Un repertorio (posible) de la filmografía de Córdoba: una década incesante y diversa en la producción de largometrajes (2010-2020)

In the last ten years, the cinematographic production in the province of Córdoba has not stopped growing, reaching recognition and legitimation on screens and very varied geo-cultural environments. It can be seen that, at the beginning of the century, the rhythm was slow but progressive, until reaching a centrifugal dynamic that produced a transformation in the offer of Cordovan feature films. In this way, a modulation time operated that enabled the circulation of other narrative rhythms, figures of subjects, landscapes, problems and sounds; at the same time that the field of production and the ways of making cinema in the region were reconfigured. The State (national, provincial, local at different times) and its policies to promote content production provided a fundamental enclave for the development of this unprecedented phenomenon in Cordoba's cinematographic history. It is time, then, for an update of the “list” of local productions. Based on the experience of investigating the regional audiovisual field, a (possible) repertoire, by no means exhaustive, of feature films from Córdoba is proposed where stylistic plurality and the evolution of audiovisual/cinematographic trajectories and practices.En los últimos diez años la producción cinematográfica en la provincia de Córdoba no dejó de crecer, alcanzando el reconocimiento y la legitimación en pantallas y en ámbitos geo-culturales muy variados. Se puede observar que, en los inicios del siglo, el ritmo fue lento pero progresivo, hasta alcanzar una dinámica centrífuga que produjo una transformación en la oferta de largometrajes cordobeses. De este modo operó un tiempo de modulación que habilitó la circulación de otros ritmos narrativos, figuras de sujetxs, paisajes, problemáticas y sonoridades; al tiempo que se reconfiguraba el campo de la producción y los modos de hacer cine en la región. El Estado (nacional, provincial, local en distintos momentos) y sus políticas de fomento a la producción de contenidos proporcionaron un enclave fundamental para el desenvolvimiento de este fenómeno sin precedente en la historia cinematográfica cordobesa. Es el tiempo, entonces, de una actualización de la “lista” de producciones locales. A partir de la experiencia de investigar el campo audiovisual regional se propone un repertorio (posible), en absoluto exhaustivo, de largometrajes de Córdoba donde se vislumbra la pluralidad estilística y el devenir de trayectorias y prácticas audiovisuales/cinematográficas

Burnout among surgeons before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: an international survey

Background: SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has had many significant impacts within the surgical realm, and surgeons have been obligated to reconsider almost every aspect of daily clinical practice. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study reported in compliance with the CHERRIES guidelines and conducted through an online platform from June 14th to July 15th, 2020. The primary outcome was the burden of burnout during the pandemic indicated by the validated Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure. Results: Nine hundred fifty-four surgeons completed the survey. The median length of practice was 10 years; 78.2% included were male with a median age of 37 years old, 39.5% were consultants, 68.9% were general surgeons, and 55.7% were affiliated with an academic institution. Overall, there was a significant increase in the mean burnout score during the pandemic; longer years of practice and older age were significantly associated with less burnout. There were significant reductions in the median number of outpatient visits, operated cases, on-call hours, emergency visits, and research work, so, 48.2% of respondents felt that the training resources were insufficient. The majority (81.3%) of respondents reported that their hospitals were included in the management of COVID-19, 66.5% felt their roles had been minimized; 41% were asked to assist in non-surgical medical practices, and 37.6% of respondents were included in COVID-19 management. Conclusions: There was a significant burnout among trainees. Almost all aspects of clinical and research activities were affected with a significant reduction in the volume of research, outpatient clinic visits, surgical procedures, on-call hours, and emergency cases hindering the training. Trial registration: The study was registered on clicaltrials.gov "NCT04433286" on 16/06/2020

Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study

Background: The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on postoperative recovery needs to be understood to inform clinical decision making during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reports 30-day mortality and pulmonary complication rates in patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: This international, multicentre, cohort study at 235 hospitals in 24 countries included all patients undergoing surgery who had SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality and was assessed in all enrolled patients. The main secondary outcome measure was pulmonary complications, defined as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or unexpected postoperative ventilation. Findings: This analysis includes 1128 patients who had surgery between Jan 1 and March 31, 2020, of whom 835 (74·0%) had emergency surgery and 280 (24·8%) had elective surgery. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed preoperatively in 294 (26·1%) patients. 30-day mortality was 23·8% (268 of 1128). Pulmonary complications occurred in 577 (51·2%) of 1128 patients; 30-day mortality in these patients was 38·0% (219 of 577), accounting for 81·7% (219 of 268) of all deaths. In adjusted analyses, 30-day mortality was associated with male sex (odds ratio 1·75 [95% CI 1·28–2·40], p\textless0·0001), age 70 years or older versus younger than 70 years (2·30 [1·65–3·22], p\textless0·0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 3–5 versus grades 1–2 (2·35 [1·57–3·53], p\textless0·0001), malignant versus benign or obstetric diagnosis (1·55 [1·01–2·39], p=0·046), emergency versus elective surgery (1·67 [1·06–2·63], p=0·026), and major versus minor surgery (1·52 [1·01–2·31], p=0·047). Interpretation: Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality. Thresholds for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic should be higher than during normal practice, particularly in men aged 70 years and older. Consideration should be given for postponing non-urgent procedures and promoting non-operative treatment to delay or avoid the need for surgery. Funding: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, NIHR Academy, Sarcoma UK, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research

Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative sars-cov-2 infection: An international cohort study

Background The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on postoperative recovery needs to be understood to inform clinical decision making during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reports 30-day mortality and pulmonary complication rates in patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods This international, multicentre, cohort study at 235 hospitals in 24 countries included all patients undergoing surgery who had SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality and was assessed in all enrolled patients. The main secondary outcome measure was pulmonary complications, defined as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or unexpected postoperative ventilation. Findings This analysis includes 1128 patients who had surgery between Jan 1 and March 31, 2020, of whom 835 (740%) had emergency surgery and 280 (248%) had elective surgery. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed preoperatively in 294 (261%) patients. 30-day mortality was 238% (268 of 1128). Pulmonary complications occurred in 577 (512%) of 1128 patients; 30-day mortality in these patients was 380% (219 of 577), accounting for 817% (219 of 268) of all deaths. In adjusted analyses, 30-day mortality was associated with male sex (odds ratio 175 [95% CI 128-240], p<00001), age 70 years or older versus younger than 70 years (230 [165-322], p<00001), American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 3-5 versus grades 1-2 (235 [157-353], p<00001), malignant versus benign or obstetric diagnosis (155 [101-239], p=0046), emergency versus elective surgery (167 [106-263], p=0026), and major versus minor surgery (152 [101-231], p=0047). Interpretation Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality. Thresholds for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic should be higher than during normal practice, particularly in men aged 70 years and older. Consideration should be given for postponing non-urgent procedures and promoting non-operative treatment to delay or avoid the need for surgery. Funding National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, NIHR Academy, Sarcoma UK, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Medios de comunicación en la historia contemporánea latinoamericana. Actores, acontecimientos, mediaciones

El libro sintetiza los principales aportes y resultados de proyectos de investigación que conforman un Programa de investigación subsidiado desde la SECYT-UNC y radicado en la UNC. Asimismo recoge escritos de académicos latinoamericanos vinculados a las temáticas de la historia, la educación y la comunicación.Fil: Brunetti, Paulina Maritza. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Alaniz, María. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación. Cátedra de Historia Social Contemporánea; Argentina.Fil: Mengo, Renee Isabel. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Pizarro, Hugo Ignacio. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Tenaglia, Pablo Rubén. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Ramírez Cabanzo, Ana Brizet. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Tenaglia, Pablo Rubén. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Albarracín Nievas, Pedro Julian. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Aguirres, Renzo Gabriel. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Alonso, Eduardo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Astrada, Lucía Victoria. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Batalla, Andrea. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Bruera, Rodrigo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Bruera, Rodrigo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Castello Rojo, Federico. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Castello Rojo, Federico. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Dallera, Mariana. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Dallera, Mariana. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Della Vedoba, Cecilia Elizabeth. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Giordano, Pedro. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: González, Tomas Agustín. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: González Zugasti, Mateo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Grzincich, Claudia. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Gruszynski, Ana. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Jobani, Maisa Belén. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Jonsson, Micaela. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Mathe, Inés. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Ojeda, Rafael. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Pelizza, Lautaro. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Pietrantuono, Florencia. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Porto, Julia. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Rolón, María Belén. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Sousa, Maira Evangelista de. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Segura, Laura. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.il: Siragusa, Marcos. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Tamasiro, Chiemi. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Vagliente, Bruno. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Vera Asinari, Ernesto. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Vera de Flachs, María Cristina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Fil: Vicente, Tomás. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación; Argentina.Comunicación de medios y socio-cultura