10 research outputs found

    Mutations in DCC cause isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum with incomplete penetrance

    Get PDF
    Brain malformations involving the corpus callosum are common in children with developmental disabilities. We identified DCC mutations in four families and five sporadic individuals with isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC) without intellectual disability. DCC mutations result in variable dominant phenotypes with decreased penetrance, including mirror movements and ACC associated with a favorable developmental prognosis. Possible phenotypic modifiers include the type and location of mutation and the sex of the individual

    Les fondements neurophysiologiques de la latéralisation motrice : le paradigme des mouvements en miroir

    No full text
    Mirror movements are involuntary symmetrical movements of one side of the body that mirror voluntary movements of the other side. Congenital mirror movements (CMM) is a rare genetic disorder transmitted in autosomal dominant manner, in which mirror movements are the only clinical abnormality. Two structures are involved in the physiopathology of CMM: the corpus callosum (CC) and the corticospinal tract (CST). The two main culprit genes identified so far are DCC and RAD51. While the role of DCC in commissural axons guidance during development is well known, RAD51 is involved in DNA repair, and its link with CMM was totally unexpected. In mice, we investigated the role of RAD51 and DCC in the development of the CC and CST, as well as the role of these two structures in motor lateralization. We showed that DCC controls CST midline crossing in an indirect manner. Our work clarified the role of RAD51 in neocortex development, but how RAD51 influences motor system development remains unknown. We compared a group of CMM patients with healthy volunteers to investigate the lateralization of cortical activity during movement preparation. We showed that activation of motor/premotor areas and interhemispheric interactions during movement preparation differed between the CMM patients and healthy volunteers. Transient inhibition of the supplementary motor area (SMA) in the healthy volunteers resulted in abnormal interhemispheric interactions during movement preparation, reminiscent of the situation observed in the patients. These results suggest the SMA is involved in lateralized movements preparation, potentially by modulating interhemispheric interactions via the CC.Le syndrome des mouvements en miroir congénitaux (MMC) est une maladie génétique caractérisée par l’existence de mouvements involontaires symétriques d’une main qui reproduisent à l’identique les mouvements volontaires de l’autre main. Deux structures sont impliquées dans la physiopathologie de cette maladie : le corps calleux (CC) et le faisceau corticospinal (FCS). Deux gènes ont été liés aux MMC à ce jour : DCC et RAD51. Tandis que DCC joue un rôle crucial dans le guidage des axones commissuraux, RAD51 intervient dans la réparation de l’ADN, et son rôle dans le développement du système moteur était inattendu.Chez la souris, nous avons étudié le rôle de RAD51 et DCC dans le développement du FCS et du CC, ainsi que l’implication de ces deux structures dans la latéralisation du contrôle moteur. Nous avons prouvé que DCC contrôle le guidage du FCS à la ligne médiane de façon indirecte. RAD51 intervient dans le développement du neocortex, mais son rôle précis dans le développement du système moteur demeure inconnu. Nous avons par ailleurs comparé un groupe de patients MMC à des volontaires sains afin d’étudier la latéralisation de l’activité corticale lors de la préparation motrice. L’activation et les interactions inter-hémisphériques des aires motrices sont anormales dès la préparation du mouvement chez les patients MMC. L’inhibition de l’aire motrice supplémentaire (AMS) chez les volontaires sains reproduit les défauts d’interactions inter-hémisphériques observés chez les patients. Ces résultats suggèrent que l’AMS est impliquée dans la préparation des mouvements latéralisés, potentiellement en modulant les interactions entre les deux hémisphères via le CC

    Neurophysiological basis of motor lateralization : the mirror movements paradigm

    No full text
    Le syndrome des mouvements en miroir congénitaux (MMC) est une maladie génétique caractérisée par l’existence de mouvements involontaires symétriques d’une main qui reproduisent à l’identique les mouvements volontaires de l’autre main. Deux structures sont impliquées dans la physiopathologie de cette maladie : le corps calleux (CC) et le faisceau corticospinal (FCS). Deux gènes ont été liés aux MMC à ce jour : DCC et RAD51. Tandis que DCC joue un rôle crucial dans le guidage des axones commissuraux, RAD51 intervient dans la réparation de l’ADN, et son rôle dans le développement du système moteur était inattendu.Chez la souris, nous avons étudié le rôle de RAD51 et DCC dans le développement du FCS et du CC, ainsi que l’implication de ces deux structures dans la latéralisation du contrôle moteur. Nous avons prouvé que DCC contrôle le guidage du FCS à la ligne médiane de façon indirecte. RAD51 intervient dans le développement du neocortex, mais son rôle précis dans le développement du système moteur demeure inconnu. Nous avons par ailleurs comparé un groupe de patients MMC à des volontaires sains afin d’étudier la latéralisation de l’activité corticale lors de la préparation motrice. L’activation et les interactions inter-hémisphériques des aires motrices sont anormales dès la préparation du mouvement chez les patients MMC. L’inhibition de l’aire motrice supplémentaire (AMS) chez les volontaires sains reproduit les défauts d’interactions inter-hémisphériques observés chez les patients. Ces résultats suggèrent que l’AMS est impliquée dans la préparation des mouvements latéralisés, potentiellement en modulant les interactions entre les deux hémisphères via le CC.Mirror movements are involuntary symmetrical movements of one side of the body that mirror voluntary movements of the other side. Congenital mirror movements (CMM) is a rare genetic disorder transmitted in autosomal dominant manner, in which mirror movements are the only clinical abnormality. Two structures are involved in the physiopathology of CMM: the corpus callosum (CC) and the corticospinal tract (CST). The two main culprit genes identified so far are DCC and RAD51. While the role of DCC in commissural axons guidance during development is well known, RAD51 is involved in DNA repair, and its link with CMM was totally unexpected. In mice, we investigated the role of RAD51 and DCC in the development of the CC and CST, as well as the role of these two structures in motor lateralization. We showed that DCC controls CST midline crossing in an indirect manner. Our work clarified the role of RAD51 in neocortex development, but how RAD51 influences motor system development remains unknown. We compared a group of CMM patients with healthy volunteers to investigate the lateralization of cortical activity during movement preparation. We showed that activation of motor/premotor areas and interhemispheric interactions during movement preparation differed between the CMM patients and healthy volunteers. Transient inhibition of the supplementary motor area (SMA) in the healthy volunteers resulted in abnormal interhemispheric interactions during movement preparation, reminiscent of the situation observed in the patients. These results suggest the SMA is involved in lateralized movements preparation, potentially by modulating interhemispheric interactions via the CC

    The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency

    No full text
    International audienceFor more than two decades, there has been converging evidence for an essential role of the cerebellum in non-motor functions. The cerebellum is not only important in learning and sensorimotor processes, some growing evidences show its implication in conditional learning and reward, which allows building our expectations about behavioral outcomes. More recent work has demonstrated that the cerebellum is also required for the sense of agency, a cognitive process that allows recognizing an action as our own, suggesting that the cerebellum might serve as an interface between sensorimotor function and cognition. A unifying model that would explain the role of the cerebellum across these processes has not been fully established. Nonetheless, an important heritage was given by the field of motor control: the forward model theory. This theory stipulates that movements are controlled based on the constant interactions between our organism and its environment through feedforward and feedback loops. Feedforward loops predict what is going to happen, while feedback loops confront the prediction with what happened so that we can react accordingly. From an anatomical point of view, the cerebellum is at an ideal location at the interface between the motor and sensory systems, as it is connected to cerebral, striatal, and spinal entities via parallel loops, so that it can link sensory and motor systems with cognitive processes. Recent findings showing that the cerebellum participates in building the sense of agency as a predictive and comparator system will be reviewed together with past work on motor control within the context of the forward model theory

    Congenital mirror movements From piano player to opera singer

    No full text
    International audienceCongenital mirror movements (CMM) disorder is characterized by involuntary movements of one side of the body that accompany and mirror intentional movements on the opposite side (OMIM #157600).(1) CMM mostly involve the hands, and affected subjects are unable to perform pure unimanual movements or skilled dissociated movements of the 2 hands. We show a 33-year-old patient with CMM with no abnormality in DCC or RAD51, the known culprit genes (video on the Neurology (R) Web site at Neurology.org).(2) He had always dreamed of becoming a piano player but was unable to play properly with both hands despite intensive training. He became an opera singer instead

    Loss of floor plate Netrin-1 impairs midline crossing of corticospinal axons and leads to mirror movements

    Get PDF
    International audienceIn humans, execution of unimanual movements requires lateralized activation of the primary motor cortex,which then transmits the motor command to the contralateral hand through the crossed corticospinal tract(CST). Mutations inNTN1alter motor control lateralization, leading to congenital mirror movements. Toaddress the role of midline Netrin-1 on CST development and subsequent motor control, we analyze themorphological and functional consequences of floor plate Netrin-1 depletion in conditional knockout mice.We show that depletion of floor plate Netrin-1 in the brainstem critically disrupts CST midline crossing,whereas the other commissural systems are preserved. The only associated defect is an abnormal entryof CST axons within the inferior olive. Alteration of CST midline crossing results in functional ipsilateral pro-jections and is associated with abnormal symmetric movements. Our study reveals the role of Netrin-1 in CSTdevelopment and describes a mouse model recapitulating the characteristics of human congenital mirrormovements

    Non cell-autonomous role of DCC in the guidance of the corticospinal tract at the midline

    No full text
    International audienceDCC, a NETRIN-1 receptor, is considered as a cell-autonomous regulator for midline guidance of many commissural populations in the central nervous system. The corticospinal tract (CST), the principal motor pathway for voluntary movements, crosses the anatomic midline at the pyramidal decussation. CST fails to cross the midline in Kanga mice expressing a truncated DCC protein. Humans with heterozygous DCC mutations have congenital mirror movements (CMM). As CMM has been associated, in some cases, with malformations of the pyramidal decussation, DCC might also be involved in this process in human. Here, we investigated the role of DCC in CST midline crossing both in human and mice. First, we demonstrate by multimodal approaches, that patients with CMM due to DCC mutations have an increased proportion of ipsilateral CST projections. Second, we show that in contrast to Kanga mice, the anatomy of the CST is not altered in mice with a deletion of DCC in the CST. Altogether, these results indicate that DCC controls CST midline crossing in both humans and mice, and that this process is non cell-autonomous in mice. Our data unravel a new level of complexity in the role of DCC in CST guidance at the midline

    Mutations in the netrin-1 gene cause congenital mirror movements

    No full text
    Netrin-1 is a secreted protein that was first identified 20 years ago as an axon guidance molecule that regulates midline crossing in the CNS. It plays critical roles in various tissues throughout development and is implicated in tumorigenesis and inflammation in adulthood. Despite extensive studies, no inherited human disease has been directly associated with mutations in NTN1, the gene coding for netrin-1. Here, we have identified 3 mutations in exon 7 of NTN1 in 2 unrelated families and 1 sporadic case with isolated congenital mirror movements (CMM), a disorder characterized by involuntary movements of one hand that mirror intentional movements of the opposite hand. Given the diverse roles of netrin-1, the absence of manifestations other than CMM in NTN1 mutation carriers was unexpected. Using multimodal approaches, we discovered that the anatomy of the corticospinal tract (CST) is abnormal in patients with NTN1-mutant CMM. When expressed in HEK293 or stable HeLa cells, the 3 mutated netrin-1 proteins were almost exclusively detected in the intracellular compartment, contrary to WT netrin-1, which is detected in both intracellular and extracellular compartments. Since netrin-1 is a diffusible extracellular cue, the pathophysiology likely involves its loss of function and subsequent disruption of axon guidance, resulting in abnormal decussation of the CST
    corecore