45 research outputs found
Microwave beneficiation of coal to improve grindability and handleability
Experimental results and analyses have shown that significant improvements in coal grindability (reductions in Relative Work Index) can be achieved by exposing coals to
microwave radiation. Experimental data have indicated that low rank coals are highly responsive to microwave radiation, possibly due to their higher inherent moisture content.
There is evidence to suggest that gaseous evolution (water vapour and volatile matter) and localised zones of differential expansion (arising for example from occluded mineral matter) in coal during heating give rise to crack formation and hence are the probable causes for the measured increase in coal grindability. The composition of the various coals treated by microwave radiation remained relatively unaltered and there was no significant change in coal calorific value or the proximate and ultimate analyses (dry, mineral matter free basis). Initial (laboratory-scale) microwave trials and pilot-scale testwork demonstrated an improvement in the grindability of various coals. However, the gross energy input for these tests were excessively high (220k WhIt) in comparison to that used mechanically for pulverised coal production (15-20kWhlt).
Improvements in microwave cavity design and increased electric field strengths may increase the energy efficiency of the process; however, further work would be required. Additional studies were carried out to evaluate the potential use of microwave technology for coal desulphurisation. The results were encouraging and show that substantial improvements in pyrite separation can be achieved with some coals. Fundamental studies have shown that there is significant change in coal flowability following microwave exposure
Secondary literacy across the curriculum: Challenges and possibilities
This paper discusses the challenges and possibilities attendant upon successfully implementing literacy across the curriculum initiatives â or âschool language policiesâ as they have come to be known - particularly at the secondary or high school level. It provides a theoretical background to these issues, exploring previous academic discussions of school language policies, and highlights key areas of concern as well as opportunity with respect to school implementation of such policies. As such, it provides a necessary conceptual background to the subsequent papers in this special issue, which focus upon the Secondary Schoolsâ Literacy Initiative (SSLI) â a New Zealand funded programme that aims to establish cross-curricular language and literacy policies in secondary schools
Powering West Midlands Growth: A Regional Approach to Clean Energy Innovation
The West Midlands is uniquely positioned to lead the UK in taking advantage of the economic opportunities arising from the global transition to a clean energy system. The regionâs strengths include: strong and coherent political leadership committed to sustainability; the diversity of economic needs and scale of demand required to build competitive markets to support radical innovation; a world-class concentration of both academic and commercial expertise in the low-carbon energy sector; a massive programme of public and private investment in infrastructure planned for the next decade, and above all, the determination to secure long-term economic benefit from clean energy innovation.
This report makes the case for the creation of a small number of Energy Innovation Zones (EIZs) across the region, acting as pathfinders for an approach that might subsequently be adopted across the country as a whole. EIZs enable barriers â such as powerful institutional silos separating transport, digital, planning and energy â to be overcome within designated geographies. They create a risk-managed and commercial-scale context for the development of new local clean energy markets. They also provide a practical mechanism to help attract investment and muster local political support. At a national level, they can help ensure innovation is built into the governmentâs strategic sector deals and other large scale public investment projects
In vivo application of an implantable tri-anchored methylene blue-based electrochemical pH sensor
Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide
Efforts to control climate change require the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. This can only be achieved through a drastic reduction of global CO2 emissions. Yet fossil fuel emissions increased by 29% between 2000 and 2008, in conjunction with increased contributions from emerging economies, from the production and international trade of goods and services, and from the use of coal as a fuel source. In contrast, emissions from land-use changes were nearly constant. Between 1959 and 2008, 43% of each year's CO2 emissions remained in the atmosphere on average; the rest was absorbed by carbon sinks on land and in the oceans. In the past 50 years, the fraction of CO2 emissions that remains in the atmosphere each year has likely increased, from about 40% to 45%, and models suggest that this trend was caused by a decrease in the uptake of CO2 by the carbon sinks in response to climate change and variability. Changes in the CO2 sinks are highly uncertain, but they could have a significant influence on future atmospheric CO2 levels. It is therefore crucial to reduce the uncertainties
Global carbon budget 2019
Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere â the âglobal carbon budgetâ â is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO2 emissions (EFF) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land use change (ELUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land use and land use change data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly and its growth rate (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) and terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) are estimated with global process models constrained by observations. The resulting carbon budget imbalance (BIM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1Ï. For the last decade available (2009â2018), EFF was 9.5±0.5âGtCâyrâ1, ELUC 1.5±0.7âGtCâyrâ1, GATM 4.9±0.02âGtCâyrâ1 (2.3±0.01âppmâyrâ1), SOCEAN 2.5±0.6âGtCâyrâ1, and SLAND 3.2±0.6âGtCâyrâ1, with a budget imbalance BIM of 0.4âGtCâyrâ1 indicating overestimated emissions and/or underestimated sinks. For the year 2018 alone, the growth in EFF was about 2.1â% and fossil emissions increased to 10.0±0.5âGtCâyrâ1, reaching 10âGtCâyrâ1 for the first time in history, ELUC was 1.5±0.7âGtCâyrâ1, for total anthropogenic CO2 emissions of 11.5±0.9âGtCâyrâ1 (42.5±3.3âGtCO2). Also for 2018, GATM was 5.1±0.2âGtCâyrâ1 (2.4±0.1âppmâyrâ1), SOCEAN was 2.6±0.6âGtCâyrâ1, and SLAND was 3.5±0.7âGtCâyrâ1, with a BIM of 0.3âGtC. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration reached 407.38±0.1âppm averaged over 2018. For 2019, preliminary data for the first 6â10 months indicate a reduced growth in EFF of +0.6â% (range of â0.2â% to 1.5â%) based on national emissions projections for China, the USA, the EU, and India and projections of gross domestic product corrected for recent changes in the carbon intensity of the economy for the rest of the world. Overall, the mean and trend in the five components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959â2018, but discrepancies of up to 1âGtCâyrâ1 persist for the representation of semi-decadal variability in CO2 fluxes. A detailed comparison among individual estimates and the introduction of a broad range of observations shows (1) no consensus in the mean and trend in land use change emissions over the last decade, (2) a persistent low agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO2 flux in the northern extra-tropics, and (3) an apparent underestimation of the CO2 variability by ocean models outside the tropics. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget and the progress in understanding of the global carbon cycle compared with previous publications of this data set (Le QuĂ©rĂ© et al., 2018a, b, 2016, 2015a, b, 2014, 2013). The data generated by this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/gcp-2019 (Friedlingstein et al., 2019)
Global Carbon Budget 2022
Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere in a changing climate is critical to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe and synthesize data sets and methodologies to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO emissions (E) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land-use change (E), mainly deforestation, are based on land use and land-use change data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO concentration is measured directly, and its growth rate (G) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO sink (S) is estimated with global ocean biogeochemistry models and observation-based data products. The terrestrial CO sink (S) is estimated with dynamic global vegetation models. The resulting carbon budget imbalance (B), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1Ï.
For the year 2021, E increased by 5.1â% relative to 2020, with fossil emissions at 10.1â±â0.5âGtCâyr (9.9â±â0.5âGtCâyr when the cement carbonation sink is included), and E was 1.1â±â0.7âGtCâyr, for a total anthropogenic CO emission (including the cement carbonation sink) of 10.9â±â0.8âGtCâyr (40.0â±â2.9âGtCO). Also, for 2021, G was 5.2â±â0.2âGtCâyr (2.5â±â0.1âppmâyr), S was 2.9 â±â0.4âGtCâyr, and S was 3.5â±â0.9âGtCâyr, with a B of â0.6âGtCâyr (i.e. the total estimated sources were too low or sinks were too high). The global atmospheric CO concentration averaged over 2021 reached 414.71â±â0.1âppm. Preliminary data for 2022 suggest an increase in E relative to 2021 of +1.0â% (0.1â% to 1.9â%) globally and atmospheric CO concentration reaching 417.2âppm, more than 50â% above pre-industrial levels (around 278âppm). Overall, the mean and trend in the components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959â2021, but discrepancies of up to 1âGtCâyr persist for the representation of annual to semi-decadal variability in CO fluxes. Comparison of estimates from multiple approaches and observations shows (1) a persistent large uncertainty in the estimate of land-use change emissions, (2) a low agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO flux in the northern extratropics, and (3) a discrepancy between the different methods on the strength of the ocean sink over the last decade. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget and the progress in understanding of the global carbon cycle compared with previous publications of this data set. The data presented in this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2022 (Friedlingstein et al., 2022b)
The climatic impacts of land surface change and carbon management, and the implications for climate-change mitigation policy
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14693062Strategies to mitigate anthropogenic climate change recognize that carbon sequestration in the terrestrial biosphere
can reduce the build-up of carbon dioxide in the Earthâs atmosphere. However, climate mitigation policies do not
generally incorporate the effects of these changes in the land surface on the surface albedo, the fluxes of sensible and
latent heat to the atmosphere, and the distribution of energy within the climate system. Changes in these components
of the surface energy budget can affect the local, regional, and global climate. Given the goal of mitigating climate
change, it is important to consider all of the effects of changes in terrestrial vegetation and to work toward a better
understanding of the full climate system. Acknowledging the importance of land surface change as a component of
climate change makes it more challenging to create a system of credits and debits wherein emission or sequestration
of carbon in the biosphere is equated with emission of carbon from fossil fuels. Recognition of the complexity of
human-caused changes in climate does not, however, weaken the importance of actions that would seek to minimize
our disturbance of the Earthâs environmental system and that would reduce societal and ecological vulnerability to
environmental change and variability