620 research outputs found

    An enhanced fraction of starbursting galaxies among high Eddington ratio AGNs

    Get PDF
    We investigate the star-forming properties of 1620 X-ray selected active galactic nuclei (AGN) host galaxies as a function of their specific X-ray luminosity (i.e. X-ray luminosity per unit host stellar mass) – a proxy of the Eddington ratio. Our motivation is to determine whether there is any evidence of a suppression of star formation at high Eddington ratios, which may hint towards ‘AGN feedback’ effects. Star formation rates (SFRs) are derived from fits to Herschel-measured far-infrared spectral energy distributions, taking into account any contamination from the AGN. Herschel-undetected AGNs are included via stacking analyses to provide average SFRs in bins of redshift and specific X-ray luminosity (spanning 0.01≲LX/M∗≲100L⊙M−1. After normalizing for the effects of mass and redshift arising from the evolving galaxy main sequence, we find that the SFRs of high specific luminosity AGNs are slightly enhanced compared to their lower specific luminosity counterparts. This suggests that the SFR distribution of AGN hosts changes with specific X-ray luminosity, a result reinforced by our finding of a significantly higher fraction of starbursting hosts among high specific luminosity AGNs compared to that of the general star-forming galaxy population (i.e. 8–10 per cent versus 3 per cent). Contrary to our original motivation, our findings suggest that high specific luminosity AGNs are more likely to reside in galaxies with enhanced levels of star formation

    Coupling angle variability in healthy and patellofemoral pain runners

    Get PDF
    Background Patellofemoral pain is hypothesized to result in less joint coordination variability. The ability to relate coordination variability to patellofemoral pain pathology could have many clinical uses; however, evidence to support its clinical application is lacking. The aim was to determine if vector coding's coupling angle variability, as a measure of joint coordination variability, was less for runners with patellofemoral pain than healthy controls as is commonly postulated. Methods Nineteen female recreational runners with patellofemoral pain and eleven healthy controls performed a treadmill acclimation protocol then ran at a self-selected pace for 15 min. 3-D kinematics, force plate kinetics, knee pain and rating of perceived exertion were recorded each minute. Data were selected for the: pain group at the highest pain reached (pain � 3/10) in a non-exerted state (exertion < 14/20), and; non-exerted healthy group from the eleventh minute. Coupling angle variability was calculated over several portions of the stride for six knee-ankle combinations during five non-consecutive strides. Findings 46 of 48 coupling angle variability measures were greater for the pain group, with 7 significantly greater (P <.05). Interpretation These findings oppose the theory that less coupling angle variability is indicative of a pathological coordinate state during running. Greater coupling angle variability may be characteristic of patellofemoral pain in female treadmill running when a larger threshold of pain is reached than previously observed. A predictable and directional response of coupling angle variability measures in relation to knee pathology is not yet clear and requires further investigation prior to considerations for clinical utility. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd

    Determining patterns of student graduation using a bi-level learning framework

    Get PDF
    The practice of data science, artificial intelligence (AI) in general, has expanded greatly in terms of both theoretical and application domains. Many existing and new problems have been tackled using different reasoning and learning methods. These include the research subject, generally referred to as education data mining (or EDM). Among many issues that have been studied in this EMD community, student performance and achievement provide an interesting, yet useful result to shaping effective learning style and academic consultation. Specific to this work at Mae Fah Luang University, the pattern of students’ graduation is determined based on their profile of performance in different categories of courses. This course-group approach is picked up to generalize the framework for various undergraduation programmes. In that, a bi-level learning method is proposed in order to predict the length of study before graduation. At the first tier, clustering is applied to derive major types of performance profiles, for which classification models can be developed to refine the prediction further. With the experiments on a real data collection, this framework usually provides accurate predictive outcomes, using several conventional classification techniques

    The Roles of Guanine Nucleotide Binding Proteins in Health and Disease

    Get PDF
    G-proteins are important mediators of cellular and tissue functions and are characterised by a recognition site for Guanine Triphosphate (GTP), Guanine Diphosphate (GDP) and possess intrinsic GTPase activity. They play important roles in signal transduction responsible for cytoskeletal remodelling, cellular differentiation and vesicular transport. They are made up of three types namely, the small G-proteins, the sensors and the heterotrimeric G-proteins. The G-protein heterotrimers consist of G-alpha (G), G-beta (G)andGgamma(G()subunits.EachheterotrimericGproteinhavedifferentsubunitsandthecombinationofthesesubunitsdefinethespecificroleofeachGprotein.TheactivationofGsubunitsregulatestheactivityofeffectorenzymesandionchannelswhileG) and G-gamma (G() subunits. Each heterotrimeric G-protein have different subunits and the combination of these subunits define the specific role of each G-protein. The activation of G subunits regulates the activity of effector enzymes and ion channels while G( subunits function in the regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP-kinase) pathway. The G-protein-mediated signal transduction is important in the regulation of a cells morphological and physiological response to external stimuli. MAPKs are involved in the phosphorylation of transcription factors that stimulate gene transcription. Gs stimulates adenylate cyclase, thereby increasing cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) leading to the phosphorylation and subsequent activation of Ca_+ channels. G proteins are involved in disease pathology through several mechanisms which interfere with the G protein activity. Other disease pathologies associated with abnormal mutations in G proteins can interfere with signal transduction pathways which may involve signal transmission that is either excessive, by augmentation of G protein function, or insufficient, via inactivation of G proteins.sch_dieBenians, A., M. Nobles, S. Hosny and A. Tinker, 2005. Regulators of G-protein signalling form a quaternary complex with the agonist, receptor, and G-protein. A novel explanation for the acceleration of signalling activation kinetics. J. Biol. Chem., 280(14): 13383-13394. Berman, D.M. and A.G. Gilman, 1998. Mammalian RGS proteins: barbarians at the gate. J Biol. Chem., 273(3): 1269-1272. Berridge, M.J., 2006. Cell Signalling Biology. Portland Press Ltd. Retrieved from: www.cellsignalling biology.org. Berridge, M.J., M.D. Bootman and H.L. Roderick, 2003. Calcium signalling: Dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 4(7): 517-529. Blackmer, T., E.C. Larsen, M. Takahashi, T.F.J. Martin, S. Alford and H.E. Hamm, 2001. G protein ( subunit-mediated presynaptic inhibition: Regulation of exocytotic fusion downstream of Ca2+ entry. Science, 292(5515): 293-297. Blaukat, A., A. Barac, M.J. Cross, S. Offermanns and I. Dikic, 2000. G protein-coupled receptor-mediated mitogen-activated protein kinase activation through cooperation of Galpha(q) and Galpha(i) signals. Mol Cell Biol., 20(18): 6837-6848 Burgoyne, R.D., 2007. Neuronal calcium sensor proteins: generating diversity in neuronal Ca2+ signalling. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 8: 182-193. Cabrera-Vera, T.M., J. Vanhauwe, T.O. Thomas, M. Medkova, A. Preininger, M.R. Mazzoni and H.E. Hamm, 2003. Insights into G protein structure, function, and regulation. Endocr Rev., 24(6): 765-781. Clapham, D.E., 1996. Intracellular signalling: More jobs for G beta gamma. Curr. Biol., 6(7): 814-816. Danner, S. and M.J. Lohse, 1996. Phosducin is a ubiquitous G-protein regulator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 93(19): 10145-10150. Dhanasekaran, N. and M.V. Prasad, 1998. G protein subunits and cell proliferation. Biol Signals Recept., 7(2): 109-117. Dignard, D., D. Andr and M. Whiteway, 2008. Heterotrimeric G protein subunit function in Candida albicans: both the {} and {} subunits of the pheromone response G protein are required for mating. Eukaryot Cell, 7(9): 1591-1599. Dohlman, H.G. and J. Thorner, 1997. RGS proteins and signaling by heterotrimeric G proteins. J Biol Chem., 272(7): 3871-3874. Dolphin, A.C., 1990. G protein modulation of calcium currents in neurons. Ann. Rev. Physiol., 52: 243-255. Dolphin, A.C., 1996. Facilitation of Ca2+ current in excitable cells. Trends Neurosci., 19(1): 35-43. Durchnkov, D., J. Novotn_ and P. Svoboda, 2008. The time-course of agonist-induced solubilization of trimeric G(q)/G(11) proteins resolved by twodimensional electrophoresis. Physiol Res., 57(2): 195-203. Farfel, Z., H.R. Bourne and T. Iiri, 1999. The expanding spectrum of G protein diseases.N. Engl. J. Med., 340(13): 1012-1020. Flavahan, N.A. and P.M. Vanhoutte, 1990. G-proteins and endothelial responses. Blood Vessels, 27(2-5): 218-229. Fromm, C., O.A. Coso, S. Montaner, N. Xu and J.S. Gutkind, 1997. The small GTP-binding protein Rho links G protein-coupled receptors and Galpha12 to the serum response element and to cellular transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94(19): 10098-10103. Hamm, H.E. and A. Gilchrist, 1996. Heterotrimeric G proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 8(2): 189-196. Hepler, J.R. and A.G. Gilman, 1992. G proteins. Trend. Biochem. Sci., 17(10): 383-387. Howe, L.R. and C.J. Marshall, 1993. Lysophosphatidic acid stimulates mitogen-activated protein kinase activation via a G-protein-coupled pathway requiring p21ras and p74raf-1. J. Biol. Chem., 268(28): 20717-20720. Jiang, M., M.S. Gold, G. Boulay, K. Spicher, M. Peyton, P. Brabet, Y. Srinivasan, U. Rudolph, G. Ellison and L. Birnbaumer, 1998. Multiple neurological abnormalities in mice deficient in the G protein Go. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95(6): 3269-3274. Kaziro, Y., H. Itoh, T. Kozasa, M. Nakafuku and T. Satoh, 1991. Structure and function of signaltransducing GTP-binding proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 60: 349-400. Kitanaka, N., J. Kitanaka, F.S. Hall, T. Tatsuta, Y. Morita, M. Takemura, X.B. Wang and G.R. Uhl, 2008. Alterations in the levels of heterotrimeric G protein subunits induced by psychostimulants, opiates, barbiturates, and ethanol: Implications for drug dependence, tolerance, and withdrawal. Synapse, 62(9): 689-699. Kolch, W., G. Heidecker, G. Kochs, R. Hummel, H. Vahidi, H. Mischak, G. Finkenzeller, D. Marme and U.R. Rapp, 1993. Protein kinase C alpha activates RAF-1 by direct phosphorylation. Nature, 364(6434): 249-252. Levitzki, A., 1990. GTP-GDP exchange proteins. Science, 248(4957): 794. Lorenz, S., R. Frenzel, R. Paschke, G.E. Breitwieser and S.U. Miedlich, 2007. Functional desensitization of the extracellular calcium-sensing receptor is regulated via distinct mechanisms: Role of G proteincoupled receptor kinases, protein kinase C and {$}- arrestins. Endocrinology, 148(5): 2398-2404. Lowes, V.L., N.Y. Ip and Y.H. Wong, 2002. Integration of signals from receptor tyrosine kinases and g protein-coupled receptors. Neurosignals, 11(1): 5-19. Luttrell, L.M., Y. Daaka, G.J. Della Rocca and R.J. Lefkowitz, 1997. G protein-coupled receptors mediate two functionally distinct pathways of tyrosine phosphorylation in rat 1a fibroblasts. Shc phosphorylation and receptor endocytosis correlate with activation of ERK kinases. J. Biol. Chem., 272(50): 31648-31656. Milligan, G., D.A. Groarke, A. McLean, R. Ward, C.W. Fong, A. Cavalli and T. Drmota, 1999. Diversity in the signalling and regulation of Gprotein- coupled receptors. Biochem. Soc. Trans., 27(2): 149-154. Milligan, G., I. Mullaney and F.R. McKenzie, 1990. Specificity of interactions of receptors and effectors with GTP-binding proteins in native membranes. Biochem. Soc Symp., 56: 21-34. Morris, A.J. and C.C. Malbon, 2000. Physiological regulation of G protein-linked signalling. Physiol. Rev., 79(4): 1373-1430. Mullaney, I., 1999. Signal transduction: A practical approach. Milligan G., 5: 73-90. Muller, S. and M.J. Lohse, 1995. The role of G-protein beta gamma subunits in signal transduction. Biochem. Soc. Trans., 23(1): 141-148. Murray, A.J. and D.A. Shewan, 2008. Epac mediates cyclic AMP-dependent axon growth, guidance and regeneration. Mol. Cell Neurosci., 38(4): 578-588. Neer, E.J., 1995. Heterotrimeric G proteins: organizers of transmembrane signals. Cell, 80(2): 249-257. Novotny, J. and P. Svoboda, 1998. The long (Gs()-L) and short (Gs()-S) variants of the stimulatory guanine nucleotide-binding protein. Do they behave in an identical way? J. Mol. Endocrinol., 20(2): 163-173. Nunn, C., H. Mao, P. Chidiac and P.R. Albert, 2006. RGS17/RGSZ2 and the RZ/A family of regulators of G-protein signaling. Semin Cell Dev. Biol., 17(3): 390-399. Ohkubo, S. and N. Nakahata, 2007. Role of lipid rafts in trimeric G protein-mediated signal transduction. Yakugaku Zasshi, 127(1): 27-40. Oldham, W.M. and H.E. Hamm, 2006. Structural basis of function in heterotrimeric G proteins. Q. Rev. Biophys., 39(2): 117-166. Schneider, T., P. Igelmund and J. Hescheler, 1997. G protein interaction with K+ and Ca2+ channels. Trend. Pharmacol. Sci., 18(1): 8-11. Schrder, S. and M.J. Lohse, 1996. Inhibition of Gprotein betagamma-subunit functions by phosducinlike protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93(5): 2100- 2104. Siegel, G.J., B.W. Agranoff, R.W. Albers, S.K. Fisher and M.D. Uhler, 1999. Basic Neurochemistry; Molecular, Cellular and Medical Aspects. 6th Edn., Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp: 1023-1120. Siegel, G.J., R.W. Albers, S.T. Brady and D.L. Price, 2006. Basic Neurochemistry: Molecular, Cellular and Medical Aspects. 7th Edn., Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, pp: 339-346. Slessareva, J.E., H. Ma, K.M. Depree, L.A. Flood, H. Bae, T.M. Cabrera-Vera, H.E. Hamm and S.G. Graber 2003. Closely related G-protein-coupled receptors use multiple and distinct domains on Gprotein alpha-subunits for selective coupling. J. Biol. Chem., 278(50): 50530-50536. Sprang, S.R., 1997. G proteins, effectors and GAPs: structure and mechanism.Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 7(6): 849-856. Straiker, A.J., C.R. Borden and J.M. Sullivan, 2002. GProtein subunit isoforms couple differentially to receptors that mediate presynaptic inhibition at rat hippocampal synapses. J. Neurosci., 22(7): 2460-2468. Wang, L., 1999. Multi-associative neural networks and their applications to learning and retrieving complex spatio-temporal sequences. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern B Cybern, 29(1): 73-82. Walter, L. and N. Stella, 2004. Cannabinoids and neuroinflammation. Br. J. Pharmcl., 141(5): 775-785. Walter, L., A. Franklin, A. Witting, C. Wade, Y. Xie, G. Kunos, K. Mackie and N. Stella, 2003. Nonpsychotropic cannabinoid receptors regulate microglial cell migration. J. Neurosci., 23(4): 1398-1405. Wettschureck, N. and S. Offermanns, 2005. Mammalian G proteins and their cell type specific functions. Physiol. Rev., 85(4): 1159-1204. Wickman, K.D. and D.E. Clapham, 1995. G-protein regulation of ion channels. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 5(3): 278-285. Xie, G.X. and PP. Palmer 2007. How regulators of G protein signaling achieve selective regulation. J. Mol. Biol., 366(2): 349-365. Zhong, M., M. Yang and BM. Sanborn, 2003. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 activation by myometrial oxytocin receptor involves Galpha(q)Gbetagamma and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase activation. Endocrinology, 144(7): 2947-2956.2pub2712pub

    Learning radiation oncology in Europe: Results of the ESTRO multidisciplinary survey

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Radiotherapy education can be very different across Europe, despite the publication of the ESTRO core curricula in 2011. The purpose of the current study is to map the different RO European education systems, to report their perceived quality and to understand what could be improved to better teach RO. Methods: An online survey consisting of 30 questions was sent to RO professionals under 40 years of age via email and social media. Clinicians, radiobiologists, physicists and radiation therapists (RTTs) were invited to answer questions regarding (1) demographics data, (2) duration, (3) organization, (4) content, (5) quality and potential improvements of national education programs. Results: Four hundred and sixty three questionnaires were received from 34 European countries. All disciplines were represented: 45% clinicians (n = 210), 29% physicists (n = 135), 24% RTTs (n = 108) and 2% radiobiologists (n = 10). Male and female participants were well-balanced in each speciality, except for radiobiologists (80% males). Median age was 31.5 years old (range 21–40). A large range of the duration of the National RO education programs was observed: median = 9 years (range: 3–15). In half of the surveyed countries the European Credit Transfer System (ECTS), that facilitates mobility for trainees, has been implemented. Participants declared only a minority of countries have implemented the ESTRO Core Curriculum (n = 5). A quarter of participants indicated that their national education program is insufficient. Conclusion: This is the first study to examine the different RO education systems in Europe. Large differences in organization and duration of national education programs have been found, along with perceived quality across Europe within each speciality. These results show the necessity of a discussion on how to move forward in this diversity of education programs and the potential contribution that the ESTRO may fulfil
    corecore