100 research outputs found
A vision about lifelong learning and its barriers
Around 25 years ago, some researchers argued for moving towards innovative learning models characterized by being more personalized and where the students would have a more active role in deciding what to learn, when to learn and how to learn. Nowadays, there is a need for a flexible, efficient, universal and lifelong education. Lifelong learning is fully integrated into our society and, from the student point of view, it is very different from regular learning. Among these differences there is the maturity of students, the fact that the domains of interest are much broader, the way how learning occurs at different depths, the fact that the topics to study may be related both to work, family and leisure, and that students have little availability due to their necessity to conciliate home, work, leisure and learning. Lifelong learning requires personalized models that adapt to students'' needs and constraints, but lifelong learners keep suffering from models that are neither adapted to their necessities, nor to the needs of society. This paper reflects on the actual situation of lifelong learning, analyses some of the relevant literature and discusses the challenges to conceptualize, from a transdisciplinary point of view, innovative e-learning models that promote self-determination of students
Evidence for the strangeness-changing weak decay
Using a collision data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity
of 3.0~fb, collected by the LHCb detector, we present the first search
for the strangeness-changing weak decay . No
hadron decay of this type has been seen before. A signal for this decay,
corresponding to a significance of 3.2 standard deviations, is reported. The
relative rate is measured to be
, where and
are the and fragmentation
fractions, and is the branching
fraction. Assuming is bounded between 0.1 and
0.3, the branching fraction would lie
in the range from to .Comment: 7 pages, 2 figures, All figures and tables, along with any
supplementary material and additional information, are available at
https://lhcbproject.web.cern.ch/lhcbproject/Publications/LHCbProjectPublic/LHCb-PAPER-2015-047.htm
Study of the production of and hadrons in collisions and first measurement of the branching fraction
The product of the () differential production
cross-section and the branching fraction of the decay () is
measured as a function of the beauty hadron transverse momentum, ,
and rapidity, . The kinematic region of the measurements is and . The measurements use a data sample
corresponding to an integrated luminosity of collected by the
LHCb detector in collisions at centre-of-mass energies in 2011 and in 2012. Based on previous LHCb
results of the fragmentation fraction ratio, , the
branching fraction of the decay is
measured to be \begin{equation*} \mathcal{B}(\Lambda_b^0\rightarrow J/\psi
pK^-)= (3.17\pm0.04\pm0.07\pm0.34^{+0.45}_{-0.28})\times10^{-4},
\end{equation*} where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second is
systematic, the third is due to the uncertainty on the branching fraction of
the decay , and the
fourth is due to the knowledge of . The sum of the
asymmetries in the production and decay between and
is also measured as a function of and .
The previously published branching fraction of , relative to that of , is updated.
The branching fractions of are determined.Comment: 29 pages, 19figures. All figures and tables, along with any
supplementary material and additional information, are available at
https://lhcbproject.web.cern.ch/lhcbproject/Publications/LHCbProjectPublic/LHCb-PAPER-2015-032.htm
Measurements of long-range near-side angular correlations in TeV proton-lead collisions in the forward region
Two-particle angular correlations are studied in proton-lead collisions at a
nucleon-nucleon centre-of-mass energy of TeV, collected
with the LHCb detector at the LHC. The analysis is based on data recorded in
two beam configurations, in which either the direction of the proton or that of
the lead ion is analysed. The correlations are measured in the laboratory
system as a function of relative pseudorapidity, , and relative
azimuthal angle, , for events in different classes of event
activity and for different bins of particle transverse momentum. In
high-activity events a long-range correlation on the near side, , is observed in the pseudorapidity range . This
measurement of long-range correlations on the near side in proton-lead
collisions extends previous observations into the forward region up to
. The correlation increases with growing event activity and is found
to be more pronounced in the direction of the lead beam. However, the
correlation in the direction of the lead and proton beams are found to be
compatible when comparing events with similar absolute activity in the
direction analysed.Comment: All figures and tables, along with any supplementary material and
additional information, are available at
https://lhcbproject.web.cern.ch/lhcbproject/Publications/LHCbProjectPublic/LHCb-PAPER-2015-040.htm
A global observational analysis to understand changes in air quality during exceptionally low anthropogenic emission
This global study, which has been coordinated by the World Meteorological Organization Global Atmospheric Watch (WMO/GAW) programme, aims to understand the behaviour of key air pollutant species during the COVID-19 pandemic period of exceptionally low emissions across the globe. We investigated the effects of the differences in both emissions and regional and local meteorology in 2020 compared with the period 2015â2019. By adopting a globally consistent approach, this comprehensive observational analysis focuses on changes in air quality in and around cities across the globe for the following air pollutants PM2.5, PM10, PMC (coarse fraction of PM), NO2, SO2, NOx, CO, O3 and the total gaseous oxidant (OX = NO2 + O3) during the pre-lockdown, partial lockdown, full lockdown and two relaxation periods spanning from January to September 2020. The analysis is based on in situ ground-based air quality observations at over 540 traffic, background and rural stations, from 63 cities and covering 25 countries over seven geographical regions of the world. Anomalies in the air pollutant concentrations (increases or decreases during 2020 periods compared to equivalent 2015â2019 periods) were calculated and the possible effects of meteorological conditions were analysed by computing anomalies from ERA5 reanalyses and local observations for these periods. We observed a positive correlation between the reductions in NO2 and NOx concentrations and peoplesâ mobility for most cities. A correlation between PMC and mobility changes was also seen for some Asian and South American cities. A clear signal was not observed for other pollutants, suggesting that sources besides vehicular emissions also substantially contributed to the change in air quality. As a global and regional overview of the changes in ambient concentrations of key air quality species, we observed decreases of up to about 70% in mean NO2 and between 30% and 40% in mean PM2.5 concentrations over 2020 full lockdown compared to the same period in 2015â2019. However, PM2.5 exhibited complex signals, even within the same region, with increases in some Spanish cities, attributed mainly to the long-range transport of African dust and/or biomass burning (corroborated with the analysis of NO2/CO ratio). Some Chinese cities showed similar increases in PM2.5 during the lockdown periods, but in this case, it was likely due to secondary PM formation. Changes in O3 concentrations were highly heterogeneous, with no overall change or small increases (as in the case of Europe), and positive anomalies of 25% and 30% in East Asia and South America, respectively, with Colombia showing the largest positive anomaly of ~70%. The SO2 anomalies were negative for 2020 compared to 2015â2019 (between ~25 to 60%) for all regions. For CO, negative anomalies were observed for all regions with the largest decrease for South America of up to ~40%. The NO2/CO ratio indicated that specific sites (such as those in Spanish cities) were affected by biomass burning plumes, which outweighed the NO2 decrease due to the general reduction in mobility (ratio of ~60%). Analysis of the total oxidant (OX = NO2 + O3) showed that primary NO2 emissions at urban locations were greater than the O3 production, whereas at background sites, OX was mostly driven by the regional contributions rather than local NO2 and O3 concentrations. The present study clearly highlights the importance of meteorology and episodic contributions (e.g., from dust, domestic, agricultural biomass burning and crop fertilizing) when analysing air quality in and around cities even during large emissions reductions. There is still the need to better understand how the chemical responses of secondary pollutants to emission change under complex meteorological conditions, along with climate change and socio-economic drivers may affect future air quality. The implications for regional and global policies are also significant, as our study clearly indicates that PM2.5 concentrations would not likely meet the World Health Organization guidelines in many parts of the world, despite the drastic reductions in mobility. Consequently, revisions of air quality regulation (e.g., the Gothenburg Protocol) with more ambitious targets that are specific to the different regions of the world may well be required.Peer reviewedFinal Published versio
Recommended from our members
Gaia Early Data Release 3: The celestial reference frame (Gaia-CRF3)
Context. Gaia-CRF3 is the celestial reference frame for positions and proper motions in the third release of data from the Gaia mission, Gaia DR3 (and for the early third release, Gaia EDR3, which contains identical astrometric results). The reference frame is defined by the positions and proper motions at epoch 2016.0 for a specific set of extragalactic sources in the (E)DR3 catalogue. Aims. We describe the construction of Gaia-CRF3 and its properties in terms of the distributions in magnitude, colour, and astrometric quality. Methods. Compact extragalactic sources in Gaia DR3 were identified by positional cross-matching with 17 external catalogues of quasi-stellar objects (QSO) and active galactic nuclei (AGN), followed by astrometric filtering designed to remove stellar contaminants. Selecting a clean sample was favoured over including a higher number of extragalactic sources. For the final sample, the random and systematic errors in the proper motions are analysed, as well as the radio-optical offsets in position for sources in the third realisation of the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF3). Results. Gaia-CRF3 comprises about 1.6 million QSO-like sources, of which 1.2 million have five-parameter astrometric solutions in Gaia DR3 and 0.4 million have six-parameter solutions. The sources span the magnitude range G = 13-21 with a peak density at 20.6 mag, at which the typical positional uncertainty is about 1 mas. The proper motions show systematic errors on the level of 12 ÎŒas yr-1 on angular scales greater than 15 deg. For the 3142 optical counterparts of ICRF3 sources in the S/X frequency bands, the median offset from the radio positions is about 0.5 mas, but it exceeds 4 mas in either coordinate for 127 sources. We outline the future of Gaia-CRF in the next Gaia data releases. Appendices give further details on the external catalogues used, how to extract information about the Gaia-CRF3 sources, potential (Galactic) confusion sources, and the estimation of the spin and orientation of an astrometric solution
A global observational analysis to understand changes in air quality during exceptionally low anthropogenic emission conditions
This global study, which has been coordinated by the World Meteorological Organization Global Atmospheric
Watch (WMO/GAW) programme, aims to understand the behaviour of key air pollutant species during the
COVID-19 pandemic period of exceptionally low emissions across the globe. We investigated the effects of the
differences in both emissions and regional and local meteorology in 2020 compared with the period 2015â2019.
By adopting a globally consistent approach, this comprehensive observational analysis focuses on changes in air
quality in and around cities across the globe for the following air pollutants PM2.5, PM10, PMC (coarse fraction of
PM), NO2, SO2, NOx, CO, O3 and the total gaseous oxidant (OX = NO2 + O3) during the pre-lockdown, partial
lockdown, full lockdown and two relaxation periods spanning from January to September 2020. The analysis is
based on in situ ground-based air quality observations at over 540 traffic, background and rural stations, from 63
cities and covering 25 countries over seven geographical regions of the world. Anomalies in the air pollutant
concentrations (increases or decreases during 2020 periods compared to equivalent 2015â2019 periods) were
calculated and the possible effects of meteorological conditions were analysed by computing anomalies from
ERA5 reanalyses and local observations for these periods. We observed a positive correlation between the reductions
in NO2 and NOx concentrations and peoplesâ mobility for most cities. A correlation between PMC and
mobility changes was also seen for some Asian and South American cities. A clear signal was not observed for
other pollutants, suggesting that sources besides vehicular emissions also substantially contributed to the change
in air quality.
As a global and regional overview of the changes in ambient concentrations of key air quality species, we
observed decreases of up to about 70% in mean NO2 and between 30% and 40% in mean PM2.5 concentrations
over 2020 full lockdown compared to the same period in 2015â2019. However, PM2.5 exhibited complex signals,
even within the same region, with increases in some Spanish cities, attributed mainly to the long-range transport
of African dust and/or biomass burning (corroborated with the analysis of NO2/CO ratio). Some Chinese cities
showed similar increases in PM2.5 during the lockdown periods, but in this case, it was likely due to secondary
PM formation. Changes in O3 concentrations were highly heterogeneous, with no overall change or small increases
(as in the case of Europe), and positive anomalies of 25% and 30% in East Asia and South America,
respectively, with Colombia showing the largest positive anomaly of ~70%. The SO2 anomalies were negative for
2020 compared to 2015â2019 (between ~25 to 60%) for all regions. For CO, negative anomalies were observed for all regions with the largest decrease for South America of up to ~40%. The NO2/CO ratio indicated that
specific sites (such as those in Spanish cities) were affected by biomass burning plumes, which outweighed the
NO2 decrease due to the general reduction in mobility (ratio of ~60%). Analysis of the total oxidant (OX = NO2
+ O3) showed that primary NO2 emissions at urban locations were greater than the O3 production, whereas at
background sites, OX was mostly driven by the regional contributions rather than local NO2 and O3 concentrations.
The present study clearly highlights the importance of meteorology and episodic contributions (e.g.,
from dust, domestic, agricultural biomass burning and crop fertilizing) when analysing air quality in and around
cities even during large emissions reductions. There is still the need to better understand how the chemical
responses of secondary pollutants to emission change under complex meteorological conditions, along with
climate change and socio-economic drivers may affect future air quality. The implications for regional and global
policies are also significant, as our study clearly indicates that PM2.5 concentrations would not likely meet the
World Health Organization guidelines in many parts of the world, despite the drastic reductions in mobility.
Consequently, revisions of air quality regulation (e.g., the Gothenburg Protocol) with more ambitious targets that
are specific to the different regions of the world may well be required.World Meteorological Organization Global Atmospheric Watch
programme is gratefully acknowledged for initiating and coordinating
this study and for supporting this publication.
We acknowledge the following projects for supporting the analysis
contained in this article:
Air Pollution and Human Health for an Indian Megacity project
PROMOTE funded by UK NERC and the Indian MOES, Grant reference
number NE/P016391/1;
Regarding project funding from the European Commission, the sole
responsibility of this publication lies with the authors. The European
Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information
contained therein.
This project has received funding from the European Commissionâs
Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement
No 874990 (EMERGE project).
European Regional Development Fund (project MOBTT42) under the
Mobilitas Pluss programme;
Estonian Research Council (project PRG714);
Estonian Research Infrastructures Roadmap project Estonian Environmental
Observatory (KKOBS, project 2014-2020.4.01.20-0281).
European network for observing our changing planet project (ERAPLANET,
grant agreement no. 689443) under the European Unionâs
Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, Estonian Ministry of
Sciences projects (grant nos. P180021, P180274), and the Estonian
Research Infrastructures Roadmap project Estonian Environmental Observatory
(3.2.0304.11-0395).
Eastern Mediterranean and Middle EastâClimate and Atmosphere Research (EMME-CARE) project, which has received funding from the
European Unionâs Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme
(grant agreement no. 856612) and the Government of Cyprus.
INAR acknowledges support by the Russian government (grant
number 14.W03.31.0002), the Ministry of Science and Higher Education
of the Russian Federation (agreement 14.W0331.0006), and the Russian
Ministry of Education and Science (14.W03.31.0008). We are grateful to to the following agencies for providing access to
data used in our analysis:
A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics Russian Academy of
Sciences;
Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dellâAmbiente della Campania
(ARPAC);
Air Quality and Climate Change, Parks and Environment (MetroVancouver,
Government of British Columbia);
Air Quality Monitoring & Reporting, Nova Scotia Environment
(Government of Nova Scotia);
Air Quality Monitoring Network (SIMAT) and Emission Inventory,
Mexico City Environment Secretariat (SEDEMA);
Airparif (owner & provider of the Paris air pollution data);
ARPA Lazio, Italy;
ARPA Lombardia, Italy;
Association AgrÂŽeÂŽee de Surveillance de la QualitÂŽe de lâAir en ËIle-de-
France AIRPARIF / Atmo-France;
Bavarian Environment Agency, Germany;
Berlin Senatsverwaltung fĂŒr Umwelt, Verkehr und Klimaschutz,
Germany;
California Air Resources Board;
Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), India;
CETESB: Companhia Ambiental do Estado de SËao Paulo, Brazil.
China National Environmental Monitoring Centre;
Chandigarh Pollution Control Committee (CPCC), India.
DCMR Rijnmond Environmental Service, the Netherlands.
Department of Labour Inspection, Cyprus;
Department of Natural Resources Management and Environmental
Protection of Moscow.
Environment and Climate Change Canada;
Environmental Monitoring and Science Division Alberta Environment
and Parks (Government of Alberta);
Environmental Protection Authority Victoria (Melbourne, Victoria,
Australia);
Estonian Environmental Research Centre (EERC);
Estonian University of Life Sciences, SMEAR Estonia;
European Regional Development Fund (project MOBTT42) under
the Mobilitas Pluss programme;
Finnish Meteorological Institute;
Helsinki Region Environmental Services Authority;
Haryana Pollution Control Board (HSPCB), IndiaLondon Air Quality
Network (LAQN) and the Automatic Urban and Rural Network (AURN)
supported by the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs,
UK Government;
Madrid Municipality;
Met Office Integrated Data Archive System (MIDAS);
Meteorological Service of Canada;
Minist`ere de lâEnvironnement et de la Lutte contre les changements
climatiques (Gouvernement du QuÂŽebec);
Ministry of Environment and Energy, Greece;
Ministry of the Environment (Chile) and National Weather Service
(DMC);
Moscow State Budgetary Environmental Institution
MOSECOMONITORING.
Municipal Department of the Environment SMAC, Brazil;
Municipality of Madrid public open data service;
National institute of environmental research, Korea;
National Meteorology and Hydrology Service (SENAMHI), Peru;
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation;
NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment;
Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks,
Canada;
Public Health Service of Amsterdam (GGD), the Netherlands.
Punjab Pollution Control Board (PPCB), India.
RÂŽeseau de surveillance de la qualitÂŽe de lâair (RSQA) (MontrÂŽeal);
Rosgydromet. Mosecomonitoring, Institute of Atmospheric Physics,
Russia;
Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project 20â05â00254)
SAFAR-IITM-MoES, India;
SËao Paulo State Environmental Protection Agency, CETESB;
Secretaria de Ambiente, DMQ, Ecuador;
SecretarĂa Distrital de Ambiente, BogotÂŽa, Colombia.
Secretaria Municipal de Meio Ambiente Rio de Janeiro;
Mexico City Atmospheric Monitoring System (SIMAT); Mexico City
Secretariat of Environment, SecretarĂa del Medio Ambiente (SEDEMA);
SLB-analys, Sweden;
SMEAR Estonia station and Estonian University of Life Sciences
(EULS);
SMEAR stations data and Finnish Center of Excellence;
South African Weather Service and Department of Environment,
Forestry and Fisheries through SAAQIS;
Spanish Ministry for the Ecological Transition and the Demographic
Challenge (MITECO);
University of Helsinki, Finland;
University of Tartu, Tahkuse air monitoring station;
Weather Station of the Institute of Astronomy, Geophysics and Atmospheric
Science of the University of SËao Paulo;
West Bengal Pollution Control Board (WBPCB).http://www.elsevier.com/locate/envintam2023Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorolog
Model-independent measurement of mixing parameters in Dââ K ÏÏ decays
The first model-independent measurement of the charm mixing parameters in the
decay is reported, using a sample of collision
data recorded by the LHCb experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity
of 1.0 fb at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV. The measured values are
\begin{eqnarray*} x &=& (-0.86 \pm 0.53 \pm 0.17) \times 10^{-2}, \\ y &=&
(+0.03 \pm 0.46 \pm 0.13) \times 10^{-2}, \end{eqnarray*} where the first
uncertainties are statistical and include small contributions due to the
external input for the strong phase measured by the CLEO collaboration, and the
second uncertainties are systematic.Comment: 25 pages, 3 figures. Sign error in x fixed as of v2. All figures and
tables, along with any supplementary material and additional information, are
available at
https://lhcbproject.web.cern.ch/lhcbproject/Publications/LHCbProjectPublic/LHCb-PAPER-2015-042.htm
- âŠ