Using the Achievement of Therapeutic Objectives Scale to Operationalize 'Unlocking' of the Unconscious

Objective:Intensive short-term dynamic therapy (ISTDP) is an evidence-based psychotherapy supported by a growing literature base. “Unlocking” of the unconscious is a central process in ISTDP. This study sought to operationalize the concept of unlocking by adopting a detailed process analysis of the early phase of therapy for four patients by using a structured measure, the Achievement of Therapeutic Objectives Scale (ATOS).Methods:The ATOS is a measure of psychotherapy processes. A profile of the scale’s cutoff scores was developed to identify episodes of unlocking in videos of 28 ISTDP therapy sessions. Expert raters assessed for episodes of unlocking for up to the first 10 recorded psychotherapy sessions of four participants in a naturalistic private practice setting. Sessions were then rated with the ATOS profile, and these ratings were compared with expert ratings to assess the sensitivity of the ATOS in identifying episodes of unlocking.Results:Using the profile of subscale cutoff scores, the ATOS successfully identified seven of 11 episodes of unlocking. A visual analysis of descriptive data indicated that average ATOS subscale scores consistently identified episodes of unlocking and the presence of complex feelings of rage and guilt about the rage. Expert ratings of unlocking and the ATOS ratings were found to have high interrater reliability.Conclusions:This pilot study suggests that the ATOS may be adapted to provide a profile that can identify episodes of unlocking of the unconscious. The proposed measure is worthy of further study, representing an initial step toward operationalizing a central process associated with positive outcomes in ISTDP

Enhancing cognitive-behavioural therapy for recurrent headache: Design of a randomised controlled trial

Background: We have argued against the traditional approach of counselling avoidance of all triggers of headaches and migraine. Problems with this approach include the impossibility of avoiding all triggers and the high costs associated with trying to do so, and that avoidance could lead to reduced tolerance for the triggers. We have developed an alternative approach called Learning to Cope with Triggers (LCT) that encourages avoidance of triggers that are detrimental to health and wellbeing, but uses exposure to other triggers to desensitise headache sufferers to the triggers. This approach has been shown to be more effective than advising avoidance of all triggers. Trigger management is only one component of a comprehensive treatment program and the current study is designed to evaluate a new approach to treating headaches in which LCT has been integrated into an established cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) package (LCT/CBT). Methods/Design: A target sample of 120 adult participants who suffer from migraine or tension-type headache, at least six days per month, and have done so for at least 12 months will be recruited. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: LCT/CBT; Avoid/CBT (CBT combined with instructions to avoid all triggers); and waiting-list control. Measures will include: daily diaries for recording headaches, triggers and medication consumption; headache disability and quality of life; trigger avoidance; locus of control and self-efficacy; and coping strategies. Treatment will involve 12 60-minute sessions scheduled weekly. Assessment will be completed before and after treatment, and at 4 and 12 month follow-up. The data will be analysed to determine which approach is most effective, and predictors of response to treatment. Discussion: Migraine and tension-type headache are common and can be disabling. CBT has been demonstrated to be an efficacious treatment for both disorders. However, there is room for improvement. This study aims to increase the efficacy of behavioural approaches and identify factors predictive of a positive response