Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party

Amicus ("friend of the court") brief written by the United States in support of neither party in AMP v. Myriad Genetics (No. 2010-1406)

Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party

Amicus ("friend of the court") brief written by the United States in support of petitioners in AMP v. Myriad Genetics (Supreme Court Case Docket No. 12-398)

Brief for Respondents, Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 US 306 (2003) (No. 02-241).

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether this Court should reaffirm its decision in Regents of University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) and hold that the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body to an institution of higher education, its students, and the public it serves, are sufficiently compelling to permit the school to consider race and/or ethnicity as one of many factors in making admissions decisions through a properly devised admissions program. 2. Whether the Court of Appeals correctly held that the University of Michigan Law School\u27s admissions program is properly devised

Brief for Respondents, Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 US 306 (2003) (No. 02-241).

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether this Court should reaffirm its decision in Regents of University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) and hold that the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body to an institution of higher education, its students, and the public it serves, are sufficiently compelling to permit the school to consider race and/or ethnicity as one of many factors in making admissions decisions through a properly devised admissions program. 2. Whether the Court of Appeals correctly held that the University of Michigan Law School\u27s admissions program is properly devised

Managing for engagement

This second edition offers a comprehensive coverage of employee performance and reward, presenting the material in a conceptually integrated way