Limited risks of major congenital anomalies in children of mothers with IBD and effects of medications

Background & aims: Concerns persist about the risk of major congenital anomalies in children of women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and whether medication use affects risk. We assessed these risks, and variations in use of medications by women with IBD before, during, and after pregnancy. Methods: We accessed data on children born to women 15-45 y old from 1990 through 2010, using a mother-child linked dataset from an electronic database of primary care records containing medical diagnoses, events, and drug prescriptions from across the United Kingdom. We identified pregnant women with IBD, and all prescriptions for 5-aminosalicylates azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, and corticosteroids were extracted from their primary care records. We calculated risks of major congenital anomaly in children of mothers with and without IBD, and in children exposed or not exposed to 5-aminosalicylates, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, or corticosteroids during their first trimester of fetal development. Logistic regression with a generalized estimating equation was used to provide risk estimates adjusted for confounders. We calculated proportions of women taking medications before, during, and after pregnancy and assessed whether cessation was associated with subsequent disease flares. Results: Risks of a major congenital anomaly in 1703 children of mothers with IBD and 384,811 children of mothers without IBD were 2.7% and 2.8%, respectively. This corresponded to an adjusted odds ratio of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.31). In children of women with IBD, the adjusted odds ratios of a major congenital anomaly associated with drug use were 0.82 (95% CI, 0.42-1.61) for 5-aminosalicylates 0.48 (95% CI, 0.15-1.50) for corticosteroids, and 1.27 (95% CI, 0.48-3.39) for azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine. No increases in heart, limb, or genital anomalies were found in children of women with IBD; 31.2% of women discontinued 5-aminosalicylates and 24.6% discontinued azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine in early pregnancy. The risk of flares later in pregnancy was not related to cessation of medication. Conclusions: We found no evidence that IBD during pregnancy or medical therapy for IBD during pregnancy increases the risk of a major congenital anomaly in children. Patients should receive appropriate guidance on use of medication before and during pregnancy

Randomised clinical trial : A comparative dose-finding study of three arms of dual release mesalazine for maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis

Background Comparative data regarding different regimens of oral mesalazine (mesalamine) for maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis are limited. Aim To evaluate whether 3.0 g mesalazine once-daily (OD) is superior to the standard treatment of 0.5 g mesalazine three times daily (t.d.s.) and to prove the therapeutic equivalence of OD vs. t.d.s. dosing of total 1.5 g mesalazine for remission maintenance in patients with ulcerative colitis. Methods A 1-year, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy study was undertaken in patients with endoscopically and histologically confirmed ulcerative colitis in remission. Patients were randomised to oral mesalazine 3.0 g OD, 1.5 g OD or 0.5 g t.d.s. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients still in clinical remission at the final visit, with clinical relapse being defined as CAI score >4 and an increase of â¥3 from baseline. Results The primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 162/217 3.0 g OD patients (75%), 129/212 1.5 g OD patients (61%) and 150/218 0.5 g t.d.s. patients (69%) in the intention-to-treat population, and in 152/177 (86%), 121/182 (67%) and 144/185 (78%) in the per protocol population respectively; 3.0 g OD was superior to both low-dose regimens for the primary endpoint (i.e. P < 0.001, 3.0 g OD vs. 1.5 g OD; P = 0.024, 3.0 g OD vs. 0.5 g t.d.s.; superiority test, per protocol population). Safety analysis, including comprehensive renal monitoring, revealed no concern in any treatment group. Conclusion Mesalazine 3.0 g once daily was the most effective dose for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis of the three regimens assessed, with no penalty in terms of safety.publishersversionPeer reviewe

Tailoring Crohn's disease treatment : the impact of small bowel capsule endoscopy

"Article in Press"; "Epub 2014 Mar 14"BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) may detect proximal small bowel lesions that have been previously missed by ileocolonoscopy and small bowel imaging in patients with known ileal and/or colonic Crohn's disease (CD). We aimed to evaluate whether the therapeutic management is influenced by SBCE findings. METHODS: Retrospective single center study. Inclusion of consecutive patients with known non-stricturing and non-penetrating ileal and/or colonic CD, submitted to SBCE to evaluate disease extension and activity, with ≥ 1year follow-up. Lesions were classified with the Lewis score (LS) as non-significant (LS790). Therapeutic changes were assessed three months after SBCE. RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients (35±13years, 52% females) were included. At ileocolonoscopy, disease location was ileal (L1) in 60%, colonic (L2) in 10% and ileocolonic (L3) in 30% of the patients. In 33 patients (66%) SBCE detected significant proximal lesions previously missed by other modalities. The proportion of patients on thiopurines and/or biologics before SBCE was 2/50 (4%); this was significantly higher three months after SBCE, 15/50 (30%), p=0.023. Treatment with thiopurines and/or biologics was started more often in patients with proximal small bowel lesions [13/33 (39%) vs. 1/17 (6%), p=0.011, relative risk (RR) 6.5], particularly when severe (6%, 36% and 45% of patients with non-significant, mild and moderate-to-severe inflammation, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SBCE diagnoses previously undetected lesions and it influences therapeutic management of CD, triggering an earlier introduction of immunomodulators and/or biological therapy

Once versus three times daily dosing of oral budesonide for active Crohn's disease : A double-blind, double-dummy, randomised trial

Note: J.Pokrotnieks is in the list of the main authors of the article, as well as in the list of International Budenofalk Study Group collaboration list. His surname is made visible as the main author in this bibliographic record. Funding Information: The study was funded by Dr Falk Pharma GmbH, Freiburg, Germany . The study sponsor contributed to the design of the study in collaboration with the authors, funded the analysis of the data by an independent biostatistics company, worked in conjunction with the authors to interpret the data, and reviewed the draft manuscript. The sponsor was not involved in data collection. The final decision to publish was made by the first author (AD).Background: Oral budesonide 9. mg/day represents first-line treatment of mild-to-moderately active ileocolonic Crohn's disease. However, there is no precise recommendation for budesonide dosing due to lack of comparative data. A once-daily (OD) 9. mg dose may improve adherence and thereby efficacy. Methods: An eight-week, double-blind, double-dummy randomised trial compared budesonide 9. mg OD versus 3. mg three-times daily (TID) in patients with mild-to-moderately active ileocolonic Crohn's disease. Primary endpoint was clinical remission defined as CDAI < 150 at week 8 (last observation carried forward). Results: The final intent-to-treat population comprised 471 patients (238 [9 mg OD], 233 [3 mg TID]). The confirmatory population for the primary endpoint analysis was the interim per protocol population (n = 377; 188 [9 mg OD], 189 [3 mg TID]), in which the primary endpoint was statistically non-inferior with budesonide 9. mg OD versus 3. mg TID. Clinical remission was achieved in 71.3% versus 75.1%, a difference of - 3.9% (95% CI [- 14.6%; 6.4%]; p = 0.020 for non-inferiority). The mean (SD) time to remission was 21.9 (13.8) days versus 21.4 (14.6) days with budesonide 9 mg OD versus 3. mg TID, respectively. In a subpopulation of 122 patients with baseline SES-CD ulcer score ≥ 1, complete mucosal healing occurred in 32.8% (21/64) on 9 mg OD and 41.4% (24/58) on 3 mg TID; deep remission (mucosal healing and clinical remission) was observed in 26.6% (17/64) and 32.8% (19/58) of patients, respectively. Treatment-emergent suspected adverse drug reactions were reported in 4.6% of 9 mg OD and 4.7% of 3 mg TID patients. Conclusions: Budesonide at the recommended dose of 9 mg/day can be administered OD without impaired efficacy and safety compared to 3 mg TID dosing in mild-to-moderately active Crohn's disease.publishersversionPeer reviewe

A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial to assess mercaptopurine versus placebo to prevent or delay recurrence of Crohn's disease following surgical resection (TOPPIC)

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic, relapsing, inflammatory bowel disease. Up to 65% of patients with CD require an operation to control the disease within 10 years. Both endoscopic and clinical recurrence is common within 2 years of operation, with re-operation rates cumulating at 5% of patients per year