13 research outputs found

    The influence of music in the development of phonetics, phonology and phonological awareness in 3-year-olds with typical development and 3- to 6-year-olds with speech or language disorder

    Get PDF
    The relation between music and language has been intensively studied in recent years. Research has revealed that both domains engage similar processing mechanisms, including auditory processing and higher cognitive functions, and recruite partially overlapping brain structures. Furthemore, different authors have shown that linguistic functions can be positively influenced by music training above 4 years old. Music has also been shown to be associated with the promotion of linguistics skills in children with specific pathologies related to language, such as dyslexia, in 7- to 10-year-olds. In this thesis, we conducted four studies on the effect of music training on different aspects of language development. We studied this influence on phonological awareness in children with typical development and speech or language disorder (Studies 1 and 2) and on phonetic and phonological development in the same populations (Studies 3 and 4). In this randomized control study, with a test-training-retest methodology, 49 typically developing children, aged between 3 and 4, were assessed with a phonological awareness test (Study 1) and a phonetic and phonological test (Study 3). These tests were applied before and after a school year with weekly Music Classes (experimental group) or Visual Arts Classes (control group) in kindergarten. Two additional studies with the same methodology were conducted with 16 atypically developing children, aged between 3 and 6. This group included children with phonologically based Speech Sound Disorder (SSD) and / or Developmental Language Disorder (DLD). The goal of investigating this topic in this group of atypical children was to understand music relation with phonological awareness development (Study 2) and phonetic and phonological development (Study 4), and this at stages earlier than those where the beneficial effect of music in language-related skills has already been found. When comparing pre- and post-assessment and irrespective of type of lessons’ exposure (music or visual arts), results always showed significant differences in each group, as expected due to general developmental reasons. In Study 1, Music Classes’ students outperformed the control group, showing significantly larger differences between the beginning and the end of the lessosns period, indicating that music lessons have influenced phonological awareness, and pointing to a causal relation between music training and phonological awareness as soon as 3 years of age. In Studies 2, 3 and 4 no significant differences were found between groups in the post-assessment moment. This fact may suggest the need of more intensive music training or, in what concerns atypically developing children, a specific music curriculum designed to bridge their linguistic rhythm (and possibly pitch) processing deficits. Globally, this thesis supports the hypothesis that music training may promote language abilities, in particular phonological awareness, in 3-year-olds with typical development, that is prior to the ages that have been previously studied.A relação entre música e linguagem tem sido alvo de diversos estudos ao longo dos últimos anos. Estes estudos têm demonstrado que as duas áreas estão relacionadas, utilizando mecanismos de processamento comuns (incluindo o processamento auditivo e o processamento de funções cognitivas) e recorrendo a estruturas neuronais comuns. Vários autores referem a influência da música em diferentes áreas do desenvolvimento linguístico em crianças com idades superiores a 4 anos, nomeadamente no que diz respeito a competências de consciência fonológica, consciência fonémica, precursores da leitura e capacidade de leitura (em crianças com desenvolvimento típico e com dislexia). De forma a compreender a influência do treino musical no desenvolvimento da consciência fonológica (Estudos 1 e 2) bem como das capacidades fonéticas e fonológicas da criança (Estudos 3 e 4), foi desenhado um estudo com metologia teste-treino-reteste, com randomização de uma amostra e constituição de um grupo com Aulas de Música (grupo experimental) e outro grupo com Aulas de Artes Visuais (grupo de controlo). Esta metodologia incidiu sobre uma população de crianças com desenvolvimento típico (N=49), com 3 anos de idade (Estudos 1 e 3) e sobre uma população com Perturbação de Sons de Fala de base fonológica e / ou Perturbação do Desenvolvimento da Linguagem (N=16), entre os 3 e os 6 anos de idade (Estudos 2 e 4). Todas as crianças foram avaliadas antes e depois do período de intervenção, que decorreu durante um ano escolar, em contexto de Jardim de Infância, com a frequência de uma aula semanal de 45 minutos (Música VS Artes Visuais). A comparação realizada entre os momentos de avaliação inicial e final revelou diferenças significativas no desenvolvimento das diversas competências, em todos os grupos – melhoria expectável devido ao desenvolvimento da criança resultante apenas do tempo decorrido. No Estudo 1, sobre a influência da música no desenvolvimento da Consciência Fonológica, os alunos de Música obtiveram melhores resultados do que os alunos de Artes Visuais, mostrando uma evolução significativamente maior do que o grupo de controlo no momento da pós-avaliação. Este facto indica que o treino musical influenciou positivamente o desenvolvimento das competências de consciência fonológica, apontando para uma relação de causa-efeito, aos 3 anos de idade. Nos Estudos 2 (influência da música no desenvolvimento da consciência fonológica em crianças com desenvolvimento atípico), 3 (influência da música no desenvolvimento fonético-fonológico em crianças com desenvolvimento típico) e 4 (influência da música no desenvolvimento fonético-fonológico em crianças com desenvolvimento atípico) não foram encontradas diferenças significativas entre os grupos experimentais e de controlo no momento de avaliação final. Este facto pode indicar a necessidade de um treino musical mais intensivo ou, no caso das crianças com desenvolvimento atípico, que compreenda um currículo especificamente desenhado para colmatar as dificuldades ao nível do processamento linguístico e musical. Esta tese suporta a hipótese de que o treino musical promove o desenvolvimento de capacidades linguísticas, nomeadamente de consciência fonológica, aos 3 anos de idade, numa faixa etária anterior às até aqui estudadas. Este facto poderá ter impacto na criação de programas de promoção da consciência fonológica em contexto de Jardim de Infância, ou na potenciação de estratégias utilizadas pelo educador de infância, no seu dia-a-dia, no sentido de promover o desenvolvimento de competências fundamentais nas aprendizagens subsequentes da leitura e da escrita

    Characterisation of microbial attack on archaeological bone

    Get PDF
    As part of an EU funded project to investigate the factors influencing bone preservation in the archaeological record, more than 250 bones from 41 archaeological sites in five countries spanning four climatic regions were studied for diagenetic alteration. Sites were selected to cover a range of environmental conditions and archaeological contexts. Microscopic and physical (mercury intrusion porosimetry) analyses of these bones revealed that the majority (68%) had suffered microbial attack. Furthermore, significant differences were found between animal and human bone in both the state of preservation and the type of microbial attack present. These differences in preservation might result from differences in early taphonomy of the bones. © 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved

    Proceedings Of The 23Rd Paediatric Rheumatology European Society Congress: Part Two

    No full text
    PubMe

    Effects of hospital facilities on patient outcomes after cancer surgery: an international, prospective, observational study

    No full text
    © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 licenseBackground: Early death after cancer surgery is higher in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with in high-income countries, yet the impact of facility characteristics on early postoperative outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between hospital infrastructure, resource availability, and processes on early outcomes after cancer surgery worldwide. Methods: A multimethods analysis was performed as part of the GlobalSurg 3 study—a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study of patients who had surgery for breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day major complication rates. Potentially beneficial hospital facilities were identified by variable selection to select those associated with 30-day mortality. Adjusted outcomes were determined using generalised estimating equations to account for patient characteristics and country-income group, with population stratification by hospital. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and April 23, 2019, facility-level data were collected for 9685 patients across 238 hospitals in 66 countries (91 hospitals in 20 high-income countries; 57 hospitals in 19 upper-middle-income countries; and 90 hospitals in 27 low-income to lower-middle-income countries). The availability of five hospital facilities was inversely associated with mortality: ultrasound, CT scanner, critical care unit, opioid analgesia, and oncologist. After adjustment for case-mix and country income group, hospitals with three or fewer of these facilities (62 hospitals, 1294 patients) had higher mortality compared with those with four or five (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3·85 [95% CI 2·58–5·75]; p<0·0001), with excess mortality predominantly explained by a limited capacity to rescue following the development of major complications (63·0% vs 82·7%; OR 0·35 [0·23–0·53]; p<0·0001). Across LMICs, improvements in hospital facilities would prevent one to three deaths for every 100 patients undergoing surgery for cancer. Interpretation: Hospitals with higher levels of infrastructure and resources have better outcomes after cancer surgery, independent of country income. Without urgent strengthening of hospital infrastructure and resources, the reductions in cancer-associated mortality associated with improved access will not be realised. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research

    Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries

    No full text
    © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseBackground: 80% of individuals with cancer will require a surgical procedure, yet little comparative data exist on early outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared postoperative outcomes in breast, colorectal, and gastric cancer surgery in hospitals worldwide, focusing on the effect of disease stage and complications on postoperative mortality. Methods: This was a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for primary breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer requiring a skin incision done under general or neuraxial anaesthesia. The primary outcome was death or major complication within 30 days of surgery. Multilevel logistic regression determined relationships within three-level nested models of patients within hospitals and countries. Hospital-level infrastructure effects were explored with three-way mediation analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03471494. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and Jan 31, 2019, we enrolled 15 958 patients from 428 hospitals in 82 countries (high income 9106 patients, 31 countries; upper-middle income 2721 patients, 23 countries; or lower-middle income 4131 patients, 28 countries). Patients in LMICs presented with more advanced disease compared with patients in high-income countries. 30-day mortality was higher for gastric cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (adjusted odds ratio 3·72, 95% CI 1·70–8·16) and for colorectal cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (4·59, 2·39–8·80) and upper-middle-income countries (2·06, 1·11–3·83). No difference in 30-day mortality was seen in breast cancer. The proportion of patients who died after a major complication was greatest in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (6·15, 3·26–11·59) and upper-middle-income countries (3·89, 2·08–7·29). Postoperative death after complications was partly explained by patient factors (60%) and partly by hospital or country (40%). The absence of consistently available postoperative care facilities was associated with seven to 10 more deaths per 100 major complications in LMICs. Cancer stage alone explained little of the early variation in mortality or postoperative complications. Interpretation: Higher levels of mortality after cancer surgery in LMICs was not fully explained by later presentation of disease. The capacity to rescue patients from surgical complications is a tangible opportunity for meaningful intervention. Early death after cancer surgery might be reduced by policies focusing on strengthening perioperative care systems to detect and intervene in common complications. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit

    Characteristics and outcomes of an international cohort of 600 000 hospitalized patients with COVID-19

    Get PDF
    Background: We describe demographic features, treatments and clinical outcomes in the International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infection Consortium (ISARIC) COVID-19 cohort, one of the world's largest international, standardized data sets concerning hospitalized patients. Methods: The data set analysed includes COVID-19 patients hospitalized between January 2020 and January 2022 in 52 countries. We investigated how symptoms on admission, co-morbidities, risk factors and treatments varied by age, sex and other characteristics. We used Cox regression models to investigate associations between demographics, symptoms, co-morbidities and other factors with risk of death, admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Results: Data were available for 689 572 patients with laboratory-confirmed (91.1%) or clinically diagnosed (8.9%) SARS-CoV-2 infection from 52 countries. Age [adjusted hazard ratio per 10 years 1.49 (95% CI 1.48, 1.49)] and male sex [1.23 (1.21, 1.24)] were associated with a higher risk of death. Rates of admission to an ICU and use of IMV increased with age up to age 60&nbsp;years then dropped. Symptoms, co-morbidities and treatments varied by age and had varied associations with clinical outcomes. The case-fatality ratio varied by country partly due to differences in the clinical characteristics of recruited patients and was on average 21.5%. Conclusions: Age was the strongest determinant of risk of death, with a ∼30-fold difference between the oldest and youngest groups; each of the co-morbidities included was associated with up to an almost 2-fold increase in risk. Smoking and obesity were also associated with a higher risk of death.&nbsp;The size of our international database and the standardized data collection method make this study a comprehensive international description of COVID-19 clinical features. Our findings may inform strategies that involve prioritization of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who have a higher risk of death

    Respiratory support in patients with severe COVID-19 in the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection (ISARIC) COVID-19 study: a prospective, multinational, observational study

    No full text
    Background: Up to 30% of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 require advanced respiratory support, including high-flow nasal cannulas (HFNC), non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV), or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, outcomes and risk factors for failing non-invasive respiratory support in patients treated with severe COVID-19 during the first two years of the pandemic in high-income countries (HICs) and low middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: This is a multinational, multicentre, prospective cohort study embedded in the ISARIC-WHO COVID-19 Clinical Characterisation Protocol. Patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who required hospital admission were recruited prospectively. Patients treated with HFNC, NIV, or IMV within the first 24 h of hospital admission were included in this study. Descriptive statistics, random forest, and logistic regression analyses were used to describe clinical characteristics and compare clinical outcomes among patients treated with the different types of advanced respiratory support. Results: A total of 66,565 patients were included in this study. Overall, 82.6% of patients were treated in HIC, and 40.6% were admitted to the hospital during the first pandemic wave. During the first 24 h after hospital admission, patients in HICs were more frequently treated with HFNC (48.0%), followed by NIV (38.6%) and IMV (13.4%). In contrast, patients admitted in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs) were less frequently treated with HFNC (16.1%) and the majority received IMV (59.1%). The failure rate of non-invasive respiratory support (i.e. HFNC or NIV) was 15.5%, of which 71.2% were from HIC and 28.8% from LMIC. The variables most strongly associated with non-invasive ventilation failure, defined as progression to IMV, were high leukocyte counts at hospital admission (OR [95%CI]; 5.86 [4.83-7.10]), treatment in an LMIC (OR [95%CI]; 2.04 [1.97-2.11]), and tachypnoea at hospital admission (OR [95%CI]; 1.16 [1.14-1.18]). Patients who failed HFNC/NIV had a higher 28-day fatality ratio (OR [95%CI]; 1.27 [1.25-1.30]). Conclusions: In the present international cohort, the most frequently used advanced respiratory support was the HFNC. However, IMV was used more often in LMIC. Higher leucocyte count, tachypnoea, and treatment in LMIC were risk factors for HFNC/NIV failure. HFNC/NIV failure was related to worse clinical outcomes, such as 28-day mortality. Trial registration This is a prospective observational study; therefore, no health care interventions were applied to participants, and trial registration is not applicable

    Respiratory support in patients with severe COVID-19 in the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection (ISARIC) COVID-19 study: a prospective, multinational, observational study

    No full text
    Background: Up to 30% of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 require advanced respiratory support, including high-flow nasal cannulas (HFNC), non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV), or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, outcomes and risk factors for failing non-invasive respiratory support in patients treated with severe COVID-19 during the first two years of the pandemic in high-income countries (HICs) and low middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: This is a multinational, multicentre, prospective cohort study embedded in the ISARIC-WHO COVID-19 Clinical Characterisation Protocol. Patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who required hospital admission were recruited prospectively. Patients treated with HFNC, NIV, or IMV within the first 24 h of hospital admission were included in this study. Descriptive statistics, random forest, and logistic regression analyses were used to describe clinical characteristics and compare clinical outcomes among patients treated with the different types of advanced respiratory support. Results: A total of 66,565 patients were included in this study. Overall, 82.6% of patients were treated in HIC, and 40.6% were admitted to the hospital during the first pandemic wave. During the first 24 h after hospital admission, patients in HICs were more frequently treated with HFNC (48.0%), followed by NIV (38.6%) and IMV (13.4%). In contrast, patients admitted in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs) were less frequently treated with HFNC (16.1%) and the majority received IMV (59.1%). The failure rate of non-invasive respiratory support (i.e. HFNC or NIV) was 15.5%, of which 71.2% were from HIC and 28.8% from LMIC. The variables most strongly associated with non-invasive ventilation failure, defined as progression to IMV, were high leukocyte counts at hospital admission (OR [95%CI]; 5.86 [4.83–7.10]), treatment in an LMIC (OR [95%CI]; 2.04 [1.97–2.11]), and tachypnoea at hospital admission (OR [95%CI]; 1.16 [1.14–1.18]). Patients who failed HFNC/NIV had a higher 28-day fatality ratio (OR [95%CI]; 1.27 [1.25–1.30]). Conclusions: In the present international cohort, the most frequently used advanced respiratory support was the HFNC. However, IMV was used more often in LMIC. Higher leucocyte count, tachypnoea, and treatment in LMIC were risk factors for HFNC/NIV failure. HFNC/NIV failure was related to worse clinical outcomes, such as 28-day mortality. Trial registration This is a prospective observational study; therefore, no health care interventions were applied to participants, and trial registration is not applicable

    Association of Country Income Level With the Characteristics and Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients Hospitalized With Acute Kidney Injury and COVID-19

    No full text
    Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) has been identified as one of the most common and significant problems in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. However, studies examining the relationship between COVID-19 and AKI in low- and low-middle income countries (LLMIC) are lacking. Given that AKI is known to carry a higher mortality rate in these countries, it is important to understand differences in this population. Methods: This prospective, observational study examines the AKI incidence and characteristics of 32,210 patients with COVID-19 from 49 countries across all income levels who were admitted to an intensive care unit during their hospital stay. Results: Among patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit, AKI incidence was highest in patients in LLMIC, followed by patients in upper-middle income countries (UMIC) and high-income countries (HIC) (53%, 38%, and 30%, respectively), whereas dialysis rates were lowest among patients with AKI from LLMIC and highest among those from HIC (27% vs. 45%). Patients with AKI in LLMIC had the largest proportion of community-acquired AKI (CA-AKI) and highest rate of in-hospital death (79% vs. 54% in HIC and 66% in UMIC). The association between AKI, being from LLMIC and in-hospital death persisted even after adjusting for disease severity. Conclusions: AKI is a particularly devastating complication of COVID-19 among patients from poorer nations where the gaps in accessibility and quality of healthcare delivery have a major impact on patient outcomes
    corecore