10 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Study protocol: cross-national comparative case study of recovery-focused mental health care planning and coordination (COCAPP).
BACKGROUND: The collaborative care planning study (COCAPP) is a cross-national comparative study of care planning and coordination in community mental healthcare settings. The context and delivery of mental health care is diverging between the countries of England and Wales whilst retaining points of common interest, hence providing a rich geographical comparison for research. Across England the key vehicle for the provision of recovery-focused, personalised, collaborative mental health care is the care programme approach (CPA). The CPA is a form of case management introduced in England in 1991, then revised in 2008. In Wales the CPA was introduced in 2003 but has now been superseded by The Mental Health (Care Co-ordination and Care and Treatment Planning) (CTP) Regulations (Mental Health Measure), a new statutory framework. In both countries, the CPA/CTP requires providers to: comprehensively assess health/social care needs and risks; develop a written care plan (which may incorporate risk assessments, crisis and contingency plans, advanced directives, relapse prevention plans, etc.) in collaboration with the service user and carer(s); allocate a care coordinator; and regularly review care. The overarching aim of this study is to identify and describe the factors that ensure CPA/CTP care planning and coordination is personalised, recovery-focused and conducted collaboratively. METHODS/DESIGN: COCAPP will employ a concurrent transformative mixed methods approach with embedded case studies. Phase 1 (Macro-level) will consider the national context through a meta-narrative mapping (MNM) review of national policies and the relevant research literature. Phase 2 (Meso-level and Micro-level) will include in-depth micro-level case studies of everyday 'frontline' practice and experience with detailed qualitative data from interviews and reviews of individual care plans. This will be nested within larger meso-level survey datasets, senior-level interviews and policy reviews in order to provide potential explanations and understanding. DISCUSSION: COCAPP will help identify the key components that support and hinder the provision of personalised, recovery-focused care planning and provide an informed rationale for a future planned intervention and evaluation
Primary immune deficiencies - principles of care
Primary immune deficiencies (PIDs) are a growing group of over 230 different disorders caused by ineffective, absent or an increasing number of gain of function mutations in immune components, mainly cells and proteins. Once recognized, these rare disorders are treatable and in some cases curable. Otherwise untreated PIDs are often chronic, serious, or even fatal. The diagnosis of PIDs can be difficult due to lack of awareness or facilities for diagnosis, and management of PIDs is complex. This document was prepared by a worldwide multi-disciplinary team of specialists; it aims to set out comprehensive principles of care for PIDs. These include the role of specialized centers, the importance of registries, the need for multinational research, the role of patient organizations, management and treatment options, the requirement for sustained access to all treatments including immunoglobulin therapies and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, important considerations for developing countries and suggestions for implementation. A range of healthcare policies and services have to be put into place by government agencies and healthcare providers, to ensure that PID patients worldwide have access to appropriate and sustainable medical and support services
Effect of web page menu orientation on retrieving information by people with learning disabilities
The Internet facilitates the provision of accessible infor-
mation to people with learning disabilities. However,
problems with navigation and retrieval represent a
barrier for this cohort. This article addresses one aspect
of page design, testing whether a horizontal or vertical
contents arrangement facilitates faster access to
content for people with learning disabilities. Participants
were timed as they looked for one-word \u201cdummy\u201d menu
entries appearing in various locations along a horizontal
or vertical grid. The words corresponded to images
shown at random in a word-search type activity. Results
were analyzed using mixed effects models. Results
showed that mean search times increased as the posi-
tion shifted from left to right and from top to bottom.
Thus, participants undertook the test as if it were a
reading exercise, despite the images appearing in the
center of the page and the words appearing at random
positions. The research also suggests that a horizontal
menu may be more effective than a vertical one, with the
most important links placed on the left. The propensity
to imbibe information \u201cserially\u201d (word-for-word) rather
than to skim or look \u201cglobally\u201d has important website
design implications