Beyond the arithmetic constraint: depth-optimal mapping of logic chains in reconfigurable fabrics

Look-up table based FPGAs have migrated from a niche technology for design prototyping to a valuable end-product component and, in some cases, a replacement for general purpose processors and ASICs alike. One way architects have bridged the performance gap between FPGAs and ASICs is through the inclusion of specialized components such as multipliers, RAM modules, and microcontrollers. Another dedicated structure that has become standard in reconfigurable fabrics is the arithmetic carry chain. Currently, it is only used to map arithmetic operations as identified by HDL macros. For non-arithmetic operations, it is an idle but potentially powerful resource.;Obstacles to using the carry chain for generic logic operations include lack of architectural and computer-aided design support. Current carry-select architectures facilitate carry chain reuse, although they do so only for (K-1)-input operations. Additionally, hardware description language (HDL) macros are the only recourse for a designer wishing to map generic logic chains in a carry-select architecture. A novel architecture that allows the full K-input operational capacity of the carry chain to be harnessed is presented as a solution to current architectural limitations. It is shown to have negligible impact on logic element area and delay. Using only two additional 2:1 pass transistor multiplexers, it enables the transmission of a K-input operation to the carry chain and general routing simultaneously. To successfully identify logic chains in an arbitrary Boolean network, ChainMap is presented as a novel technology mapping algorithm. ChainMap creates delay-optimal generic logic chains in polynomial time without HDL macros. It maps both arithmetic and non-arithmetic logic chains whenever depth increasing nodes, which increase logic depth but not routing depth, are encountered. Use of the chain is not reserved for arithmetic, but rather any set of gates exhibiting similar characteristics. By using the carry chain as a generic, near zero-delay adjacent cell interconnection structure a potential average optimal speedup of 1.4x is revealed. Post place and route experiments indicate that ChainMap solutions perform similarly to HDL chains when cluster resources are abundant and significantly better in cluster-constrained arrays

Satisfiability Logic Analysis Via Radial Basis Function Neural Network with Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm

Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN) is a variant of artificial neural network (ANN) paradigm, utilized in a plethora of fields of studies such as engineering, technology and science. 2 Satisfiability (2SAT) programming has been coined as a prominent logical rule that defines the identity of RBFNN. In this research, a swarm-based searching algorithm namely, the Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) will be introduced to facilitate the training of RBFNN. Worth mentioning that ABC is a new population-based metaheuristics algorithm inspired by the intelligent comportment of the honey bee hives. The optimization pattern in ABC was found fruitful in RBFNN since ABC reduces the complexity of the RBFNN in optimizing important parameters. The effectiveness of ABC in RBFNN has been examined in terms of various performance evaluations. Therefore, the simulation has proved that the ABC complied efficiently in tandem with the Radial Basis Neural Network with 2SAT according to various evaluations such as the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Sum of Squares Error (SSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and CPU Time. Overall, the experimental results have demonstrated the capability of ABC in enhancing the learning phase of RBFNN-2SAT as compared to the Genetic Algorithm (GA), Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm

Parallel and Distributed Computing

The 14 chapters presented in this book cover a wide variety of representative works ranging from hardware design to application development. Particularly, the topics that are addressed are programmable and reconfigurable devices and systems, dependability of GPUs (General Purpose Units), network topologies, cache coherence protocols, resource allocation, scheduling algorithms, peertopeer networks, largescale network simulation, and parallel routines and algorithms. In this way, the articles included in this book constitute an excellent reference for engineers and researchers who have particular interests in each of these topics in parallel and distributed computing

Design Automation and Application for Emerging Reconfigurable Nanotechnologies

In the last few decades, two major phenomena have revolutionized the electronic industry – the ever-increasing dependence on electronic circuits and the Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) downscaling. These two phenomena have been complementing each other in a way that while electronics, in general, have demanded more computations per functional unit, CMOS downscaling has aptly supported such needs. However, while the computational demand is still rising exponentially, CMOS downscaling is reaching its physical limits. Hence, the need to explore viable emerging nanotechnologies is more imperative than ever. This thesis focuses on streamlining the existing design automation techniques for a class of emerging reconfigurable nanotechnologies. Transistors based on this technology exhibit duality in conduction, i.e. they can be configured dynamically either as a p-type or an n-type device on the application of an external bias. Owing to this dynamic reconfiguration, these transistors are also referred to as Reconfigurable Field-Effect Transistors (RFETs). Exploring and developing new technologies just like CMOS, require tackling two main challenges – first, design automation flow has to be modified to enable tailor- made circuit designs. Second, possible application opportunities should be explored where such technologies can outsmart the existing CMOS technologies. This thesis targets the above two objectives for emerging reconfigurable nanotechnologies by proposing approaches for enabling an Electronic Design Automation (EDA) flow for circuits based on RFETs and exploring hardware security as an application that exploits the transistor-level dynamic reconfiguration offered by this technology. This thesis explains the bottom-up approach adopted to propose a logic synthesis flow by identifying new logic gates and circuit design paradigms that can particularly exploit the dynamic reconfiguration offered by these novel nanotechnologies. This led to the subsequent need of finding natural Boolean logic abstraction for emerging reconfigurable nanotechnologies as it is shown that the existing abstraction of negative unate logic for CMOS technologies is sub-optimal for RFETs-based circuits. In this direction, it has been shown that duality in Boolean logic is a natural abstraction for this technology and can truly represent the duality in conduction offered by individual transistors. Finding this abstraction paved the way for defining suitable primitives and proposing various algorithms for logic synthesis and technology mapping. The following step is to explore compatible physical synthesis flow for emerging reconfigurable nanotechnologies. Using silicon nanowire-based RFETs, .lef and .lib files have been provided which can provide an end-to-end flow to generate .GDSII file for circuits exclusively based on RFETs. Additionally, new approaches have been explored to improve placement and routing for circuits based on reconfigurable nanotechnologies. It has been demonstrated how these approaches led to superior results as compared to the native flow meant for CMOS. Lastly, the unique property of transistor-level reconfiguration offered by RFETs is utilized to implement efficient Intellectual Property (IP) protection schemes against adversarial attacks. The ability to control the conduction of individual transistors can be argued as one of the impactful features of this technology and suitably fits into the paradigm of security measures. Prior security schemes based on CMOS technology often come with large overheads in terms of area, power, and delay. In contrast, RFETs-based hardware security measures such as logic locking, split manufacturing, etc. proposed in this thesis, demonstrate affordable security solutions with low overheads. Overall, this thesis lays a strong foundation for the two main objectives – design automation, and hardware security as an application, to push emerging reconfigurable nanotechnologies for commercial integration. Additionally, contributions done in this thesis are made available under open-source licenses so as to foster new research directions and collaborations.:Abstract List of Figures List of Tables 1 Introduction 1.1 What are emerging reconfigurable nanotechnologies? 1.2 Why does this technology look so promising? 1.3 Electronics Design Automation 1.4 The game of see-saw: key challenges vs benefits for emerging reconfigurable nanotechnologies 1.4.1 Abstracting ambipolarity in logic gate designs 1.4.2 Enabling electronic design automation for RFETs 1.4.3 Enhanced functionality: a suitable fit for hardware security applications 1.5 Research questions 1.6 Entire RFET-centric EDA Flow 1.7 Key Contributions and Thesis Organization 2 Preliminaries 2.1 Reconfigurable Nanotechnology 2.1.1 1D devices 2.1.2 2D devices 2.1.3 Factors favoring circuit-flexibility 2.2 Feasibility aspects of RFET technology 2.3 Logic Synthesis Preliminaries 2.3.1 Circuit Model 2.3.2 Boolean Algebra 2.3.3 Monotone Function and the property of Unateness 2.3.4 Logic Representations 3 Exploring Circuit Design Topologies for RFETs 3.1 Contributions 3.2 Organization 3.3 Related Works 3.4 Exploring design topologies for combinational circuits: functionality-enhanced logic gates 3.4.1 List of Combinational Functionality-Enhanced Logic Gates based on RFETs 3.4.2 Estimation of gate delay using the logical effort theory 3.5 Invariable design of Inverters 3.6 Sequential Circuits 3.6.1 Dual edge-triggered TSPC-based D-flip flop 3.6.2 Exploiting RFET’s ambipolarity for metastability 3.7 Evaluations 3.7.1 Evaluation of combinational logic gates 3.7.2 Novel design of 1-bit ALU 3.7.3 Comparison of the sequential circuit with an equivalent CMOS-based design 3.8 Concluding remarks 4 Standard Cells and Technology Mapping 4.1 Contributions 4.2 Organization 4.3 Related Work 4.4 Standard cells based on RFETs 4.4.1 Interchangeable Pull-Up and Pull-Down Networks 4.4.2 Reconfigurable Truth-Table 4.5 Distilling standard cells 4.6 HOF-based Technology Mapping Flow for RFETs-based circuits 4.6.1 Area adjustments through inverter sharings 4.6.2 Technology Mapping Flow 4.6.3 Realizing Parameters For The Generic Library 4.6.4 Defining RFETs-based Genlib for HOF-based mapping 4.7 Experiments 4.7.1 Experiment 1: Distilling standard-cells from a benchmark suite 4.7.2 Experiment 2A: HOF-based mapping . 4.7.3 Experiment 2B: Using the distilled standard-cells during mapping 4.8 Concluding Remarks 5 Logic Synthesis with XOR-Majority Graphs 5.1 Contributions 5.2 Organization 5.3 Motivation 5.4 Background and Preliminaries 5.4.1 Terminologies 5.4.2 Self-duality in NPN classes 5.4.3 Majority logic synthesis 5.4.4 Earlier work on XMG 5.4.5 Classification of Boolean functions 5.5 Preserving Self-Duality 5.5.1 During logic synthesis 5.5.2 During versatile technology mapping 5.6 Advanced Logic synthesis techniques 5.6.1 XMG resubstitution 5.6.2 Exact XMG rewriting 5.7 Logic representation-agnostic Mapping 5.7.1 Versatile Mapper 5.7.2 Support of supergates 5.8 Creating Self-dual Benchmarks 5.9 Experiments 5.9.1 XMG-based Flow 5.9.2 Experimental Setup 5.9.3 Synthetic self-dual benchmarks 5.9.4 Cryptographic benchmark suite 5.10 Concluding remarks and future research directions 6 Physical synthesis flow and liberty generation 6.1 Contributions 6.2 Organization 6.3 Background and Related Work 6.3.1 Related Works 6.3.2 Motivation 6.4 Silicon Nanowire Reconfigurable Transistors 6.5 Layouts for Logic Gates 6.5.1 Layouts for Static Functional Logic Gates 6.5.2 Layout for Reconfigurable Logic Gate 6.6 Table Model for Silicon Nanowire RFETs 6.7 Exploring Approaches for Physical Synthesis 6.7.1 Using the Standard Place & Route Flow 6.7.2 Open-source Flow 6.7.3 Concept of Driver Cells 6.7.4 Native Approach 6.7.5 Island-based Approach 6.7.6 Utilization Factor 6.7.7 Placement of the Island on the Chip 6.8 Experiments 6.8.1 Preliminary comparison with CMOS technology 6.8.2 Evaluating different physical synthesis approaches 6.9 Results and discussions 6.9.1 Parameters Which Affect The Area 6.9.2 Use of Germanium Nanowires Channels 6.10 Concluding Remarks 7 Polymporphic Primitives for Hardware Security 7.1 Contributions 7.2 Organization 7.3 The Shift To Explore Emerging Technologies For Security 7.4 Background 7.4.1 IP protection schemes 7.4.2 Preliminaries 7.5 Security Promises 7.5.1 RFETs for logic locking (transistor-level locking) 7.5.2 RFETs for split manufacturing 7.6 Security Vulnerabilities 7.6.1 Realization of short-circuit and open-circuit scenarios in an RFET-based inverter 7.6.2 Circuit evaluation on sub-circuits 7.6.3 Reliability concerns: A consequence of short-circuit scenario 7.6.4 Implication of the proposed security vulnerability 7.7 Analytical Evaluation 7.7.1 Investigating the security promises 7.7.2 Investigating the security vulnerabilities 7.8 Concluding remarks and future research directions 8 Conclusion 8.1 Concluding Remarks 8.2 Directions for Future Work Appendices A Distilling standard-cells B RFETs-based Genlib C Layout Extraction File (.lef) for Silicon Nanowire-based RFET D Liberty (.lib) file for Silicon Nanowire-based RFET

Low-Power and Programmable Analog Circuitry for Wireless Sensors

Embedding networks of secure, wirelessly-connected sensors and actuators will help us to conscientiously manage our local and extended environments. One major challenge for this vision is to create networks of wireless sensor devices that provide maximal knowledge of their environment while using only the energy that is available within that environment. In this work, it is argued that the energy constraints in wireless sensor design are best addressed by incorporating analog signal processors. The low power-consumption of an analog signal processor allows persistent monitoring of multiple sensors while the device\u27s analog-to-digital converter, microcontroller, and transceiver are all in sleep mode. This dissertation describes the development of analog signal processing integrated circuits for wireless sensor networks. Specific technology problems that are addressed include reconfigurable processing architectures for low-power sensing applications, as well as the development of reprogrammable biasing for analog circuits

Low-Power and Programmable Analog Circuitry for Wireless Sensors

Embedding networks of secure, wirelessly-connected sensors and actuators will help us to conscientiously manage our local and extended environments. One major challenge for this vision is to create networks of wireless sensor devices that provide maximal knowledge of their environment while using only the energy that is available within that environment. In this work, it is argued that the energy constraints in wireless sensor design are best addressed by incorporating analog signal processors. The low power-consumption of an analog signal processor allows persistent monitoring of multiple sensors while the device\u27s analog-to-digital converter, microcontroller, and transceiver are all in sleep mode. This dissertation describes the development of analog signal processing integrated circuits for wireless sensor networks. Specific technology problems that are addressed include reconfigurable processing architectures for low-power sensing applications, as well as the development of reprogrammable biasing for analog circuits

A Field Guide to Genetic Programming

xiv, 233 p. : il. ; 23 cm.Libro ElectrónicoA Field Guide to Genetic Programming (ISBN 978-1-4092-0073-4) is an introduction to genetic programming (GP). GP is a systematic, domain-independent method for getting computers to solve problems automatically starting from a high-level statement of what needs to be done. Using ideas from natural evolution, GP starts from an ooze of random computer programs, and progressively refines them through processes of mutation and sexual recombination, until solutions emerge. All this without the user having to know or specify the form or structure of solutions in advance. GP has generated a plethora of human-competitive results and applications, including novel scientific discoveries and patentable inventions. The authorsIntroduction -- Representation, initialisation and operators in Tree-based GP -- Getting ready to run genetic programming -- Example genetic programming run -- Alternative initialisations and operators in Tree-based GP -- Modular, grammatical and developmental Tree-based GP -- Linear and graph genetic programming -- Probalistic genetic programming -- Multi-objective genetic programming -- Fast and distributed genetic programming -- GP theory and its applications -- Applications -- Troubleshooting GP -- Conclusions.Contents xi 1 Introduction 1.1 Genetic Programming in a Nutshell 1.2 Getting Started 1.3 Prerequisites 1.4 Overview of this Field Guide I Basics 2 Representation, Initialisation and GP 2.1 Representation 2.2 Initialising the Population 2.3 Selection 2.4 Recombination and Mutation Operators in Tree-based 3 Getting Ready to Run Genetic Programming 19 3.1 Step 1: Terminal Set 19 3.2 Step 2: Function Set 20 3.2.1 Closure 21 3.2.2 Sufficiency 23 3.2.3 Evolving Structures other than Programs 23 3.3 Step 3: Fitness Function 24 3.4 Step 4: GP Parameters 26 3.5 Step 5: Termination and solution designation 27 4 Example Genetic Programming Run 4.1 Preparatory Steps 29 4.2 Step-by-Step Sample Run 31 4.2.1 Initialisation 31 4.2.2 Fitness Evaluation Selection, Crossover and Mutation Termination and Solution Designation Advanced Genetic Programming 5 Alternative Initialisations and Operators in 5.1 Constructing the Initial Population 5.1.1 Uniform Initialisation 5.1.2 Initialisation may Affect Bloat 5.1.3 Seeding 5.2 GP Mutation 5.2.1 Is Mutation Necessary? 5.2.2 Mutation Cookbook 5.3 GP Crossover 5.4 Other Techniques 32 5.5 Tree-based GP 39 6 Modular, Grammatical and Developmental Tree-based GP 47 6.1 Evolving Modular and Hierarchical Structures 47 6.1.1 Automatically Defined Functions 48 6.1.2 Program Architecture and Architecture-Altering 50 6.2 Constraining Structures 51 6.2.1 Enforcing Particular Structures 52 6.2.2 Strongly Typed GP 52 6.2.3 Grammar-based Constraints 53 6.2.4 Constraints and Bias 55 6.3 Developmental Genetic Programming 57 6.4 Strongly Typed Autoconstructive GP with PushGP 59 7 Linear and Graph Genetic Programming 61 7.1 Linear Genetic Programming 61 7.1.1 Motivations 61 7.1.2 Linear GP Representations 62 7.1.3 Linear GP Operators 64 7.2 Graph-Based Genetic Programming 65 7.2.1 Parallel Distributed GP (PDGP) 65 7.2.2 PADO 67 7.2.3 Cartesian GP 67 7.2.4 Evolving Parallel Programs using Indirect Encodings 68 8 Probabilistic Genetic Programming 8.1 Estimation of Distribution Algorithms 69 8.2 Pure EDA GP 71 8.3 Mixing Grammars and Probabilities 74 9 Multi-objective Genetic Programming 75 9.1 Combining Multiple Objectives into a Scalar Fitness Function 75 9.2 Keeping the Objectives Separate 76 9.2.1 Multi-objective Bloat and Complexity Control 77 9.2.2 Other Objectives 78 9.2.3 Non-Pareto Criteria 80 9.3 Multiple Objectives via Dynamic and Staged Fitness Functions 80 9.4 Multi-objective Optimisation via Operator Bias 81 10 Fast and Distributed Genetic Programming 83 10.1 Reducing Fitness Evaluations/Increasing their Effectiveness 83 10.2 Reducing Cost of Fitness with Caches 86 10.3 Parallel and Distributed GP are Not Equivalent 88 10.4 Running GP on Parallel Hardware 89 10.4.1 Master–slave GP 89 10.4.2 GP Running on GPUs 90 10.4.3 GP on FPGAs 92 10.4.4 Sub-machine-code GP 93 10.5 Geographically Distributed GP 93 11 GP Theory and its Applications 97 11.1 Mathematical Models 98 11.2 Search Spaces 99 11.3 Bloat 101 11.3.1 Bloat in Theory 101 11.3.2 Bloat Control in Practice 104 III Practical Genetic Programming 12 Applications 12.1 Where GP has Done Well 12.2 Curve Fitting, Data Modelling and Symbolic Regression 12.3 Human Competitive Results – the Humies 12.4 Image and Signal Processing 12.5 Financial Trading, Time Series, and Economic Modelling 12.6 Industrial Process Control 12.7 Medicine, Biology and Bioinformatics 12.8 GP to Create Searchers and Solvers – Hyper-heuristics xiii 12.9 Entertainment and Computer Games 127 12.10The Arts 127 12.11Compression 128 13 Troubleshooting GP 13.1 Is there a Bug in the Code? 13.2 Can you Trust your Results? 13.3 There are No Silver Bullets 13.4 Small Changes can have Big Effects 13.5 Big Changes can have No Effect 13.6 Study your Populations 13.7 Encourage Diversity 13.8 Embrace Approximation 13.9 Control Bloat 13.10 Checkpoint Results 13.11 Report Well 13.12 Convince your Customers 14 Conclusions Tricks of the Trade A Resources A.1 Key Books A.2 Key Journals A.3 Key International Meetings A.4 GP Implementations A.5 On-Line Resources 145 B TinyGP 151 B.1 Overview of TinyGP 151 B.2 Input Data Files for TinyGP 153 B.3 Source Code 154 B.4 Compiling and Running TinyGP 162 Bibliography 167 Inde

Advances in Functional Decomposition: Theory and Applications

Functional decomposition aims at finding efficient representations for Boolean functions. It is used in many applications, including multi-level logic synthesis, formal verification, and testing. This dissertation presents novel heuristic algorithms for functional decomposition. These algorithms take advantage of suitable representations of the Boolean functions in order to be efficient. The first two algorithms compute simple-disjoint and disjoint-support decompositions. They are based on representing the target function by a Reduced Ordered Binary Decision Diagram (BDD). Unlike other BDD-based algorithms, the presented ones can deal with larger target functions and produce more decompositions without requiring expensive manipulations of the representation, particularly BDD reordering. The third algorithm also finds disjoint-support decompositions, but it is based on a technique which integrates circuit graph analysis and BDD-based decomposition. The combination of the two approaches results in an algorithm which is more robust than a purely BDD-based one, and that improves both the quality of the results and the running time. The fourth algorithm uses circuit graph analysis to obtain non-disjoint decompositions. We show that the problem of computing non-disjoint decompositions can be reduced to the problem of computing multiple-vertex dominators. We also prove that multiple-vertex dominators can be found in polynomial time. This result is important because there is no known polynomial time algorithm for computing all non-disjoint decompositions of a Boolean function. The fifth algorithm provides an efficient means to decompose a function at the circuit graph level, by using information derived from a BDD representation. This is done without the expensive circuit re-synthesis normally associated with BDD-based decomposition approaches. Finally we present two publications that resulted from the many detours we have taken along the winding path of our research