Regulation von Apoptose in Ebolavirus-infizierten Zellen

In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde die Regulation von Apoptose in Ebolavirus Zaire (ZEBOV)-infizierten Zellen untersucht. Studien an infizierten Affen ergaben, dass mit ZEBOV infizierte Zellen nicht in Apoptose gehen, während die Zahl der Lymphozyten, die nicht durch ZEBOV infiziert werden, im Verlauf der Infektion durch Apoptose stark abnimmt, wodurch die Immunantwort geschwächt wird. Als entscheidender Faktor wird hier die Sekretion des Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) aus infizierten Zellen diskutiert, in der vorliegenden Arbeit konnte jedoch eine Reduktion der TRAIL-mRNA-Level in ZEBOV-infizierten Zellen festgestellt werden. Ziel dieser Arbeit war zu klären, ob ZEBOV die Induktion der Apoptose in infizierten Zellen hemmt. Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass eine Infektion mit ZEBOV nicht zur Induktion von Apoptose in kultivierten Zellen führt. Es wurden weder die Initiatorcaspasen 8 und 9 noch die Effektorcaspase 3 aktiviert. Auch führte die Infektion mit ZEBOV nicht zu Veränderungen der mRNA- und Proteinlevel des antiapoptotischen Proteins Bcl-2 und des proapoptotischen Proteins Bax, über die eine Regulation von Apoptose an den Mitochondrien erfolgt. Anschließend wurden ZEBOV-infizierte Zellen verschiedenen Apoptosestimuli ausgesetzt, um die unterschiedlichen Apoptosesignalwege zu aktivieren und einen möglichen inhibierenden Einfluss von ZEBOV zu analysieren. Es konnte jedoch bei keinem der durchgeführten Experimente eine Hemmung der Apoptose durch ZEBOV beobachtet werden. Weder eine Aktivierung des externen Apoptosesignalweges mittels TRAIL, noch die Induktion der mitochondrial-vermittelten Apoptose durch Camptothecin oder eine Infektion mit dem vesikulären Stomatitis-Virus wurden durch eine Infektion mit ZEBOV gehemmt oder vermindert. Da eine Hemmung der dsRNA-abhängigen Proteinkinase R (PKR) durch ZEBOV bereits bekannt war, wurde untersucht, ob dies zur Hemmung der Apoptoseinduktion führt. Obwohl ZEBOV die Aktivierung von PKR sowohl in Sendai Virus (SeV)-infizierten als auch in poly-IC (pIC)-behandelten Zellen inhibierte, wurde die Induktion der Apoptose in diesen Zellen nicht unterdrückt. Die Rolle der PKR-Hemmung durch ZEBOV in der Apoptoseregulation konnte jedoch nicht abschließend geklärt werden, da die verwendeten Stimuli möglicherweise auch andere, von der PKR unabhängige Apoptosesignalwege aktivieren. Viele Viren aktivieren zelluläre Überlebenssignalwege wie den PI3K/Akt-Signalweg,um die Induktion der Apoptose zu unterbinden. In ZEBOV-infizierten Zellen konnte jedoch zu keinem Zeitpunkt der Infektion eine Aktivierung von Akt nachgewiesen werden. Die fehlende Induktion von Apoptose ist demnach auch nicht durch eine Aktivierung von Überlebenssignalwegen zu erklären. Die Überexpression des viralen Oberflächenproteins GP führte in stabil exprimierenden Zellen zur Induktion von Apoptose, welche durch eine Infektion mit ZEBOV nicht gehemmt werden konnte. Dies deutet darauf hin, dass eine ausbalancierte virale Proteinexpression für die fehlende Apoptoseinduktion von Bedeutung ist. Zusammenfassend lässt sich feststellen, dass eine Infektion mit ZEBOV nicht zur Induktion von Apoptose führt, aber auch keine Hemmung von Apoptose vorliegt. Vielmehr scheint ZEBOV die Erkennung pathogener Muster in den infizierten Zellen zu verhindern, sodass Signalwege, die der Virusabwehr dienen, nicht aktiviert werden

Intracellular Events and Cell Fate in Filovirus Infection

Marburg and Ebola viruses cause a severe hemorrhagic disease in humans with high fatality rates. Early target cells of filoviruses are monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. The infection spreads to the liver, spleen and later other organs by blood and lymph flow. A hallmark of filovirus infection is the depletion of non-infected lymphocytes; however, the molecular mechanisms leading to the observed bystander lymphocyte apoptosis are poorly understood. Also, there is limited knowledge about the fate of infected cells in filovirus disease. In this review we will explore what is known about the intracellular events leading to virus amplification and cell damage in filovirus infection. Furthermore, we will discuss how cellular dysfunction and cell death may correlate with disease pathogenesis

Recent advances in marburgvirus research [version 1; peer review: 3 approved]

Marburgviruses are closely related to ebolaviruses and cause a devastating disease in humans. In 2012, we published a comprehensive review of the first 45 years of research on marburgviruses and the disease they cause, ranging from molecular biology to ecology. Spurred in part by the deadly Ebola virus outbreak in West Africa in 2013–2016, research on all filoviruses has intensified. Not meant as an introduction to marburgviruses, this article instead provides a synopsis of recent progress in marburgvirus research with a particular focus on molecular biology, advances in animal modeling, and the use of Egyptian fruit bats in infection experiments

Human and murine IFIT1 proteins do not restrict infection of negative-sense RNA viruses of the Orthomyxoviridae, Bunyaviridae, and Filoviridae families

UNLABELLED: Interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 1 (IFIT1) is a host protein with reported cell-intrinsic antiviral activity against several RNA viruses. The proposed basis for the activity against negative-sense RNA viruses is the binding to exposed 5\u27-triphosphates (5\u27-ppp) on the genome of viral RNA. However, recent studies reported relatively low binding affinities of IFIT1 for 5\u27-ppp RNA, suggesting that IFIT1 may not interact efficiently with this moiety under physiological conditions. To evaluate the ability of IFIT1 to have an impact on negative-sense RNA viruses, we infected Ifit1(-/-) and wild-type control mice and primary cells with four negative-sense RNA viruses (influenza A virus [IAV], La Crosse virus [LACV], Oropouche virus [OROV], and Ebola virus) corresponding to three distinct families. Unexpectedly, a lack of Ifit1 gene expression did not result in increased infection by any of these viruses in cell culture. Analogously, morbidity, mortality, and viral burdens in tissues were identical between Ifit1(-/-) and control mice after infection with IAV, LACV, or OROV. Finally, deletion of the human IFIT1 protein in A549 cells did not affect IAV replication or infection, and reciprocally, ectopic expression of IFIT1 in HEK293T cells did not inhibit IAV infection. To explain the lack of antiviral activity against IAV, we measured the binding affinity of IFIT1 for RNA oligonucleotides resembling the 5\u27 ends of IAV gene segments. The affinity for 5\u27-ppp RNA was approximately 10-fold lower than that for non-2\u27-O-methylated (cap 0) RNA oligonucleotides. Based on this analysis, we conclude that IFIT1 is not a dominant restriction factor against negative-sense RNA viruses. IMPORTANCE: Negative-sense RNA viruses, including influenza virus and Ebola virus, have been responsible for some of the most deadly outbreaks in recent history. The host interferon response and induction of antiviral genes contribute to the control of infections by these viruses. IFIT1 is highly induced after virus infection and reportedly has antiviral activity against several RNA and DNA viruses. However, its role in restricting infection by negative-sense RNA viruses remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated the ability of IFIT1 to inhibit negative-sense RNA virus replication and pathogenesis both in vitro and in vivo. Detailed cell culture and animal studies demonstrated that IFIT1 is not a dominant restriction factor against three different families of negative-sense RNA viruses

Recombinant Lloviu virus as a tool to study viral replication and host responses

Next generation sequencing has revealed the presence of numerous RNA viruses in animal reservoir hosts, including many closely related to known human pathogens. Despite their zoonotic potential, most of these viruses remain understudied due to not yet being cultured. While reverse genetic systems can facilitate virus rescue, this is often hindered by missing viral genome ends. A prime example is Lloviu virus (LLOV), an uncultured filovirus that is closely related to the highly pathogenic Ebola virus. Using minigenome systems, we complemented the missing LLOV genomic ends and identified cis-acting elements required for LLOV replication that were lacking in the published sequence. We leveraged these data to generate recombinant full-length LLOV clones and rescue infectious virus. Similar to other filoviruses, recombinant LLOV (rLLOV) forms filamentous virions and induces the formation of characteristic inclusions in the cytoplasm of the infected cells, as shown by electron microscopy. Known target cells of Ebola virus, including macrophages and hepatocytes, are permissive to rLLOV infection, suggesting that humans could be potential hosts. However, inflammatory responses in human macrophages, a hallmark of Ebola virus disease, are not induced by rLLOV. Additional tropism testing identified pneumocytes as capable of robust rLLOV and Ebola virus infection. We also used rLLOV to test antivirals targeting multiple facets of the replication cycle. Rescue of uncultured viruses of pathogenic concern represents a valuable tool in our arsenal for pandemic preparedness

Global maps of soil temperature

Research in global change ecology relies heavily on global climatic grids derived from estimates of air temperature in open areas at around 2 m above the ground. These climatic grids do not reflect conditions below vegetation canopies and near the ground surface, where critical ecosystem functions occur and most terrestrial species reside. Here, we provide global maps of soil temperature and bioclimatic variables at a 1-km2 resolution for 0–5 and 5–15 cm soil depth. These maps were created by calculating the difference (i.e. offset) between in situ soil temperature measurements, based on time series from over 1200 1-km2 pixels (summarized from 8519 unique temperature sensors) across all the world\u27s major terrestrial biomes, and coarse-grained air temperature estimates from ERA5-Land (an atmospheric reanalysis by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts). We show that mean annual soil temperature differs markedly from the corresponding gridded air temperature, by up to 10°C (mean = 3.0 ± 2.1°C), with substantial variation across biomes and seasons. Over the year, soils in cold and/or dry biomes are substantially warmer (+3.6 ± 2.3°C) than gridded air temperature, whereas soils in warm and humid environments are on average slightly cooler (−0.7 ± 2.3°C). The observed substantial and biome-specific offsets emphasize that the projected impacts of climate and climate change on near-surface biodiversity and ecosystem functioning are inaccurately assessed when air rather than soil temperature is used, especially in cold environments. The global soil-related bioclimatic variables provided here are an important step forward for any application in ecology and related disciplines. Nevertheless, we highlight the need to fill remaining geographic gaps by collecting more in situ measurements of microclimate conditions to further enhance the spatiotemporal resolution of global soil temperature products for ecological applications

Global maps of soil temperature

Research in global change ecology relies heavily on global climatic grids derived from estimates of air temperature in open areas at around 2 m above the ground. These climatic grids do not reflect conditions below vegetation canopies and near the ground surface, where critical ecosystem functions occur and most terrestrial species reside. Here, we provide global maps of soil temperature and bioclimatic variables at a 1-km² resolution for 0–5 and 5–15 cm soil depth. These maps were created by calculating the difference (i.e., offset) between in-situ soil temperature measurements, based on time series from over 1200 1-km² pixels (summarized from 8500 unique temperature sensors) across all the world’s major terrestrial biomes, and coarse-grained air temperature estimates from ERA5-Land (an atmospheric reanalysis by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts). We show that mean annual soil temperature differs markedly from the corresponding gridded air temperature, by up to 10°C (mean = 3.0 ± 2.1°C), with substantial variation across biomes and seasons. Over the year, soils in cold and/or dry biomes are substantially warmer (+3.6 ± 2.3°C) than gridded air temperature, whereas soils in warm and humid environments are on average slightly cooler (-0.7 ± 2.3°C). The observed substantial and biome-specific offsets emphasize that the projected impacts of climate and climate change on near-surface biodiversity and ecosystem functioning are inaccurately assessed when air rather than soil temperature is used, especially in cold environments. The global soil-related bioclimatic variables provided here are an important step forward for any application in ecology and related disciplines. Nevertheless, we highlight the need to fill remaining geographic gaps by collecting more in-situ measurements of microclimate conditions to further enhance the spatiotemporal resolution of global soil temperature products for ecological applications

Global maps of soil temperature.

Research in global change ecology relies heavily on global climatic grids derived from estimates of air temperature in open areas at around 2 m above the ground. These climatic grids do not reflect conditions below vegetation canopies and near the ground surface, where critical ecosystem functions occur and most terrestrial species reside. Here, we provide global maps of soil temperature and bioclimatic variables at a 1-km2 resolution for 0-5 and 5-15 cm soil depth. These maps were created by calculating the difference (i.e. offset) between in situ soil temperature measurements, based on time series from over 1200 1-km2 pixels (summarized from 8519 unique temperature sensors) across all the world's major terrestrial biomes, and coarse-grained air temperature estimates from ERA5-Land (an atmospheric reanalysis by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts). We show that mean annual soil temperature differs markedly from the corresponding gridded air temperature, by up to 10°C (mean = 3.0 ± 2.1°C), with substantial variation across biomes and seasons. Over the year, soils in cold and/or dry biomes are substantially warmer (+3.6 ± 2.3°C) than gridded air temperature, whereas soils in warm and humid environments are on average slightly cooler (-0.7 ± 2.3°C). The observed substantial and biome-specific offsets emphasize that the projected impacts of climate and climate change on near-surface biodiversity and ecosystem functioning are inaccurately assessed when air rather than soil temperature is used, especially in cold environments. The global soil-related bioclimatic variables provided here are an important step forward for any application in ecology and related disciplines. Nevertheless, we highlight the need to fill remaining geographic gaps by collecting more in situ measurements of microclimate conditions to further enhance the spatiotemporal resolution of global soil temperature products for ecological applications

Establishment of an Inactivation Method for Ebola Virus and SARS-CoV-2 Suitable for Downstream Sequencing of Low Cell Numbers

Technologies that facilitate the bulk sequencing of small numbers of cells as well as single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) have aided greatly in the study of viruses as these analyses can be used to differentiate responses from infected versus bystander cells in complex systems, including in organoid or animal studies. While protocols for these analyses are typically developed with biosafety level 2 (BSL-2) considerations in mind, such analyses are equally useful for the study of viruses that require higher biosafety containment levels. Many of these workstreams, however, are not directly compatible with the more stringent biosafety regulations of BSL-3 and BSL-4 laboratories ensuring virus inactivation and must therefore be modified. Here we show that TCL buffer (Qiagen), which was developed for bulk sequencing of small numbers of cells and also facilitates scRNA-seq, inactivates both Ebola virus (EBOV) and SARS-CoV-2, BSL-4 and BSL-3 viruses, respectively. We show that additional heat treatment, necessary for the more stringent biosafety concerns for BSL-4-derived samples, was additionally sufficient to inactivate EBOV-containing samples. Critically, this heat treatment had minimal effects on extracted RNA quality and downstream sequencing results