4,769 research outputs found
Graph Summarization
The continuous and rapid growth of highly interconnected datasets, which are
both voluminous and complex, calls for the development of adequate processing
and analytical techniques. One method for condensing and simplifying such
datasets is graph summarization. It denotes a series of application-specific
algorithms designed to transform graphs into more compact representations while
preserving structural patterns, query answers, or specific property
distributions. As this problem is common to several areas studying graph
topologies, different approaches, such as clustering, compression, sampling, or
influence detection, have been proposed, primarily based on statistical and
optimization methods. The focus of our chapter is to pinpoint the main graph
summarization methods, but especially to focus on the most recent approaches
and novel research trends on this topic, not yet covered by previous surveys.Comment: To appear in the Encyclopedia of Big Data Technologie
Synchronization in complex networks
Synchronization processes in populations of locally interacting elements are
in the focus of intense research in physical, biological, chemical,
technological and social systems. The many efforts devoted to understand
synchronization phenomena in natural systems take now advantage of the recent
theory of complex networks. In this review, we report the advances in the
comprehension of synchronization phenomena when oscillating elements are
constrained to interact in a complex network topology. We also overview the new
emergent features coming out from the interplay between the structure and the
function of the underlying pattern of connections. Extensive numerical work as
well as analytical approaches to the problem are presented. Finally, we review
several applications of synchronization in complex networks to different
disciplines: biological systems and neuroscience, engineering and computer
science, and economy and social sciences.Comment: Final version published in Physics Reports. More information
available at http://synchronets.googlepages.com
A Bayesian alternative to mutual information for the hierarchical clustering of dependent random variables
The use of mutual information as a similarity measure in agglomerative
hierarchical clustering (AHC) raises an important issue: some correction needs
to be applied for the dimensionality of variables. In this work, we formulate
the decision of merging dependent multivariate normal variables in an AHC
procedure as a Bayesian model comparison. We found that the Bayesian
formulation naturally shrinks the empirical covariance matrix towards a matrix
set a priori (e.g., the identity), provides an automated stopping rule, and
corrects for dimensionality using a term that scales up the measure as a
function of the dimensionality of the variables. Also, the resulting log Bayes
factor is asymptotically proportional to the plug-in estimate of mutual
information, with an additive correction for dimensionality in agreement with
the Bayesian information criterion. We investigated the behavior of these
Bayesian alternatives (in exact and asymptotic forms) to mutual information on
simulated and real data. An encouraging result was first derived on
simulations: the hierarchical clustering based on the log Bayes factor
outperformed off-the-shelf clustering techniques as well as raw and normalized
mutual information in terms of classification accuracy. On a toy example, we
found that the Bayesian approaches led to results that were similar to those of
mutual information clustering techniques, with the advantage of an automated
thresholding. On real functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) datasets
measuring brain activity, it identified clusters consistent with the
established outcome of standard procedures. On this application, normalized
mutual information had a highly atypical behavior, in the sense that it
systematically favored very large clusters. These initial experiments suggest
that the proposed Bayesian alternatives to mutual information are a useful new
tool for hierarchical clustering
Twin Learning for Similarity and Clustering: A Unified Kernel Approach
Many similarity-based clustering methods work in two separate steps including
similarity matrix computation and subsequent spectral clustering. However,
similarity measurement is challenging because it is usually impacted by many
factors, e.g., the choice of similarity metric, neighborhood size, scale of
data, noise and outliers. Thus the learned similarity matrix is often not
suitable, let alone optimal, for the subsequent clustering. In addition,
nonlinear similarity often exists in many real world data which, however, has
not been effectively considered by most existing methods. To tackle these two
challenges, we propose a model to simultaneously learn cluster indicator matrix
and similarity information in kernel spaces in a principled way. We show
theoretical relationships to kernel k-means, k-means, and spectral clustering
methods. Then, to address the practical issue of how to select the most
suitable kernel for a particular clustering task, we further extend our model
with a multiple kernel learning ability. With this joint model, we can
automatically accomplish three subtasks of finding the best cluster indicator
matrix, the most accurate similarity relations and the optimal combination of
multiple kernels. By leveraging the interactions between these three subtasks
in a joint framework, each subtask can be iteratively boosted by using the
results of the others towards an overall optimal solution. Extensive
experiments are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.Comment: Published in AAAI 201
Evaluating Overfit and Underfit in Models of Network Community Structure
A common data mining task on networks is community detection, which seeks an
unsupervised decomposition of a network into structural groups based on
statistical regularities in the network's connectivity. Although many methods
exist, the No Free Lunch theorem for community detection implies that each
makes some kind of tradeoff, and no algorithm can be optimal on all inputs.
Thus, different algorithms will over or underfit on different inputs, finding
more, fewer, or just different communities than is optimal, and evaluation
methods that use a metadata partition as a ground truth will produce misleading
conclusions about general accuracy. Here, we present a broad evaluation of over
and underfitting in community detection, comparing the behavior of 16
state-of-the-art community detection algorithms on a novel and structurally
diverse corpus of 406 real-world networks. We find that (i) algorithms vary
widely both in the number of communities they find and in their corresponding
composition, given the same input, (ii) algorithms can be clustered into
distinct high-level groups based on similarities of their outputs on real-world
networks, and (iii) these differences induce wide variation in accuracy on link
prediction and link description tasks. We introduce a new diagnostic for
evaluating overfitting and underfitting in practice, and use it to roughly
divide community detection methods into general and specialized learning
algorithms. Across methods and inputs, Bayesian techniques based on the
stochastic block model and a minimum description length approach to
regularization represent the best general learning approach, but can be
outperformed under specific circumstances. These results introduce both a
theoretically principled approach to evaluate over and underfitting in models
of network community structure and a realistic benchmark by which new methods
may be evaluated and compared.Comment: 22 pages, 13 figures, 3 table
- …