Single hadron response measurement and calorimeter jet energy scale uncertainty with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

The uncertainty on the calorimeter energy response to jets of particles is derived for the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). First, the calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons is measured and compared to the Monte Carlo simulation using proton-proton collisions at centre-of-mass energies of sqrt(s) = 900 GeV and 7 TeV collected during 2009 and 2010. Then, using the decay of K_s and Lambda particles, the calorimeter response to specific types of particles (positively and negatively charged pions, protons, and anti-protons) is measured and compared to the Monte Carlo predictions. Finally, the jet energy scale uncertainty is determined by propagating the response uncertainty for single charged and neutral particles to jets. The response uncertainty is 2-5% for central isolated hadrons and 1-3% for the final calorimeter jet energy scale.Comment: 24 pages plus author list (36 pages total), 23 figures, 1 table, submitted to European Physical Journal

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis – 2021 update

Non-invasive tests are increasingly being used to improve the diagnosis and prognostication of chronic liver diseases across aetiologies. Herein, we provide the latest update to the EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the use of non-invasive tests for the evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis, focusing on the topics for which relevant evidence has been published in the last 5 years

Intramucosal adenocarcinoma of the ileum originated 40 years after ileosigmoidostomy

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Small bowel adenocarcinomas (SBAs) are rare carcinomas. They are asymptomatic and usually neither endoscopy nor contrast studies are performed for screening</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>A 72-year-old Japanese male had a positive fecal occult blood test at a regular check-up in 2006. He suffered appendicitis and received an ileosigmoidostomy in 1966. A colonoscopy revealed an irregular mucosal lesion with an unclear margin at the ileum side of the anastomosis. A mucosal biopsy specimen showed adenocarcinoma histopathologically. Excision of the anastomosis was performed for this patient. The resected specimen showed a flat mucosal lesion with a slight depression at the ileum adjacent to the anastomosis. Histological examination revealed a well differentiated intramucosal adenocarcinoma (adenocarcinoma in situ). Immunohistological staining demonstrated the overexpression of p53 protein in the adenocarcinoma.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Adenocarcinoma of the ileum at such an early stage is a very rare event. In this case, there is a possibility that the ileosigmoidostomy resulted in a back flow of colonic stool to the ileum that caused the carcinogenesis of the small intestine.</p

Reduction of liver stiffness following resolution of acute flares of chronic hepatitis B

Background: Measuring liver stiffness is becoming more popular as a non-invasive tool for assessing liver fibrosis. Aim: To assess the effect of severe hepatitis B flare on liver stiffness and determine factors that correlate with liver stiffness measurements. Methods: Twenty-nine patients with severe hepatitis B flare (ALT > 10 × upper limit of normal) were followed up for 1 year. Serial transient elastography was performed at the time of flare, 3-6, and 12 months after flare. Results: At the time of flare, the median liver stiffness was 16.8 kPa, with no patients having normal liver stiffness (<6 kPa). There was a significant decrease in liver stiffness from baseline to 3-6 months (16.8 vs. 7.9 kPa, respectively, P < 0.001), and a further smaller decline from 3-6 to 12 months (7.9 vs. 6.9 kPa, respectively, P = 0.039). By 12 months, 10 (34%) had normalized their liver stiffness. Baseline parameters which correlated with liver stiffness include bilirubin, ALT, albumin, prothrombin time and platelet levels (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: Liver stiffness was increased in patients with severe hepatitis B flares, with return to near normal levels by 6 months. Transient elastography for proper assessment of liver fibrosis should be performed at least 6 months after flare. © 2010 The Author(s).published_or_final_versionSpringer Open Choice, 31 May 201

Discordance between Liver Biopsy and FibroScan® in Assessing Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B: Risk Factors and Influence of Necroinflammation

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated predictors of discordance between liver biopsy (LB) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using FibroScan®. We assessed predictors of discordance between LB and LSM in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and investigated the effects of necroinflammatory activity. METHODS: In total, 150 patients (107 men, 43 women) were prospectively enrolled. Only LSM with ≥ 10 valid measurements was considered reliable. Liver fibrosis was evaluated using the Laennec system. LB specimens <15 mm in length were considered ineligible. Reference cutoff LSM values to determine discordance were calculated from our cohort (6.0 kPa for ≥ F2, 7.5 kPa for ≥ F3, and 9.4 kPa for F4). RESULTS: A discordance, defined as a discordance of at least two stages between LB and LSM, was identified in 21 (14.0%) patients. In multivariate analyses, fibrosis stages F3-4 and F4 showed independent negative associations with discordance (P = 0.002; hazard ratio [HR], 0.073; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.014-0.390 for F3-4 and P = 0.014; HR, 0.067; 95% CI, 0.008-0.574 for F4). LSM values were not significantly different between maximal activity grades 1-2 and 3-4 in F1 and F2 fibrosis stages, whereas LSM values were significantly higher in maximal activity grade 3-4 than 1-2 in F3 and F4 fibrosis stage (median 8.6 vs. 11.3 kPa in F3, P = 0.049; median 11.9 vs. 19.2 kPa in F4, P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Advanced fibrosis stage (F3-4) or cirrhosis (F4) showed a negative correlation with discordance between LB and LSM in patients with CHB, and maximal activity grade 3-4 significantly influenced LSM values in F3 and F4

Liver-FibroSTARD checklist and glossary: tools for standardized design and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies of liver fibrosis tests

Chronic liver diseases are highly prevalent and require an accurate evaluation of liver fibrosis to determine patient management. Many efforts have been made over this last decade to develop accurate non-invasive tools for liver fibrosis evaluation as alternative methods to liver biopsy. These non-invasive methods of liver fibrosis assessment including blood markers and liver stiffness measurement by elastography are increasingly well validated and contribute to safer and more practical clinical care for patients [1, 2]. These efforts have led to a dramatic increase in the number of diagnostic accuracy studies of liver fibrosis tests and to a proliferation of reports whose quality is very heterogeneous. [...

An extension of STARD statements for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies on liver fibrosis tests: the Liver-FibroSTARD standards

BACKGROUND &amp; AIMS: Chronic liver diseases are highly prevalent and require an accurate evaluation of liver fibrosis to determine patient management. Over the last decade, great effort has been made to develop non-invasive liver fibrosis tests. The ensuing increase of literature is, however, impaired by extensive heterogeneity in the quality of published reports. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD), first published in 2003, were developed to improve the quality of research reports on diagnostic studies. We aimed to evaluate STARD statements in the setting of diagnostic studies on non-invasive liver fibrosis tests, and to propose an extended version developed specifically for those studies. METHODS: Eight French experts evaluated STARD statement adequacy in 10 studies on non-invasive liver fibrosis tests and then developed an extended version with a glossary. The new checklist and glossary were independently evaluated by seven international experts. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 25 STARD items were considered only partially adequate for the evaluation of diagnostic studies on non-invasive liver fibrosis tests. Inter-expert agreement was at least very good for 8 STARD items (32%), moderate for 9 (36%), and poor or very poor for 8 (32%). The experts\u27 proposals were developed into the new Liver-FibroSTARD standards including a checklist with 62 items/sub-items and a corresponding comprehensive glossary. New proposals were inserted in the 25 STARD items as a complementary module. Independent evaluation of the Liver-FibroSTARD checklist showed at least very good inter-expert agreement for 39 items/sub-items (63%), moderate agreement for 11 (18%), and poor or very poor agreement for only 12 (19%). CONCLUSIONS: As a supplement of the STARD statements, the Liver-FibroSTARD checklist and its glossary are new tools specifically designed for the evaluation of diagnostic studies about non-invasive liver fibrosis tests

Noninvasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B

A serum biomarker (FibroTest; Biopredictive, Paris, France; FibroSure; LabCorp, Burlington, USA) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by Fibroscan (Echosens, Paris, France) have been extensively validated in chronic hepatitis C. This review updates the clinical validation of serum biomarkers and LSM in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). One meta-analysis combined all published studies and another used a database combining FibroTest individual data. Sensitivity analysis assessed the impact of several factors, including authors’ independence, length of biopsy, ethnicity, hepatitis B early antigen status, viral load, and alanine aminotransferase value. Only two biomarkers had several validations: FibroTest (8 studies, 1,842 patients), and Fibroscan (5 studies, 618 patients). For the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis, the standardized area under the receiver operating curve was 0.84 (0.79–0.86) for FibroTest and 0.89 (0.83–0.96) for LSM, without significant difference. No significant factors of variability were identified for FibroTest’s performance. In conclusion, FibroTest and LSM were the most validated biomarkers of fibrosis in CHB. However, the reliability of Fibroscan must be better assessed