, Y. C., Backman, K. F., Backman, S. J., & Chang, L. L. (2015). Exploring the Implications of Virtual Reality Technology in Tourism Marketing: An Integrated Research Framework. International Journal of Tourism Research, 18(2), 116-128. doi:10.1002/jtr.2038Hunt, S. D. (1983). General Theories and the Fundamental Explananda of Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 9-17. doi:10.1177/002224298304700402IJsselsteijn, W., Ridder, H. de, Freeman, J., Avons, S. E., & Bouwhuis, D. (2001). Effects of Stereoscopic Presentation, Image Motion, and Screen Size on Subjective and Objective Corroborative Measures of Presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(3), 298-311. doi:10.1162/105474601300343621Ischer, M., Baron, N., Mermoud, C., Cayeux, I., Porcherot, C., Sander, D., & Delplanque, S. (2014). How incorporation of scents could enhance immersive virtual experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00736Jaeger, S. R., & Porcherot, C. (2017). Consumption context in consumer research: methodological perspectives. Current Opinion in Food Science, 15, 30-37. doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2017.05.001Jerald, J. (2017). Human-centered design for immersive interactions. 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). doi:10.1109/vr.2017.7892361Jones, K., & Biasiotto, M. (1999). Internet retailing: current hype or future reality? The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 9(1), 69-79. doi:10.1080/095939699342688Kalantari, M., & Rauschnabel, P. (2017). Exploring the Early Adopters of Augmented Reality Smart Glasses: The Case of Microsoft HoloLens. Progress in IS, 229-245. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64027-3_16Kannan, P. K., & Li, H. «Alice». (2017). Digital marketing: A framework, review and research agenda. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 22-45. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.006Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2009). Consumer Use and Business Potential of Virtual Worlds: The Case of «Second Life». International Journal on Media Management, 11(3-4), 93-101. doi:10.1080/14241270903047008Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2009). The fairyland of Second Life: Virtual social worlds and how to use them. Business Horizons, 52(6), 563-572. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.07.002Stanney, K., Kennedy, R., Harm, D., Compton, D., Lanham, D., & Drexler, J. (2003). Con.gural Scoring of Simulator Sickness, Cybersickness and Space Adaptation Syndrome. Virtual and Adaptive Environments, 247-278. doi:10.1201/9781410608888.ch12Kenning, P. H., & Plassmann, H. (2008). How Neuroscience Can Inform Consumer Research. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 16(6), 532-538. doi:10.1109/tnsre.2008.2009788Keshavarz, B., & Hecht, H. (2011). Validating an Efficient Method to Quantify Motion Sickness. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53(4), 415-426. doi:10.1177/0018720811403736Klein, L. R. (1998). Evaluating the Potential of Interactive Media through a New Lens: Search versus Experience Goods. Journal of Business Research, 41(3), 195-203. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(97)00062-3Kolesar, M. B., & Wayne Galbraith, R. (2000). A services‐marketing perspective on e‐retailing: implications for e‐retailers and directions for further research. Internet Research, 10(5), 424-438. doi:10.1108/10662240010349444Koontz, M. L., & Gibson, I. E. (2002). Mixed reality merchandising: bricks, clicks – and mix. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 6(4), 381-395. doi:10.1108/13612020210448664Liston, P. M., Kay, A., Cromie, S., Leva, C., D’Cruz, M., Patel, H., … Aromaa, S. (2012). Evaluating the iterative development of VR/AR human factors tools for manual work. Work, 41, 2208-2215. doi:10.3233/wor-2012-0443-2208Kruijff, E., & Riecke, B. E. (2018). Navigation Interfaces for Virtual Reality and Gaming. Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. doi:10.1145/3170427.3170643Lamberton, C., & Stephen, A. T. (2016). A Thematic Exploration of Digital, Social Media, and Mobile Marketing: Research Evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an Agenda for Future Inquiry. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 146-172. doi:10.1509/jm.15.0415Latorre, J., Llorens, R., Colomer, C., & Alcañiz, M. (2018). Reliability and comparison of Kinect-based methods for estimating spatiotemporal gait parameters of healthy and post-stroke individuals. Journal of Biomechanics, 72, 268-273. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.03.008LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444. doi:10.1038/nature14539Lee, K. S., & Tan, S. J. (2003). E-retailing versus physical retailing. Journal of Business Research, 56(11), 877-885. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(01)00274-0Lee, N., Broderick, A. J., & Chamberlain, L. (2007). What is ‘neuromarketing’? A discussion and agenda for future research. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63(2), 199-204. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.007Li, H., Daugherty, T., & Biocca, F. (2003). The Role of Virtual Experience in Consumer Learning. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(4), 395-407. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1304_07Chuan-Chuan Lin, J., & Lu, H. (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site. International Journal of Information Management, 20(3), 197-208. doi:10.1016/s0268-4012(00)00005-0Liu, C., & Arnett, K. P. (2000). Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Information & Management, 38(1), 23-33. doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(00)00049-5Lorenz, M., Busch, M., Rentzos, L., Tscheligi, M., Klimant, P., & Frohlich, P. (2015). I’m There! The influence of virtual reality and mixed reality environments combined with two different navigation methods on presence. 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). doi:10.1109/vr.2015.7223376Marín-Morales, J., Higuera-Trujillo, J. L., Greco, A., Guixeres, J., Llinares, C., Scilingo, E. P., … Valenza, G. (2018). Affective computing in virtual reality: emotion recognition from brain and heartbeat dynamics using wearable sensors. Scientific Reports, 8(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-018-32063-4Mars, P., Chen, J. R., & Nambiar, R. (2018). Learning Algorithms. doi:10.1201/9781351073974Massara, F., Liu, S. S., & Melara, R. D. (2010). Adapting to a retail environment: Modeling consumer–environment interactions. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 673-681. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.004Mathwick, C. (2002). Understanding the online consumer: A typology of online relational norms and behavior. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(1), 40-55. doi:10.1002/dir.10003Mazloumi Gavgani, A., Walker, F. R., Hodgson, D. M., & Nalivaiko, E. (2018). A comparative study of cybersickness during exposure to virtual reality and «classic» motion sickness: are they different? Journal of Applied Physiology, 125(6), 1670-1680. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00338.2018McGrath, J. L., Taekman, J. M., Dev, P., Danforth, D. R., Mohan, D., Kman, N., … Bond, W. F. (2017). Using Virtual Reality Simulation Environments to Assess Competence for Emergency Medicine Learners. Academic Emergency Medicine, 25(2), 186-195. doi:10.1111/acem.13308Meehan, M., Insko, B., Whitton, M., & Brooks, F. P. (2002). Physiological measures of presence in stressful virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 21(3), 645-652. doi:10.1145/566654.566630Meißner, M., Pfeiffer, J., Pfeiffer, T., & Oppewal, H. (2019). Combining virtual reality and mobile eye tracking to provide a naturalistic experimental environment for shopper research. Journal of Business Research, 100, 445-458. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.028Menezes, P., Gouveia, N., & Patrão, B. (2017). Touching Is Believing - Adding Real Objects to Virtual Reality. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 681-688. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64352-6_64Merrilees, B. (2002). Interactivity Design as the Key to Managing Customer Relations in E-Commerce. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 1(3-4), 111-126. doi:10.1300/j366v01n03_07Nalivaiko, E., Davis, S. L., Blackmore, K. L., Vakulin, A., & Nesbitt, K. V. (2015). Cybersickness provoked by head-mounted display affects cutaneous vascular tone, heart rate and reaction time. Physiology & Behavior, 151, 583-590. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.08.043Neslin, S. A., Grewal, D., Leghorn, R., Shankar, V., Teerling, M. L., Thomas, J. S., & Verhoef, P. C. (2006). Challenges and Opportunities in Multichannel Customer Management. Journal of Service Research, 9(2), 95-112. doi:10.1177/1094670506293559Pantano, E., & Servidio, R. (2012). Modeling innovative points of sales through virtual and immersive technologies. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(3), 279-286. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.02.002Papagiannidis, S., Pantano, E., See-To, E. W. K., & Bourlakis, M. (2013). Modelling the determinants of a simulated experience in a virtual retail store and users’ product purchasing intentions. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(13-14), 1462-1492. doi:10.1080/0267257x.2013.821150Parsons, T. D. (2015). Virtual Reality for Enhanced Ecological Validity and Experimental Control in the Clinical, Affective and Social Neurosciences. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00660Perid, J. L. A., & Steiger, P. (1998). Making Electronic Commere Easier to Use With Novel User Interfaces. Electronic Markets, 8(3), 8-12. doi:10.1080/10196789800000032Ranasinghe, N., Nakatsu, R., Nii, H., & Gopalakrishnakone, P. (2012). Tongue Mounted Interface for Digitally Actuating the Sense of Taste. 2012 16th International Symposium on Wearable Computers. doi:10.1109/iswc.2012.16Rieuf, V., Bouchard, C., Meyrueis, V., & Omhover, J.-F. (2017). Emotional activity in early immersive design: Sketches and moodboards in virtual reality. Design Studies, 48, 43-75. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2016.11.001Schnall, S., Hedge, C., & Weaver, R. (2012). The Immersive Virtual Environment of the digital fulldome: Considerations of relevant psychological processes. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(8), 561-575. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.04.001Scholz, J., & Smith, A. N. (2016). Augmented reality: Designing immersive experiences that maximize consumer engagement. Business Horizons, 59(2), 149-161. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2015.10.003Seibert, J., & Shafer, D. M. (2017). Control mapping in virtual reality: effects on spatial presence and controller naturalness. Virtual Reality, 22(1), 79-88. doi:10.1007/s10055-017-0316-1Skarbez, R., Brooks, Jr., F. P., & Whitton, M. C. (2018). A Survey of Presence and Related Concepts. ACM Computing Surveys, 50(6), 1-39. doi:10.1145/3134301Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2016). Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3. doi:10.3389/frobt.2016.00074Stone, R. J. (1995). The reality of virtual reality. World Class Design to Manufacture, 2(4), 11-17. doi:10.1108/09642369310091106Szymanski, D. M., & Hise, R. T. (2000). E-satisfaction: an initial examination. Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 309-322. doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(00)00035-xTeo, W.-P., Muthalib, M., Yamin, S., Hendy, A. M., Bramstedt, K., Kotsopoulos, E., … Ayaz, H. (2016). Does a Combination of Virtual Reality, Neuromodulation and Neuroimaging Provide a Comprehensive Platform for Neurorehabilitation? – A Narrative Review of the Literature. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00284Tikkanen, H., Hietanen, J., Henttonen, T., & Rokka, J. (2009). Exploring virtual worlds: success factors in virtual world marketing. Management Decision, 47(8), 1357-1381. doi:10.1108/00251740910984596Usoh, M., Catena, E., Arman, S., & Slater, M. (2000). Using Presence Questionnaires in Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(5), 497-503. doi:10.1162/105474600566989Van Herpen, E., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2009). When demand accelerates demand: Trailing the bandwagon☆. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 302-312. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.01.001Van Herpen, E., van den Broek, E., van Trijp, H. C. M., & Yu, T. (2016). Can a virtual supermarket bring realism into the lab? Comparing shopping behavior using virtual and pictorial store representations to behavior in a physical store. Appetite, 107, 196-207. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.033Van Kerrebroeck, H., Brengman, M., & Willems, K. (2017). When brands come to life: experimental research on the vividness effect of Virtual Reality in transformational marketing communications. Virtual Reality, 21(4), 177-191. doi:10.1007/s10055-017-0306-3Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2007). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10. doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6Varma, V., & Nathan-Roberts, D. (2017). Gestural Interaction with Three-Dimensional Interfaces; Current Research and Recommendations. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 61(1), 537-541. doi:10.1177/1541931213601618Verhoef, P. C., Kannan, P. K., & Inman, J. J. (2015). From Multi-Channel Retailing to Omni-Channel Retailing. Journal of Retailing, 91(2), 174-181. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2015.02.005Verhulst, A., Normand, J.-M., Lombart, C., & Moreau, G. (2017). A study on the use of an immersive virtual reality store to investigate consumer perceptions and purchase behavior toward non-standard fruits and vegetables. 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). doi:10.1109/vr.2017.7892231Vrechopoulos, A., Apostolou, K., & Koutsiouris, V. (2009)

Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Social Cognition.

The traditional view on the cerebellum is that it controls motor behavior. Although recent work has revealed that the cerebellum supports also nonmotor functions such as cognition and affect, only during the last 5 years it has become evident that the cerebellum also plays an important social role. This role is evident in social cognition based on interpreting goal-directed actions through the movements of individuals (social "mirroring") which is very close to its original role in motor learning, as well as in social understanding of other individuals' mental state, such as their intentions, beliefs, past behaviors, future aspirations, and personality traits (social "mentalizing"). Most of this mentalizing role is supported by the posterior cerebellum (e.g., Crus I and II). The most dominant hypothesis is that the cerebellum assists in learning and understanding social action sequences, and so facilitates social cognition by supporting optimal predictions about imminent or future social interaction and cooperation. This consensus paper brings together experts from different fields to discuss recent efforts in understanding the role of the cerebellum in social cognition, and the understanding of social behaviors and mental states by others, its effect on clinical impairments such as cerebellar ataxia and autism spectrum disorder, and how the cerebellum can become a potential target for noninvasive brain stimulation as a therapeutic intervention. We report on the most recent empirical findings and techniques for understanding and manipulating cerebellar circuits in humans. Cerebellar circuitry appears now as a key structure to elucidate social interactions

Prior Dengue Virus Exposure Shapes T Cell Immunity to Zika Virus in Humans

While progress has been made in characterizing humoral immunity to Zika virus (ZIKV) in humans, little is known regarding the corresponding T cell responses to ZIKV. Here, we investigate the kinetics and viral epitopes targeted by T cells responding to ZIKV and address the critical question of whether preexisting dengue virus (DENV) T cell immunity modulates these responses. We find that memory T cell responses elicited by prior infection with DENV or vaccination with tetravalent dengue attenuated vaccines (TDLAV) recognize ZIKV-derived peptides. This cross-reactivity is explained by the sequence similarity of the two viruses, as the ZIKV peptides recognized by DENV-elicited memory T cells are identical or highly conserved in DENV and ZIKV. DENV exposure prior to ZIKV infection also influences the timing and magnitude of the T cell response. ZIKV-reactive T cells in the acute phase of infection are detected earlier and in greater magnitude in DENV-immune patients. Conversely, the frequency of ZIKV-reactive T cells continues to rise in the convalescent phase in DENV-naive donors but declines in DENV-preexposed donors, compatible with more efficient control of ZIKV replication and/or clearance of ZIKV antigen. The quality of responses is also influenced by previous DENV exposure, and ZIKV-specific CD8 T cells from DENV-preexposed donors selectively upregulated granzyme B and PD1, unlike DENV-naive donors. Finally, we discovered that ZIKV structural proteins (E, prM, and C) are major targets of both the CD4 and CD8 T cell responses, whereas DENV T cell epitopes are found primarily in nonstructural proteins. IMPORTANCE The issue of potential ZIKV and DENV cross-reactivity and how preexisting DENV T cell immunity modulates Zika T cell responses is of great relevance, as the two viruses often cocirculate and Zika virus has been spreading in geographical regions where DENV is endemic or hyperendemic. Our data show that memory T cell responses elicited by prior infection with DENV recognize ZIKV-derived peptides and that DENV exposure prior to ZIKV infection influences the timing, magnitude, and quality of the T cell response. Additionally, we show that ZIKV-specific responses target different proteins than DENV-specific responses, pointing toward important implications for vaccine design against this global threat