12 research outputs found
Dendritic Cell-Mediated, DNA-Based Vaccination Against Hepatitis C Induces the Multi-Epitope-Specific Response of Humanized, HLA Transgenic Mice
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the etiologic agent of chronic liver disease, hepatitis C. Spontaneous resolution of viral infection is associated with vigorous HLA class I- and class II-restricted T cell responses to multiple viral epitopes. Unfortunately, only 20% of patients clear infection spontaneously, most develop chronic disease and require therapy. The response to chemotherapy varies, however; therapeutic vaccination offers an additional treatment strategy. To date, therapeutic vaccines have demonstrated only limited success. Vector-mediated vaccination with multi-epitope-expressing DNA constructs alone or in combination with chemotherapy offers an additional treatment approach. Gene sequences encoding validated HLA-A2- and HLA-DRB1-restricted epitopes were synthesized and cloned into an expression vector. Dendritic cells (DCs) derived from humanized, HLA-A2/DRB1 transgenic (donor) mice were transfected with these multi-epitope-expressing DNA constructs. Recipient HLA-A2/DRB1 mice were vaccinated s.c. with transfected DCs; control mice received non-transfected DCs. Peptide-specific IFN-γ production by splenic T cells obtained at 5 weeks post-immunization was quantified by ELISpot assay; additionally, the production of IL-4, IL-10 and TNF-α were quantified by cytokine bead array. Splenocytes derived from vaccinated HLA-A2/DRB1 transgenic mice exhibited peptide-specific cytokine production to the vast majority of the vaccine-encoded HLA class I- and class II-restricted T cell epitopes. A multi-epitope-based HCV vaccine that targets DCs offers an effective approach to inducing a broad immune response and viral clearance in chronic, HCV-infected patients
HCV Epitope, Homologous to Multiple Human Protein Sequences, Induces a Regulatory T Cell Response in Infected Patients
Background & Aims: Spontaneous resolution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections depends upon a broad T cell response to multiple viral epitopes. Most patients fail to clear infections spontaneously, however, and develop chronic disease. The elevated number and function of CD3+CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T(reg) cells in HCV-infected patients suggest the role of Treg cells in impaired viral clearance. The factors contributing to increased Treg cell activity in chronic hepatitis C cases remain to be delineated.
Methods: Immunoinformatics tools were used to predict promiscuous, highly-conserved HLA-DRB1- restricted immunogenic consensus sequences (ICS), each composed of multiple T cell epitopes. These sequences were synthesized and added to cultures of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) derived from patients who resolved HCV infection spontaneously, patients with persistent infection, and non-infected individuals. The cells were collected following 5 days incubation, quantified and characterized by flow cytometry.
Results: One ICS, HCV_G1_p7_794, induced a marked increase in Treg cells in PBMC cultures derived from infected patients, but not patients who spontaneously cleared HCV or non-infected individuals. An analogous human peptide (p7_794), on the other hand, induced a significant increase in Treg cells among PBMCs derived from both HCV infected and non-infected individuals. JanusMatrix analyses determined that HCV_G1_p7_794 is comprised of Treg cell epitopes that exhibit extensive cross-reactivity with the human proteome.
Conclusion: A virus-encoded peptide (HCV_G1_p7_794) with extensive human homology activates cross-reactive CD3+CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ nTreg cells, which potentially contribute to immunosuppression and chronic hepatitis C
Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study
Background: The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on postoperative recovery needs to be understood to inform clinical decision making during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reports 30-day mortality and pulmonary complication rates in patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: This international, multicentre, cohort study at 235 hospitals in 24 countries included all patients undergoing surgery who had SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality and was assessed in all enrolled patients. The main secondary outcome measure was pulmonary complications, defined as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or unexpected postoperative ventilation. Findings: This analysis includes 1128 patients who had surgery between Jan 1 and March 31, 2020, of whom 835 (74·0%) had emergency surgery and 280 (24·8%) had elective surgery. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed preoperatively in 294 (26·1%) patients. 30-day mortality was 23·8% (268 of 1128). Pulmonary complications occurred in 577 (51·2%) of 1128 patients; 30-day mortality in these patients was 38·0% (219 of 577), accounting for 81·7% (219 of 268) of all deaths. In adjusted analyses, 30-day mortality was associated with male sex (odds ratio 1·75 [95% CI 1·28â2·40], p\textless0·0001), age 70 years or older versus younger than 70 years (2·30 [1·65â3·22], p\textless0·0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 3â5 versus grades 1â2 (2·35 [1·57â3·53], p\textless0·0001), malignant versus benign or obstetric diagnosis (1·55 [1·01â2·39], p=0·046), emergency versus elective surgery (1·67 [1·06â2·63], p=0·026), and major versus minor surgery (1·52 [1·01â2·31], p=0·047). Interpretation: Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality. Thresholds for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic should be higher than during normal practice, particularly in men aged 70 years and older. Consideration should be given for postponing non-urgent procedures and promoting non-operative treatment to delay or avoid the need for surgery. Funding: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, NIHR Academy, Sarcoma UK, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research
DCs derived from Flt3L-treated, HLA-A2/DRB1 mice exhibit an immature phenotype<sup>a</sup>.
a<p>CD11c<sup>+</sup>PDCA-1<sup>+</sup> DCs, purified from 2.55Ă10<sup>8</sup> splenocytes/HLA-A2/DRB1 transgenic mouse inoculated s.c. with Flt3L-secreting B16 myeloma cells 12 days previously, were quantified and characterized by flow cytometry.</p>b<p>Not determined.</p
Schematic: DC vector-mediated vaccination of HLA-A2/DR1 mice.
<p>Humanized HLA-A2/DRB1 transgenic mice were vaccinated s.c. with multi-HCV epitope-expressing plasmids using DCs derived from transgenic mice administered Flt3L-secreting B16 melanoma cells as a vaccine vector.</p
IFN-Îł ELISpot assays.
<p>The spleens were dissected and pooled on day 35 from groups of 4 mice immunized with vaccine construct-transfected, and IFN-γ ELISpot assays were performed in triplicate. The data, expressed as the means ± SD ELISpots/10<sup>6</sup> splenocytes minus the average negative control, 0.1% DMSO+2 SD (3,346 ELISpots/10<sup>6</sup> splenocytes), were obtained in a single experiment representative of duplicate experiments. The average number of ELISpots/10<sup>6</sup> splenocytes derived from mice immunized with non-transfected DCs was not significantly different from the DMSO control (not shown). *Splenocytes derived from mice immunized with transfected DCs and incubated with the HLA-A2- and -DRB1-restricted peptides indicated did not yield values that were significantly different from the DMSO control (ANOVA).</p
Cytokine bead array.
<p>The spleens were dissected and pooled on day 35 from groups of four mice immunized with vaccine construct-transfected or non-transfected DCs. Single cell suspensions were transferred to quadruplicate wells and cultured 40 hours in the presence of the peptide indicated. The data, obtained in a single experiment representative of two experiments, are the means ± SD pg/ml cytokine produced by splenocytes obtained from mice immunized with transfected DCs minus that produced by splenocytes derived from control mice immunized with non-transfected DCs. Concentrations of IFN-Îł, TNF-α, IL-4 and IL-10 (where indicated by *) are significantly greater than that produced by splenocytes derived from control animals (<i>P<</i>0.05; Studentâs <i>t</i> test or Mann-Whitney Rank Sums test).</p
HLA-A2/DRB1 DCs transfected by electroporation.
<p>Purified HLA-A2/DRB1 DCs were transfection by electroporation with a GFP-expressing plasmid (NTC8685-eRNA41H-EGFP) and cultured overnight in the presence of GM-CSF to promote viability. The cells were examined visually on the following day: UV microscopy (left), DAPI-counter stain (center), merged images (right).</p
Surgeons' perspectives on artificial intelligence to support clinical decision-making in trauma and emergency contexts: results from an international survey
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining traction in medicine and surgery. AI-based applications can offer tools to examine high-volume data to inform predictive analytics that supports complex decision-making processes. Time-sensitive trauma and emergency contexts are often challenging. The study aims to investigate trauma and emergency surgeons' knowledge and perception of using AI-based tools in clinical decision-making processes. Methods: An online survey grounded on literature regarding AI-enabled surgical decision-making aids was created by a multidisciplinary committee and endorsed by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES). The survey was advertised to 917 WSES members through the society's website and Twitter profile. Results: 650 surgeons from 71 countries in five continents participated in the survey. Results depict the presence of technology enthusiasts and skeptics and surgeons' preference toward more classical decision-making aids like clinical guidelines, traditional training, and the support of their multidisciplinary colleagues. A lack of knowledge about several AI-related aspects emerges and is associated with mistrust. Discussion: The trauma and emergency surgical community is divided into those who firmly believe in the potential of AI and those who do not understand or trust AI-enabled surgical decision-making aids. Academic societies and surgical training programs should promote a foundational, working knowledge of clinical AI
Time for a paradigm shift in shared decision-making in trauma and emergency surgery? Results from an international survey
Background
Shared decision-making (SDM) between clinicians and patients is one of the pillars of the modern patient-centric philosophy of care. This study aims to explore SDM in the discipline of trauma and emergency surgery, investigating its interpretation as well as the barriers and facilitators for its implementation among surgeons.
Methods
Grounding on the literature on the topics of the understanding, barriers, and facilitators of SDM in trauma and emergency surgery, a survey was created by a multidisciplinary committee and endorsed by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES). The survey was sent to all 917 WSES members, advertised through the societyâs website, and shared on the societyâs Twitter profile.
Results
A total of 650 trauma and emergency surgeons from 71 countries in five continents participated in the initiative. Less than half of the surgeons understood SDM, and 30% still saw the value in exclusively engaging multidisciplinary provider teams without involving the patient. Several barriers to effectively partnering with the patient in the decision-making process were identified, such as the lack of time and the need to concentrate on making medical teams work smoothly.
Discussion
Our investigation underlines how only a minority of trauma and emergency surgeons understand SDM, and perhaps, the value of SDM is not fully accepted in trauma and emergency situations. The inclusion of SDM practices in clinical guidelines may represent the most feasible and advocated solutions