8 research outputs found

    The role of cell cycle control mechanisms in regulated and sustained cell proliferation

    Get PDF
    The cell cycle is the time a cell spends between two cell divisions. The cell cycle includes several parallel processes, all of which must be completed before a cell is mature for dividing. In the first place, all subcomponents (RNA, protein and membrane lipids) need to double in quantity and this occurs continuously through the cell cycle. Furthermore, the genome and some chromosomal proteins must double and this take place during a limited interval in the middle of the cell cycle (S-phase). On either side of the S-phase are two "gaps" which is called G1 and G2. When the cell has passed a point in the G-phase they are irreversibly programmed to progress through the remaining of the cell cycle and will undergo the next cell division. When a cell have passed a point in the G1 phase, approximately four hours after mitosis, a normal cell is in a state of indecision. During this phase (G1pm), the cell is affected by external factors, such as presence of certain growth factors and proximity to other cells to make a decision whether to continue toward S-phase or exit the cell cycle and enter a reversible resting stage-G0. G1pm phase is always of constant length (four hours), followed by a variable phase of G1 (G1ps) during which the cell builds its structural components with varying speed. A small cell spend a relatively longer time in G1ps than a larger one. The idea is that any size differences between cells will be adjusted before S-phase is initiated. Unlike normal cells, the transformed cells lack the ability to withdraw the G0 under suboptimal conditions. This article aims to summarize how normal and transformed cells relate to the G0-blocking and how individual factors determine the both cells relation to cell proliferation inhibition and "sustained proliferation."Cellcykeln benĂ€mns den tid som en cell tillbringar mellan tvĂ„ celldelningar. Cellcykeln innefattar flera parallella processer som alla mĂ„ste slutföras innan en cell Ă€r mogen för delning. För det första mĂ„ste alla cellens strukturella komponenter (RNA, proteiner och membranlipider) fördubblas och detta sker kontinuerligt genom cellcykeln. Dessutom mĂ„ste arvsmassan och nĂ„gra av de kromosomala proteinerna fördubblas och detta sker under ett avgrĂ€nsat intervall ungefĂ€r mitt i cellcykeln (S-fasen). PĂ„ ömse sidor om S-fasen finns tvĂ„ ”gaps” som brukar kallas G1 och G2. NĂ€r celler har passerat en punkt i G1-fasen Ă€r de oĂ„terkalleligen programmerade för att progrediera genom Ă„terstoden av cellcykeln och kommer genomgĂ„ nĂ€sta celldelning. UngefĂ€r fyra timmar efter mitos befinner sig normalcellen i ett stadium av obeslutsamhet. Under denna fas (G1pm) pĂ„verkas cellen av yttre faktorer som exempelvis tillgĂ„ng till tillvĂ€xtfaktorer och nĂ€rhet till andra celler att fatta ett beslut om den skall fortsĂ€tta mot S-fas eller uttrĂ€da ur cellcykeln och intrĂ€da i ett reversibelt vilostadium – G0. G1pm-fasen Ă€r alltid av konstant lĂ€ngd (fyra timmar) och Ă„tföljs av en variabel del, G1ps, under vilken cellen bygger upp sina strukturkomponenter med varierande hastighet. En liten cell tillbringar en relativt lĂ€ngre tid i G1ps Ă€n en större. Tanken Ă€r att alla storleksskillnader mellan celler skall vara utjĂ€mnade nĂ€r S-fasen initieras. Till skillnad frĂ„n normala celler saknar transformerade celler förmĂ„gan att uttrĂ€da i G0 under suboptimala förhĂ„llanden. Denna artikel syftar till att sammanfatta hur normala och transformerade celler förhĂ„ller sig till G0-blockeringen samt hur enskilda faktorer styr de bĂ„da cellslagens förhĂ„llande till proliferationshĂ€mning och "sustained proliferation"

    The effect of differential phosphorylation of YB-1 on apoptosis and cell cycle regulation

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this study was to investigate whether different phosphorylated forms of Y-box binding protein (YB-1) can affect the regulation of the cell cycle and/or apoptosis of cancer cells. Recent studies have suggested a key role for YB-1 in the regulation of cancer. Just like many other oncoproteins YB-1 is required for vital processes in the cell and hence it is not possible to apply YB-1 in a therapeutic role. Therefore, my aim was to elucidate whether or not one or more phosphorylated forms of YB-1 play a decisive role in apoptosis. Human colorectal cancer cells (HCT 116) were transfected with different phosphorylated forms of YB-1. These cells were subsequently analysed by flow cytometry in order to compare live/dead cells between the different mutants. The results from this study suggest that one of the mutants (S176A) plays a more important role when it comes to protecting the cells from apoptosis and hence contribute to promoting sustained proliferation. Moreover, in opposite to S176A, the results indicate that another mutant (S167A) seems to have a more important role protecting the cells from sustained proliferation.Syftet med denna studie var att undersöka huruvida olika fosforylerade former av Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1) pÄverkar celldöd och/eller reglering av cell cykeln. Tidigare studier tyder pÄ att YB-1 har en nyckelposition gÀllande reglering och uppkomst av cancer. Precis som med mÄnga andra onkoproteiner krÀvs YB-1 för mÄnga vitala processer i cellerna och dÀrför kan inte behandling riktas generellt mot YB-1. Med denna studie hoppas jag dÀrför kunna finna en eller flera olika fosforylerade former av YB-1 som har en mer eller mindre avgörande roll gÀllande apoptos. Detta för att behandling av cancer i framtiden dÄ skulle kunna riktas mot enbart ett eller flera av dessa fosforyleringsstÀllen. För att undersöka detta har humana colo-rektala cancerceller transfekterats med sex olika mutationer av YB-1, dessa har sedan analyserats med hjÀlp av flödescytometri för att jÀmföra levande/döda celler mellan de olika mutationerna

    Assessing the carcinogenic potential of low-dose exposures to chemical mixtures in the environment: the challenge ahead.

    Get PDF
    Lifestyle factors are responsible for a considerable portion of cancer incidence worldwide, but credible estimates from the World Health Organization and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) suggest that the fraction of cancers attributable to toxic environmental exposures is between 7% and 19%. To explore the hypothesis that low-dose exposures to mixtures of chemicals in the environment may be combining to contribute to environmental carcinogenesis, we reviewed 11 hallmark phenotypes of cancer, multiple priority target sites for disruption in each area and prototypical chemical disruptors for all targets, this included dose-response characterizations, evidence of low-dose effects and cross-hallmark effects for all targets and chemicals. In total, 85 examples of chemicals were reviewed for actions on key pathways/mechanisms related to carcinogenesis. Only 15% (13/85) were found to have evidence of a dose-response threshold, whereas 59% (50/85) exerted low-dose effects. No dose-response information was found for the remaining 26% (22/85). Our analysis suggests that the cumulative effects of individual (non-carcinogenic) chemicals acting on different pathways, and a variety of related systems, organs, tissues and cells could plausibly conspire to produce carcinogenic synergies. Additional basic research on carcinogenesis and research focused on low-dose effects of chemical mixtures needs to be rigorously pursued before the merits of this hypothesis can be further advanced. However, the structure of the World Health Organization International Programme on Chemical Safety 'Mode of Action' framework should be revisited as it has inherent weaknesses that are not fully aligned with our current understanding of cancer biology

    Assessing the carcinogenic potential of low-dose exposures to chemical mixtures in the environment: the challenge ahead

    Get PDF
    Lifestyle factors are responsible for a considerable portion of cancer incidence worldwide, but credible estimates from the World Health Organization and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) suggest that the fraction of cancers attributable to toxic environmental exposures is between 7% and 19%. To explore the hypothesis that low-dose exposures to mixtures of chemicals in the environment may be combining to contribute to environmental carcinogenesis, we reviewed 11 hallmark phenotypes of cancer, multiple priority target sites for disruption in each area and prototypical chemical disruptors for all targets, this included dose-response characterizations, evidence of low-dose effects and cross-hallmark effects for all targets and chemicals. In total, 85 examples of chemicals were reviewed for actions on key pathways/mechanisms related to carcinogenesis. Only 15% (13/85) were found to have evidence of a dose-response threshold, whereas 59% (50/85) exerted low-dose effects. No dose-response information was found for the remaining 26% (22/85). Our analysis suggests that the cumulative effects of individual (non-carcinogenic) chemicals acting on different pathways, and a variety of related systems, organs, tissues and cells could plausibly conspire to produce carcinogenic synergies. Additional basic research on carcinogenesis and research focused on low-dose effects of chemical mixtures needs to be rigorously pursued before the merits of this hypothesis can be further advanced. However, the structure of the World Health Organization International Programme on Chemical Safety ‘Mode of Action’ framework should be revisited as it has inherent weaknesses that are not fully aligned with our current understanding of cancer biology

    Ungdomars, ledares och förÀldrars upplevelser av 'KOMET för förÀldrar till ungdomar 12-18 Är'

    No full text
    Kometprogrammet började utvecklas 2001 och Ă€r en svensk variant av nordamerikanska manualbaserade förĂ€ldratrĂ€ningsprogram. Varianten Komet 12-18 Ă„r riktar sig till förĂ€ldrar med utagerande ungdomar med syftet att bryta negativa beteendemönster genom att Ă€ndra förĂ€ldrarnas förhĂ„llningssĂ€tt till sina barn. Grundtankarna Ă€r hĂ€mtade frĂ„n inlĂ€rningsteori, beteendeanalys, prevention och kognitiv beteendeterapi och bygger pĂ„ evidensbaserad forskning. Syftet med studien Ă€r att bidra till utvecklingen av Komet 12-18 Ă„r och tillgodose ungdomsperspektivet med resultat frĂ„n ungdomsintervjuer och –enkĂ€ter. FrĂ„gestĂ€llningen Ă€r om ungdomarna sjĂ€lva upplever nĂ„gon förĂ€ndring i sina förĂ€ldrars beteende och i sĂ„ fall vilken efter genomgĂ„nget program. Ledarnas och förĂ€ldrarnas Ă„sikter om programmet sammanfattas utifrĂ„n en enkĂ€tundersökning. Antalet deltagare blev lĂ€gre Ă€n vĂ€ntat. Komets övergripande mĂ„l, att minska brĂ„k och förbĂ€ttra kommunikationen hemma, uppfylldes enligt de medverkande ungdomarna i genomsnitt men ungdomarna uttryckte sig försiktigare Ă€n bĂ„de ledare och förĂ€ldrar angĂ„ende förbĂ€ttringen. Hos dem dĂ€r förĂ€ndring skett uppfattades den positivt och ungdomarna uppskattade anstrĂ€ngningen frĂ„n förĂ€ldrarna som frĂ€mst mammorna stod för
    corecore