492 research outputs found

    Does Board Independence Reduce the Cost of Debt?

    Get PDF
    Using the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the associated change in listing standards as a natural experiment, we find that while board independence decreases the cost of debt when credit conditions are strong or leverage low, it increases the cost of debt when credit conditions are poor or leverage high. We also document that independent directors set corporate policies that increase firm risk. These results suggest that, acting in the interest of shareholders, independent directors are increasingly costly to bondholders with the intensification of the agency conflict between these two stakeholders

    Real earnings management activities prior to bondissuance

    Get PDF
    We examine real activities manipulation by firms prior to their debt issuances andhow such manipulation activities affect bond yield spreads. We find that bond-issuing firmsincrease their real activities manipulation in the five quarters leading to a bond issuance. Wedocument an inverse association between yield spread and pre-issue real activities manipula-tion, i.e., firms engaged in abnormally high levels of real activities manipulation are associatedwith subsequent lower cost of debt

    Influencia del gobierno corporativo en el costo de capital proveniente de la emisión de deuda

    Get PDF
    Este documento estudia la relación entre la aplicación de prácticas de gobierno corporativo, incluidasen el código de mejores prácticas corporativas (Código País), y el costo de capital proveniente de deudaen empresas listadas en la Bolsa de Valores de Colombia. Usando modelos de regresión, se encuentraevidencia que indica la existencia de una relación inversa entre el nivel de aplicación de prácticas degobierno corporativo y el costo de la deuda en emisores no financieros (empresas pertenecientes alsector real y de servicios públicos). Para el caso de los emisores financieros, no se encuentra evidencia deesta situación

    Points to consider when self-assessing your empirical accounting research

    Get PDF
    We provide a list of points to consider (PTCs) to help researchers self-assess whether they have addressed certain common issues that arise frequently in accounting research seminars and in reviewers’ and editors’ comments on papers submitted to journals. Anticipating and addressing such issues can help accounting researchers, especially doctoral students and junior faculty members, convert an initial empirical accounting research idea into a thoughtful and carefully designed study. Doing this also allows outside readers to provide more beneficial feedback rather than commenting on the common issues that could have been dealt with in advance. The list, provided in the appendix, consists of five sections: Research Question; Theory; Contribution; Research Design and Analysis; and Interpretation of Results and Conclusions. In each section, we include critical items that readers, journal referees, and seminar participants are likely to raise and offer suggestions for how to address them. The text elaborates on some of the more challenging items, such as how to increase a study's contribution, and provides examples of how such issues have been effectively addressed in previous accounting studie
    corecore