Health and social care for older persons from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds : Australian policy and practice

Introduction In an increasingly globalised world, the challenges of meeting the health and social needs of older people from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds is becoming increasingly important, with the World Health Organisation stating that designing for diversity is a primary characteristic of an age friendly city (World Health Organization [WHO], 2007). In Australia, the importance of meeting the needs of CALD older people has been recognised at all levels of government and is one of the features of the current proposed Australian Government aged care reforms (Chenoweth, Jeon, Goff & Burke, 2006; Commonwealth of Australia, 2012; Radermacher, Karunarathna, Grace & Feldman, 2011). This paper explores the challenges and opportunities of CALD ageing, building on an earlier scoping study of ageing and cultural diversity (Bartlett, Rao & Warburton, 2006) which included a comprehensive review of the literature (Rao, Warburton & Bartlett, 2006) and analysis of the implications for policy and practice (Warburton, Bartlett & Rao, 2009). In addition to consideration of the health and social needs of diverse groups, this paper reviews a range of other factors impacting upon the wellbeing of CALD older people, outlines selected innovation and good practice, and highlights areas for further research, policy and practice development. 「多元文化及语言背景长者的健康及护理：澳洲的政策与实践」 导言 在不断全球化的社会中，应付来自多元文化及语言（CALD）背景长者的健康及社会需要成为一大挑战，其重要性也越来越高。世界卫生组织指出要成为老龄友好型社会，首要条件是要设计多元化顾及不同需要（世界卫生组织［WHO］，2007）。澳洲政府上下一致认同满足多元文化及语言背景长者的需要之重要性，更把其作为现时所提议的长者护理改革中其中一个重点（肯诺恩斯，全，高夫与伯克，2006；澳洲联邦，2012；拉德马赫尔，卡鲁纳拉特纳，葛瑞丝与费尔德曼，2011）。此论文以较早前的老龄化与多元文化的概括研究为基础（芭特莉特，拉奥与沃伯顿，2006），探讨多元文化及语言背景人口老龄化所带来的挑战和机遇，同时包括全面的文献综述（拉奥，沃伯顿与芭特莉特，2006）和分析政策与实践的意涵（沃伯顿，芭特莉特与拉奥，2009）。除了涉及多元群组的健康和社会需要，此论文还包括一系列影响多元文化及语言背景长者的健康福祉的因素，概述当中的创新意念和优良的实践方法，并讨论日后研究、政策与实践的路向

Global Ecologies and the Environmental Humanities: Postcolonial Approaches edited by Elizabeth Deloughrey, Jill Didur, and Anthony Carrigan

Review of Elizabeth Deloughrey, Jill Didur, and Anthony Carrigan\u27s Global Ecologies and the Environmental Humanities: Postcolonial Approaches

General Relativity eliminates Dark Energy, Dark Matter and Universal Expansion

This letter was rejected by International Knowledge Press because "we are unable to conclude that these findings would warrant publication in this journal." The letter is suggesting that dark energy, dark matter and universal expansion are intimately related. However, they aren't viewed as revolutions in cosmology which are essential to a complete understanding of the modern universe. They are instead viewed as properties which need to be added to the cosmos when Einstein's theory of gravity (General Relativity) is apparently still not thoroughly comprehended a little over a century since it was published

In the Interval of the Wave: Prince Edward Island Women\u27s Nineteenth- and Early Twentieth-Century Life Writing by Mary McDonald-Rissanen

Review of In the Interval of the Wave: Prince Edward Island Women\u27s Nineteenth- and Early Twentieth-Century Life Writing by Mary McDonald-Rissanen

Is The Daily Show Bad for Democracy? An Analysis of Cynicism and its Significance

In recent years, satirical news programs like The Daily Show with Jon Stewart have emerged as an important development in contemporary American society, culture, and politics. Critics have argued that The Daily Show has a negative impact on the political attitudes of American citizens by making them cynical about government and the political process as a whole. As a result of these attitudes, they argue, citizens are less apt to participate in politics and, in turn, this behavior is detrimental to American democracy. The purpose of this research project is to explore the debate over whether or not The Daily Show is indeed bad for democracy. Its objectives are not simply to develop my own answer to this question, but more importantly to critically unpack the question itself in order to analyze the complex relationships between The Daily Show, cynicism, and democracy. To do so, I review, analyze, and assess various and competing definitions of the concepts “cynicism” and “democracy,” and then use close readings of scholarship from political science, communication, and cultural studies to construct a “debate” on the question of the show’s significance for contemporary American democracy