28 research outputs found
Regional Strategies of Multinational Pharmaceutical Firms
This paper examines the R&D and strategies of the worldâs largest firms in the pharmaceuticals sector and finds a high degree of intra-regional sales. R&D and sales are more concentrated within North America and Europe than in Asia. In addition, the relative size of the U.S. market, compared to other parts of the triad, creates imbalances with respect to R&D, sales and international strategy.
ComunicacioÌn en Nueva EspanÌa: Una metodologiÌa desde la complejidad
El propoÌsito de esta tesis es integrar conceptos de sistemas complejos a las metodologiÌas utilizadas en las ciencias sociales y las humanidades. En particular, se pretende poner el eÌnfasis en la naturaleza de los seres humanos, sus interacciones, procesos de auto-ordenacioÌn y emergencia y fenoÌmenos sisteÌmicos como path-dependence y retornos crecientes, de manera que el resultado contribuya a una metodologiÌa para el estudio de la complejidad de los sistemas de cultura. El trabajo estaÌ dividido en dos partes. La primera parte introduce conceptos desarrollados en investigaciones de sistemas complejos y proporciona ejemplos de su aplicacioÌn a las ciencias sociales y humanidades. La segunda parte presenta los beneficios de utilizar estos conceptos en estudios especiÌficos del aÌmbito de las ciencias sociales y las humanidades y aplica estos conceptos a tres estudios de casos relacionados con la comunicacioÌn en la eÌpoca colonial en MesoameÌrica. Los tres estudios de caso son: (1) Aprendizaje de lenguas indiÌgenas por parte de espanÌoles en Nueva EspanÌa en los primeros cien anÌos despueÌs de la conquista; (2) Textos cosmogoÌnico-religiosos de las civilizaciones nahuas y espanÌolas. Narrativas inestables como ejes simboÌlicos de sistemas de comunicacioÌn socializadores y; (3) La coexistencia de dos sistemas de contaduriÌa, el espanÌol e indiÌgena, y la adaptacioÌn de eÌstos en un ambiente de contacto entre dos cultura
Juan Everardo Nithard, protagonista de «La estatua de Prometeo» de Calderón de la Barca
Este artĂculo parte de la polĂ©mica que se desarrolla alrededor de la interpretaciĂłn que hace Greer del texto polĂtico en La estatua de Prometeo. En su lectura, Greer asocia al personaje principal, el ilustrado Prometeo, con Don Juan JosĂ© de Austria, enemigo de la Reina, a la vez que argumenta que la obra lo sugiere como la mejor opciĂłn para resolver los problemas del imperio. Este artĂculo provee una interpretaciĂłn alternativa que alinea el mensaje con la posiciĂłn polĂtica y personal de la Reina sobre los eventos polĂticos que se estĂĄn tratando. Esta nueva lectura resuelve los elementos mĂĄs polĂ©micos que derivan de la interpretaciĂłn de Greer, lo que tiene consecuencias en como entendemos el nivel de libertad expresiĂłn que disfrutaban los dramaturgos del Siglo de Oro.This article discusses Greerâs controversial interpretation of La estatua de Prometeoâs political text, which argued that the protagonist, the enlightened Prometeo, is a dramatization of the QueenÂŽs enemy, Don Juan JosĂ© of Austria and that CalderĂłn is suggesting him as the best option for governing the troubled Spanish Empire. This article provides an alternative interpretation that better aligns with the personal and political position of the Queen regarding the political events that are being dramatized and resolves the contradictions that arose from Greerâs interpretations. This, in turn, contributes to our understanding of the level of freedom of expression enjoyed by Golden Age playwrights
El currĂculum de Ciencias Naturales de la EducaciĂłn Secundaria. Retos y desafĂos de cara al futuro : dossier
Fil: Ferreyra, Horacio Ademar. Universidad CatĂłlica de CĂłrdoba. Facultad de EducaciĂłn; Argentin
Recommended from our members
Effect of Hydrocortisone on Mortality and Organ Support in Patients With Severe COVID-19: The REMAP-CAP COVID-19 Corticosteroid Domain Randomized Clinical Trial.
Importance: Evidence regarding corticosteroid use for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is limited. Objective: To determine whether hydrocortisone improves outcome for patients with severe COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: An ongoing adaptive platform trial testing multiple interventions within multiple therapeutic domains, for example, antiviral agents, corticosteroids, or immunoglobulin. Between March 9 and June 17, 2020, 614 adult patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled and randomized within at least 1 domain following admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) for respiratory or cardiovascular organ support at 121 sites in 8 countries. Of these, 403 were randomized to open-label interventions within the corticosteroid domain. The domain was halted after results from another trial were released. Follow-up ended August 12, 2020. Interventions: The corticosteroid domain randomized participants to a fixed 7-day course of intravenous hydrocortisone (50 mg or 100 mg every 6 hours) (nâ=â143), a shock-dependent course (50 mg every 6 hours when shock was clinically evident) (nâ=â152), or no hydrocortisone (nâ=â108). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was organ support-free days (days alive and free of ICU-based respiratory or cardiovascular support) within 21 days, where patients who died were assigned -1 day. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model that included all patients enrolled with severe COVID-19, adjusting for age, sex, site, region, time, assignment to interventions within other domains, and domain and intervention eligibility. Superiority was defined as the posterior probability of an odds ratio greater than 1 (threshold for trial conclusion of superiority >99%). Results: After excluding 19 participants who withdrew consent, there were 384 patients (mean age, 60 years; 29% female) randomized to the fixed-dose (nâ=â137), shock-dependent (nâ=â146), and no (nâ=â101) hydrocortisone groups; 379 (99%) completed the study and were included in the analysis. The mean age for the 3 groups ranged between 59.5 and 60.4 years; most patients were male (range, 70.6%-71.5%); mean body mass index ranged between 29.7 and 30.9; and patients receiving mechanical ventilation ranged between 50.0% and 63.5%. For the fixed-dose, shock-dependent, and no hydrocortisone groups, respectively, the median organ support-free days were 0 (IQR, -1 to 15), 0 (IQR, -1 to 13), and 0 (-1 to 11) days (composed of 30%, 26%, and 33% mortality rates and 11.5, 9.5, and 6 median organ support-free days among survivors). The median adjusted odds ratio and bayesian probability of superiority were 1.43 (95% credible interval, 0.91-2.27) and 93% for fixed-dose hydrocortisone, respectively, and were 1.22 (95% credible interval, 0.76-1.94) and 80% for shock-dependent hydrocortisone compared with no hydrocortisone. Serious adverse events were reported in 4 (3%), 5 (3%), and 1 (1%) patients in the fixed-dose, shock-dependent, and no hydrocortisone groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with severe COVID-19, treatment with a 7-day fixed-dose course of hydrocortisone or shock-dependent dosing of hydrocortisone, compared with no hydrocortisone, resulted in 93% and 80% probabilities of superiority with regard to the odds of improvement in organ support-free days within 21 days. However, the trial was stopped early and no treatment strategy met prespecified criteria for statistical superiority, precluding definitive conclusions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02735707
Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study
Background: The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on postoperative recovery needs to be understood to inform clinical decision making during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reports 30-day mortality and pulmonary complication rates in patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: This international, multicentre, cohort study at 235 hospitals in 24 countries included all patients undergoing surgery who had SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality and was assessed in all enrolled patients. The main secondary outcome measure was pulmonary complications, defined as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or unexpected postoperative ventilation. Findings: This analysis includes 1128 patients who had surgery between Jan 1 and March 31, 2020, of whom 835 (74·0%) had emergency surgery and 280 (24·8%) had elective surgery. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed preoperatively in 294 (26·1%) patients. 30-day mortality was 23·8% (268 of 1128). Pulmonary complications occurred in 577 (51·2%) of 1128 patients; 30-day mortality in these patients was 38·0% (219 of 577), accounting for 81·7% (219 of 268) of all deaths. In adjusted analyses, 30-day mortality was associated with male sex (odds ratio 1·75 [95% CI 1·28â2·40], p\textless0·0001), age 70 years or older versus younger than 70 years (2·30 [1·65â3·22], p\textless0·0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 3â5 versus grades 1â2 (2·35 [1·57â3·53], p\textless0·0001), malignant versus benign or obstetric diagnosis (1·55 [1·01â2·39], p=0·046), emergency versus elective surgery (1·67 [1·06â2·63], p=0·026), and major versus minor surgery (1·52 [1·01â2·31], p=0·047). Interpretation: Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality. Thresholds for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic should be higher than during normal practice, particularly in men aged 70 years and older. Consideration should be given for postponing non-urgent procedures and promoting non-operative treatment to delay or avoid the need for surgery. Funding: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, NIHR Academy, Sarcoma UK, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research
Escuela secundaria posible
REPENSAR LA EDUCACIĂN SECUNDARIA
ColecciĂłn de infografĂas II Parte Seguimiento de medios
de comunicaciĂłn 2017-2019Fil: Ferreyra, Horacio Ademar. Universidad CatĂłlica de CĂłrdoba. Facultad de EducaciĂłn; ArgentinaFil: Di Francesco, Adriana Carlota. Universidad CatĂłlica de CĂłrdoba. Facultad de EducaciĂłn; ArgentinaFil: Equipo de investigaciĂłn en educaciĂłn de adolescentes y jĂłvenes. Unidad Asociada CONICET. Universidad CatĂłlica de CĂłrdoba. Facultad de EducaciĂłn; Argentina
La renovaciĂłn de la palabra en el bicentenario de la Argentina : los colores de la mirada lingĂŒĂstica
El libro reĂșne trabajos en los que se exponen resultados de investigaciones presentadas por investigadores de Argentina, Chile, Brasil, España, Italia y Alemania en el XII Congreso de la Sociedad Argentina de LingĂŒĂstica (SAL), Bicentenario: la renovaciĂłn de la palabra, realizado en Mendoza, Argentina, entre el 6 y el 9 de abril de 2010. Las temĂĄticas abordadas en los 167 capĂtulos muestran las grandes lĂneas de investigaciĂłn que se desarrollan fundamentalmente en nuestro paĂs, pero tambiĂ©n en los otros paĂses mencionados arriba, y señalan ademĂĄs las ĂĄreas que reciĂ©n se inician, con poca tradiciĂłn en nuestro paĂs y que deberĂan fomentarse. Los trabajos aquĂ publicados se enmarcan dentro de las siguientes disciplinas y/o campos de investigaciĂłn: FonologĂa, Sintaxis, SemĂĄntica y PragmĂĄtica, LingĂŒĂstica Cognitiva, AnĂĄlisis del Discurso, PsicolingĂŒĂstica, AdquisiciĂłn de la Lengua, SociolingĂŒĂstica y DialectologĂa, DidĂĄctica de la lengua, LingĂŒĂstica Aplicada, LingĂŒĂstica Computacional, Historia de la Lengua y la LingĂŒĂstica, Lenguas AborĂgenes, FilosofĂa del Lenguaje, LexicologĂa y TerminologĂa
Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker initiation on organ support-free days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19
IMPORTANCE Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.
Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 nonâcritically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022).
INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (nâ=â257), ARB (nâ=â248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; nâ=â10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; nâ=â264) for up to 10 days.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ supportâfree days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes.
RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ supportâfree days among critically ill patients was 10 (â1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (nâ=â231), 8 (â1 to 17) in the ARB group (nâ=â217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (nâ=â231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ supportâfree days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0273570
Cognition, Adherence and Stigma in Schizophrenia. The COAST study
Schizophrenia is a serious stigmatizing illness. Antipsychotic medication is a cornerstone in treatment. Non-adherence is a predictor of poor outcome leading to relapse, poor functioning, high mortality and costs. Reported adherence rates vary (8-86%). Most adherence studies are small, short and use subjective adherence measures known to underestimate non-adherence. The overall aim of this thesis is to increase knowledge about factors related to adherence to oral antipsychotics and to stigma in a large cohort of patients with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychosis, followed for one year. The specific aims are: to examine adherence to antipsychotics and to compare objective and subjective measures of adherence; to investigate predictors of adherence; to explore stigma and discriminaÂŹtion and to test for potential associations between a) different types of stigma and b) stigma and adherence; to study stigma experiences and the relationship between associated stigma and burden in relatives to persons with schizophrenia.
Adherence was monitored for a year in 117 outpatients at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Adherence was determined by the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMSÂź), considered the reference standard, pill count, a composite measure of plasma levels and adherence to lab visits, and patient, staff, psychiatrist and close informant ratings. Symptom burden, insight, cognition, psychosoÂŹcial function (PSP) and side effects were rated (n=112). Experiences of stigma (n=111) and drug attitude (using the Drug Attitude Inventory, DAI-10) of patients (n=112) and informants (n=65), as well as burden in relatives (n=65) were assessed.
Non-adherence (MEMSÂź adherence †0.80) was observed in 27% of the patients. In Study I MEMSÂź adherence was highly correlated with pill count but very poorly correlated with the plasma level measure. In Study II low patient-rated DAI-10 scores and poor function emerged as predictors of non-adherence. Positive symptom burden, psychiatric side effects, lack of insight and low DAI-10 informant scores also predicted non-adherence. No association between stigma and adherence could be shown in Study III. Almost two-thirds of the patients reported discrimination in social relationships and âanticipated stigmaâ. One-half felt discriminated against by mental health staff. In Study IV a fifth of the relatives avoided situations that might elicit stigma, but there was no association between experienced or anticipated stigma and burden. Stigma impact regarding the relativesâ personal quality of life was associated with overall burden.
In conclusion, structured pill count might be a useful clinical tool to objectively follow adherence. The large discrepancy between MEMSÂź and the plasma level measure needs further study. Positive drug attitude in combination with good psychosocial functioning emerged as predictors of MEMSÂź monitored adherence. Associations were found neither between stigma and adherence nor the relativesâ stigma and burden, and both phenomena need to be investigated further